Skip to main content

A Journey Through Possible Views of Relational Logic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Dynamics in a Systems Perspective

Part of the book series: New Economic Windows ((NEW))

Abstract

This chapter discusses how the relational logic is one of the most interesting and profitable management paradigms to understand firms’ behaviour and to foster value co-creation processes.

The relational view and the resulting relational inter-subjective dynamics are critical success factors for corporate governance capable to mobilise different involved actors’ resources. However, the importance of a system perspective of relational dynamics is only recently discussed in the current doctrinal debate. Therefore, our goal is to contribute in bridging this gap by reinterpreting, in a system key, the issue of relations. Methodologically, the authors have carried out a review taking a system vision, in order to conceptualize an original interpretative model. The interpretative model that we call “Enterprise Relational Vision” (ERV) is based on the following assumptions (pillars): Relationality and autopoiesis, Dissemination and definition, Sense and cohesion, Training and decision formulation, Co-creation and regeneration, Resources and competitiveness, Leadership and viability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashby, W. R. (1962). Principles of the self-organizing system. London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., & Polese, F. (2010). Linking the viable system and many-to-many network approaches to service-dominant logic and service science. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 2(1), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barile, S., Spohrer, J., & Polese, F. (2010). Editorial column – System thinking for service research advances. Service Science, 2(1–2), i–iii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. I. (1939). Dilemmas of leadership in the democratic process. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature. A necessary unity [Trad. it. (1984). Mente e natura. Un’unità necessaria]. Milano: Adelphi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1989). The viable system model. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. L. (1983). Relationship marketing. In L. L. Berry, G. L. Shostack, & G. D. Upah (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of services marketing (pp. 25–28). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi, A., & Rullani, E. (2005). Il capitalismo personale: vite al lavoro. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, F. (1997). Sull’architettura delle relazioni tra impresa e ambiente. Problemi di gestione dell’impresa, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, L., & Zamagni, S. (2004). Economia civile. Efficienza, equità, felicità pubblica. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casali, G. L., Franco, E., & Perano, M. (2016). Strategic management. Growing into a foreign market. Prahran: Tilde Publishing and Distribution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciasullo, M. V. (2010). La competitività. In M. Pellicano & M. V. Ciasullo (Eds.), La visione strategica dell’impresa. Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Piana, B. (2010). L’analisi strategica. In M. Pellicano & M. V. Ciasullo (Eds.), La visione strategica dell’impresa. Torino: G. Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. (2004). Introduzione alla sociologia relazionale. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, È. (1893). De la division du travail social. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 4, 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabris, G. (2008). Societing: il marketing nella società postmoderna. Milano: Egea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: Business in the 21st century. Managing for stakeholders: Survival, reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golinelli, G. M. (2010). Viable systems approach: Governing business dynamics. Padova: Cedam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1983). Strategic management and marketing in the service sector. Helsingfors, Helsinky: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1991). The marketing strategy continuum: A marketing concept for the 1990s. Management Decision, 29(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C., & Gummesson, E. (1985). The Nordic school of service marketing. Service Marketing–Nordic School Perspectives. Stockholm University, 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (2002). Total relationship marketing (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E. (2004). From one-to-one to many-to-many marketing. In Service Excellence in Management: Interdisciplinary Contributions, Proceedings from the QUIS 9 Symposium, Karlstad University Karlstad, Sweden, 16–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E., & Polese, F. (2009). B2B is not an island! Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H. (1982). International marketing and purchasing of industrial goods an interaction approach. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: International Thomson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, T. (1954). Leviathan, or the matter, forme and power of a common wealth ecclesiastical and civil. London: Andrew Crooke (1651).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing Theory, 6(3), 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusch, R. F., Vargo, S. L., & Gustafsson, A. (2016). Fostering a trans-disciplinary perspectives of service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2957–2963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., & Spohrer, J. (2008). Fundamentals of service science. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 18–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J., & Frenk, S. (1985). Autopoiesi e cognizione: La realizzazione del vivente. Venezia: Marsilio Editori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, C., Pels, J., & Polese, F. (2010). A brief review of systems theories and their managerial applications. Service Science, 2(1-2), 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6(3), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahapaiet, J. E., & Goshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R., & Ramírez, R. (1994). Designing interactive strategy. Chichester: Wyley, (trad. it.) Le strategie interattive d’impresa, Etas, Milano, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Normann, R., & Ramírez, R. (1998). Designing interactive strategy: From value chain to value constellation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardi, F. (1998). Teoria dei Sistemi, in Enciclopedia delle scienze sociali (VIII, ed., pp. 19–26). Roma: Istituto Enciclopedia Italiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press (trad. it.) Il sistema sociale, Edizioni Comunità, Milano, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano, M. (1992). La comunicazione aziendale nelle imprese di servizi pubblici. Padova: Cedam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano, M. (1994). Sistemi di Management. Padova: Cedam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano, M. (2002). Il governo delle relazioni nei sistemi vitali socio-economici (n. 13). Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano, M. (2004). (a cura di) Il governo strategico dell’impresa. Torino: Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano, M. (2005). Il governo delle relazioni d’impresa. Sinergie, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano, M., & Perano, M. (2007). Esposito De Falco, S.: Analysis of the relational capital devaluation risks within the organization. In Proceedings of 10th International Conference Society for Global Business & Economic Development (SGBED). Kyoto, 8–11 August 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pels, J., Barile, S., Saviano, M., Polese, F., & Carrubbo, L. (2014). The contribution of VSA and SDL perspectives to strategic thinking in emerging economies. Managing Service Quality, 24(6), 565–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reficco, E., & Vernis, A. (2010). Market ecosystem and social inclusion. In P. Márquez, E. Reficco, & G. Berger (Eds.), Socially inclusive business in Iberoamerica: Challenges and opportunities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullani, E. (1989). La teoria dell’impresa: soggetti, sistemi, evoluzione. In M. Rispoli (Ed.), L’impresa industriale. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Broadway Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N., & Parvatiyar, A. (2000). Handbook of relationship marketing. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J., & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. IEEE Computer, 40(1), 71–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2008). The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production and Operations Management, 17(3), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., Anderson, J. L., Pass, N., & Ager, T. (2008). Service science and service dominant logic. Otago Forum, 2, 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2011). It’s all B2B… and beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 181–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicari, S. (1991). L’impresa vivente. Milano: Etas Libri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicari, S., Bertoli, G., & Busacca, B. (2000). Il valore delle relazioni di mercato. Nuove prospettive nelle analisi delle performance aziendali. Finanza, Marketing e Produzione, 5, 7–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. Foundation development, application. New York: Penguin University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1968). Systematic observational methods. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 2, 357–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sense-making in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, H., Polese, F., Vargo, S., & Lusch, R. (2012). Toward a service (eco) systems perspective on value creation. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 3(3), 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics, or, Control and communication in the animal and the machine. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Pellicano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pellicano, M., Ciasullo, M.V., Troisi, O., Casali, G.L. (2018). A Journey Through Possible Views of Relational Logic. In: Barile, S., Pellicano, M., Polese, F. (eds) Social Dynamics in a Systems Perspective. New Economic Windows. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61967-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics