Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structure and Genetics of Cave Populations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Cave Ecology

Part of the book series: Ecological Studies ((ECOLSTUD,volume 235))

Abstract

Cave populations have been traditionally perceived as genetically strongly structured and less diverse than related surface populations because of the patchiness of subterranean habitats, low dispersal of cave species, and genetic bottlenecks at colonization. These patterns are at odds with relatively large and/or disjunct ranges of many troglobionts, as well as the countless successful cave colonizations. One way to disentangle those discrepancies is to discriminate between exogenous processes that take place at the surface or during invasion, and endogenous ones that take place in and are governed by the specific conditions of caves. Genetic evidence collected over the past decades suggests that ongoing endogenous processes, endogenous vicariance, and gene flow between allopatric cave populations have less effect on the genetic structure of cave populations than patterns inherited from past exogenous events. Conversely, most known cases of recent migration between non-neighboring cave populations entail the possibility of dispersal via the surface. Gene pools of young cave populations often show strong exogenous imprints such as multiple colonization events and/or recurring gene flow from the surface. This is compatible with the high propagule pressure hypothesis of successful biological invasions, while convincing molecular evidence for the genetic bottleneck hypothesis of cave colonization is sparse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allegrucci G, Sbordoni V, Cesaroni D (2015) Is radon emission in caves causing deletions in satellite DNA sequences of cave-dwelling crickets? PLoS One 10:e0122456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell Publishing, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmyhr MG, Hose G, Graham P et al (2014) Fine-scale genetics of subterranean syncarids. Freshw Biol 59:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Avise JC, Selander RK (1972) Genetics of cave-dwelling fishes of the genus Astyanax. Evolution 26:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr TC (1968) Cave ecology and the evolution of troglobites. Evol Biol 2:35–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutin C, Coineau N (2000) Evolutionary rates and phylogenetic age in some stygobiont species. In: Wilkens H, Culver DC, Humphreys W (eds) Ecosystems of the world: subterranean ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 433–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford TM, Adams M, Guzik MT et al (2013) Patterns of population genetic variation in sympatric chiltoniid amphipods within a calcrete aquifer reveal a dynamic subterranean environment. Heredity 111:77–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradic M, Beerli P, García-de León FJ et al (2012) Gene flow and population structure in the Mexican blind cavefish complex (Astyanax mexicanus). BMC Evol Biol 12:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressi N, Aljancic M, Lapini L (1999) Notes on presence and feeding of Proteus anguinus Laurenti, 1768 outside caves. Riv Idrobiol 38:431–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhay JE, Crandall KA (2005) Subterranean phylogeography of freshwater crayfishes shows extensive gene flow and surprisingly large population sizes. Mol Ecol 14:4259–4273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caccone A, Sbordoni V (2001) Molecular biogeography of cave life: a study using mitochondrial DNA from bathysciine beetles. Evolution 55:122–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlini DB, Manning J, Sullivan PG et al (2009) Molecular genetic variation and population structure in morphologically differentiated cave and surface populations of the freshwater amphipod Gammarus minus. Mol Ecol 18:1932–1945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen KA (1965) Behavior and form in the evolution of cave Collembola. Evolution 19:529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coghill LM, Darrin Hulsey C, Chaves-Campos J et al (2014) Next generation phylogeography of cave and surface Astyanax mexicanus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 79:368–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SJ, Bradbury JH, Saint KM et al (2007) Subterranean archipelago in the Australian arid zone: mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of amphipods from central Western Australia. Mol Ecol 16:1533–1544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crouau-Roy B (1989) Population studies on an endemic troglobitic beetle: geographical patterns of genetic variation, gene flow and genetic structure compared with morphometric data. Genetics 121:571–582

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC (1982) Cave life: evolution and ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Pipan T (2014) Shallow subterranean habitats: ecology, evolution, and conservation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Kane TC, Fong DW (1995) Adaptation and natural selection in caves: the evolution of Gammarus minus. Harvard University Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Culver DC, Pipan T, Schneider K (2009) Vicariance, dispersal and scale in the aquatic subterranean fauna of karst regions. Freshw Biol 54:918–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Aguiar MA, Baranger M, Baptestini EM et al (2009) Global patterns of speciation and diversity. Nature 460:384–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desutter-Grandcolas L (1997) Studies in cave life evolution: a rationale for future theoretical developments using phylogenetic inference. J Zoolog Syst Evol Res 35:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eme D, Malard F, Konecny-Dupre L et al (2013) Bayesian phylogeographic inferences reveal contrasting colonization dynamics among European groundwater isopods. Mol Ecol 22:5685–5699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito LA, Bloom T, Caicedo-Quiroga L et al (2015) Islands within islands: diversification of tailless whip spiders (Amblypygi, Phrynus) in Caribbean caves. Mol Phylogenet Evol 93:107–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faille A, Bourdeau C, Belles X et al (2015) Allopatric speciation illustrated: the hypogean genus Geotrechus Jeannel, 1919 (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Trechini), with description of four new species from the Eastern Pyrenees (Spain). Arthropod Syst Phylogeny 73:439–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Graening GO, Slay ME, Brown AV et al (2006) Status and distribution of the endangered Benton Cave crayfish, Cambarus aculabrum (Decapoda: Cambaridae). Southwest Nat 51:376–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzik MT, Cooper SJB, Humphreys WF et al (2009) Fine-scale comparative phylogeography of a sympatric sister species triplet of subterranean diving beetles from a single calcrete aquifer in Western Australia. Mol Ecol 18:3683–3698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guzik MT, Cooper SJB, Humphreys WF et al (2011) Evidence for population fragmentation within a subterranean aquatic habitat in the Western Australian desert. Heredity 107:215–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández D, Casane D, Chevalier-Monteagudo P et al (2016) Go west: a one way stepping-stone dispersion model for the cavefish Lucifuga dentata in western Cuba. PLoS One 11:e0153545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoelzer GA, Drewes R, Meier J et al (2008) Isolation-by-distance and outbreeding depression are sufficient to drive parapatric speciation in the absence of environmental influences. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger JR (2000) Ecological derivation, colonisation and speciation. In: Wilkens H, Culver DC, Humphreys WF (eds) Ecosystems of the world: subterranean ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 399–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys WF (2008) Rising from down under: developments in subterranean biodiversity in Australia from a ground-water fauna perspective. Invertebr Syst 22:85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane TC (1982) Genetic patterns and population structure in cave animals. In: Mossakowski D, Roth G (eds) Environmental adaptation and evolution. Gustav Fisher, Stuttgart, pp 131–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane TC, Barr TC, Badaracca WJ (1992) Cave beetle genetics: geology and gene flow. Heredity 68:277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketmaier V, Argano R, Caccone A (2003) Phylogeography and molecular rates of subterranean aquatic Stenasellid isopods with a peri-Tyrrhenian distribution. Mol Ecol 12:547–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konec M, Prevorčnik S, Sarbu SM et al (2015) Parallels between two geographically and ecologically disparate cave invasions by the same species, Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda, Crustacea). J Evol Biol 28:864–875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Konec M, Delić T, Trontelj P (2016) DNA barcoding sheds light on hidden subterranean boundary between Adriatic and Danubian drainage basins. Ecohydrology 9:1304–1312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laing C, Carmody GR, Peck SB (1976) Population genetics and evolutionary biology of the cave beetle Ptomaphagus hirtus. Evolution 30:484–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lefébure T, Douady CJ, Gouy M et al (2006) Phylogeography of a subterranean amphipod reveals cryptic diversity and dynamic evolution in extreme environments. Mol Ecol 15:1797–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefébure T, Douady CJ, Malard F et al (2007) Testing dispersal and cryptic diversity in a widely distributed groundwater amphipod (Niphargus rhenorhodanensis). Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:676–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leys R, Watts CHS, Cooper SJB et al (2003) Evolution of subterranean diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Hydroporini, Bidessini) in the arid zone of Australia. Evolution 57:2819–2834

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meleg IN, Zakšek V, Fišer C et al (2013) Can environment predict cryptic diversity? The case of Niphargus inhabiting Western Carpathian groundwater. PLoS One 8:e76760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milanović P (2015) Karst of eastern Herzegovina, the Dubrovnik littoral and western Montenegro. Environ Earth Sci 74:15–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison DA (2014) The monkey’s voyage: how improbable journeys shaped the history of life.—By Alan de Queiroz. Syst Biol 63:847–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notenboom J (1991) Marine regressions and the evolution of groundwater dwelling amphipods (Crustacea). J Biogeogr 18:437–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortuño VM, Gilgado JD, Jiménez-Valverde A et al (2013) The “alluvial mesovoid shallow substratum”, a new subterranean habitat. PLoS One 8:e76311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panaram K, Borowsky R (2005) Gene flow and genetic variability in cave and surface populations of the Mexican tetra, Astyanax mexicanus (Teleostei: Characidae). Copeia 2005:409–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pante E, Puillandre N, Viricel A et al (2015) Species are hypotheses: avoid connectivity assessments based on pillars of sand. Mol Ecol 24:525–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plath M, Hauswaldt JS, Moll K et al (2007) Local adaptation and pronounced genetic differentiation in an extremophile fish, Poecilia mexicana, inhabiting a Mexican cave with toxic hydrogen sulphide. Mol Ecol 16:967–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polak S, Delić T, Kostanjšek R et al (2016) Molecular phylogeny of the cave beetle genus Hadesia (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Leptodirini), with a description of a new species from Montenegro. Arthropod Syst Phylogeny 74:241–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulson TL (1963) Cave adaptation in amblyopsid fishes. Am Midl Nat 70:257–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulson TL, White WB (1969) The cave environment. Science 165:971–981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reed DH, Frankham R (2003) Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conserv Biol 17:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera MAJ, Howarth FG, Taiti S et al (2002) Evolution in Hawaiian cave-adapted isopods (Oniscidea: Philosciidae): vicariant speciation or adaptive shifts? Mol Phylogenet Evol 25:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo V, Comas J, Fadrique F et al (2013) Early Pliocene range expansion of a clade of subterranean Pyrenean beetles. J Biogeogr 40:1861–1873

    Google Scholar 

  • Roman J, Darling JA (2007) Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:454–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbordoni V, Caccone A, De Matthaeis E et al (1980) Biochemical divergence between cavernicolous and marine Sphaeromidae and the Mediterranean salinity crisis. Cell Mol Life Sci 36:48–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbordoni V, Allegrucci G, Cesaroni D (2000) Population genetic structure, speciation and evolutionary rates in cave-dwelling organisms. In: Wilkens H, Culver DC, Humphreys W (eds) Ecosystems of the world: subterranean ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 453–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilthuizen M, Rutten EMJ, Haase M (2012) Small-scale genetic structuring in a tropical cave snail and admixture with its above-ground sister species. Biol J Linn Soc 105:727–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrbinšek T, Jelenčič M, Waits L et al (2012) Monitoring the effective population size of a brown bear (Ursus arctos) population using new single-sample approaches. Mol Ecol 21:862–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strecker U, Hausdorf B, Wilkens H (2012) Parallel speciation in Astyanax cave fish (Teleostei) in Northern Mexico. Mol Phylogenet Evol 62:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL, Branson BA, Sievert G (1980) Genetic differentiation in cavefish populations (Amblyopsidae). Isozyme Bull 13:109–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Trontelj P, Douady CJ, Fišer C et al (2009) A molecular test for cryptic diversity in ground water: how large are the ranges of macro-stygobionts? Freshw Biol 54:727–744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turanchik EJ, Kane TC (1979) Ecological genetics of the cave beetle Neaphaenops tellkampfii (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Oecologia 44:63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verovnik R, Sket B, Prevorcnik S et al (2003) Random amplified polymorphic DNA diversity among surface and subterranean populations of Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda). Genetica 119:155–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verovnik R, Sket B, Trontelj P (2004) Phylogeography of subterranean and surface populations of water lice Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda). Mol Ecol 13:1519–1532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Villacorta C, Jaume D, Oromí P et al (2008) Under the volcano: phylogeography and evolution of the cave-dwelling Palmorchestia hypogaea (Amphipoda, Crustacea) at La Palma (Canary Islands). BMC Biol 6:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Palmer MA (1994) Distribution patterns of interstitial freshwater meiofauna over a range of spatial scales, with emphasis on alluvial river-aquifer systems. Hydrobiologia 287:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel A, Hoch H, Asche M et al (2013) Founder effects initiated rapid species radiation in Hawaiian cave planthoppers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:9391–9396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zakšek V, Sket B, Trontelj P (2007) Phylogeny of the cave shrimp Troglocaris: evidence of a young connection between Balkans and Caucasus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 42:223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakšek V, Sket B, Gottstein S et al (2009) The limits of cryptic diversity in groundwater: phylogeography of the cave shrimp Troglocaris anophthalmus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Atyidae). Mol Ecol 18:931–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The ideas presented in this chapter have grown through intriguing discussions with David Culver, Cene Fišer, Slavko Polak and numerous other colleagues, students and friends. They are based on research supported by and conducted under the Slovenian Research Agency Program P1–0184 and associated projects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Biology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Peter Trontelj

Authors
  1. Peter Trontelj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Trontelj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Emil Racovitza Institute of Speleology, Romanian Academy, Cluj Napoca, Romania

    Oana Teodora Moldovan

  2. Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University, Košice, Slovakia

    Ľubomír Kováč

  3. Bennelongia Environmental Consultants, Jolimont, Western Australia, Australia

    Stuart Halse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trontelj, P. (2018). Structure and Genetics of Cave Populations. In: Moldovan, O., Kováč, Ľ., Halse, S. (eds) Cave Ecology. Ecological Studies, vol 235. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98852-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation