Abstract
No aspect of the massive participation in content creation that the web enables is more evident than in the countless number of opinions, news and product reviews that are constantly posted on the Internet. Given their importance we have analyzed their temporal evolution in a number of scenarios. We have found that while ignorance of previous views leads to a uniform sampling of the range of opinions among a community, exposure of previous opinions to potential reviewers induces a trend following process which leads to the expression of increasingly extreme views. Moreover, when the expression of an opinion is costly and previous views are known, a selection bias softens the extreme views, as people exhibit a tendency to speak out differently from previous opinions. These findings are not only robust but also suggest simple procedures to extract given types of opinions from the population at large.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cosley, D., Lam, S.K., Albert, I., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Is seeing believing? How recommender interfaces affect users opinions. In: CHI 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA (April 2003)
Dellarocas, C.: Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior. In: ACM EC 2000, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA (October 2000)
Dellarocas, C.: The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science 49(10), 1407–1424 (2003)
Dellarocas, C., Narayan, R.: What motivates consumers to review a product online? A study of the product-specific antecedents of online movie reviews. In: Aberer, K., Peng, Z., Rundensteiner, E.A., Zhang, Y., Li, X. (eds.) WISE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4255. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Downs, A.: An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row, New York (1957)
Gao, G., Gu, B., Lin, M.: The dynamics of online consumer reviews. In: Aberer, K., Peng, Z., Rundensteiner, E.A., Zhang, Y., Li, X. (eds.) WISE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4255. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Geys, B.: ‘Rational’ theories of voter turnout: A review. Political Studies Review 4, 16–35 (2006)
Hu, N., Pavlou, P.A., Zhang, J.: Can online reviews reveal a product’s true quality? Empirical findings and analytical modeling of online word-of-mouth communication. In: ACM EC 2006, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA (June 2006)
Ketzan, E.: Amazon.com and the new democracy of opinion (November 2002), http://www.themodernword.com/pynchon/papers_ketzan1.html
Li, X., Hitt, L.M.: Self selection and information role of online product reviews. In: Zhou, X., Su, S., Papazoglou, M.P., Orlowska, M.E., Jeffery, K. (eds.) WISE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3306. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Osborne, M.J., Rosenthal, J.S., Turner, M.A.: Meetings with costly participation. American Economic Review 90(4), 927–943 (2000)
Riker, W.H., Ordeshook, P.C.: A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review 62, 25–42 (1968)
Schuessler, A.A.: Expressive voting. Rationality and Society 12(1), 87–119 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wu, F., Huberman, B.A. (2008). How Public Opinion Forms. In: Papadimitriou, C., Zhang, S. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5385. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92185-1_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92185-1_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-92184-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-92185-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)