Skip to main content

Partnering with People with Disabilities to Prevent Interpersonal Violence: Organization Practices Grounded in the Social Model of Disability and Spectrum of Prevention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religion, Disability, and Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

The chapter provides a framework for religious organizations to contribute within their communities to prevent interpersonal violence of people with disabilities through collaboration with people with disabilities as equal members of their faith communities. Collaboration with people with disabilities requires moving from a medical model, deficit-based orientation of disability to a social, empowering, and strength-based model. This chapter examines how each model intersects with vulnerability to interpersonal violence. Prevention of interpersonal violence requires an understanding of how multiple factors (knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, behaviors, policies) and multiple system levels (individual, relationship, community/environmental, societal/cultural) interconnect, influence interpersonal violence, and can be targets for prevention. Prevention of interpersonal violence is examined using the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) public health perspective of primary, secondary, and tertiary intervention (a.k.a. prevention) and using the Prevention Institutes’ Spectrum of Prevention. Strategies for religious organizations to examine and modify organizational teachings, policies, and practices, which aim to prevent interpersonal violence or improve response to interpersonal violence perpetrated against people with disabilities, are grounded in the six-level Spectrum of Prevention. Engagement in each of the levels of prevention is predicated upon religious organizations recognizing their roles and responsibilities in preventing and responding to interpersonal violence of their members with disabilities. Emphasis is placed on coordinated community responses to address interpersonal violence. Given that people of faith may prefer to seek guidance and support from their own places of worship, rather than community-based secular organizations, it is imperative that religious organizations collaborate with other community agencies involved in prevention or response to interpersonal violence and organizations serving people with disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albee, G. W. (1983). Psychopathology, prevention, and the just society. Journal of Primary Prevention, 4, 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amado, A. N., & Simon, S. R. (2001/02). Congregational roles in community inclusion across the lifespan. Impact, 14(3), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association. (2017). What is public health? Retrieved from http://apha.org/what-is-public-health

  • Barker, R. L. (2014). The social work dictionary. Washington, DC: NASW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E. (2007). Including people with disabilities in faith communities: A guide for services providers, families, and congregations. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E. (2016). A place of belonging: Research at the intersection of faith and disability. Review and Expositor, 113(2), 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Sexual violence prevention: Beginning the dialogue. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015, March 25). The socio-ecological model: A framework for prevention. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/overview/social-ecologicalmodel.html

  • Charlton, J. I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability, oppression and empowerment. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chehimi, S., Cohen, L., & Valdovinos, E. (2011). The first place: Community prevention’s promise to advance health and equity. Environment & Urbanization, 23(1), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cnaan, R. A., & Boddie, S. C. (2002). Charitable choice and faith-based welfare: A call for social work. Social Work, 47(3), 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Swift, S. (1999). The spectrum of prevention: Developing a comprehensive approach to injury prevention. Retrieved from the Spectrum Institute website: https://www.preventioninstitute.org/publications/spectrum-prevention-developing-comprehensive-approach-injury-prevention

  • Cortes, C. E., & Wilkinson, L. C. (2009). Developing and implementing a multicultural vision. In M. A. Moodian (Ed.), Contemporary leadership and intercultural competence: Exploring the cross-cultural dynamics within organizations (pp. 17–31). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, M. J., & Love, T. (2009). Tools for change: An introduction to the primary prevention of sexual assault. Austin, TX: Texas Association Against Sexual Assault.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R., Parks, L. F., & Cohen, L. (2006). Sexual violence and the spectrum of prevention: Towards a community solution. Retrieved from the National Sexual Violence Resource Center website: http://www.nsvrc.org

  • Delehanty, J. D. (2016). Prophets of resistance: Social justice activist contesting comfortable church culture. Sociology of Religion, 77(1), 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiesland, N. (2001/02). Liberation, inclusion, and justice: A faith response to persons with disabilities. Impact: Feature Issue on Faith Communities and Persons with Developmental Disabilities, 14(3), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, M. A. (2008). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, N. (2009). Combating violence and abuse of people with disabilities: A call to action. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, N. (2016). Justice for crime victims with disabilities in the criminal justice system. An examination of barriers and impetus for change. University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 13(1), 33–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garces-Foley, K. (2007). Opportunities and new values: The emergence of the multicultural church. The Annual of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 612, 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, M. M., Kane, L. W., Taylor, C., Francis, S. H., & Hodapp, R. M. (2011). Characteristics of inclusive faith communities: A preliminary survey of inclusive practices in the United States. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25, 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollomotz, A. (2009). Beyond ‘vulnerability’: An ecological model approach to conceptualizing risk of sexual violence against people with learning difficulties. British Journal of Social Work, 39(1), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollomotz, A. (2011). Learning difficulties and sexual vulnerability: A social approach. London, UK: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollomotz, A. (2012). Disability, oppression, and violence: Towards a sociological explanation. Sociology, 47(3), 477–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, S. (2012, February). Promoting equal and respectful relationships in faith communities: A manual and toolkit. The Northern Interfaith Respectful Relationships Project a partnership between Darebin City Council & The Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. Retrieved from www.darebin.vic.gov.au

  • Jenkins, J. J. (2014). A “community” of discipline: The paradox of diversity within an intercultural church. Western Journal of Communication, 78(2), 134–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joeckel, S. (2006). A Christian approach to disabilities studies: A prolegomenon. Christian Scholars Review, 35(3), 323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. S., & Fowler, T. S. (2009). A faith community-domestic violence partnership. Social Work and Christianity, 36(4), 415–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karger, H. J., & Stoesz, D. (2014). Religion and social welfare policy. In American social welfare policy: A pluralist approach (pp. 35–50). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, L. (2015). Disability statistics annual report. Retrieved from University of New Hampshire, Institute on Disability, Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics website: http://www.disabilitycompendium.org

  • Levin, J. (2013). Engaging the faith community for public health advocacy: An agenda for the surgeon general. Journal of Religious Studies, 52, 368–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J. (2014). Faith-based initiatives in health promotion: History, challenges, and current partnerships. American Journal of Health Promotion, 26(3), 139–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. I., Sto Domingo, M. R., & Westin, A. M. L. (2013). Addressing religion and psychology in communities: The congregation as intervention site, community resources, and community influence. In K. I. Pargament & A. Mahoney (Eds.), APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (vol 2): An applied psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 613–632). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Partnership to End Interpersonal Violence Across the Lifespan. (2016). A national plan to end interpersonal violence across the lifespan. Retrieved from the Insitute on Violence, Abuse & Trauma website: http://www.ivatcenters.org/national-plan/

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman-McNaney, R. (2001/02). Disability through a lens of inclusion: A theological framework for welcoming all. Impact: Feature Issue on Faith Communities and Persons with Developmental Disabilities, 14(3), 1, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osburn, J. (1998). An overview of social role valorization theory. The International Social Role Valorization Journal, 3(1), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobsey, D. (1994). Violence and abuse in the lives of people with disabilities: The end of silent acceptance? Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, J. (2009). Engaging bystanders in sexual violence prevention. Enola, PA: National Sexual Violence Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • The White House. (n.d.). Office of faith-based and neighborhood partnerships. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ofbnp/about

  • Thogmartin-Cleaver, L. (2001/02). Gifted, called, and differently-abled. Impact: Feature Issue on Faith Communities and Persons with Developmental Disabilities, 14(3), 1, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. (2002). Disability theory: Key ideas, issues, and thinkers. In C. Barnes, M. Oliver, & L. Barton (Eds.), Disability studies today (pp. 38–57). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, J., Polloway, E. A., & Smith, D. (2006). Inclusion of people with mental retardation and other developmental disabilities in communities of faith. Mental Retardation, 44(2), 100–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy M. Fitzsimons PhD, MSW, LISW .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fitzsimons, N.M. (2017). Partnering with People with Disabilities to Prevent Interpersonal Violence: Organization Practices Grounded in the Social Model of Disability and Spectrum of Prevention. In: Johnson, A., Nelson, J., Lund, E. (eds) Religion, Disability, and Interpersonal Violence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56901-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56901-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56900-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56901-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics