Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Capturing the Heterogeneity of Family Firms: Reviewing Scales to Directly Measure Socioemotional Wealth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Heterogeneity among Family Firms

Abstract

Socioemotional wealth (SEW) is a key concept in family business research. In this chapter, I follow recent work et al. (2012) by emphasizing the theoretical relevance of SEW; at the same time, I share concerns about conceptual and empirical issues that still need to be examined. For example, the concept still needs to be tested more directly. My first aim is to provide an overview of previously published alternatives to directly measuring SEW. This is in line with criticism of the mismatch between the theoretical construct and its empirical correlate. This debate has only recently led to the development and validation of new measures to directly grasp SEW. In this chapter, I review the recent discussion, lay out emerging possibilities of directly measuring SEW, and discuss challenges associated with using direct measures of SEW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arregle, J.-L., Hitt, M., Sirmon, D., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, I. (1994). Product/market strategies of small and medium-sized enterprises. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger, I., & Weir, A. (1990). Strategic orientations of small European businesses. The STRATOS group. Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, D. D. (2001). Diversification strategy research at a crossroads. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), Handbook of strategic management (pp. 362–383). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., Gómez-Mejía, L. R., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less? Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björnberg, A., & Nicholson, N. (2007). The family climate scales—Development of a new measure for use in family business research. Family Business Review, 20(3), 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björnberg, A., & Nicholson, N. (2012). Emotional ownership: The next generation’s relationship with the family firm. Family Business Review, 25(4), 374–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (2010). Family management, family ownership, and downsizing: Evidence from S&P 500 firms. Family Business Review, 23(2), 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, C., & Ambrosini, V. (1997). Using single respondents in strategy research. British Journal of Management, 8, 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B. K., Gove, S., & Hitt, M. A. (2005). Construct measurement in strategic management research: Illusion or reality? Strategic Management Journal, 26, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlock, R. S., & Ward, J. L. (2001). Strategic planning for the family business—Parallel planning to unify the family and business. New York/Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. (1999). The economics of the family firm. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 47, 10–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & De Massis, A. (2015). A closer look at socioemotional wealth: Its flows, stocks, and prospects for moving forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L., & Rau, S. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1103–1113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, C. C., Gómez-Mejia, L. R., & Becerra, M. (2010). Perceptions of benevolence and the design of agency contracts: CEO–TMT relationships in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, C., Larraza-Kintana, M., Garcés-Galdeano, L., & Berrone, P. (2014). Are family firms really more socially responsible? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1295–1316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darke, P. R., Ashworth, L., & Ritchie, R. J. (2008). Damage from corrective advertising: Causes and cures. Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debicki, B. J., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., Pearson, A. W., & Spencer, B. A. (2016). Development of a socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston, K. A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evert, R. E., Martin, J. A., McLeod, M. S., & Payne, G. T. (2016). Empirics in family business research progress, challenges, and the path ahead. Family Business Review, 29(1), 17–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, P. C., & Hill, C. W. (1995). The problem of unobservables in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal, 16(7), 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, S., Voordeckers, W., van Gils, A., & van den Heuvel, J. (2013). CEO’s empathy and salience of socioemotional wealth in family SMEs – The moderating role of external directors. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(3/4), 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Makri, M., & Kintana, M. L. (2010). Diversification decisions in family controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Campbell, J. T., Martin, G., Hoskisson, R. E., Makri, M., & Sirmon, D. G. (2014). Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1351–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handler, W. C. (1990). Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 15(1), 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, J., & Prügl, R. (2015). Innovation activities during intra-family leadership succession in family firms: An empirical study from a socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2), 104–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, J., Suess-Reyes, J., Beck, S., Prügl, R., & Frank, H. (2016). Measuring socioemotional wealth in family-owned and -managed firms: A validation and short form of the FIBER scale. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 7(3), 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, F., & Sharma, P. (2010). Entrepreneurial family firms. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., & Zellweger, T. M. (2012). Extending the socioemotional wealth perspective: A look at the dark side. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1175–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. B., Astrachan, J. H., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2013). Socioemotional wealth across the family firm life cycle: A commentary on “family business survival and the role of boards”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1391–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Rogoff, E. G. (1996). Comparison of small business with family participation versus small business without family participation: An investigation of differences in goals, attitudes, and family business conflicts. Family Business Review, 9(4), 423–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., Bobko, P., Ashford, S., Chen, Z., & Reb, X. (2008). Cross-cultural development of an abridged job insecurity measure. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M. H., Durand, R., & Ling, Y. (2007). The missing lens in family firm governance theory: A self-other typology of parental altruism. Journal of Business Research, 60(10), 1022–1029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensching, H., Kraus, S., & Bouncken, R. (2014). Socioemotional wealth in family firm research – A literature review. Journal of International Business and Economics, 14(4), 165–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2014). Deconstructing socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 713–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., Lee, J., Chang, S., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2009). Filling the institutional void: The social behaviour and performance of family vs. non family technology firms in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5), 802–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieper, T. M. (2010). Non solus: Toward a psychology of family business. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pukall, T. J., & Calabrò, A. (2014). The internationalization of family firms: A critical review and integrative model. Family Business Review, 27, 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, M. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(June), 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, J., Voordeckers, W., Steijvers, T., & Laveren, E. (2014a). The entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in private family firms: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, J., Voordeckers, W., Steijvers, T., & Laveren, E. (2014b). Entrepreneurial intentions and entrepreneurial actions in family firms: A look at the dark side of socioemotional wealth. Paper presented at the IFERA Research Development Workshop. Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. S., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). Reifying socioemotional wealth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(3), 447–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales. Personnel Psychology, 55, 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9, 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerkhof, P., Steijvers, T., Hendriks, W., & Voordeckers, W. (2015). The effect of organizational characteristics on the appointment of nonfamily managers in private family firms. The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 28(2), 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandekerkhof, P., Steijvers, T., Hendriks, W., & Voordeckers, W. (2018). Socio-emotional wealth separation and decision-making quality in family firm TMTs: The moderating role of psychological safety. Journal of Management Studies, 55(4), 648–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardaman, J. M., & Gondo, M. B. (2014). Socioemotional wealth conflict in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1317–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. (2007). ‘Types’ of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(5), 405–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., Cowling, M., & Howorth, C. (2001). The development of family companies: Management and ownership imperatives. Family Business Review, 14(4), 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, R. M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (1998). A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FIF@Zeppelin University, Friedrichshafen | Lake Constance, Germany

    Reinhard Prügl

Authors
  1. Reinhard Prügl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Prügl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina-Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA

    Esra Memili

  2. School of Business Administration, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA

    Clay Dibrell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Prügl, R. (2019). Capturing the Heterogeneity of Family Firms: Reviewing Scales to Directly Measure Socioemotional Wealth. In: Memili, E., Dibrell, C. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Heterogeneity among Family Firms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77676-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation