Abstract
The chapter identifies an evaluation gap in the European literature on local public sector reforms and a lack of cross-sectoral comparisons of local services successfulness. It presents a common theoretical and methodological framework of studies included in this volume. There is still the north-west–south-east divide in the performance of the studies evaluating the successfulness of local service regimes and their reforms. The chapter introduces the concept and structure of this volume whose chapters deal with the evaluation of several local services regimes, the evaluation of comprehensive local service reforms in Europe, and the general issues of evaluating local services. The whole repertoire of evaluation approaches applicable to the local service delivery is briefly introduced. The explanatory function of evaluation is addressed as well as the problem of and possibilities for utilisation of evaluation-generated knowledge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Balthasar, A. (2012). Fremd- und Eigenevaluation kombinieren: Der „critical friend approach” als alternative. Zeitschrift für Evaluation, 11(2), 173–193.
Beywl, W. (1999). Nutzungsfokussierte evaluation von Humandienstleistungen. Sozialwissenschaften und Berufspraxis, 22(2), 143–150.
Brousselle, A., & Champagne, F. (2011). Program theory evaluation: Logic analysis. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(1), 69–78.
Chang, Y. C., & Chen, M. N. (2016). Service regime and innovation clusters: An empirical study from service firms in Taiwan. Research Policy, 45(9), 1845–1857.
Dahler-Larsen, P. (2005). Evaluation and public management. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. M., & Smith, P. C. (2009). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S. J., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Fouquet, A. (Ed.). (2013). L’évaluation des politiques publiques: état(s) de l’art et controverses (Evaluating public policies: Latest developments and controversies), Revue Française D’Administration Publique No. 148. Strasbourg: ENA.
Grossi, G., & Reichard, C. (2016). Variance in the institutions of local utility services: Evidence from several European Countries. In H. Wollmann, I. Koprić, & G. Marcou (Eds.), Public and social services in Europe: From public and municipal to private sector provision. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Koprić, I. (2010). Managing performance in the Western Balkan civil service structures. Bratislava: UNDP & RCPAR.
Koprić, I. (2017a). European administrative space—Myth, reality, and hopes. In I. Koprić & P. Kovač (Eds.), European administrative space: Spreading standards, building capacities. Bratislava: NISPAcee.
Koprić, I. (2017b, Forthcoming). Decentralization as a precarious component of contemporary European governance: From concepts to practice. In Mélanges en l’honneur du Professeur Gérard Marcou.
Koprić, I. (2017c). Public administration reforms in eastern Europe: Naive cultural following, hesitant Europeanization, or search for genuine changes? In P. Kovač & M. Bileišis (Eds.), Public administration reforms in eastern European Union member states. Post-accession convergence and divergence. Ljubljana: Faculty of Administration, University of Ljubljana and Vilnius: Mykolas Romeris University.
Koprić, I. & Džinić, J. (2016). Local and Regional governance in Europe: For a new comparative framework. In S. Guérard & A. Astraukas (Eds.), Local autonomy in the 21st century: Between tradition and modernisation. Paris: Institut Universitaire Varenne, Clermont-Ferrand.
Kuhlmann, S. (2010). Performance measurement in European local governments: A comparative analysis of reform experiences in great Britain. France, Sweden and Germany, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(2), 1–15.
Kuhlmann, S., Bogumil, J., & Grohs, S. (2008). Evaluating administrative modernization in German local government: Success of failure of the “New Steering Model”. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 851–863.
Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2011). The evaluation of institutional reforms at sub-national government levels: A still neglected research agenda. Local Government Studies, 37(5), 479–494.
Lippi, A., & Tsekos, T. (2017, forthcoming). Local public services in times of austerity in the mediterranean Europe.
Mathinson, S. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Myrick, D. (2013). A logical framework for monitoring and evaluation: A pragmatic approach to M&E. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 423–428.
Patton, M. (1994). Developmental evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 311–319.
Patton, M. (1997). Utilization focused evaluation (3rd ed.). Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. Sage: London.
Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, Policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.
Stake, R. E. (1983). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
Stake, R. E. (2004). Standard-based & responsive evaluation. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Stoker, G., & Evans, M. (2016). Evidence-based policy making in the social sciences. Methods that matter. Bristol: Policy Press.
Wollmann, H. (2001). Public sector reforms and evaluation: Trajectories and trends—An international overview. In H. Wollmann (Ed.), Evaluating public sector reforms: An international and comparative perspective. Revista Internacional de Estudos Politicos, 3, 11–37. Special issue.
Wollmann, H. (Ed.). (2003a). Evaluation in Public Sector Reform: Concepts and Practice in International Perspective. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Wollmann, H. (2003b). Evaluation in public-sector reform: Towards a third wave of evaluation? In H. Wollmann (Ed.), Evaluation in public sector reform: Concepts and practice in international perspective. Northampton: Edward Elgar).
Wollmann, H. (2007). Policy evaluation and evaluation research. In F. Fischer, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sydney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis. London: CRC Press.
Wollmann, H. (2016). Utilization of evaluation results in policy-making and administration: A challenge to political science research. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 16(3), 433–458.
Wollmann, H., & Marcou, G. (2010). The provision of public services in Europe: Between state, local government and market. Edward Elgar: Northampton.
Wollmann, H., Koprić, I., & Marcou, G. (Eds.). (2016). Public and social services in Europe: From public and municipal to private sector provision. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koprić, I., Wollmann, H. (2018). Evaluating Reforms of Local Public and Social Services in Europe. In: Koprić, I., Wollmann, H., Marcou, G. (eds) Evaluating Reforms of Local Public and Social Services in Europe. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61091-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61091-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61090-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61091-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)