Skip to main content

Impact of Biological Invasions on Infrastructure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services

Abstract

Non-native species cause significant damage to hard infrastructure across the globe, affecting buildings, transportation, water and energy supplies. This review provides a broad account of non-native species impacts on infrastructure with links, directly or indirectly, to ecosystem services where relevant. The impacts of non-native species on hard infrastructure are discussed, with examples taken from around the world of some of the most prominent impacts. Of the non-native species listed as among the world’s worst 100 species by the IUCN, 14 are recognised as having impacts on hard infrastructure, with damage to buildings being most common (9 species) followed by energy and water (7 species each) and finally transport (5 species). Several species affect more than one infrastructure type, particularly for water and hydroelectric energy infrastructure. Using Great Britain as a case study, the economic costs arising from infrastructure impacts by non-native species are reviewed. Overall, a conservative estimate of the direct cost of non-native species to infrastructure in 2010 was approximately £310 million per annum, comprising 18 % of the overall cost of non-native species to Great Britain (£1.7billion).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Airoldi L, Turon X, Perkol-Finkel S et al (2015) Corridors for aliens but not for natives: effects of marine urban sprawl at a regional scale. Divers Distrib 21:755–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge DC, Elliott P, Moggridge GD (2004) The recent and rapid spread of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Great Britain. Biol Conserv 119(2):253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery ML, Yoder CA, Tilman EA (2008) Diazacon inhibits reproduction in invasive monk parakeet population. J Wildl Manag 72(6):149–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayodo T, Jagero N (2012) The economic, educational and social responsibilities of elders development groups in lake Victoria region. Acad Res Int 2(3):610–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Bax N, Hayes K, Marshall A et al (2002) Man-made marinas as sheltered islands for alien marine organisms: establishment and eradication of an alien invasive marine species. In: Turning the tide: the eradication of invasive species, IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. IUCN [World Conservation Union], Gland/Cambridge, pp 26–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein R (2001) Kudzu’s invasion into Southern United States life and culture. In: The great reshuffling: human dimensions of invasive species. IUCN, Gland, pp 55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Booy O, Wade PM, White V (2008) Invasive species management for infrastructure managers and the construction industry. Construction Industry Research & Information Association, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Catford J (2017) Hydrological impacts of biological invasion. In: Vilà M, Hulme PE (eds) Impact of biological invasions on ecosystem services. Springer, Cham, pp 63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Essl F, Bacher S, Blackburn TM et al (2015) Crossing frontiers in tackling pathways of biological invasions. BioScience 65:769–782, biv082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritts TH (2002) Economic costs of electrical system instability and power outages caused by snakes on the Island of Guam. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 49:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giessow J, Casanova J, Leclerc R et al (2011) Arundo donax (giant reed): distribution and impact report. California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC), California

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez E, Huerto R, Saldana P et al (1996) Strategies for water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) control in Mexico. Hydrobiologia 340(1–3):181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdich DM (1999) The negative effects of established crayfish introductions. Crustacean Issues 11:31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • IPIECA (2010) Alien invasive species and the oil and gas industry: guidance for prevention and management, International Association of Oil & Gas Producers OGP report number 436. IPIECA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Julien MH, Hill MP, Center TD et al (2006) Biological and integrated control of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes. In: Proceedings of the second meeting of the Global Working Group for the Biological and Integrated Control of Water Hyacinth, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Beijing, China, 9–12 October 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Kateregga E, Sterner T (2006) Indicators for an invasive species: water hyacinths in Lake Victoria. Ecol Indic 227:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Lax AR, Osbrink WLA (2003) United States Department of Agriculture – agriculture research service research on targeted management of the Formosan subterranean termite Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Pest Manag Sci 59(6–7):788–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe A, Browne M, Boudjelas S et al (2000) 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. Invasive Species Specialist Group, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland DG, Nelson LS, Grodowitz MJ et al (2004) Salvinia molesta DS Mitchell (Giant Salvinia) in the United States: A review of species ecology and approaches to management, No. ERDC/EL-SR-04-2. Engineer Research and Development Centre, Environmental Lab, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlan C, Gallardo B, Aldridge DC (2014) How complete is our knowledge of the ecosystem services impacts of Europe’s top 10 invasive species? Acta Oecol 54:119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman JR, Newman CM, Lindsay JR et al (2008) Monk parakeets: an expanding problem on power lines and other electrical utility structures. In: Goodrich-Mahoney JW, Abrahamson LP, Ballard JL et al (eds) Environmental concerns in rights-of-way management: eighth international symposium. September 2004, Saratoga Springs, New York, USA, pp 355–363

    Google Scholar 

  • OTA (1993) U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565. U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington, DC, September

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree K (1991) An assessment of the potential impact of alien invasive vegetation on the geomorphology of river channels in South Africa. Afr J Aquat Sci 17:28–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust M (2008) Cockroaches. In: Bonnefoy X, Kampen H, Sweeney K (eds) Public health significance of urban pests. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer DF, Colby L, Norris GR (2013) An evaluation of flooding risks associated with giant reed (Arundo donax). J Freshw Ecol 28:397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streftaris N, Zenetos A (2006) Alien marine species in the mediterranean – the 100 ‘worst invasives’ and their impact. Mediterr Mar Sci 7:87–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams F, Eschen R, Harris A et al (2010) The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain, CABI report. CABI, Wallingford, p 198

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg R, Cock MJW (2001) Invasive alien species: a toolkit of best prevention and management practices. CABI, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zenetos A, Ballesteros E, Verlaque M (2012) Alien species in the Mediterranean Sea by 2012. A contribution to the application of European Union’s Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Part 2. Introduction trends and pathways. Mediterr Mar Sci 13(2):328–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olaf Booy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Booy, O., Cornwell, L., Parrott, D., Sutton-Croft, M., Williams, F. (2017). Impact of Biological Invasions on Infrastructure. In: Vilà, M., Hulme, P. (eds) Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45121-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics