Abstract
In this chapter, the author describes nonverbal test methodologies for the assessment of personality and psychopathology, some of which date back to the beginning of personality assessment in psychology. Methods include drawing techniques, object placement and play techniques, and self-rating and self-report techniques. While adding a potentially valuable set of tools to assessment, these methods have some substantial strengths and weaknesses. For example, the Nonverbal Personality Questionnaire (Paunonen and Jackson 1998) offers the strength of fully adequate psychometric properties while demonstrating good cross-cultural transferability, without the need for item translations. In contrast, no current system of scoring and interpreting human figure drawings appears to have adequate reliability and validity for personality assessment, and it appears difficult to justify continued use of projective drawing measures for any clinical or educational decision-making purposes. Research on nonverbal methods demonstrates that nonverbal techniques can be constructed to tap conventional constructs, like big five personality traits, and constructs that are not easily accessible with traditional verbal methodologies, like family relations, cohesiveness, and hierarchy. While the last two decades have seen a pronounced swing toward direct, face-valid, objective, and explicit assessment methods, nonverbal methods offer alternative methods that are less direct and more implicit. Moreover, nonverbal assessment methodologies are somewhat less obvious in their targeted constructs, thereby being less susceptible to the effects of examinee dissimulation and impression management.
Keywords
- Personality Assessment
- Drawing Test
- Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
- Drawing Task
- Behavior Rating Scale
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achenbach, T. M. (2011). Commentary: Definitely more than measurement error: But how should we understand and deal with informant discrepancies? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(1), 80–86.
Achenbach, T. M., Krukowki, R. A., Dumenci, L., & Ivanova, M. Y. (2005). Assessment of adult psychopathology: Meta-analyses and implications of cross-informant comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 361–382.
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.
Aitken, R. C. B. (1969). Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 62, 989–993.
Aoki, S. (1981). The retest reliability of the sand play technique: II. British Journal of Projective Psychology & Personality Study, 26, 25–33.
Archer, R. P., Handel, R. W., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2016). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-adolescent restructured form (MMPI-A-RF). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Arruda, J. E., Stern, R. A., & Legendre, S. A. (1996). Assessment of mood state in patients undergoing electroconvulsive therapy: The utility of visual analog mood scales developed for cognitively impaired patients. Convulsive Therapy, 12, 207–212.
Bardos, A. N., & Doropoulou, M. (2014). Draw-a-person screening procedure for emotional disturbance validity evidence. In L. Handler & A. D. Thomas (Eds.), Drawings in assessment and psychotherapy: Research and application (pp. 42–57). New York: Routledge.
Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Beck depression inventory manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Beck depression inventory manual (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Bell, J. E. (1948). Projective techniques: A dynamic approach to the study of the personality. New York: Longmans, Green.
Bender, L. (1938). A visual motor gestalt test and its clinical use. Research monograph No. 3. New York: American Orthopsychiatric Association.
Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2008). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 restructured form): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Bernreuter, R. G. (1931). Bernreuter personality inventory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174, 727–735.
Buck, J. N. (1948). The H-T–P technique: A qualitative and quantitative scoring manual. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4, 317–396.
Buck, J. N., & Warren, W. L. (1992). House–tree–person projective drawing technique (H–T–P): Manual and interpretive guide. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Buhler, C. (1951a). The World test: A projective technique. Journal of Child Psychiatry, 2, 4–23.
Buhler, C. (1951b). The World test: Manual of directions. Journal of Child Psychiatry, 2, 69–81.
Buhler, C., & Kelly, G. (1941). The World test. A measurement of emotional disturbance. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Burns, R. C. (1982). Self-growth in families: Kinetic family drawings (K–F–D): Research and application. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Burns, R. C., & Kaufman, S. H. (1970). Kinetic family drawings (K–F–D): An introduction to understanding children through kinetic drawings. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Burns, R. C., & Kaufman, S. H. (1972). Actions, styles, and symbols in Kinetic family drawings (K–F–D): An interpretive manual. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory—2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional psychology: Research & practice, 31, 141–154.
Cummings, J. A. (1986). Projective drawings. In H. M. Knoff (Ed.), The assessment of child and adolescent personality (pp. 199–244). New York: Guilford.
Derogatis, L. R. (1987). The Derogatis stress profile (DSP): Quantification of psychological stress. Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine, 17, 30–54.
Dumont, F., & Smith, D. (1996). Projectives and their infirm research base. Professional psychology: Research and practice, 27, 419–421.
Exner, J. E. (1993). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system. Volume 1: Basic foundations (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Eysenck, H. J. (1990). The decline and fall of the Freudian empire. Washington, DC: Scott-Townsend.
Flanagan, R., & Motta, R. W. (2007). Figure drawings: A popular method. Psychology in the Schools, 44(3), 257–270.
Frank, L. K. (1939). Projective methods for the study of personality. Journal of Psychology, 8, 389–413.
Frank, L. K. (1948). Projective methods. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Freyd, M. (1923). The graphic rating scale. Journal of Educational Psychology, 14, 83–102.
Ganellen, R. J. (2007). Assessing normal and abnormal personality functioning: Strengths and weaknesses of self-report, observer, and performance-based methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 30–40.
Garb, H. N. (1999). Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot in clinical and forensic settings. Assessment, 6, 313–317.
Gehring, T. M. (1998). The Family system test (FAST). Seattle WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
Gehring, T. M., Debry, M., & Smith, P. K. (Eds.). (2001). The Family system test: Theory and application. Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
Gehring, T. M., & Marti, D. (2001). Concept and psychometric properties of the FAST. In T. M. Gehring, M. Debry, & P. K. Smith (Eds.), The Family system test (FAST): Theory and application (pp. 3–27). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.
Gehring, T. M., & Page, J. (2000). Family system test (FAST): A systemic approach for family evaluation in clinical practice and research. In K. Gitlin-Weiner, A. Sandgrund, & C. Schaefer (Eds.), Play diagnosis and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 419–445). New York: Wiley.
Gitlin-Weiner, K., Sandgrund, A., & Schaefer, C. (Eds.). (2000). Play diagnosis and assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48(1), 26.
Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: World Book AQ: Company.
Handler, L., & Habenicht, D. (1994). The Kinetic family drawing technique: A review of the literature. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 440–464.
Harris, D. B. (1963). Children’s drawings as measures of intellectual maturity. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Hartshorne, H., & May, M. (1928). Tests of honesty and trustworthiness. New York: Association Press.
Holt, R. R. (1992). The contemporary crises of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought, 15, 375–403.
Hong, R., & Paunonen, S. V. (2008). Nonverbal personality assessment. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and testing (pp. 485–507). London: Sage.
Homberger, E. [Erikson, E. H.] (1938). Dramatic productions test. In H. A. Murray (Ed.), Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age (pp. 552–582). New York: Oxford University Press.
Huprich, S. K., Bornstein, R. F., & Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Self-report methodology is insufficient for improving the assessment and classification of Axis II personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(5), 557–570.
Hutt, M. L. (1985). The Hutt adaptation of the Bender-Gestalt test (4th ed.). New York: Grune & Stratton.
Imuta, K., Scarf, D., Pharo, H., & Hayne, H. (2013). Drawing a close to the use of human figure drawings as a projective measure of intelligence. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e58991.
Jackson, D. N. (1971). A sequential system for personality scale development. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 61–92). New York: Academic Press.
Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality research form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists.
Kahill, S. (1984). Human figure drawing in adults: An update of the empirical evidence, 1967–1982. Canadian Psychology, 25, 269–292.
Klein, R. G. (1986). Questioning the clinical usefulness of projective psychological tests for children. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 7, 378–382.
Knoff, H. M. (1993). The utility of human figure drawings in personality and intellectual assessment: Why ask why? School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 191–196.
Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Lamersa, S., Westerhofa, G. J., Kovácsb, V., & Bohlmeijera, E. T. (2012). Differential relationships in the association of the Big Five personality traits with positive mental health and psychopathology. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 517–524.
Levick, M. F. (2000). The Levick emotional and cognitive art therapy assessment (LECATA rev ed.). Boca Raton, FL: South Florida Art Psychotherapy Institute.
Levick, M. F. (2009). Levick emotional and cognitive art therapy assessment: A normative study. Bloomington, IN: AuthorHouse.
Lindzey, G. (1961). Projective techniques and cross-cultural research. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Lowenfeld, M. (1939). The world pictures of children; A method of recording and studying them (Paper read on March 23rd, 1938 to the medical section of the British Psychological Society). British Journal of Medical Psychology, 18, 65–101.
Lowenfeld, M. (1979). The World Technique. London: Allen & Unwin.
Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure (A method of personality investigation). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Martin, R. P. (1983). The ethical issues in the use and interpretation of the Draw-a-person test and other similar projective procedures. School Psychologist, 38(6), 8.
Matto, H. C. (2001). Investigating the clinical utility of the Draw-a-person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance (DAP:SPED) projective test in assessment of high-risk youth. A measurement validation study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(2), 2920.
Matto, H. C. (2002). Investigating the validity of the Draw-a-person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance: A measurement validation study with high-risk youth. Psychological Assessment, 14(2), 221–225.
Matto, H. C., Naglieri, J. A., & Clausen, C. (2005). Validity of the Draw-a-person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance (DAP: SPED) in strengths-based assessment. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(1), 41–46.
McGrath, R. E., & Carroll, E. J. (2012). The current status of “projective” “tests” American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13619-018
McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1981). Profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
McNeish, T. J., & Naglieri, J. A. (1993). Identification of individuals with serious emotional disturbance using the Draw a person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance. Journal of Special Education, 27, 115–121.
Michael, J. C., & Buhler, C. (1945). Experiences with personality testing in the neuropsychiatric department of a general hospital. Diseases of the Nervous System, 6, 205–211.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families & family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating phantasies: The thematic apperception test. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 34, 289–306.
Motta, R. W., Little, S. G., & Tobin, M. I. (1993a). A picture is worth less than a thousand words: Response to reviewers. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 197–199.
Motta, R. W., Little, S. G., & Tobin, M. I. (1993b). The use and abuse of human figure drawings. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 162–169.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Naglieri, J. A. (1988). Draw a person: A quantitative scoring system. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Naglieri, J. A., McNeish, T. J., & Bardos, A. N. (1991). Draw a person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance (DAP: SPED). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Naglieri, J. A., & Pfeiffer, S. I. (1992). Performance of disruptive behavior disordered and normal samples on the Draw a person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance. Psychological Assessment, 4, 156–159.
Nyenhuis, D. L., Stern, R. A., Yamamoto, C., Luchetta, T., & Arruda, J. E. (1997). Standardization and validation of the Visual analog mood scales. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 407–415.
Oltmanns, T. F., & Carlson, E. (2013). Informant reports and the assessment of personality disorders using the five-factor model. In T. A. Widiger & P. T. Costa (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (3rd ed., pp. 233–248). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2002). The nonverbal assessment of personality: The NPQ and the FF-NPQ. In B. de Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big five assessment. Hogrefe & Huber: Göttingen, Germany.
Paunonen, S. V., Ashton, M. C., & Jackson, D. N. (2001). Nonverbal assessment of the big five personality factors. European Journal of Personality, 15, 3–18.
Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (1998). Nonverbal personality questionnaire (NPQ). Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., & Keinonen, M. (1990). The structured nonverbal assessment of personality. Journal of Personality, 58, 481–502.
Paunonen, S. V., Jackson, D. N., Trzebinski, J., & Forsterling, F. (1992). Personality structure across cultures: A multimethod evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 447–456.
Paunonen, S. V., Keinonen, M., Trzebinski, J., Forsterling, F., Grishenko-Roze, N., Kouznetsova, L., et al. (1996). The structure of personality in six cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 339–353.
Paunonen, S. V., Zeidner, M., Engvik, H. A., Oosterveld, P., & Maliphant, R. (2000). The nonverbal assessment of personality in five cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 220–239.
Quaglia, R., Longobardi, C., Iotti, N. O., & Prino, L. E. (2015). A new theory on children’s drawings: Analyzing the role of emotion and movement in graphical development. Infant Behavior & Development, 39, 81–91.
Remington, M., Tyrer, P. J., Newson-Smith, J., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1979). Comparative reliability of categorical and analog rating scales in the assessment of psychiatric symptomatology. Psychological Medicine, 9, 765–770.
Rescorla, L. A., Achenbach, T. M., Ivanova, M. Y., et al. (2016). Collateral reports and cross-informant agreement about adult psychopathology in 14 societies. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38, 381–397.
Rescorla, L. A., Bochicchio, L., Achenbach, T. M., et al. (2014). Parent–teacher agreement on children’s problems in 21 societies. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(4), 627–642.
Reynolds, C. R., & Hickman, J. A. (2004). Draw-a-person intellectual ability test for children, adolescents, and adults: Examiner’s manual. Pro-Ed.
Rorschach, H. (1921). Psychodiagnostik. Bern: Ernst Bircher.
Scott, W. D. (1919). Personnel system of the U.S. army (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Sjolund, M. (1981). Play-diagnosis and therapy in Sweden: The Erica-method. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 322–325.
Sjolund, M. (1993). The Erica method: A technique for play therapy and diagnosis: A training guide. Greeley, CO: Carron.
Sjolund, M., & Schaefer, C. E. (1994). The Erica method of sand play diagnosis and assessment. In K. J. O’Connor & C. E. Schaefer (Eds.), Handbook of play therapy (Vol. 2, pp. 231–252)., Advances and innovations New York: Wiley.
Smith, D., & Dumont, F. (1995). A cautionary study: Unwarranted interpretations of the draw-a-person test. Professional psychology: Research & practice, 26, 298–303.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., & Lushene, R. E. (1970). The State-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Stern, R. A. (1997). Visual analog mood scales professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Stern, R. A., Arruda, J. E., Hooper, C. R., Wolfner, G. D., & Morey, C. E. (1997). Visual analogue mood scales to measure internal mood state in neurologically impaired patients: Description and initial validity evidence. Aphasiology, 11, 59–71.
Stern, R. A., Daneshvar, D., & Poon, S. (2010). The Visual Analog Mood Scales. In S. Brumfitt (Ed.), Psychological well being and acquired communication impairments (pp. 116–136). West Sussex, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stern, R. A., Rosenbaum, J., White, R. F., & Morey, C. E. (1991). Clinical validation of a visual analogue dysphoria scale for neurologic patients (Abstract). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 106.
Swenson, C. H. (1968). Empirical evaluations of human figure drawings: 1957–1966. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 20–44.
Tharinger, D. J., & Stark, K. D. (1990). A qualitative versus quantitative approach to evaluating the draw-a-person and kinetic family drawing: A study of mood-and anxiety-disorder children. Psychological Assessment, 2, 365–375.
Thomas, G. V., & Jolley, R. P. (1998). Drawing conclusions: A re-examination of empirical and conceptual bases for psychological evaluation of children from their drawings. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 127–139.
Vass, Z. (1998). The inner formal structure of the H-T-P drawings: An exploratory study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54, 611–619.
Vass, Z. (1999). Projektív rajzvizsgálat algoritmusokkal (A számítógépes formai elemzés módszerének bemutatása a szkizofrénia képi kifejezodésének tükrében) (Analysis of projective drawings with algorithms. The method of computer assisted formal analysis, validated in visual expression of schizophrenia). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University of Sciences.
Vass, Z. (2012). A psychological interpretation of drawings and paintings. The SSCA method: A systems analysis approach. Pécs, Hungary: Alexandra Publishing/Pècsi Direkt Ltd. (Available from http://kre.academia.edu/VassZoltán)
Wagner, E. E. (1999). Defining projective techniques: The irrelevancy of “projection”. North American Journal of Psychology, 1, 35–40.
Wood, J. M., Garb, H. N., Nezworski, M. T., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Duke, M. C. (2015). A second look at the validity of widely used Rorschach indices: Comment on Mihura, Meyer, Dumitrascu, and Bombel (2013). Psychological Bulletin, 141, 236–249.
Woodworth, R. S. (1917). Personal data sheet. Chicago: C. H. Stoelting Company.
Wrightson, L., & Saklofske, D. H. (2000). Validity and reliability of the Draw a person: Screening procedure for emotional disturbance with adolescent students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 16, 95–102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wasserman, J.D. (2017). Nonverbal Assessment of Personality and Psychopathology. In: McCallum, R. (eds) Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50604-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50604-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-50602-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-50604-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)