Skip to main content

Adaptation and Mitigation of Climate Change by Improving Agriculture in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Between 1800 and 2050, the population of India would increase from 255 million to 1.71 billion, by a factor of 7, with a strong environmental impact. Rapid urbanization and its encroachment on agricultural land is a consequence of increase in population. Between 1950 and 2025, the population (106) would increase from 1.4 to 28.6 (20.4 times) of New Delhi, 4.5 to 20.1 (4.5 times) of Kolkata, 2.9 to 25.8 (8.9 times) of Mumbai, 0.6 to 6.6 (11.0 times) of Pune, 1.1 to 8.9 (8.1 times) of Hyderabad, 0.7 to 9.5 (13.6 times) of Bengaluru, and 1.5 to 9.6 (6.4 times) of Chennai. The city of Mumbai generates 11 thousand Mg of waste per day or 4 million Mg per year, which if recycled effectively, can improve urban and peri-urban agriculture. It takes about 40,000 ha of land to provide accommodation and infrastructure to 1 million people. An annual increase of 11.5 million people in India encroaches upon 0.5 million hectare (Mha) of agricultural land. Thus, there is a strong need to protect prime agricultural land against other uses. By 2025, India will have 7 cities of >10 million people, and a city of 10 million consumes 6000 Mg of food per day. Thus, nutrients brought into the city must be returned to the land by recycling waste as compost and for producing energy. Climate change, with increase in frequency of extreme events, is exacerbating vulnerability of agricultural soils to degradation processes. Land area (Mha) in India already affected by degradation includes 93.7 by water erosion, 9.5 by wind erosion, 14.3 by waterlogging, 5.9 by salinity/alkalinity, 16.0 by soil acidity and 7.4 by complex problems. In addition to the impacts of changing and uncertain climate, soil degradation is exacerbated by burning of crop residues, use of cow dung for household cooking rather than as manure, uncontrolled grazing, unbalanced use of fertilizers, and other extractive farming practices. The drought-flood syndrome, caused by water misuse and mismanagement, adversely affects agronomic productivity and wellbeing of millions of people despite the fact that India receives 4000 km3 of annual precipitation.

A systematic understanding is needed of the coupled cycling of water, carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulfur at ecoregions and watershed scale to enhance provisioning of essential ecosystem services from agroecosystem (e.g., food feed, fiber, fuel, water, biodiversity). In addition to the drought-flood syndrome, other ramifications of the mismanagement of coupled cycling include emission of greenhouse gases from agroecosytems, especially of CH4 and N2O with global warming potential of 21 and 310, respectively. Adaptation and mitigation of agroecosystems to climate change necessitate adoption of the strategies of sustainable intensification. The latter implies “producing more from less”: more agronomic yield per unit of land area, and input of water, energy, fertilizers, pesticides and gaseous emissions. The large yield gap, difference in agronomic yield of research plots and the national average yield, can be abridged by adoption of the best management practices (BMPs). Thus, soil health must be restored by increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration to the threshold level of ~1.5–2.0% in the root zone (0–40 cm depth). Soils of agroecosystems in India, similar to those of other countries in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, are severely depleted of their SOC stocks. The magnitude of depletion is high in soils prone to accelerated erosion by water and wind, and other degradation processes. The SOC stock can be restored by adaptation of BMPs which control erosion and create a positive soil/ecosystem C budget. Important among these are afforestation of degraded and marginal soils, restoration and management of wetlands, use of conservation agriculture in conjunction with mulch farming/cover cropping, integrated nutrient management, and establishment of biofuel plantations on degraded lands. The SOC restored must also be stabilized/ protected to prolong its mean residence time to centennial/millennial scale. There is no one-size-fit-all BMP, and site-specific adaptation/fine-tuning is essential with due consideration of the biophysical, socio-economic and cultural (the human dimensions) factors. In addition to adaptation and mitigation of climate change, restoration of degraded soils is also essential to local, national, regional and global peace and harmony. Fertile soils of good health, rich in SOC stock, and teaming with biodiversity of intense activity are essential to advancing food and nutritional security, improving water quality and renewability and adapting and mitigating climate change. Healthy soils are the engine of economic development especially under changing and uncertain climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bhattacharyya, R., Ghosh, B. N., Mishra, P. K., et al. (2015). Soil degradation in India: Challenges and potential solutions. Sustainability., 7, 3528–3570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoen, D., Joshi, P., Diels, L., Sarma, P. M., & Pant, D. (2015). Agriculture biomass in India: Part 2. Post harvest losses, cost and environmental impacts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commoner, B. (1971). The closing circle:Nature, man and technology. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikshit, A., & Birthal, P. (2010). Environmental value of dung in mixed crop-livestock systems. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 80(7), 679–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2017). FAO, Rome, Italy. http://www.fap/prg/faostat/en/#data/RL.

  • Fiksel, J. and R. Lal. (2017). Transforming waste into resources for the Indian economy. Current Science (Submitted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiloidhari, M., Das, D., & Baruah, D. C. (2014). Bioenergy potential from crop residue biomass in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 32, 504–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, A. Y., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2012). The water footprint of humanity. PNAS, 109, 3232–3237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (1995). The role of residue management in sustainable agricultural systems. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 5, 51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (2006). Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degradation& Development, 17, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (2014). Societal value of soil carbon. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 69, 186A–192A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R. (2015). A system approach to conservation agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 70(4), 82A–88A.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohan, S. K., Dixit, J., Kumar, R., Pandey, Y., Khan, J., Isaq, M., Modasir, S., & Kumar, D. (2015). Biogas: A boon for sustainable energy development in India’s cold climate. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 43, 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muir, J. (1911). My first summer in the sierra. Boston: The Riverside Press Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pathak, H., Mohanty, S., Jain, N., & Bhatia, A. (2010). Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium budgets in Indian agriculture. Nutrient, Cycling, Agroecosystems, 86, 287–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ravindranath, N. H., Somasekhar, H. I., Nagraja, M. S., et al. (2005). Biomass and Bioenergy, 29, 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R.K. (2017). Indian foodgrain output up 8.7% at a record 273.38 MT in 2016–17. Hindustantimes, 8th July 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.N. (2017). World Population Prospects: Key Findings and Advance Tables. 2017 Revision. Division of Economic and Social Affairs. U.N., New York, p 46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rattan Lal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lal, R. (2019). Adaptation and Mitigation of Climate Change by Improving Agriculture in India. In: Sheraz Mahdi, S. (eds) Climate Change and Agriculture in India: Impact and Adaptation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90086-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics