Skip to main content

Why Entertainment Products are Unique: Key Characteristics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entertainment Science

Abstract

This chapter shows the set of critical characteristics of entertainment products that make them stand out from other types of products. Our overview of these characteristics provides the foundation for developing a marketing mix for entertainment products that takes their uniqueness into account. Their hedonic and cultural nature makes it difficult for consumers to judge the quality of entertainment products when deciding whether or not to buy them—and, because they are also artistic and creative offerings, sometimes difficult to truly judge even after consuming them. Entertainment products also have economic characteristics that affect managerial decisions; they are information goods (which means that most costs are incurred in creating the “first copy,” with each additional copy being low- or no-cost), and tend to have short life cycles. Entertainment products can acquire revenues not only from consumers, but also from advertisers and other parties, and “externalities” exist between these parties. This chapter provides a critical foundation for the rest of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Our book points at quite a few of those failures. See for example the fallacy of the once-ambitious Cannon Group in the 1980s which we summarize in our chapter on entertainment product innovation.

  2. 2.

    Follows’ analysis even tends to be conservative, as he does not consider potential profits made through what the industry refers to as “distribution fees.”

  3. 3.

    In a formal perspective, in such a model revenues y are the result of a × bt, where a is the starting value (such as the revenues generated by a movie in its first week of release), b is the decay factor (or “multiplier”) which determines the slope of the curve, and t is the time period (with 1 being the first week of the movie’s release, 2 the second week, etc.).

  4. 4.

    Let us add that utilitarian products can possess certain hedonic elements. All else equal, we will choose a better-tasting low-fat food while pursuing weight loss and you will choose a calendar app that has more attractive graphics while striving to organize your life. However, the essential motivation for consumption of the food or the app is to accomplish another goal—not the desire to experience the product itself.

  5. 5.

    Specifically, we used the following statements for measuring utilitarian benefits: (1) “In general, [product] are very practical [praktisch] for me.”; (2) “In general, I think of [product] as very useful [zweckmäßig].”; (3) “In most cases, I perceive [product] as very functional [funktional].” For hedonic benefits, we used the following items: (1) “In most cases, using [product] gives me a lot of pleasure [Vergnügen].”; (2) “In general, I really enjoy [Freude haben] using [product].”; (3) “Usually, I have a lot of fun [Spaß] when using [product].”

  6. 6.

    Another reason might be entertainment’s ability to support consumers’ need for managing their mood, a motive that contains a certain instrumental (i.e., utilitarian) element.

  7. 7.

    The political role of entertainment is further demonstrated by a recent Chinese initiative which precedes movie screenings with video messages, in which movie stars such as Jackie Chan promote “socialist core values,” quoting from Mao and other national leaders (Qin 2017).

  8. 8.

    In-between rating categories for movies are PG (“parental guidance” is suggested for children under 13), PG-13 (parents of children of 12 or younger are “strongly cautioned”), and R (under 17 year olds require adults to accompany them). For games, additional categories are E (“everyone”), E10 + (“everyone 10+”), T (“teen”), and M (“mature 17+”). We find it interesting that no such restrictions exists for books, in general. Obviously watching character Anastacia Steele having intercourse in 50 Shades of Grey—the movie—is considered to have more impact than reading its description in 50 Shades of Grey—the novel.

  9. 9.

    This moral conflict is obvious in many comments on religious websites about the film. For example, Prins (1999), in his review for Christian Answers Network, judges the film as “extremely morally offensive” and writes: “Many Christians will no doubt be disturbed by the fact that Shakespeare and Viola are in a sexual relationship despite Shakespeare being married and Viola being engaged to another man.”

  10. 10.

    Meta analysis is a research technique that does not use original data, but combines data from many studies on a topic, trying to determine a “true” average effect.

  11. 11.

    See also the critique of Anderson et al.’s (2010) meta-analysis results by Hilgard et al. (2017), who, after re-analyzing the same studies, question some of the authors’ key findings. In a separate work, DeCamp (2017) provides rich insights into factors that determine people’s playing of violent games, which potentially also influence real-life violence—a potential source of an endogeneity bias that might underlie the empirically measured correlations between playing violent games and real-life violence. Using a variety of surveys conducted in public and public-charter schools in Delaware in 2015, his cross-sectional OLS regressions show that playing violent games differs with gender (males play way more), several family factors (e.g., students play more when family members are in the military, the father has lost his job, or a family member was recently in prison), and social variables (those who feel safe at school or their neighborhood and find support from teachers all play less violent games). They also found impacts for health issues (e.g., those who take medication for bipolar disorder and/or are around people who smoke play more) and psychological states and attitudes (those who feel worried play more, as do those who have been bullied in their neighborhood).

  12. 12.

    Specifically, the judges stated that “[Anderson’s studies] do not prove that violent video games cause minors to act aggressively (which would at least be a beginning). Instead, ‘[n]early all of the research is based on correlation, not evidence of causation, and most of the studies suffer from significant, admitted flaws in methodology.’ (Video Software Dealers Assn. 556 F. 3d, at 964). They show at best some correlation between exposure to violent entertainment and minuscule real-world effects, such as children’s feeling more aggressive or making louder noises in the few minutes after playing a violent game than after playing a nonviolent game. [But even] those effects are both small and indistinguishable from effects produced by other media [such as Bugs Bunny TV shows]” (Supreme Court 2011). For those of our readers who want to dive deeper into potential antisocial, but also prosocial effects of entertainment, and video games in particular, we recommend the book edited by Kowert and Quandt (2016).

  13. 13.

    Let us note that there are specific constellations in which a particular quasi-search attribute functions as a “true” search quality for some consumers. In the case of Mr. Depp, a particularly dedicated fan may find him so appealing that he or she goes to a movie simply to look at Mr. Depp, not for his contribution to the film—and thus indeed knows what he or she will get in advance.

  14. 14.

    Mr. Weingarten’s (2007) coverage of the experiment in the Washington Post is as fascinating as the experiment itself; although our book refers to a large number of awarded pieces of entertainment, it is probably the only item in our reference list that itself was honored with a Pulitzer Prize. You might also watch a time-lapse version of Mr. Bell’s performance at https://goo.gl/MmwRBi.

  15. 15.

    As the squared correlation coefficient equals the shared variance of the two ratings, professional critics’ evaluations explain only 6% of the ordinary consumers’ preferences, and vice versa in Holbrook’s study.

  16. 16.

    The genres were: action, comedy, drama, horror, independent, international, romance, science fiction/fantasy, sports, and thriller.

  17. 17.

    Holt (1998, p. 23) also suggests a pragmatic measure of cultural capital, which essentially weights a consumer’s and his/her parents’ education and occupation.

  18. 18.

    The taste-forming role of a nation’s culture also affects preferences for elements and forms of entertainment, such as genre.

  19. 19.

    Forde (2013) has compiled a list of some of these cases where musicians such as The Mamas & Papas, Van Morrison, and Marvin Gaye produced songs and albums not because of an intrinsic motivation, but solely to avoid lawsuits. Probably the most drastic case of such “artistic disobedience” might be the 1970 song Schoolboy Blues by the Rolling Stones, whose quite explicit references to certain sexual “techniques” were so radical that they prevented the managers at Decca from releasing it (in line with the creators’ intentions).

  20. 20.

    We will revisit several of the scenes Scrawler has included in his list in our consumer behavior chapter when discussing the need for verisimilitude for great storytelling.

  21. 21.

    Some argue that the development of automated recommender systems and other digital innovations will cause a shift toward the “long tail,” which would go hand in hand with a reduction of this perishability property, extending the length of entertainment’s life cycle. We discuss this potential effect later in the book.

  22. 22.

    Although beyond the scope of this book, it is an interesting question how such avoidance strategies impact the value of consumers’ product usage for advertisers. Bronnenberg et al. (2010) study how the ownership of a TiVo digital video recorder (DVR) changed the shopping behaviors of 819 Texas households, comparing purchases in several product categories for 13 months prior and 26 months after the adoption of the DVR with a large control sample. Analyzing the differences in spending behavior show no significant effects—in other words, obtaining a TiVo DVR and the associated ad skipping does not impact purchase behaviors, at least not in Bronnenberg et al.’s setting.

  23. 23.

    Please note that one can also argue that (positive) externalities exist between different groups of customers in the printer example above: consumers might consider a printer as more powerful if it is adopted by business customers. However, usually the link between the two customer groups is weak and is not related to separate benefits, as is the case with advertising—that is why we are hesitant to use the term “two-sided market” for such constellations.

References

  • Abebe, N. (2017). 25 Songs that tell us where music is going. The New York Times Magazine, March 9, https://goo.gl/LYWgBY.

  • Adner, R., & Vincent, W. (2010). Get ready for ads in books. The Wall Street Journal, August 19, https://goo.gl/otEf9J.

  • Alba, J. W., & Williams, E. F. (2013). Pleasure principles: A review of research on hedonic consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23, 2–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. A. (2003). Violent video games: Myths, facts, and unanswered questions. Psychological Science Agenda, October, https://goo.gl/iwfXiH.

  • Anderson, C. R., & Zeithaml, C. P. (1984). Stage of product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 27, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S. P., & Gabszewicz, J. J. (2006). The media and advertising: A tale of two-sided markets. Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, 1, 567–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. A., Akiko, S., Nobuko, I., Swing, E. L., Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., Rothstein, H. R., & Saleem, M. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 151–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M. (2006). Competition in two-sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 668–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asai, S. (2009). Sales patterns of hit music in Japan. Journal of Media Economics, 22, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askin, N., & Mauskapf, M. (2017). What makes popular culture popular? Product features and optimal differentiation in music. American Sociological Review, 82, 910–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audley, A. (2015). What does your ringtone say about you? The Telegraph, January 15, https://goo.gl/YWSgYF.

  • Barroso, A., Giarratana, M. S., Reis, S., & Sorenson, O. (2016). Crowding, satiation, and saturation: The days of television series’ lives. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 565–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belk, R. W., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2000). The missing streetcar named desire. In S. Ratneshwar, D. Glen Mick, & C. Huffman (Eds.), The why of consumption: Contemporary perspectives on consumer motives, goals, and desires (pp. 98–199). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellesiles, M. A. (1996). The origins of gun culture in the United States, 1760–1865. Journal of American History, 83, 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohnenkamp, B., Wiertz, C., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2012). Consuming ‘Media Trash:’ When “Bad” becomes “Good”. In Z. Gürhan-Canli, C. Otnes, & R. (Juliet) Zhu (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 40, pp. 1035–1036). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2002). The forms of capital. In N. Woolsey Biggart (Ed.), Readings in economic sociology (pp. 280–291). Blackwell: Malden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. (1994). Trouble on ‘Trouble’ set? Take your pick: (a) co-stars Julia Roberts and Nick Nolte got on each other’s nerves; (b) the filmmakers got on their nerves; (c) snoopy questions are getting on everyone’s nerves. Los Angeles Times, July 3, https://goo.gl/mY6NSe.

  • Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory: A symposium (pp. 287–302). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronnenberg, B. J., Dub, J., & Mela, C. F. (2010). Do digital video recorders influence sales? Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 998–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, W. D. A., & Throsby, D. (2006). Creativity and the behavior of artists. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (pp. 507–529).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J. (2016). Violent media and hostile appraisals: A meta-analytic review. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E. (2006). Chapter 17 Organization of arts and entertainment industries. In Handbook of economics of art and culture (Vol. V).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. (2007). Flow in games (and everything else). Communications of the ACM, 50, 31–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, M. T., & Ohashi, H. (2005). Indirect network effects and the product cycle: Video games in the U.S., 1994–2002. Journal of Industrial Economics, 53, 515–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, C. H., & Avrunin, G. S. (1977). Single-peaked functions and the theory of preference. Psychological Review, 84, 216–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, A., & Kirkpatrick, D. D. (2017). Saudi Arabia to allow movie theaters after 35-year ban. The New York Times, December 11, https://goo.gl/hv36xp.

  • Culbert, D. (2003). Jud Süss. In N. J. Cull, D. Culbert, & D. Welch (Eds.), Propaganda and mass persuasion (p. 205). Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debenedetti, S., & Larcenieux, F. (2011). ‘The Taste of Others’: Divergences in tastes between professional experts and ordinary consumers of movies in France. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 26, 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCamp, W. (2017). Who plays violent video games? An exploratory analysis of predictors of playing violent games. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 260–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFillippi, R., Grabher, G., & Jones, C. (2007). Introduction to paradoxes of creativity: Managerial and organizational challenges in the cultural economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, R., & Webster Jr., F. E. (1989). Organizational culture and marketing: Defining the research agenda. Journal of Marketing, 53, 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vany, A. (2006). The movies. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (pp. 615–665). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vany, A., & David Walls, W. (1999). Uncertainty in the movie industry: Does star power reduce the terror of the box office? Journal of Cultural Economics, 23, 285–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerr, A. (2014). All the light we cannot see. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikhof, D. R., & Haunschild, A. (2007). For art’s sake! Artistic and economic logics in creative production. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekelund Jr., R. B., Mixon Jr., F. G., & Ressler, R. (1995). Advertising and information: An empirical study of search, experience and credence goods. Journal of Economic Studies, 22, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elberse, A. (2013). Blockbusters: Hit-making, risk-taking, and the big business of entertainment. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empire (1999). Harrison Ford’s Blade Runner gripe, October 7, https://goo.gl/BKkbU7.

  • Farndale, N. (2015). Art Garfunkel on Paul Simon: ‘I created a monster’. The Telegraph, May 24, https://goo.gl/Rg4XgR.

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2013). Violent video games and the supreme court. American Psychologist, 68, 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feshbach, S., & Singer, R. D. (1971). Television and aggression. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [An online version of the book can be found at Ajzen’s website at https://goo.gl/Re6HGP].

  • Fleming Jr., M. (2015). Blast from the past on ‘Back To The Future’: How Frank Price rescued Robert Zemeckis’ classic from obscurity. Deadline, October 21, https://goo.gl/8MvUpd.

  • Follows, S. (2016). How movies make money: $100 m + Hollywood blockbusters, July 10, https://goo.gl/uYwnJe.

  • Forde, K. (2013). Top 10 albums only recorded because of contractual obligations. TopTenz, April 16, https://goo.gl/qWLGXB.

  • Getzels, J. W., & Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1969). Aesthetic opinion: An empirical study. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grobel, L. (1993). The dark side of fame: Robert Evans Pt. II. Movieline, September 1, https://goo.gl/RD1J34.

  • Hahn, A. (2004). Possessed: The rise and fall of Prince. New York: Billboard Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Walsh, G., & Wruck, O. (2001). An investigation into the factors determining the success of service innovations: The case of motion pictures. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgard, J., Engelhardt, C. R., & Rouder, J. N. (2017). Overstated evidence for short-term effects of violent games on affect and behavior: A reanalysis of Anderson et al. (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 143, 757–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46, 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B. (1993). Nostalgia and consumption preferences: Some emerging patterns of consumer tastes. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Popular appeal versus expert judgments of motion pictures. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B. (2005). The role of ordinary evaluations in the market for popular culture: Do consumers have ‘Good Taste’? Marketing Letters, 16, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B., & Schindler, R. M. (1989). Some exploratory findings on the development of musical tastes. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, M. B., Lacher, K. T., & LaTour, M. S. (2006). Audience judgments as potential missing link between expert judgments and audience appeal: An illustration based on musical recordings of ‘My Funny Valentine’. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D. B. (1998). Does cultural capital structure american consumption? Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannone, N. E., Kelly. J. R., & Williams, K. D. (2018). ‘Who’s That?’ The negative consequences of being out of the loop on pop culture. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7, 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibbi, A. A. (2013). Hollywood, The American image and the global film industry. CINEJ Cinema Journal, 3, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansari, A., & Parkin, A. J. (1989). Things that go bump in your life: Explaining the reminiscence bump in autobiographical memory. Psychology and Aging, 11, 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, S. M. J., Chessa, A. G., & Murre, J. M. J. (2007). Temporal distribution of favourite books, movies, and records: Differential encoding and re-sampling. Memory, 15, 755–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jedidi, K., Krider, R., & Weinberg, C. (1998). Clustering at the movies. Marketing Letters, 9, 393–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R., & Mendelson, H. (2011). Information goods vs. industrial goods: Cost structure and competition. Management Science, 57, 164–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, B., Ratner, R., & Kahnemann, D. (1997). Patterns of hedonic consumption over time. Marketing Letters, 8, 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koski, D. (2014). 10 movies sabotaged by their own creators. Listverse, September 25, https://goo.gl/J6wpur.

  • Kowert, R., & Quandt, T. (Eds.). (2016). The video game debate: Unravelling the physical, social, and psychological effects of digital games. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V. (2001). Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meanings of Star Trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. (2015). Aerosmith warns Donald Trump over ‘Dream On’ use, October 11, https://goo.gl/N7ZTEo.

  • Langfitt, F. (2015). How China’s censors influence Hollywood. NPR, May 18, https://goo.gl/fNtSM9.

  • Lee, C. (2013). A history of flexing his muscles. Los Angeles Times, June 13, https://goo.gl/7ktRF1.

  • Leenders, M. A. A. M., & Eliashberg, J. (2011). The antecedents and consequences of restrictive age-based ratings in the global motion picture industry. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28, 367–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luan, Y. J., & Sudhir, K. (2010). Forecasting marketing-mix responsiveness for new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 444–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, A., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2013). Value creation in the video game industry: Industry economics, consumer benefits, and research opportunities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27, 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, A., Wassall, G. H., DeNatale, D., & Cohen, R. (2008). Defining the creative economy: Industry and occupational approaches. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 24–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazis, M. B., Ahtola, O. T., & Eugene Klippel, R. (1975). A comparison of four multi-attribute models in the prediction of consumer attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, R. J., Coley, S. L., Wagner, M. F., Zengel, B., & Basham, A. (2016). Does playing video games with violent content temporarily increase aggressive inclinations? A pre-registered experimental study. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, B. (2013). Studio execs hated the Blade Runner voiceover they forced Harrison Ford to do. Vice Motherboard, March 14, https://goo.gl/ijBPNq.

  • Nelson, P. J. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78, 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pähler vor der Holte, N., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2016). Das Phänomen Neue Drama-Serien. Working paper, Department of Marketing and Media Research, Münster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltoniemi, M. (2015). Cultural industries: Product-market characteristics, management challenges and industry dynamics. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17, 41–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61, 900–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prins, M. (1999). Movie review Shakespeare in Love. Christian Spotlight on Entertainment, https://goo.gl/gNmHVq.

  • Qin, A. (2017). At the movies in China, some propaganda with your popcorn. The New York Times, July 7, https://goo.gl/yUTsR9.

  • Ratner, R. K., Kahn, B. E., & Kahnemann, D. (1999). Choosing less‐preferred experiences for the sake of variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redden, J. P. (2008). Reducing satiation: The role of categorization level. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 624–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rink, D. R., & Swan, J. E. (1979). Product life cycle research: A literature review. Journal of Business Research, 7, 219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet, J., & Tirole, J. (2006). Two-sided markets: A progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 37, 645–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rössel, J., & Bromberger, K. (2009). Strukturiert kulturelles Kapital auch den Konsum von Populärkultur?. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 38, 494–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 537–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaruffi, P. (1999). Paul Simon. https://goo.gl/Y48X98.

  • Schäfer, T., & Sedlmeier, P. (2009). From the functions of music to music preference. Psychology of Music, 37, 279–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878–891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrawler, J. (2016). 15 movies that were ruined by just one bad scene, July 28, https://goo.gl/NeFuxj.

  • Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, R., Moon, S., Chen, H., & Houston, M. B. (2018). When marketing strategy meets culture: The role of culture in product evaluations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 384–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparviero, S. (2015). Hollywood creative accounting: The success rate of major motion pictures. Media Industries Journal, 2, 19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberg (2012). ‘Why I’m betting £85 million on one cartoon reporter and his dog’: Steven Spielberg brings Tintin to the big screen. Mail Online, October 5, https://goo.gl/Edp3Su.

  • Strahilevitz, M., & Myers, J. G. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 434–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supreme Court (2011). Brown, Governor of California, et al. v. Entertainment Merchants Association et al., No. 08–1448, https://goo.gl/BrNQbU.

  • Szycik, G. R., Mohammadi, B., Hake, M., Kneer, J., Samii, A., Münte, T. F., & te Wildt, B. T. (2016). Excessive users of violent video games do not show emotional desensitization: An fMRI study. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szycik, G. R., Mohammadi, B., Münte, T. F., & te Wildt, B. T. (2017). Lack of evidence that neural empathic responses are blunted in excessive users of violent video games: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, article 174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., Jones, M., & Warhurst, C. (2007). From conception to consumption: Creativity and the missing managerial link. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 625–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troilo (2015). Marketing in creative industries: Value, experience, creativity. London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, G., Devilly, G. J., & Ward, T. (2007). The effect of playing violent video games on adolescents: Should parents be quaking in their boots? Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 383–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R. (1995). Pricing information goods. Working Paper, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. R. (1998). Markets for information goods. Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 310–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. (2015). Hollywood’s Child 44 pulled in Russia after falling foul of culture ministry. The Guardian, April 15, https://goo.gl/1LDG8W.

  • Walls, W. D. (2010). Superstars and heavy tails in recorded entertainment: Empirical analysis of the market for DVDs. Journal of Cultural Economics, 34, 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanderer, J. T. (1970). In defence of popular taste: Film ratings among professionals and lay audiences. American Journal of Sociology, 76, 262–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. (Alex), & Zhang, X. (Michael) (2009). Sampling of information goods. Decision Support Systems, 48, 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten, G. (2007). Pearls before breakfast: Can one of the nation’s great musicians cut through the fog of a D.C. rush hour? Let’s find out. The Washington Post, April 8, https://goo.gl/zLrEE8.

  • White, A. (2000). Joy in the struggle: A look at John Milius. Film Threat, July 18, https://goo.gl/pFBhoR.

  • Yaish, M., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2010). Disentangling ‘Cultural Capital’: The consequences of cultural and economic resources for taste and participation. European Sociology Review, 28, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. M., Gong, J. J., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2008). The business of making movies. Strategic Finance, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenatti, A. (1994). Goût musical, émotion esthétique. In A. Zenatti (Ed.), Psychologie de la Musique (pp. 177–204). Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Hennig-Thurau .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hennig-Thurau, T., Houston, M.B. (2019). Why Entertainment Products are Unique: Key Characteristics. In: Entertainment Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89292-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics