Skip to main content

Servant Leadership and Gender

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Servant Leadership and Followership

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Leadership and Followership ((PASTLEFO))

Abstract

Some scholars claim servant leadership is a gender-neutral leadership style that may enhance perceptions of women leaders by de-emphasizing the masculine traits typically expected of leaders. However, others argue servant and leader are gender-laden terms, creating a superior-subordinate paradox that mirrors the female-leader paradox. Despite debate over whether servant leadership minimizes gender biases based in leader stereotypes, multiple case studies illustrate the way some women self-identify as servant leaders, attaining leadership roles through service. Servant leadership may allow women leaders to enact the social roles of gender and leader in authentic ways, leading to enhanced follower perceptions and ethical decision making consistent with a feminine ethic of care. Taken together, these possibilities make the intersections between servant leadership and gender worthy of continued exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alston, J. A. (2005). Tempered radicals and servant leaders: Black females persevering in the superintendency. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(4), 675–688. doi:10.1177/0013161X04274275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird Jr., J. E., & Bradley, P. H. (1979). Styles of management and communication: A comparative study of men and women. Communication Monographs, 46, 101–111. doi:10.1080/03637757909375995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbuto, J. E., & Gifford, G. T. (2010). Examining gender differences of servant leadership: An analysis of the agentic and communal properties of the servant leadership questionnaire. Journal of Leadership Education, 9(2), 4–22. doi:10.12806/v9/i2/rf1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M. C. (1990). Composing a life: Life as a work in progress—The improvisations of five extraordinary women. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Gosling, J., Marturano, A., & Dennison, P. (2003, June). A review of leadership theory and competency frameworks. Centre for Leadership Studies: University of Exeter. Retrieved from http://www2.fcsh.unl.pt/docentes/luisrodrigues/textos/Lideranca.pdf

  • Brescoll, V. L. (2016). Leading with their hearts? How gender stereotypes of emotion lead to biased evaluations of female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 415–428. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. C. (2009). Action, romance, or science fiction: Your favorite movie genre may affect your communication. American Communication Journal, 11(4), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians, C. (1997). The ethics of being in a communications context. In C. Christians & M. Traber (Eds.), Communication ethics and universal values (pp. 3–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christians, C. (2008). The ethics of universal being. In S. J. A. Ward & H. Wasserman (Eds.), Media ethics beyond borders: A global perspective (pp. 6–23). Johannesburg: Heinemann. Reprinted by New York: Routledge (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christians, C. (2015). The ethics of human dignity in a multicultural world. In B. Shan & C. Christians (Eds.), The ethics of intercultural communication (pp. 337–355). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. J., Burrus, C. J., & Meyer, R. D. (2014). Gender differences in the impact of leadership styles on subordinate embeddedness and job satisfaction. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 660–671. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crippen, C. L. (2004). Pioneer women of Manitoba: Evidence of servant leadership. Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 2(4), 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dambe, M., & Moorad, F. (2008). From power to empowerment: A paradigm shift in leadership. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(3), 575–587. doi:10.4314/sajhe.v22i3.25803.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pree, M. (1992). Leadership jazz. New York: Dell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowdy, J. K., & Hamilton, A. (2011). Lessons from a Black woman administrator: “I’m still here.”. The Negro Educational Review, 62/63(1–4), 189–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. J. (2013). Performance management coaching: Servant leadership and gender implications. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(3), 204–221. doi:10.1108/01437731311326657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00326.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. (2001). The leadership style of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569–591. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233–256. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125–145. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.1.125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Sczesny, S. (2009). Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed? In M. C. Barreto, M. K. Ryan, & M. T. Schmitt’s (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 21–47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11863-002.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735–754. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.46.4.735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eicher-Catt, D. (2005). The myth of servant-leadership: A feminist perspective. Women and Language, 28(1), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekinci, A. (2015). Development of the school principals’ servant leadership behaviors scale and evaluation of servant leadership behaviors according to teachers’ views. Education and Science, 40(179), 341–360. doi:10.15390/EB.2015.2152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Focht, A., & Ponton, M. (2015). Identifying primary characteristics of servant leadership: Delphi study. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 9(1), 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, R. A. (2015). Gender, authenticity and leadership: Thinking with Arendt. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. (1977). The servant as leader. Indianapolis, IN: Greenleaf Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoggart, S. (2013, October 16). Margaret Thatcher: Power and personality by Jonathan Aitken—Review. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/oct/16/margaret-thatcher-jonathan-aitken-review

  • Hogue, M. (2016). Gender bias in communal leadership: Examining servant leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(4), 837–849. doi:10.1108/JMP-10-2014-0292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, K. H. (1995). Beyond the double bind: Women and leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Ovando, M., & High, C. (2009). Female middle school principals’ voices: Implications for school leadership preparation. Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 7(2), 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karau, S. J., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Invited reaction: Gender, social roles, and the emergence of leaders. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(4), 321–327. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920100404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kark, R., & Eagly, A. H. (2010). Gender and leadership: Negotiating the labyrinth. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology (pp. 443–468). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1467-5_19.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kark, R., Waismel-Manor, R., & Shamir, B. (2012). Does valuing androgyny and femininity lead to a female advantage? The relationship between gender-role, transformational leadership and identification. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 620–640. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, R. A., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Blascovich, J. (1996). Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(11), 1128–1143. doi:10.1177/01461672962211004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616–642. doi:10.1037/a0023557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, J. (2008). Performing gender in the workplace: Gender socialization, power, and identity among women faculty members. Community College Review, 35(4), 277–305. doi:10.1177/0091552108314756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R., & Maher, K. (1991). Leadership and information processing: Linking perception and performance. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngunjiri, F. W. (2010). Women’s spiritual leadership in Africa: Tempered radicals and critical servant leaders. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oner, H. Z. (2009). Is servant leadership gender bound in the political arena? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association 67th Annual National Conference, The Palmer House Hilton, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponton, D. M. (2010). The female political leader: A study of gender-identity in the case of Margaret Thatcher. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(2), 195–218. doi:10.1075/jlp.9.2.02pon.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K. (2011). Servant-leadership as gender-integrative leadership: Paving a path for more gender-integrative organizations through leadership education. Journal of Leadership Education, 10(2), 155–171. doi:10.12806/v10/i2/rf8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez de Rubio, A., & Galvez-Kiser, A. (2015). Gender and age differences in servant leadership. Academy of Business Research Journal, 1, 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosette, A. S., Koval, C. Z., Ma, A., & Livingston, R. (2016). Race matters for women leaders: Intersectional effects on agentic deficiencies and penalties. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 429–445. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.01.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosette, A. S., Mueller, J. S., & Lebel, R. D. (2015). Are male leaders penalized for seeking help? The influence of gender and asking behaviors on competence perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 749–762. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L., & Smits, S. J. (1994). The feminization of leadership? Training and Development, 48(2), 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, L. (1995). Tracing the growing impact of servant leadership. In L. Spears (Ed.), Insights on servant leadership: Service, stewardship, spirit, and servant-leadership (pp. 1–12). New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F., & Voerman, E. (2010). Servant-Leadership across cultures: Harnessing the strength of the world’s most powerful management philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dierendonck, D., & Patterson, K. (Eds.). (2010). Servant leadership: Developments in theory and research. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dierendonck, D., & Patterson, K. (2015). Compassionate love as a cornerstone of servant leadership: An integration of previous theorizing and research. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 119–131. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2085-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weider-Hatfield, D. (1987). Differences in self-reported leadership behavior as a function of biological sex and psychological gender. Women’s Studies in Communication, 10, 1–14. doi:10.1080/07491409.1987.11089700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scicluna Lehrke, A., Sowden, K. (2017). Servant Leadership and Gender. In: Davis, C. (eds) Servant Leadership and Followership. Palgrave Studies in Leadership and Followership. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59366-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics