Abstract
The diverse characteristics, values, and importance of small-scale fisheries imply at least two key considerations. First, there is no tailor-made, one-size-fits-all solution to the problems and challenges facing small-scale fisheries; thus, policy and governance must be sensitive to the contexts. Second, the close relationship and interactivity between the natural and the social dimensions of small-scale fisheries suggests that knowledge and understanding about small-scale fisheries may need to transcend the boundaries of academic disciplines. These are the premises for research and activities conducted in the Too Big To Ignore (TBTI) – Global Partnership for Small-Scale Fisheries Research. Taking a transdisciplinary approach to research, training, and learning about small-scale fisheries can help address real-world problems and reveal opportunities to move towards pragmatic solutions. In this chapter, we discuss what transdisciplinarity involves, what the underlying principles are, and what makes it distinct from other perspectives. We argue that transdisciplinarity in small-scale fisheries requires institutional and academic innovation at local and national scales that facilitates interactive and transformative learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This mostly is a challenge to researchers that work in research and academia, as fishers and members of the community who engage in the transdisciplinary process still retain their livelihood from the sea and not from the research itself.
- 2.
e.g. School of Anthropology and Conservation in University of Kent, UK and Interdisciplinary Research Excellence in the University of Southampton, UK.
References
Aguilar-Perera A, Arce-Ibarra AM, Bishop B et al (2017) Towards sustainable small-scale fisheries: key considerations for transdisciplinary teaching and training. Too big to ignore research report number R-04/2017. http://toobigtoignore.net/report-transdisciplinary-approach-for-ssf/. Accessed 2 May 2018
Antonova AS (2016) The rhetoric of “responsible fishing”: notions of human rights and sustainability in the European Union’s bilateral fishing agreements with developing states. Mar Pol 70:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.008
Aslin HJ, Blackstock KL (2010) “Now I”m not an expert in anything’: challenges in undertaking transdisciplinary inquiries across the social and biophysical sciences. In: Brown V, Harris J, Russell J (eds) Tackling wicked problems through transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan, London, pp 117–129
Bateson G (1987) Steps to an ecology of mind. Jason Aronson Inc, London
Bavinck M (2014) Investigating poverty through the Lens of Riches – immigration and segregation in Indian capture fisheries. Dev Pol Rev 32:33–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12042
Bergmann M, Jahn T (2008) CITY:mobil: a model for integration in sustainability research. In: Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S et al (eds) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer, Berlin/Germany, pp 89–102
Brandt P, Ernst A, Gralla F et al (2013) A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecol Econ 92:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
Brown V (2010) Collective inquiry and its wicked problems. In: Brown V, Harris J, Russell J (eds) Tackling wicked problems through transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan, London, pp 61–83
Bundy A, Chuenpagdee R, Jentoft S, Mahon R (2008) If science is not the answer, what is? An alternative governance model for the world’s fisheries. Front Ecol Environ 6:152–155. https://doi.org/10.1890/060112
Carew AL, Wickson F (2010) The TD wheel: a heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research. Futures 42:1146–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.025
Charles A (2011) Small-scale fisheries: on rights. Trade Subsid Marit Stud 10:85–94
Choi B, Pak A (2006) Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clin Invest Med 29:351–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.08.010
Chuenpagdee R (2011) World small-scale fisheries: contemporary visions. Eburon, Delft
Cornell S, Berkhout F, Tuinstra W et al (2013) Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environ Sci Pol 28:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008
Cuervo-Sánchez R, Maldonado JH, Rueda M (2018) Spillover from marine protected areas on the pacific coast in Colombia: a bioeconomic modelling approach for shrimp fisheries. Mar Pol 88:182–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MARPOL.2017.10.036
Degnbol P, Mccay BJ (2007) Unintended and perverse consequences of ignoring linkages in fisheries systems. ICES J Mar Sci 64(4):793–797
DuBois C, Zografos C (2012) Conflicts at sea between artisanal and industrial fishers: inter-sectoral interactions and dispute resolution in Senegal. Mar Pol 36:1211–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.03.007
Dyball R (2010) Human ecology and open transdisciplinary inquiry. In: Brown V, Harris J, Russell J (eds) Tackling wicked problems through transdisciplinary imagination, first. Earthscan, London, pp 273–284
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015) Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries. FAO, Rome
Geertz C (1973) Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. Fontana Press, New York
Gezelius SS (2008) The problem of implementing policies for sustainable fishing. In: Gezelius SS, Raakjær J (eds) Making fisheries management work. Implementation policies for sustainable fishing. Springer, Heldelberg, pp 1–25
Goti-Aralucea L, Fitzpatrick M, Döring R et al (2018) Overarching sustainability objectives overcome incompatible directions in the common fisheries policy. Mar Pol 91:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.02.006
Griffith R (2010) Rethinking change. In: Brown V, Harris J, Russell J (eds) Tackling wicked problems through transdisciplinary imagination, first. Earthscan, London, pp 251–259
Harris F, Lyon F (2013) Transdisciplinary environmental research: building trust across professional cultures. Environ Sci Pol 31:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.02.006
Hendricks C (2010) Inclusive governance for sustainability. In: Brown V, Harris J, Russell J (eds) Tackling wicked problems through transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan, London, pp 150–160
Jentoft S (2000) The community: a missing link of fisheries management. Mar Pol 24:53–59
Jentoft S (2006) Beyond fisheries management: the Phronetic dimension. Mar Pol 30:671–680
Jentoft S, Bavinck M (2014) Interactive governance for sustainable fisheries: dealing with legal pluralism. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 11:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.10.005
Jentoft S, Chuenpagdee R (2009) Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Mar Pol 33:553–560
Jentoft S, Eide AH, Gunnarsdottir M-V (2011) Poverty mosaics: realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. Springer, Dordrecht
Johnsen JP (2018) Small-scale fisheries governance in Norway: hierarchy, institutions and markets University of Norway. In: Pascual Fernández JJ, Pita C, Bavinck M (eds) Small-scale fisheries in Europe: status, resilience and governance. Springer, Dordrecht
Kerne A (2005) Doing interface ecology: the practice of metadisciplinary. Proceedings of the USA. URL: In: ACM SIGGRAPH 05 electronic art and animation catalog, August 1–4, 2005, Los Angeles, California,
Kooiman J (2005) Fish for life: interactive governance for fisheries, 3rd edn. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam
Lalancette A (2016) Creeping in? Neoliberalism, indigenous realities and tropical rock lobster (kaiar) management in Torres Strait. Aust Mar Pol 80:47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.02.020
Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M et al (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci 7:25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
Linke S, Jentoft S (2014) Exploring the phronetic dimension of stakeholders’ knowledge in EU fisheries governance. Mar Pol 47:153–161
McClanahan TR, Castilla JC, White AT, Defeo O (2009) Healing small-scale fisheries by facilitating complex socio-ecological systems. Rev Fish Biol Fish 19:33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-008-9088-8
McCormack F (2017) Sustainability in New Zealand’s quota management system: a convenient story. Mar Pol 80:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.022
Mitchell RK, Wood DJ, Agle B (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts authors (s): Ronald K Mitchell, Bradley R Agle, Donna J Wood. Source: The Academy of Management Review, vol 22, no 4. (Acad Manag Rev 22:853–886, October). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105
Msomphora MR (2016) Conflict resolution and the delegation of authority in fisheries management: the case of outer Hebrides Inshore Fisheries Group in Scotland. Mar Pol 73:263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.08.006
Nayak P, Berkes F (2011) Commonisation and decommonisation: understanding the processes of change in the Chilika Lagoon, India. Conserv Soc 9:132. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.83723
Nelson CH, Lowitt K, Nagy M et al (2013) Future research approaches to encourage small-scale fisheries in the local food movement. J Agric Food Syst Community Dev 3:1–5
Pinkerton E (2017) Neoliberalism and global small-scale fisheries (Special issue). Mar Pol 80:1–176
Pinkerton E, Davis R (2015) Neoliberalism and the politics of enclosure in North American small-scale fisheries. Mar Pol. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.025
Pohl C, Hadorn GH (2008) Article methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Natures Sci Sociétés 16:111–121. https://doi.org/10.1051/nss
Polk M (2014) Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving. Sustain Sci 9:439–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0247-7
Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Pol Sci 4:155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
Rochet MJ, Prigent M, Bertrand JA et al (2008) Ecosystem trends: evidence for agreement between fishers’ perceptions and scientific information. ICES J Mar Sci 65:1057–1068. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsn062
Roux DJ, Stirzaker RJ, Breen CM et al (2010) Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs. Environ Sci Pol 13:733–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.002
Russell J (2010) A philosophical framework for an open and critical transdisciplinary inquiry. In: Brown V, Harris J, Russell J (eds) Tackling wicked problems through transdisciplinary imagination, first. Earthscan, London, pp 31–60
Said A, Tzanopoulos J, MacMillan D (2016) Bluefin tuna fishery policy in Malta: the plight of artisanal fishermen caught in the capitalist net. Mar Pol 73:27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.07.025
Sundström A (2015) Covenants with broken swords: corruption and law enforcement in governance of the commons. Glob Environ Chang 31:253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.002
Symes D, Hoefnagel E (2010) Fisheries policy , research and the social sciences in Europe: challenges for the 21st century. Mar Pol 34:268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.07.006
Tunca S, Ünal V, Miran B et al (2016) Biosocioeconomic analysis of marine recreational fisheries: a comparative case study from the Eastern Mediterranean, Turkey. Fish Res 174:270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2015.10.025
Urquhart J, Acott T, Reed M et al (2011) Setting an agenda for social science research in fisheries policy in Northern Europe. Fish Res 108:240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2010.12.026
Weeratunge N, Béné C, Siriwardane R et al (2013) Small-scale fisheries through the wellbeing lens. Fish Fish 15:255–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12016
Wise PH, Shaw GM, Druzin ML et al (2017) Risky business: meeting the structural needs of transdisciplinary science. J Pediatr 191:255–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.08.072
Wyborn C, Clealand D (2010) Fences and windows: using visual methods to explore conflicts in land and seascape management. In: Brown V, Harris J, Russell J (eds) Tackling wicked problems through transdisciplinary imagination, first. Earthscan, London, pp 161–170
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Said, A. et al. (2019). The Principles of Transdisciplinary Research in Small-Scale Fisheries. In: Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S. (eds) Transdisciplinarity for Small-Scale Fisheries Governance. MARE Publication Series, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94938-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94938-3_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94937-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94938-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)