Skip to main content

Measurement-Based Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pediatric Mental Health for Primary Care Providers

Abstract

Children with mental health and substance use disorders treated in routine care experience worse outcomes than patients enrolled in clinical trials that have demonstrated the effectiveness of evidence-based treatments. This wide gap between routine outcomes and optimal outcomes spans across a wide range of patient populations and clinical treatment settings. One of the contributors to poor outcomes in routine care is that providers do not regularly use symptom rating scales in behavioral health to determine quantitatively whether their patients are improving. Almost all randomized controlled trials with frequent and timely feedback of diagnostic-specific, patient-reported symptom severity to the provider during the clinical encounter found that outcomes were significantly improved compared to usual care across a wide variety of mental health and behavioral disorders. All pediatric and behavioral healthcare providers treating children with mental health and substance use disorders should implement a system whereby patients’ routinely complete measurement-based care (MBC) validated symptom rating scales that are reviewed by clinicians during encounters. MBC will help pediatric providers determine whether treatment is working or if there is a need to facilitate treatment augmentation, consultations, or referrals for higher-intensity services when patients are not improving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Harding KJ, Rush AJ, Arbuckle M, Trivedi MH, Pincus HA. Measurement-based care in psychiatric practice: a policy framework for implementation. J Clin Psychiatry. 2011;72(8):1136–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer MS, McBride L, Williford WO, Glick H, Kinosian B, Altshuler L, et al. Collaborative care for bipolar disorder: Part II. Impact on clinical outcome, function, and costs. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(7):937–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fortney JC, Pyne JM, Mouden SB, Mittal D, Hudson TJ, Schroeder GW, et al. Practice-based versus telemedicine-based collaborative care for depression in rural federally qualified health centers: a pragmatic randomized comparative effectiveness trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(4):414–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miklowitz DJ, Otto MW, Frank E, Reilly-Harrington NA, Wisniewski SR, Kogan JN, et al. Psychosocial treatments for bipolar depression: a 1-year randomized trial from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(4):419–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy-Byrne P, Craske MG, Sullivan G, Rose RD, Edlund MJ, Lang AJ, et al. Delivery of evidence-based treatment for multiple anxiety disorders in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303(19):1921–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Simon GE, Ludman EJ, Bauer MS, Unutzer J, Operskalski B. Long-term effectiveness and cost of a systematic care program for bipolar disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(5):500–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Unützer J, Katon W, Callahan CM, et al. Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288(22):2836–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hatfield D, McCullough L, Frantz SH, Krieger K. Do we know when our clients get worse? An investigation of therapists’ ability to detect negative client change. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2010;17(1):25–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zimmerman M, McGlinchey JB. Why don’t psychiatrists use scales to measure outcome when treating depressed patients? J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(12):1916–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheldrick RC, Merchant S, Perrin EC. Identification of developmental-behavioral problems in primary care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2011;128(2):356–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Olson AL, Kelleher KJ, Kemper KJ, Zuckerman BS, Hammond CS, Dietrich AJ. Primary care pediatricians’ roles and perceived responsibilities in the identification and management of depression in children and adolescents. Ambulat Pediatrics. 2001;1(2):91–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Winters NC, Collett BR, Myers KM. Ten-year review of rating scales, VII: scales assessing functional impairment. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(4):309–38. discussion 39–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Disabilities CoCW, Pediatrics SoDB, Committee BFS, Committee MHIfCWSNPA. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Am Acad Pediatr. 2006;108(1):192.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bardach NS, Coker TR, Zima BT, Murphy JM, Knapp P, Richardson LP, et al. Common and costly hospitalizations for pediatric mental health disorders. Pediatrics. 2014;133:602–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brooks SJ, Kutcher S. Diagnosis and measurement of adolescent depression: a review of commonly utilized instruments. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2001;11(4):341–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Weitzman C, Wegner L. The section on developmental and behavioral pediatrics copaocafh, council on early childhood, and society for developmental and behavioral pediatrics. Promoting optimal development: screening for behavioral and emotional problems. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Henke RM, Zaslavsky AM, McGuire TG, Ayanian JZ, Rubenstein LV. Clinical inertia in depression treatment. Med Care. 2009;47(9):959–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zimmerman M, McGlinchey JB. Depressed patients’ acceptability of the use of self-administered scales to measure outcome in clinical practice. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2008;20(3):125–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rush AJ, Carmody TJ, Ibrahim HM, Trivedi MH, Biggs MM, Shores-Wilson K, et al. Comparison of self-report and clinician ratings on two inventories of depressive symptomatology. Psychiatr Serv. 2006;57(6):829–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin M. Simon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Simon, K.M., Wrenn, G.L. (2018). Measurement-Based Care. In: Vinson, S., Vinson, E. (eds) Pediatric Mental Health for Primary Care Providers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90350-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90350-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90349-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90350-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics