Skip to main content

What Is Participatory Health Research?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Participatory health research is practiced in many countries around the world, drawing from different traditions which are based in various cultures and time periods. In spite of the wide variation in theory and practice, the different traditions show remarkable similarities. This chapter identifies 11 common principles based on the first position paper of the International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). References to publications from various countries serve to illustrate each of the 11 criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • ATHENA Network, & Global Coalition on Women and AIDS (GCWA). (2013) Building women’s global meaningful participation in the high level meeting on AIDS. http://www.athenanetwork.org/assets/files/HLM/AP_Factsheet.pdf.

  • Bassey, M. (2001). A solution to the problem of generalisation in educational research: Fuzzy prediction. Oxford Review of Education, 27(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackstock, K. L., Kelly, G. J., & Horsey, B. L. (2007). Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 60(4), 726–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandão, C. R. (Org.) (1987). Repensando a pesquisa participante. 3 ed. São Paulo: Brasiliense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito, I. (2008). Intervenção de conscientização para prevenção da brucelose em área endémica. Tese de Doutoramento em Ciências de Enfermagem, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar ICBAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cargo, M., & Mercer, S. L. (2008). The value and challenges of participatory research: Strengthening its practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 29, 325–350.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Conchelos, G., & Kassam, Y. (1981). A brief review of critical opinions and responses on issues facing participatory research. Convergence, 14(3), 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. (2009). The purpose of mess in action research: Building rigour through a messy turn. Educational Action Research, 17(2), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking “Participation” models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropper, S., Porter, A., Williams, G., Carlisle, S., Moore, R., O’Neill, M., Roberts, C., & Snooks, H. (2010). Community health and wellbeing. Action research on inequalities. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadds, M. (2008). Empathetic validity in practitioner research. Educational Action Research, 16(2), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (DoH). (1999). Patient and public involvement in the NHS. London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (DoH). (2006). Best research for best health: A new national health research strategy. London: DH Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K., Lund, C., & Gibson, N. (2008). Validity: Expecting the unexpected in community-based research. Pimatisiwin A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 6(3), 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. (Eds.). (1991). Action and knowledge. Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. New York: Apex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, N. R., Tanile, J. M., Clinchy, B. M., & Belenky, M. F. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge, difference and power: Essays inspired by women’s ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2005). Reform of the social sciences and of universities through action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 43–64). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191–215). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, E., & Bond, M. (1995). Action research for health & social care. London: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine (IOM). (2009). Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR). (2013). Position paper 1: What is participatory health research? Version: May 2013. Berlin: International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), Global Network of People living with HIV/AIDS (GNP+), International Community of Women living with HIV/AIDS (ICW). (2013). The people living with HIV stigma index. http://www.stigmaindex.org/.

  • Ismail, S. (2009). Participatory health research. international observatory on health research systems. Cambridge: RAND Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1), 173–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., Becker, A. B., Allen, A. J., & Guzman, J. R. (2003). Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 56–73). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagosh, J., Pluye, P., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Henderson, J., Sirett, E., Bush, P. L., Seller, R., Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Cargo, M., Herbert, C. P., Seifer, S. D., & Green, L. W. (2011). Assessing the outcomes of participatory research: Protocol for identifying, selecting, appraising and synthesizing the literature for realist review. Implementation Science, 6(1), 24.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jagosh, J., Macaulay, A. C., Pluye, P., Salsberg, J., Bush, P. L., Henderson, J., Sirett, E., Wong, G., Cargo, M., Herbert, C. P., Seifer, S. D., Green, L. W., & Greenhalgh, T. (2012). Uncovering the benefits of participatory research: Implications of a realist review for health research and practice. The Milbank Quarterly, 90(2), 311–346.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, A. W., & Lindhult, E. (2008). Emancipation or workability? Critical versus pragmatic scientific orientation in action research. Action Research, 6(1), 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1986). Research as practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55(3), 290–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledwith, M., & Springett, J. (2010). Participatory practice. Community-based action for transformative change. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukesch, H., & Zecha, G. (1978). Neue Handlungsforschung? Programm und Praxis gesellschaftskritischer Sozialforschung. Soziale Welt, 29, 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, A., Commanda, L., Freeman, W. L., Gibson, N., McCabe, M., Robbins, C., & Twohig, P. (1999). Responsible research with communities: Participatory research in primary care. British Medical Journal, 319, 774–778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, A. C., Jagosh, J., Seller, R., Henderson, J., Cargo, M., Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., Salsberg, J., Green, L. W., Herbert, C. P., & Pluye, P. (2011). Assessing the benefits of participatory research: A rationale for a realist review. Global Health Promotion, 18(2), 45–48.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, N. (1999). From exploring practice to exploring inquiry: A practitioner researcher’s experience. PhD thesis. Newcastle: University of Northumbria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, G. (2002). Emancipatory disability research. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today (pp. 228–249). Cambridge: Blackwells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J., et al. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. A guide to transformational and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2008). Community-based participatory research for health: From process to outcome. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Health and Medical Research Council & Consumers’ Health Forum of Australia. (2002). Statement on consumer and community participation in health and medical research. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutbeam, D (2000) Health Literacy as a Public Health Goal: A Challenge for Contemporary Health Education and Communication Strategies into the 21st Century. Health Promotion International; 15(3): 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Johnson, R. B., & Collins, K. M. (2009). Call for mixed analysis: A philosophical framework for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(2), 114–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, S. B. (1996). Paradigms lost: Toward a new understanding of community participation in health programmes. Acta Tropica, 61(2), 79–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, L. G., & Apple, M. W. (1990). Is naturalism a move away from positivism? Materialist and feminist approaches to subjectivity in ethnographic research. In E. W. Eisner & A. Peshkin (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in education (pp. 38–73). New York: Teachers’ College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. London: Maurice Temple Smith Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithies, J., & Webster, G. (1998). Community involvement in health. From passive recipients to active participants. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohng, S. S. L. (1995). Participatory research and community organizing. Working paper presented at the New Social Movement and Community Organizing Conference, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. November 1–3, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, R. (2013). Research methods for community change: A project-based approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Unger, H., Block, M., & Wright, M. T. (2007). Aktionsforschung im deutschsprachigen Raum. Zur Geschichte und Aktualität eines kontroversen Ansatzes aus Public Health Sicht, der Reihe ‘Discussion Papers’. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Gartlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., Rhodes, S., Samuel-Hodge, C., Maty, S., Lux, L., Webb, L., Sutton, S. F., Swinson, T., Jackman, A., & Whitener, L. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence, Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 99. AHRQ Publication Number 04-E022-1, August 2004. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Unger, H. (2012). Participatory health research with immigrant communities in Germany. International Journal of Action Research, 8(3), 266–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R., & de Koning, K. (2001). Action research: A systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technology Assessment, 5(23), 1–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitelaw, S., Beattie, A., Balogh, R., & Watson, J. (2003). A review of the nature of action research. Cardiff: Welsh Assembly Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R. (2002). Truth or fiction: Problems of validity and authenticity in narratives of action research. Educational Action Research, 10(1), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. T. (Ed.). (2010). Partizipative Qualitätsentwicklung in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention. Bern: Hans-Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. T. (2012). Partizipation in der Praxis: die Herausforderung einer kritisch reflektierten Professionalität. In R. Rosenbrock & S. Hartung (Eds.), Partizipation und Gesundheit (pp. 91–101). Bern: Hans-Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. T. (2016). Partizipative Gesundheitsforschung. In Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung (BZgA), Leitbegriffe der Gesundheitsförderung. http://www.bzga.de/leitbegriffe/?id=angebote&idx=273.

  • Wright, M. T., Roche, B., von Unger, H., Block, M., & Gardner, B. (2009). A call for an international collaboration on participatory research for health. Health Promotion International, 25(1), 115–122.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. T., von Unger, H., & Block, M. (2010a). Lokales Wissen, lokale Theorie und lokale Evidenz für die Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung. In M. T. Wright (Ed.)., (2010) Partizipative Qualitätsentwicklung in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention (pp. 53–74). Hans-Huber: Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. T., Gardner, B., Roche, B., von Unger, H., & Ainlay, C. (2010b). Building an international collaboration on participatory health research. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 4(1), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. T., Kilian, H., & Brandes, S. (2013). Praxisbasierte Evidenz in der Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung bei sozial Benachteiligten. Das Gesundheitswesen. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1628-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Wright .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wright, M.T., Springett, J., Kongats, K. (2018). What Is Participatory Health Research?. In: Wright, M., Kongats, K. (eds) Participatory Health Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92177-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92177-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92176-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92177-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics