Skip to main content

MicroFinancial Services and Risk Management for Food Security: A Vulnerable Household Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Food Security and Sustainability
  • 1250 Accesses

Abstract

Microfinance has been perceived as a positive force in stimulating entrepreneurship, and regional and national development. Essentially there is a strong belief that other than narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor, access to microfinance creates a culture or a movement towards social responsibility for the subset of the population that is subjected to both social and financial exclusion. There is evidence supporting the fact that microfinancial services can promote food security and income and consumption smoothing for vulnerable households. However, there seem to be problems that cannot be ironed out just by providing access to these services as vulnerable householders are subjected to immense social and financial pressures. Nevertheless, there are mechanisms supporting vulnerable groups to be more empowered and enabling capacity build to overcome income and consumption shocks and thus reducing vulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, D., & Von Pischke, J. D. (1992). Micro-enterprise credit programs: De´ja` vu. World Development, 20(10), 1463–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlin, C., Lin, J., & Maio, M. (2009). Where does microfinance flourish? Microfinance institution performance in macroeconomic context. Journal of Development Economics, 95(2), 105–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, M. (2010). Why doesn’t microfinance work? The destructive rise of local neoliberalism. New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, M., & Chang, H. (2012). Microfinance and the illusion of development: From Hubris to Nemesis in thirty years. World Economic Review, 1, 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beall, J. (2002). Globalisation and social exclusion in cities: Framing the debate with lessons from Africa and Asia (DESTIN Working Paper Series 02–27). London: London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society-towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R. (1988a). Nutrition, health, birth order and seasonality: Intra-household allocation among Children in Rural India. Journal of Development Economics, 28, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. R. (1988b). Intra-household allocation of nutrients in Rural India: Are boys favoured? Do parents exhibit inequality aversion. Oxford Economic Papers, 40, 32–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J., & Deolalikar, A. (1990). The intra-household demand for nutrients in Rural South India: Individual estimates, fixed effects and permanent income. The Journal of Human Resources, 25(4), 665–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, P., & Rai. A. (2002). Collateral Substitutes for Microfinance. http://economics.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Workshops-Seminars/Development/rai-021104.pdf; accessed October 2016.

  • Brown, L. D., & Ashman, D. (1996). Participation, social capital and intersectoral problem solving: African and Asian cases. World Development, 24(9), 1467–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, J. (2002). Inequality and the polarizing impact of microcredit: Evidence from Zambia’s Copperbelt. Journal of International Development, 14(6), 743–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copestake, J., Bhalotra, S., & Johnson, S. (2001). Assessing the impact of microcredit: A Zambian case study. The Journal of Development Studies, 37(4), 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Counts, A. (1997). Voices from the Field: Interviews with Microcredit Practioners for The Poor.Cashpor/Grameen Bank Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • David, C., & Meyer, W. (1980). Measuring the farm level impact of agricultural loans in low income countries: A review article. In J. Howell (Ed.), Borrowers and lenders: Rural financial markets and institutions in developing countries. London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, A. S. (1992). Understanding consumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Van Oudheusden, P. (2015). The Global Findex Database 2014: Measuring Financial Inclusion around the World (Policy Research Working Paper 7255). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S., & Krishnan, P. (2000). In sickness and in health: Risk-sharing within households in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Political Economy, 108, 688–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, S. (2002). State of disaster: Causes, consequences and policy lessons from Malawi. Lilongwe: ActionAid Malawi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diagne, A., Zeller, M., & Sharma, M. (1998). Determinants of household access to and participation in formal and informal credit markets in Malawi and Bangladesh. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Economics Association, Chicago, IL, January 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dichter, T. (2007). The chicken and egg dilemma in microfinance: An historical analysis of the sequence of growth and credit in the economic development of the North. In T. Dichter & M. Harper (Eds.), What’s wrong with microfinance? (pp. 179–192). Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, T. E. (1992). Climate change and vulnerable places: Global food security and country studies in Zimbabwe, Kenya, Senegal and Chile (Research Report No 1). Oxford: Environmental Change Unit, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J., & Sen, A. K. (1989). Entitlement and deprivation. InHunger and public action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, J., & Sen, A. K. (Eds.) (1990). The political economy of hunger. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder, G., Just, R. E., & Zilberman, D. (1985). Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33, 255–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folbre, N. (1986). Hearts and spades: Paradigms of household economics. World Development, 14(2), 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fosu, A. K. (2010). Inequality, income, and poverty: Comparative global evidence. Social Science Quarterly, 91(5), 1432–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grootaert, C. (1998). Social capital, household welfare, and poverty in Indonesia. Mimeograph. Social Development Department, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Network, The World Bank. September 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, J. I., & Peters, P. E. (1987). “Introduction” to: Conceptualizing the household: Issues of theory and policy in Africa. Development and Change, 18(2), 197–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HLPE. (2013). Investing in smallholder agriculture for food security. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome: High Level Panel of Experts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, R., & Jones, N. (2009). Putting the social back into social protection: A framework for understanding the linkages between economic and social risks for poverty reduction. London: Overseas Development Institute Background Note.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAD (2011). Rural Poverty Report 2011: New realities, new challenges, new opportunities for tomorrow’s generation. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, and achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30, 435–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. (2001). Resources, agency, achievement: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. In B. Severfjord, et al. (Ed.), Discussing women’s empowerment-theory and practice (No. 3). SIDA Study.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, T. (2007). Impact of microfinance on rural households in the Philippines: A case study from the special evaluation study on the effects of microfinance operations on poor households and the status of women. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacalle-Caldero´n, M., & Rico-Garrido, S. (2006). Los microcre´ditos: una oportunidad de inclusio´n laboral. Finance and the Common Good, 25, 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnerooth-Bayer, J., & Mechler, R. (2009) Insurance against Losses from Natural Disasters in Developing Countries. DESA Working Paper No. 85 ST/ESA/2009/DWP/85 [online]. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations. Available at: http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2009/wp85_2009.pdf

  • Lenoir, R. (1974/1989). Les Exclus: Un Francais sur Dix (2nd ed.). Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (1996). The concept of social exclusion and the new “Durkheimian” hegemony. Critical Social Policy, 46, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2000). What is social exclusion? In D. Gordon & P. Townsend (Eds.), Breadline Europe: The measurement of poverty. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R. (2005). The inclusive society: Social exclusion and New Labour (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E., & Patsios, D. (2007). The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion. Bristol Institute for Public Affairs, University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liversage, H. (2010). Responding to ‘land grabbing’ and promoting responsible investment in Agriculture (IFAD Occasional Paper, No 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, D. (1995). Land, labor, food, and farming: A household analysis of urban agriculture in Kampala, Uganda. Ph.D. dissertation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. (1994). Poverty and vulnerability. American Economic Review (AEA Papers and Proceedings), 84, 221–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. (1999). Between the market and state: Can informal insurance patch the safety net? World Bank Research Observer, 14, 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. (2004). Consumption smoothing across space: Testing theories of risk-sharing in the ICRISAT study region of South India. In S. Dercon (Ed.), Insurance against poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, J. (2006). Micro-insurance: The next revolution? What have we learned about poverty? In A. Banerjee, R. Benabou, & D. Mookherjee (Eds.), Understanding poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder-Sibanda, M., Sibanda-Mulder, F. S., d’Alois, L., & Verna, D. (2002). Malnutrition in food-surplus areas: Experience from nutritional surveillance for decentralized planning in Haiti. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 23, 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navare, J., & Handley-Schacler, M. (2016). Financial aggregation of risks for MSMEs in developing economies: A conceptual framework of financial aggregation and microinsurance effects. Working paper for submission, ESRC Seminar series Small Business Social Responsibility: Global Perspectives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivares, M., & Santos, S. (2009). Market solutions in poverty: The role of microcredit in development countries with financial restrictions. (School of Economics and Management, Technical University of Lisbon working paper ISSN N° 0874-4548).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M. M, Rosenzweig, M. R, and. Hassan, M. N (1990). Productivity, health, and inequality in the intrahousehold distribution of food in low income countries. The American Economic Review, 80 5, 1139–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M. M., Khandker, S. R., Choudhury, O. H., & Millimet, D. L. (2003). Credit programs for the poor and the health status of children in rural Bangladesh. International Economic Review, 44, 87–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. S. (2001). The microfinance revolution: Sustainable finance for the poor. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rogaly, B. (1996). Microfinance evangelism, destitute women and the hard selling of a new anti-poverty formula. Development in Practice, 6(2), 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rome Declaration. (1996). United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation. http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/w3613e/w3613e00.htm; accessed 5th April 2016.

  • Rosenzweig, M., & Binswanger, H. (1993). Wealth, weather risk and the composition and profitability of agricultural investments. Economic Journal, 103, 56–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. I. (1988). Heterogeneity, intrafamily distribution, and child health. The Journal of Human Resources, 23(4), 437–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, S (1998). The savings of the poor: improving financial services in Bangladesh; Journal of International Development Vol 10:1 ; 1-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, N. D. (2004). Micro-credit no panacea for poor women. Development Gap Organization, March 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Oxford: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1986). Social Choice Theory. In: K. J. Arrow and M. Intriligator, Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. III. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. K. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1995). Rationality and Social Choice. American Economic Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1998). The possibility of social choice. American Economic Review, 89(3), 349–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebel H. (2005). Does history matter? The Old and the New World of Microfinance in Europe and Asia presented at: From moneylenders to microfinance: Southeast Asia’s credit revolution in institutional, economic and cultural perspective An interdisciplinary workshop Asia Research Institute, Department of Economics, and Department of Sociology National University of Singapore 7–8 October 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simanowitz, A. (2001). From event to process: current trends in microinance impact assessment. Small Enterprise Development, 12(4), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. (1990). Peer monitoring and credit markets, World Bank Economic Review, 4(2): 351-366

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Technical Report. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 635–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. (1991). Gender differences in household resource allocation (LSMS Working Paper No. 79.). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, J. A. (1996). International relations: Post-positivist and feminist perspectives. In R. E. Goodin & H.-d. Klingemann (Eds.), A new handbook of political science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, V., Kosal, R., & Savora, T. (1995). An introduction to the food system in Cambodia and related food security considerations, mimeo. Phnom Penh: CDRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, C. C. (2011). Microfinance and Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach. Ph.D thesis. University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian H.R (1990). Goodness-of-fit in optimizing models. Journal of Econometrics, 46:125–140,

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, L (1998). Overview on microfinance fraud. Churchill ed., Moving Microfinance Forward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Eijkel, R., Hermes, C. L. M., & Lensink, B. W. (2007). Group Lending and the Role of the Group Leader: Theory and Evidence from Eritrea. University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wydick, B. (1996). Credit Access for Household Enterprises in Developing Countries under Asymmetric Information, Ph.D. Dissertation, U.C.Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaqub, S. (2000). Intertemporal welfare dynamics: Extent and causes (Human Development Report Office Occasional Paper 70). New York: UNDP. http://hdr.undp.org.

  • Yodmani, S. (2001). Disaster risk management and vulnerability reduction: Protecting the poor. The Asia and Pacific Forum on Poverty. Asian Development Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (1999). Banker to the poor: Micro-lending and the battle against world poverty. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller M (1999). The role of micro-finance for income and consumption smoothing. International Food Policy Research Institute; Organized by the Poverty and Inequality Advisory Unit of the Sustainable Development Department Washington, DC (Feb 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, M., & Sharma, M. (1998). Rural finance and poverty alleviation (Food Policy Report). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, M., & Sharma, M. (2000). Many borrow, more save and all insure: Implications for food and microfinance policy. Food Policy, 25(2), 143–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, M., G. Schrieder, J. von Braun, & Heidhues, F, (1997). Rural finance for food security of the poor: Implications for research and policy (Food Policy Review No. 4). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, M., Diagne, A., & Mataya, C. (1998). Market access by smallholder farmers in Malawi: Implications for technology adoption, agricultural productivity and crop income. Agricultural Economics, 19, 219–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jyoti Navare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Navare, J. (2017). MicroFinancial Services and Risk Management for Food Security: A Vulnerable Household Perspective. In: Mergos, G., Papanastassiou, M. (eds) Food Security and Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40790-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics