Skip to main content

Communication Approaches in Applied Agrometeorology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Agrometeorology

Abstract

Farm-level management decisions are mostly determined by the knowledge of the interactions between the environment, the characteristics of crops and animals, technology, socio-economic factors and the institutional context (including agricultural education, government rules, customs, etc.). Among these factors, weather remains the largest source of variability of farm outputs, directly and indirectly. It can be estimated that 20–80% of the inter-annual variability of yields stems from the variability of weather (depending on the level of development), while losses due to pests, diseases and weeds are normally around 15% (Oerke et al. 1994). Post-harvest losses are also of the same order of magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen T, Curtis S, Gamble DW (2008) Remote climate forcings of Jamaica’s midsummer dry spell and vegetative response. Eos Trans AGU 89(53). Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract A13A-0211  at: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AGUFM.A13A0211A

  • Backus GBC, Eidman UR, Dijkhuigen AA (1997) Farm decision making under risk and uncertainty. Neth J Agric Sci 45:307–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Bembridge TJ (1991) Practice of agricultural extension – A training manual. Development Bank of South Africa, Halfway House 1685, Gauteng, 279pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Bembridge TJ, Tshikolomo KA (1998) Communication and decision making among fruit growers in the Phaswana area of Northern province. S Afr J Agric Ext 27:19–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi M, Gommes R, Grieser J (2006) Downscaling climate information for local disease mapping. Parasitol 48:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindraban PS, Verhagen AJ, Uithol PWJ, Henstra P (1999) A land quality indicator for sustainable land management: the yield gap. Report 106. Research Institute for Agrobiology and Soil Fertility, Wageningen, 22pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Bindraban PS, Stoorvogel JJ, Jansen DM, Vlaming J, Groot JJR (2000) Land quality indicators for sustainable land management: proposed method for yield gap and soil nutrient balance. Agr Ecosyst Environ 81:103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blench R, Marriage Z (1998) Climatic uncertainty and natural resource policy: what should the role of government be? Natural Resources Perspectives 31, ODI, London, 4pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera VE, Breuer NE, Hildebrand PE (2008) Participatory modeling in dairy farm systems: A method for building consensual environmental sustainability using seasonal climate forecasts. Clim Change 89:395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicero Report (1999) Published by Centre for International Climate and Environmental Research, University of Oslo, Sweden. 52 pp. www.cicero.uio.no/publications/annualreports/a1999.pdf

  • Everingham Y, Baillie C, Inman-Bamber G, Baillie J (2008). Forecasting water allocations for Bundaberg sugarcane farmers. Clim Res 36:231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gakuru M, Winters K, Stepman F (2008) Inventory of innovative farmer advisory services using ICTs. Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa. Entebbe, 67pp. http://www.fara-africa.org/media/uploads/File/

  • Gbetibouo GA (2009) Understanding farmers’ perceptions and adaptations to climate change and variability. The case of the Limpopo Basin, South Africa. Discussion Paper 00849, IFPRI, Washington, 48pp. http://www.ifpri.org/pubs/dp/IFPRIDP00849.pdf

  • Gommes R (1992) Applications agrométéorologiques pour le petit exploitant agricole. [Agrometeorological applications for small farmers.] Proceedings Francophone Workshop on “Rural Radio and Diffusion of Agrometeorological Information”, Bamako, 18–22, WMO/CTA, Geneva, pp 29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Gommes R (1998a) Some aspects of climate variability and food security in sub-Saharan Africa. In: Proceedings International Conference on “Tropical Climatology, Meteorology and Hydrology”, Brussels, 22–24 May 1996. Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium and Royal Academy of Overseas Science, Brussels, pp 655–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Gommes R (1998b) FAO’s experience in the provision of agrometeorological information to the user community. In: Proceedings International Workshop on “User Requirements for Agrometeorological Services”, Pune, 10–14 November 1997. IMD, Shivajinagar, Pune, pp 53–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gommes R (1999) Roving seminar on crop-yield weather modelling; lecture notes and exercises. WMO, Geneva, 153pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gommes R (2001) What can modern agricultural meteorology do for the subsistence farmers? Paper Presented at the 1st International Workshop on Farm Radio Broadcasting, 19–22 February, FAO, Rome, 11pp. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/x6721e/x6721e00.htm#TopOfPage

  • Gommes R (2003) Specification for a database of extreme agrometeorological events. In: Das HP, Adamenko TI, Anaman KA, Gommes RA, Johnson G (eds) Agrometeorology related to extreme events. WMO Technical Note 201 (WMO 943), Geneva, pp 123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann H, Pagano TC, Sorooshian S, Bales R (2002) Confidence builders: Evaluating seasonal climate forecasts from user perspectives. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:683–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellin J, Higman S (2001) Competing in the market: Farmers need new skills. Approp Technol 28(2):5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • IAC (2004) Realizing the promise and potential of African agriculture: science and technology strategies for improving agricultural productivity and food security in Africa. IAC Secretariat, Amsterdam. XXX + 266pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagtap SS, Chan AK (2000) Agrometeorological aspects of maximum temperature and precipitation in the sub- humid and humid zones of Africa and Asia. Agr For Meteorol 103:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis CH, Stuart N, Hims MJ (2002) Towards a British framework for enhancing the availability and value of agrometeorological data. Appl Geogr 22:157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyce LA (2003) Improving the flow of scientific information across the interface of forest science and policy. For Pol Econ 5:339–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersebaum KC, Lorenz K, Reuter HI, Schwarz J, Wegehenkel M, Wendroth O (2005) Operational use of agro-meteorological data and GIS to derive site specific nitrogen fertilizer recommendations based on the emulation of soil and crop growth processes. Phys Chem Earth 30(1–3, Spec Iss):59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Qian J, Li M, Liu D, Yang X (2008) Agrometeorological information publication system based on ArcIMS. Trans. Chin Soc Agric Engn 24(2, suppl):274–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancini F, Jiggins J (2008) Appraisal of methods to evaluate farmer field schools. Devel Pract 18:539–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meza FJ, Hansen JW, Osgood D (2008) Economic value of seasonal climate forecasts for agriculture: review of ex-ante assessments and recommendations for future research. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 47(5):1269–1286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhala E (2000) Meteorological services and farmers in Africa: Is there shared meaning? http://www.fao.org/sd/cddirect/cdre0051.htm.

  • Mukhala E, Groenewald DC (1998) Experiences and perceptions of Black small-scale irrigation farmers in the Free State. S Afr J Agric Ext 27:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Oerke EC, Dehne HW, Schoenbeck F, Weber A (1994) Crop production and crop protection: estimated losses in major food and cash crops. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 830pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlandini S, Massetti L, Marta AD (2008) An agrometeorological approach for the simulation of Plasmopara viticola. Comput Electron Agric 64:149–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz O, Garrett KA, Heath JJ, Orrego R, Nelson RJ (2004) Management of potato late blight in the Peruvian highlands: evaluating the benefits of farmer field schools and farmer participatory research. Plant Dis 88:565–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinners E, Balasubramanian V (1991) Use of the iterative diagnosis and design approach in the development of suitable agroforestry systems for a target area. Agrofor Syst 15:183–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijks D (1997) Feedback between yield forecast and farm operations: A matter of weight? In: Crop yield forecasting methods. Proceedings of an EU (DG VI, JRC Ispra and Eurostat) and FAO Seminar, 24–27 October 1994. Office Official Publications of the European Communities, Villefranche-sur-Mer, pp 41–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijks D, Baradas MW (2000) The clients for agrometeorological information. Agr For Meteorol 103:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrmann B (2000) A socio-psychological model for analyzing risk communication processes. Aust J Disast Trauma Stud 2:150–166. http://www.massey.ac.nz/∼trauma/issues/2000-2/rohrmann.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncoli C, Jost C, Kirshen P, Sanon M, Ingram KT, Woodin M, Somé L, Ouattara F, Sanfo BJ, Sia C, Yaka P, Hoogenboom G (2009) From accessing to assessing forecasts: an end-to-end study of participatory climate forecast dissemination in Burkina Faso (West Africa). Clim Change 92:433–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M (1992) Cropwat, a computer programme for irrigation planning and management. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 46. FAO, Rome, 126pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart JI (1988) Response farming in rainfed agriculture. Wharf foundation press, Davis, California, x + 103pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigter K (2006) Scientific research in Africa in the 21st century, in need of a change of approach. Afr J Agric Res 1:4–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigter CJ (2007) From basic agrometeorological science to agrometeorological services and information for agricultural decision makers: a simple conceptual and diagnostic framework. Agr For Meteorol 142:91–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigter CJ, Tan Ying, Das HP, Zheng Dawei, Rivero Vega RE, Nguyen van Viet, Bakheit NI, Abdullahi YM (2007) Complying with farmers’ conditions and needs using new weather and climate information approaches and technologies. In: Sivakumar MVK, Motha RP (eds) Managing weather and climate risks in agriculture. Springer, New York etc, pp 171–190

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp R, Wijeratne M, Piyadasa VH (2005) What should we expect from farmer field schools? A Sri Lanka case study. World Dev. 33:1705–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker S (2005) Role of education and training in agricultural meteorology to reduce vulnerability to climate variability. Clim Change 70(1–2):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss A, Van Crowder L, Bernardi M (2000) Communicating agrometeorological information to the user community. Agr For Meteorol 103:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitman RF, Boase PH (1983) Speech communications: principles and contexts. Macmillan, New York, 442pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Winarto YT, Stigter K, Anantasari E, Hidayah SN (2008) Climate field schools in Indonesia: coping with climate change and beyond. Low Ext Input Sust Agric (LEISA) Mag 24 (4):16–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe JR (1999) Do farmer-participating methods apply more to high potential areas than to marginal ones? Outl Agric 28:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Wratt DS, Tait A, Griffiths G, Espie P, Jessen M, Keys J, Ladd M, Lew D, Lowther W, Mitchell N, Morton J, Reid J, Reid S, Richardson A, Sansom J, Shankar U (2006) Climate for crops: integrating climate data with information about soils and crop requirements to reduce risks in agricultural decision-making. Meteorol Appl 13:305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yopp JJ, McAdams KC (1999) Reaching audiences. A guide to media writing, 2nd edn. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, USA, 392pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziervogel G, Cartwright A, Tas A, Adejuwon J, Zermoglio F, Shale M, Smith B (2008) Climate change and adaptation in African agriculture. Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden, 54pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Gommes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gommes, R. et al. (2010). Communication Approaches in Applied Agrometeorology. In: Stigter, K. (eds) Applied Agrometeorology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74698-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics