Abstract
Some architects and researchers claim that sustainable school design can raise awareness of sustainability issues and stimulate children to explore the same, thus acting pedagogically as the ‘third teacher’. However, existing design guidance explaining how to achieve sustainability in the school environment neglects this pedagogical potential. Studies delineating the ways in which school design might respond to education theories correspondingly encompass few sustainability issues. Identifying this gap, we searched the literature aiming to explain how the physical fabric of a sustainable school could provoke learning about sustainability, and on which pedagogical ideas these designs build. This paper critically reflects on the findings, drawing on relevant findings from a participatory post-occupancy study in a Spanish ‘sustainable school’ in order to establish principles and draw out messages that could be important for debates in the intersecting fields of school design and education. The findings are discussed under three core themes: food and healthy nutrition; celebrating cultural diversity; and managing the environment. It is concluded that in order to reap the pedagogical benefits of ‘sustainable schools’, the use of space needs to be choreographed through a collaborative development process with teachers and pupils.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. London: Penguin Books.
Brković, M. (2013). Sustainable schools as the ‘third teacher’: Creating a design framework for sustainable schools in Serbia, learning from practices in England, Germany, and Spain, University of Sheffield, Ph.D. thesis. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/4513/. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Brundtland report. Our common future. Report of the world commission on environment and development. United Nations.
Burke, C. (2005). Play in focus: Children researching their own spaces and places for play. Children, Youth and Environments, 15(1), 27–53.
Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11–21.
Cilento, K. (2010). Edible schoolyard/work AC. Resource document. ArchDaily. http://www.archdaily.com/47183. Accessed 28 February 2014.
Desmond, D., Grieshop, J., & Subramaniam, A. (2004). Revisiting garden-based learning in education. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
DfES—Department for Education and Skills. (2006). Design of sustainable schools: Case studies, schools for the future series. Annesley: DfES.
Ford, A. (2007). Designing the sustainable school. Mulgrave: The Images Publishing Group.
Forman, G., & Fyfe, B. (1998). Negotiated learning through Design, Documentation and Discourse. In C. L. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach advanced reflections (2nd ed., pp. 239–260). London: Ablex Publishing.
Gaia Architects & Gaia Research (2005). Design [and construction] of sustainable schools, Vol 1: Lessons from school buildings in Norway and Germany. Glasgow: The Lighthouse on Sustainability.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books Inc., Publishers.
Gelfand, L., & Freed, C. E. (2010). Sustainable school architecture: Design for elementary and secondary schools. New Jersey: Wiley.
Gough, A. (2005). Sustainable schools: Renovating educational processes. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 4(4), 339–351.
Hertzberger, H. (2008). Space and learning. Rotterdam: 010 Uitgeverij.
Hes, D., & Howard, P. (2010). Using construction of schools buildings as a novel approach to teach about sustainability. In AUBEA 2010—Proceedings of the 2010 Conference of the Australasian Universities Building Education Association, Jul 2010. https://www.academia.edu/415472/Using_construction_of_schools_buildings_as_a_novel_approach_to_teach_about_sustainability. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
Hofmann, S. (2004). The Baupiloten: Building bridges between education, practice and research. Architectural Research Quarterly, 8(2), 114–127.
LPA Architects (2009). Green school primer: Lessons in sustainability. Mulgrave: The Image Publishing Group.
Montessori, M. (1966). The secret of childhood. Notre Dame, Ind: Fides Publishers.
Nair, P., & Fielding, R. (2005). The language of school design: Design patterns for 21st century schools. Minneapolis, MN: DesignShare.com.
Nelson, J., Martin, K., Nicholas, J., Easton, C., & Featherstone, G. (2011). Food growing activities in school. National Foundation for Educational Research Report. http://www.nfer.ac.uk/nfer/publications/OFGA01/OFGA01.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
Nicholson, E. (2005). The school building as the third teacher. In M. Dudek (Ed.), Children’s spaces (pp. 44–65). Oxford: Elsevier.
Orme, J., Jones, M., Kimberlee, R., Weitkamp, E., Salmon, D., Dailami, N., et al. (2011). Food for life partnership evaluation: full report. Project report. Bristol: University of the West of England.
Orr, D. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment and the human prospect (10th ed.). Washington: Island Press.
OWP/P Cannon Design, VS Furniture & Bruce Mau Design. (2010). The third teacher: 79 ways you can use design to transform teaching & learning. New York: Harry N Abrams Inc.
Perkins Eastman and Ehrenkrantz Eckstut & Kuhn (EE&K) Architects (2010). Stoddert elementary school. Resource document. http://www.eekarchitects.com/portfolio/20-sustainable-design/88-stoddert-elementary-school. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
Prue Chiles Architects. (undated). Earlham primary school. http://www.pruechilesarchitects.co.uk/projects/earlham.html. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
Scott, S. (2010). Architecture for children. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
Shiver, S. M., & Dale, J. R. (2011). Real Solutions for Integrating Sustainability as a Learning Tool. Educational Facility Planner, 45(3), 11–13. http://media.cefpi.org/efp/EFP45-3Shiver-Dale.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
Stanners, D., Bosch, P., Dom, A., & Gabrielsen, P. (2008). Frameworks for environmental assessment and indicators at the EEA. In T. Hak, B. Moldan, & A. L. Dahl (Eds.), Sustainability indicators: A scientific assessment (pp. 127–144). Washington, DC: Island Press.
Sterling, S. (2003). Whole system thinking as a basis for paradigm change in education: Explorations in the context of sustainability, University of Bath (Ph.D. Thesis). http://www.bath.ac.uk/cree/sterling/sterlingthesis.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
Strong-Wilson, T., & Ellis, J. (2007). Children and place: Reggio Emilia’s environment as third teacher. Theory into Practice, 46(1), 40–47.
Taylor, A. (2009). Linking architecture and education: Sustainable design for learning environments. New Mexico: The University of New Mexico Press.
UNESCO. (2009). Bonn Declaration. UNESCO World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development. 31 Mar–2 Apr 2009. Bonn, Germany. http://www.esd-world-conference-2009.org/fileadmin/download/ESD2009_BonnDeclaration080409.pdf. Accessed 02 June 2014.
Wade, R., & Parker, J. (2008). EFA-ESD Dialogue: Educating for a sustainable world. Education for sustainable development policy dialogue no. 1, UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0017/001780/178044e.pdf. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
Acknowledgements
This paper draws upon research carried out by Marta Brković for a PhD at the University of Sheffield, School of Architecture, supervised by Prue Chiles and Rosie Parnell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brković, M., Parnell, R. (2017). Schools as 3D Textbooks for Sustainability Education. In: Million, A., Heinrich, A., Coelen, T. (eds) Education, Space and Urban Planning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38999-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38999-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38997-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38999-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)