Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

KM and Project Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Knowledge Management

Abstract

In this chapter we aim to analyse the context, role, structures, processes, procedures and problems associated with managing knowledge in projects. In doing so we focus particularly on the interactions and intersections between knowledge management (KM) and project management (PM). The imperative for effective KM can be viewed through the prism of poor performance in relation to PM. For example, recent reports indicate that organisations are wasting on average €97 million for every €1 billion spent on all projects (PMI 2017). In addition, PM practitioners and others involved in projects believe that 6% of projects are ‘wholly unsuccessful’ and that less than 22% of all projects undertaken wholly meet their objectives (APM 2016). These figures, which are consistent with previous reports on project success and failure, show that there continues to be deficiencies in PM and that part of the problem is a failure to effectively manage knowledge both within a project and between projects. Hence there is an urgent need to improve KM in PM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APM. (2016). Conditions for project success: APM research report. Princes Risborough: Association of Project Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1993). Knowledge for action – A guide to overcoming barriers to organizational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Project Management. (2012). APM body of knowledge (6th ed.). Princes Risborough: Association for Project Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17(6), 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baiden, B. K., Proce, A. D. F., & Dainty, A. R. J. (2006). The extent of team integration within construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1), 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, V., Ebers, M., & Maurer, I. (2013). Learning in project-based organizations: The role of project teams’ social capital for overcoming barriers to learning. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumard, P. (1999). Tacit knowledge in organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettiol, M., & Sedita, S. R. (2011). The role of community of practice in developing creative industry projects. International Journal of Project Management, 29(4), 468–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations – An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, G.-W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., & Lee, J.-N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 795–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice – Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryde, D. J. (2005). Methods for managing different perspectives of project success. British Journal of Management, 16(2), 119–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carillo, P., Ruikar, K., & Fuller, P. (2013). When will we learn? Improving lessons learned practice in construction. International Journal of Project Management, 31(4), 567–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, M. (2016). Microsoft launches AI tool to carry out project management tasks. Retrieved from http://mandmglobal.com/microsoft-launches-ai-tool-to-carry-out-project-management-tasks/. 28 May 2017.

  • Cherns, A. B., & Bryant, D. T. (1984). Studying the client’s role in construction management. Construction Management and Economics, 2(2), 177–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, N. S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies – The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossrail Ltd. (2017). Welcome to the crossrail learning legacy. Retrieved from http://learninglegacy.crossrail.co.uk/. 25 May 2017.

  • Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne, K. B., Dyer, G., Hoopes, C., & Harris, S. (2004). Toward a model of effective knowledge management and directions for future research: Culture, leadership, and CKOs. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(4), 26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, S., & Whitty, S. J. (2015). Developing a systemic lessons learned knowledge model for organisational learning through projects. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, S., & Whitty, S. J. (2016). How to apply the systemic lessons learned knowledge model to wire an organisation for the capability of storytelling. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 429–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebers, M., & Maurer, I. (2016). To continue or not to continue? Drivers of recurrent partnering in temporary organizations. Organization Studies, 37(12), 1861–1895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekrot, B., Kock, A., & Gemünden, H. G. (2016). Retaining project management competence – Antecedents and consequences. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, P. A., Dainty, A. R. J., & Thorpe, T. (2011). Improving project learning: A new approach to lessons learnt. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(1), 118–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A., Edmondson, A. C., & Gino, F. (2008). Is yours a learning organization? Harvard Business Review, March, 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., & Williams, T. (2011). Now let’s make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(9), 966–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granqvist, N., & Gustafsson, R. (2016). Temporal institutional work. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1009–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güldenberg, S., & Konrath, H. (2006). Bridging leadership and learning in knowledge-based organizations. In B. Renzl, K. Matzler, & H. Hinterhuber (Eds.), The future of knowledge management (pp. 219–236). Houndmills/Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Nohira, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge. Harvard Business Review, (March–April), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, A., & Dorée, A. (2015). Learning between projects: More than sending messages in bottles. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 341–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosley, W. N. (1987). The application of artificial intelligence software to project management. Project Management Journal, 18(3), 73–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasvi, J. J. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hailikari, M. (2003). Managing knowledge and knowledge competences in projects and project organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 21(8), 571–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, A., & Turner, J. R. (2001). Quantity versus quality in project-based learning practices. Management Learning, 32(1), 77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin, H., Akgün, A. E., Günsel, A., & İmamoğlu, S. Z. (2005). The relationships between adhocracy and clan cultures and tacit oriented KM strategy. Journal of Transnational Management, 10(3), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (1998). Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B., & Zander, H. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lydon, J. (2016). Bots and project management information systems (PMIS). http://lydonsolutions.com/bots-project-management-information-systems-pmis/. Retrieved May 28, 2017.

  • Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Müller, J., Herting, S., & Mooradian, T. A. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(3), 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Mooradian, T., von Krogh, G., & Mueller, J. (2011). Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), 296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, I. (2010). How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: The impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 629–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoormann, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organisational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Microsoft. (2017). Microsoft Azure: Machine learning. Retrieved from https://azure.microsoft.com/en-gb/services/machine-learning/. 28 May 2017.

  • Miller, J. D., & Karakowsky, L. (2005). Gender influences as an impediment to knowledge sharing: When men and women fail to seek peer feedback. Journal of Psychology: Interdiscipliary & Applied, 139(2), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: Linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. (2015). Formal and informal practices of knowledge sharing between project teams and enacted cultural characteristics. Project Management Journal, 46(1), 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Goshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., Tansley, C., & Huang, J. (2004). Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: The importance of bridging and bonding. British Journal of Management, 15(S1), S43–S57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., Scarbrough, H., & Swan, J. (2006). Sharing knowledge across projects – Limits to ICT-led project review practices. Management Learning, 37(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nymand, K. (2016). Bots will soon help project managers make more accurate plans. Retrieved from https://venturebeat.com/2016/10/14/bots-will-soon-help-project-managers-make-more-accurate-plans/. 28 May 2017.

  • OGC. (2009). Managing successful projects with PRINCE2: 2009 edition. London: The Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olympics Delivery Authority. (2013). Learning legacy. Retrieved from http://learninglegacy.independent.gov.uk/index.php. 25 May 2017.

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice – Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patanakul, P., lewwongcharoen, B., & Milosevic, D. (2016). An empirical study on the use of project management tools and techniques across project life-cycle and their impact on project success. Journal of General Management, 35(3), 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patanakul, P., & Shenhar, A. J. (2012). What project strategy really is: The fundamental building block in strategic project management. Project Management Journal, 43(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pemsel, S., & Wiewiora, A. (2013). Project management office: A knowledge broker in project-based organisations. International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PMI. (2017). PMI’s pulse of the profession: Success rates rise. http://www.pmi.org/-/media/pmi/documents/public/pdf/learning/thought-leadership/pulse/pulse-of-the-profession-2017.pdf. Retrieved March 31, 2017.

  • Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge – Towards a post-critical philosophy (First published 1958, corrected edition 1962, reprinted 1998 ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1983). The tacit dimension. Gloucester: Peter Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (5th ed.). Pennsylvania: Newtown Square.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzl, B. (2008). Trust in management and knowledge sharing: The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation. Omega, 36(2), 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V., & Subramani, M. (2005). Special issue on information technologies and knowledge management. MIS Quaterly, 29(2), 193–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, A., & Miner, A. S. (2008). Learning in hybrid-project systems: The effects of project performance on repeated collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 51(6), 1117–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., & Maltz, A. C. (2001). Project success: A multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Planning, 34(6), 699–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shokri-Ghasabeth, M., & Chileshe, N. (2014). Knowledge management: Barriers to capturing lessons learned from Australian construction contractors perspective. Construction Innovation, 14(1), 108–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock, R. M., von Hippel, E., & Gillert, N. L. (2016). Impacts of personality traits on consumer innovation success. Research Policy, 45(4), 757–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M., & Menges, J. I. (2015). The microfoundations of organizational social networks. A review and an agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1361–1387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system – A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2003). Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 410–427). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H., & Vladimirou, E. (2001). What is organizational knowledge. Journal of Management Studies, 38(7), 973–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Donk, D. P., & Riezebos, J. (2005). Exploring the knowledge inventory in project-based organisations: A case study. International Journal of Project Management, 23(1), 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Zedtwitz, M. (2002). Organizational learning through post-project reviews in R&D. R&D Management, 32(3), 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, E. J., & Dawson, S. (2001). Managers’ perceptions of criteria of organizational effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 173–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2000). “It is what one does”: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2–3), 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice – The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. C. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiewiora, A., Murphy, G., Trigunarsyah, B., & Brown, K. (2014). Interactions between organizational culture, trustworthiness, and mechanisms for inter-project knowledge sharing. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, D., Zuo, M., & Deng, X. (2015). Examining the factors influencing cross-project knowledge transfer: An empirical study of IT services in China. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Liverpool Business School, Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU), Liverpool, UK

    David James Bryde & Christine Unterhitzenberger

  2. University of Stuttgart (UoS), Stuttgart, Germany

    Birgit Renzl & Martin Rost

Authors
  1. David James Bryde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine Unterhitzenberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Birgit Renzl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Martin Rost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Suleman Dawood School of Business, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

    Jawad Syed

  2. School of Management and Enterprise, Faculty of Business, Education, Law and the Arts, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

    Peter A. Murray

  3. School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom

    Donald Hislop

  4. Muscat University, St Helens, Merseyside, United Kingdom

    Yusra Mouzughi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bryde, D.J., Unterhitzenberger, C., Renzl, B., Rost, M. (2018). KM and Project Management. In: Syed, J., Murray, P., Hislop, D., Mouzughi, Y. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Knowledge Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71434-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation