Skip to main content

Quality and Innovation in the Organic Agro-Food Sector: Threats and Opportunities of Social and Managerial Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategies and Best Practices in Social Innovation

Abstract

This study seeks to understand how innovation in the organic agro-food sector has evolved, studying the main challenges facing the sector as a consequence of its growth. Through the study and analysis of literature we reflect on the threats and opportunities facing the sector. We also used two expert panels to help us cross-reference and complete the information available from previous studies. The organic agro-food sector was born as a social and radical innovation based on specific values ​​and principles, which include respect for nature and sustainability, ecology, no pollution, equity and a close relationship with consumers. In this chapter, we explain how regulations and the interplay of different actors have sustained the sharp growth and development of the sector, mainly in the USA and Europe. However, the sector is currently facing major challenges, due precisely to this sharp growth. We identify the main challenges as the need to develop an ambidextrous capability, balancing exploration and exploitation, together with a second group of challenges, related to integrating formal and informal rules as well as new actors in the sector. There is a need to maintain the core values of the organic agro-food sector and its genuine social differentiation as well as to develop the standards and regulations required to maintain the high levels of food safety and quality of organic agro-food, given that nowadays it is distributed in supermarkets and major chains, and is consumed by a new type of customer. New actors in the organic agro-food sector (conventional distribution, mass consumers, and international traders) have been attracted by the sector’s growth. This means rules and requirements are needed to create certainty in economic activity and international trade. Institutional change constitutes a crucial component to secure the future development of the sector. We have seen that although these challenges arise from the social and economic trends that the sector is facing, there are also opportunities linked to all of them. Looking at the sector as a whole, the innovation trend has changed from paradigmatic, value-based, social and radical innovation to one of incremental managerial innovation aimed at overcoming the challenges associated with growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alroe, H. F., & Noe, E. (2008). What makes organic agriculture move: Protest, meaning or market? A polyocular approach to the dynamics and governance of organic agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7(1–2), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, B. B. (2012). Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 114(2), 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P., & Daniel, L. (2010). Understanding social innovation: A provisional framework. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 9–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitri, C., & Greene, C. (2002). Recent growth patterns in the US organic food sector. Agriculture Information Bulletin, 777, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16(4), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorais, M. (2007). Organic production of vegetables: State of the art and challenges. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 87(5), 1055–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuPuis, E. M. (2000). Not in my body: BGH and the rise of organic milk. Agriculture and Human Values, 17(3), 285–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Schachter, M. E., Matti, C. E., & Alcantara, E. (2012). Fostering quality of life through social innovation: A living lab methodology study case. Review of Policy Research, 29(6), 672–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European-Commission. (2013). Guide to social innovation. Brussels: European Commission Regional and Urban Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2000). Food safety and quality as affected by organic farming. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, H. W., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (2012). Challenge social innovation: Potentials for business, social entrepreneurship, welfare and civil society (pp. 1–16). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2004). The Trouble with “Organic Lite” in California: A Rejoinder to the “Conventionalisation” Debate. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(3), 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFOAM. (2005). Principles of organic agriculture. Adopted by the IFOAM General Assembly in Adelaide in 2005. https://www.ifoam.bio/

  • Lockie, S., & Halpin, D. (2005). The “Conventionalisation” thesis reconsidered: Structural and ideological transformation of Australian organic agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis, 45(4), 284–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAPAMA. (2015). Caracterización de la comercialización y distribución de productos ecológicos a través de los canales de venta especializados. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación Y Medio Ambiente, Madrid, Spain, 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Luzón, M. D., & Valls Pasola, J. (2011). Ambidexterity and total quality management: Towards a research agenda. Management Decision, 49(6), 927–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Luzon, M. D., Gil-Marques, M., LLoria-Aramburo, M. B., Escriba-Moreno, M. A., & Martinez-Perez, J. F. (2017). Report on threats and opportunities of the organic agro-food sector. Working Paper. University of Valencia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2012). The theoretical foundations of social innovation. In Social innovation (pp. 33–65). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics. Cambridge University Press, 2(4), 355–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, A., & Woodward, D. G. (2007). Supermarkets and the organic food supply chain: The potential for waste generation and its mitigation. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 70(1), 53–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prodescon, S. A. (2016). Caracterización del sector de la Producción ecológica española En términos de valor y mercado, Referida al año 2015. España.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds, L. T. (2004). The globalization of organic agro-food networks. World Development, 32(5), 725–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrinis, G. (2007). From techno-corporate food to alternative agri-food movements. Local-Global: Identity, Security, Community, 4, 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seebode, D., Jeanrenaud, S., & Bessant, J. (2012). Managing innovation for sustainability. R&D Management, 42(3), 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2015). Managing Innovation. Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change (5th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willer, H., & Yussefi, M. (2007). The world of organic agriculture: Statistics and emerging trends 2007 (9th ed., p. 251). International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, Bonn and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, Frick.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is part of the Project ECO2015-71380-R funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness and the State Research Agency. Co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria D. Moreno-Luzon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moreno-Luzon, M.D., Gil-Marques, M., Chams-Anturi, O. (2018). Quality and Innovation in the Organic Agro-Food Sector: Threats and Opportunities of Social and Managerial Innovation. In: Peris-Ortiz, M., Gómez, J., Marquez, P. (eds) Strategies and Best Practices in Social Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89857-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics