Skip to main content

An Overview of Programmed Cell Death Research: From Canonical to Emerging Model Species

  • Chapter

Abstract

Programmed cell death (PCD) is a critical process for the development and survival of a wide range of organisms. PCD research has made striking advances over the past 40 years, and a great deal of our understanding has emerged from studying canonical model organisms representing diverse kingdoms of life. To illuminate the differences and similarities of PCD among metazoans, plants, fungi, and prokaryotes, a cross section of established canonical model systems is examined, outlining the reasons they were chosen as models and evaluating their benefits and limitations. Novel model systems are rapidly emerging, and the advent of comparative genomics and proteomics will greatly enhance the quality of information that can be extrapolated. The pathway to developing a model is discussed along with a review of the past thirteen years of research in the emerging lace plant model system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deponte M (2008) Programmed cell death in protists. Biochim Biophys Acta 1783:1396–1405

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bayles KW (2014) Bacterial programmed cell death: making sense of a paradox. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rice KC, Bayles KW (2003) Microreview Death’s toolbox: examining the molecular components of bacterial programmed cell death. Mol Microbiol 50:729–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Abrams JM, Alnemri ES, Baehrecke EH, Blagosklonny MV, Dawson TM et al (2012) Molecular definitions of cell death subroutines: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2012. Cell Death Differ 19:107–120

    Google Scholar 

  5. Green DR (2011) Means to an end: apoptosis and other cell death mechanisms. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kerr JFR, Wyllie AH, Currie AR (1972) Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue kinetics. Br J Cancer 26:239–257

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kroemer G, El-Deiry WS, Golstein P, Peter ME, Vaux D, Vandenabeele P, Zhivotovsky B et al (2005) Classification of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death. Cell Death Differ 12(Suppl 2):1463–1467

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kroemer G, Reed J (2000) Mitochondrial control of cell death. Nat Med 6:513–519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klener P (2006) Review cell death signalling pathways in the pathogenesis and therapy of haematologic malignancies: overview of apoptotic pathways. Folia Biol (Praha) 44:34–44

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oberst A, Bender C, Green DR (2008) Living with death: the evolution of the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in animals. Cell Death Differ 15:1139–1146

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fuchs Y, Steller H (2011) Programmed cell death in animal development and disease. Cell 147:742–758

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mariño G, Niso-Santano M, Baehrecke EH, Kroemer G (2014) Self-consumption: the interplay of autophagy and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15:81–94

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levine B, Yuan J (2005) Review series autophagy in cell death: an innocent convict? J Clin Invest 115:2679–2688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kroemer G et al (2009) Classification of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2009. Cell Death Differ 16:3–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Doorn WG (2011) Classes of programmed cell death in plants, compared to those in animals. J Exp Bot 62:4749–4761

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tsujimoto Y, Shimizu S (2005) Another way to die: autophagic programmed cell death. Cell Death Differ 12:1528–1534

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kroemer G, Levine B (2008) Autophagic cell death: the story of a misnomer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9:1004–1010

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Y, Bassham DC (2012) Autophagy: pathways for self-eating in plant cells. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63:215–237

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zong W-X, Thompson CB (2006) Necrotic death as a cell fate. Genes Dev 20:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vandenabeele P, Galluzzi L, Vanden Berghe T, Kroemer G (2010) Molecular mechanisms of necroptosis: an ordered cellular explosion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:700–714

    Google Scholar 

  21. Edinger AL, Thompson CB (2004) Death by design: apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy. Curr Opin Cell Biol 16:663–669

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shen S, Kepp O, Kroemer G (2012) The end of autophagic cell death? Autophagy 8:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Greenberg JT (1996) Review programmed cell death: a way of life for plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:12094–12097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lam E (2004) Controlled cell death, plant survival and development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:305–315

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hengartner MO, Bryant JA (2000) Programmed cell death in animals and plants. In: Bryant JA, Hughes SG, Garland JM (eds) Programmed cell death in animals and plants. BIOS Scientific, Oxford, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gray J (2004) Paradigms of the evolution of programmed cell death. In: Gray J (ed) Programmed cell death in plants. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gunawardena AHLAN (2008) Programmed cell death and tissue remodelling in plants. J Exp Bot 59:445–451

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kacprzyk J, Daly CT, Mccabe PF (2011) The botanical dance of death: programmed cell death in plants. In: Kader J-C, Delseny M (eds) Advances in botanical research, vol 60. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 169–261

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Hara-Nishimura I, Hatsugai N, Nakaune S, Kuroyanagi M, Nishimura M (2005) Vacuolar processing enzyme: an executor of plant cell death. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:404–408

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tsiatsiani L, Van Breusegem F, Gallois P, Zavialov A, Lam E, Bozhkov PV (2011) Metacaspases. Cell Death Differ 18:1279–1288

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lord CEN, Gunawardena AHLAN (2012b) The lace plant: a novel model system to study plant proteases during developmental programmed cell death in vivo. Physiol Plant 145:114–120

    Google Scholar 

  32. Van Doorn WG, Beers EP, Dangl JL, Franklin-Tong VE, Gallois P, Hara-Nishimura I, Jones AM et al (2011) Morphological classification of plant cell deaths. Cell Death Differ 18:1241–1246

    Google Scholar 

  33. Doyle SM, Diamond M, McCabe PF (2010) Chloroplast and reactive oxygen species involvement in apoptotic-like programmed cell death in Arabidopsis suspension cultures. J Exp Bot 61:473–482

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bozhkov PV, Lam E (2011) Green death: revealing programmed cell death in plants. Cell Death Differ 18:1239–1240

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fomicheva AS, Tuzhikov AI, Beloshistov RE, Trusova SV, Galiullina RA, Mochalova LV, Chichkova NV, Vartapetian AB (2012) Programmed cell death in plants. Biochem (Mosc) 77:1452–1464

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lord CEN, Gunawardena AHLAN (2012a) Programmed cell death in C. elegans, mammals and plants. Eur J Cell Biol 91:603–613

    Google Scholar 

  37. Reape TJ, McCabe PF (2013) Commentary: the cellular condensation of dying plant cells: programmed retraction or necrotic collapse? Plant Sci 207:135–139

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hallgren O, Gustafsson L, Irjala H, Selivanova G, Orrenius S, Svanborg C (2006) HAMLET triggers apoptosis but tumor cell death is independent of caspases, Bcl-2 and p53. Apoptosis 11:221–233

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kaczanowski S, Sajid M, Reece SE (2011) Evolution of apoptosis-like programmed cell death in unicellular protozoan parasites. Parasit Vectors 4:44

    Google Scholar 

  40. Burhans W (2003) Apoptosis-like yeast cell death in response to DNA damage and replication defects. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen 532:227–243

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hakansson AP, Roche-Hakansson H, Mossberg A-K, Svanborg C (2011) Apoptosis-like death in bacteria induced by HAMLET, a human milk lipid-protein complex. PloS One 6:e17717

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wang J, Bayles KW (2013) Programmed cell death in plants: lessons from bacteria? Trends Plant Sci 18:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hedges SB (2002) The origin and evolution of model organisms. Nat Rev Genet 3:838–849

    Google Scholar 

  44. Davis RH (2004) The age of model organisms. Nat Rev Genet 5:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  45. Pacurar DI (2009) Turning a wild plant into a model – a Déjà vu story. Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj 37:17–24

    Google Scholar 

  46. Prüßing K, Voigt A, Schulz JB (2013) Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism for Alzheimer’s. Mol Neurodegener 8:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Mandoli DF, Olmstead R (2000) The importance of emerging model systems in plant biology. J Plant Growth Regul 19:249–252

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zhu H, Choi H, Cook DR, Shoemaker RC (2005) Bridging model and crop legumes through comparative genomics. Plant Physiol 137:1189–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Carpentier SC, Panis B, Vertommen A, Swennen R, Sergeant K, Renaut J, Laukens K et al (2008) Proteome analysis of non-model plants: a challenging but powerful approach. Mass Spectrom Rev 6:354–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Birch RG (1997) Plant transformation: problems and strategies for practical application. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:297–326

    Google Scholar 

  51. Klein TM (2011) Particle bombardment: an established weapon in the arsenal of plant biotechnologies. In: Stewart NC, Touraev A, Citovsky V, Tzfira T (eds) Plant transformation technologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 53–71

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lacroix B, Zaltsman A, Citovsky V (2011) Host factors involved in genetic transformation of plant cells by Agrobacterium. In: Stewart NC, Touraev A, Citovsky V, Tzfira T (eds) Plant transformation technologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–29

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wada N, Kajiyama S, Khemkladngoen N, Fukui K (2011) A novel gene delivery system in plants with calcium alginate micro-beads. In: Steward NC, Touraev A, Citovsky V, Tzfira T (eds) Plant transformation technologies. Wiley, Chichester, pp 73–81

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  54. Riddle IDL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR (1997) An introduction to C. elegans II. In: Riddle DL, Blumenthal T, Meyer BJ, Priess JR (eds). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  55. Arnoult D, Tatischeff I, Estaquier J, Girard M, Sureau F, Tissier JP, Grodet A et al (2001) On the evolutionary conservation of the cell death pathway: mitochondrial release of an apoptosis-inducing factor during Dictyostelium discoideum cell death. Mol Biol Cell 12:3016–3030

    Google Scholar 

  56. Baehrecke EH (2003) Autophagic programmed cell death in Drosophila. Cell Death Differ 10:940–945

    Google Scholar 

  57. Conradt B (2009) Genetic control of programmed cell death during animal development. Annu Rev Genet 43:493–523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lasi M, Pauly B, Schmidt N, Cikala M, Stiening B, Käsbauer T, Zenner G et al (2010) The molecular cell death machinery in the simple cnidarian Hydra includes an expanded caspase family and pro- and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Cell Res 20:812–825

    Google Scholar 

  59. Eisenhoffer GT, Kang H, Alvarado AS (2008) Molecular analysis of stem cells and their descendants during cell turnover and regeneration in the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. Cell Stem Cell 3:327–339

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pellettieri J, Fitzgerald P, Watanabe S, Mancuso J, Green DR, Sánchez Alvarado A (2010) Cell death and tissue remodeling in planarian regeneration. Dev Biol 338:76–85

    Google Scholar 

  61. Cole LK, Ross LS (2001) Apoptosis in the developing zebrafish embryo. Dev Biol 240:123–142

    Google Scholar 

  62. Ameisen JC (2002) On the origin, evolution, and nature of programmed cell death: a timeline of four billion years. Cell Death Differ 9:367–393

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ameisen JC (2004) Looking for death at the core of life in the light of evolution. Cell Death Differ 11:4–10

    Google Scholar 

  64. Erental A, Sharon I, Engelberg-Kulka H (2012) Two programmed cell death systems in Escherichia coli: an apoptotic-like death is inhibited by the mazEF-mediated death pathway. PLoS Biol 10:e1001281

    Google Scholar 

  65. Carmona-Gutierrez D, Eisenberg T, Büttner S, Meisinger C, Kroemer G, Madeo F (2010) Apoptosis in yeast: triggers, pathways, subroutines. Cell Death Differ 17:763–773

    Google Scholar 

  66. Meyerowitz EM (2001) Prehistory and history of Arabidopsis research. Plant Physiol 125:15–19

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hogg BV, Kacprzyk J, Molony EM, O’Reilly C, Gallagher TF, Gallois P, et al. (2011) An in vivo root hair assay for determining rates of apoptotic-like programmed cell death in plants. Plant Methods. BioMed Central Ltd; 2011;7: 45

    Google Scholar 

  68. Coll NS, Epple P, Dangl JL (2011) Programmed cell death in the plant immune system. Cell Death Differ 18:1247–1256

    Google Scholar 

  69. Filonova LH, Bozhkov PV, Brukhin VB, Daniel G, Zhivotovsky B, von Arnold S (2000) Two waves of programmed cell death occur during formation and development of somatic embryos in the gymnosperm, Norway spruce. J Cell Sci 113 Pt 24:4399–4411

    Google Scholar 

  70. Bozhkov PV, Filonova LH, Suarez MF (2005) Programmed cell death in plant embryogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol 67:135–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterbom A, Zuccolo A, Lin Y-C, Scofield DG, Vezzi F et al (2013) The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 497:579–584

    Google Scholar 

  72. Courtois-Moreau CL, Pesquet E, Sjödin A, Muñiz L, Bollhöner B, Kaneda M, Samuels L et al (2009) A unique program for cell death in xylem fibers of Populus stem. Plant J 58:260–274

    Google Scholar 

  73. Sabelli PA, Larkins BA (2009) The development of endosperm in grasses. Plant Physiol 149:14–26

    Google Scholar 

  74. Young TE, Gallie DR, DeMason DA (1997) Ethylene-mediated programmed cell death during maize endosperm development of wild-type and shrunken2 genotypes. Plant Physiol 115:737–751

    Google Scholar 

  75. Young TE, Gallie DR (1999) Analysis of programmed cell death in wheat endosperm reveals differences in endosperm development between cereals. Plant Mol Biol 39:915–926

    Google Scholar 

  76. Gunawardena AHLAN, Pearce DM, Jackson MB, Hawes CR, Evans DE (2001a) Characterisation of programmed cell death during aerenchyma formation induced by ethylene or hypoxia in roots of maize (Zea mays L.). Planta 212:205–214

    Google Scholar 

  77. Gunawardena AHLAN, Pearce DME, Jackson MB, Hawes CR, Evans DE (2001b) Rapid changes in cell wall pectic polysaccharides are closely associated with early stages of aerenchyma formation, a spatially localized form of programmed cell death in roots of maize (Zea mays L.) promoted by ethylene. Plant Cell Env 24:1369–1375

    Google Scholar 

  78. Kawai M, Samarajeewa PK, Barrero RA, Nishiguchi M, Uchimiya H (1998) Cellular dissection of the degradation pattern of cortical cell death during aerenchyma formation of rice roots. Planta 204:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  79. Fukuda H, Komamine A (1980) Establishment of an experimental system for the study of tracheary element differentiation from single cells isolated from the mesophyll of Zinnia elegans. Plant Physiol 65:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  80. Groover A, Jones A (1999) Tracheary element differentiation uses a novel mechanism coordinating programmed cell death and secondary cell wall synthesis. Plant Physiol 119:375–84

    Google Scholar 

  81. Pesquet E, Zhang B, Gorzsás A, Puhakainen T, Serk H, Escamez S, Barbier O et al (2013) Non-cell-autonomous postmortem lignification of tracheary elements in Zinnia elegans. Plant Cell 25:1314–1328

    Google Scholar 

  82. Van Bruggen HWE (1985) Monograph of the genus Aponogeton (Aponogetonaceae). Bibl Bot 8:76

    Google Scholar 

  83. Sergueff M (1907) Contribution á la Morphologie et la Biologie des Aponogetonacees. University of Geneva, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  84. Gunawardena AHLAN, Sault K, Donnelly P, Greenwood JS, Dengler N (2005) Programmed cell death and leaf morphogenesis in Monstera obliqua. Planta 221:607–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Gunawardena AHLAN, Dengler NG (2006) Alternative modes of leaf dissection in monocotyledons. Bot J Linn Soc 150:25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Nowak JS, Bolduc N, Dengler NG, Posluszny U (2011) Compound leaf development in the palm Chamaedorea elegans is KNOX-independent. Am J Bot 98:1575–1582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Gunawardena AHLAN, Greenwood JS, Dengler NG (2004) Programmed cell death remodels lace plant leaf shape during development. Plant Cell 16:60–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Ray TS (1990) Metamorphosis in the Araceae. Am J Bot 77:1599–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Zotz G, Wilhelm K, Becker A (2011) Heteroblasty—a review. Bot Rev 77:109–151

    Google Scholar 

  90. Gunawardena AHLAN, Navachandrabala C, Kane M, Dengler NG (2006) Lace plant: a novel system for studying developmental programmed cell death. In: Teixeira da Silva JA (ed) Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology: advances and tropical issues. Global Science Books, Middlesex, pp 157–162

    Google Scholar 

  91. Wright H, van Doorn WG, Gunawardena AHLAN (2009) In vivo study of developmental programmed cell death using the lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis; Aponogetonaceae) leaf model system. Am J Bot 96:865–876

    Google Scholar 

  92. Lord CEN, Wertman JN, Lane S, Gunawardena AHLAN (2011) Do mitochondria play a role in remodelling lace plant leaves during programmed cell death? BMC Plant Biol 11:102

    Google Scholar 

  93. Wertman J, Lord CEN, Dauphinee AN, Gunawardena AHLAN (2012) The pathway of cell dismantling during programmed cell death in lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis) leaves. BMC Plant Biol 12:115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Dauphinee AN, Warner TS, Gunawardena AHLAN (2014) A comparison of induced and developmental cell death morphologies in lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis) leaves. BMC Plant Biol 14:389

    Google Scholar 

  95. Reisen D, Marty F, Leborgne-Castel N (2005) New insights into the tonoplast architecture of plant vacuoles and vacuolar dynamics during osmotic stress. BMC Plant Biol 5:13

    Google Scholar 

  96. Van Doorn WG (2005) Plant programmed cell death and the point of no return. Trends Plant Sci 10:478–483

    Google Scholar 

  97. Gunawardena AHLAN, Greenwood JS, Dengler N (2007) Cell wall degradation and modification during programmed cell death in lace plant, Aponogeton madagascariensis (Aponogetonaceae). Am J Bot 94:1116–1128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Elliott A, Gunawardena AHLAN (2010) Calcium inhibition halts developmental programmed cell death in the lace plant, Aponogeton madagascariensis? Botany 88:206–210

    Google Scholar 

  99. Dauphinee AN, Wright H, Rantong G, Gunawardena AHLAN (2012) The involvement of ethylene in programmed cell death and climacteric-like behaviour during the remodelling of lace plant (Aponogeton madagascariensis) leaves. Botany 90:1237–1244

    Google Scholar 

  100. Lord CEN, Dauphinee AN, Watts RL, Gunawardena AHLAN (2013) Unveiling interactions among mitochondria, caspase- like proteases, and the actin cytoskeleton during plant programmed cell death (PCD). PLoS One 8:e57110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Hansen G, Wright M (1999) Recent advances in the transformation of plants. Trends Plant Sci 4:226–231

    Google Scholar 

  102. Carter J, Gunawardena AHLAN (2011) Regeneration of the aquatic monocot Aponogeton madagascariensis (lace plant) through callus induction. Aquat Bot 94:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  103. Lord C, Gunawardena AHLAN (2010) Isolation of leaf protoplasts from the submerged aquatic monocot Aponogeton madagascariensis. Am J Plant Sci Biotechnol 4:6–11

    Google Scholar 

  104. Liakopoulos G, Nikolopoulos D, Klouvatou A, Vekkos K-A, Manetas Y, Karabourniotis G (2006) The photoprotective role of epidermal anthocyanins and surface pubescence in young leaves of grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Ann Bot 98:257–265

    Google Scholar 

  105. Dauphinee AN, Lacroix CR (2015) Gunawardenea AHLAN. A comparison of the early developmental morphologies of Aponogeton madagascariensis and A. boivinianus, Botany

    Google Scholar 

  106. Freeman S, Harrington M, Sharp J (eds) (2008) Biological science, Canadianth edn. Pearson Canada, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  107. Mitsuhara I, Malik KA, Miura M, Ohashi Y (1999). Animal cell-death suppressors Bcl-x(L) and Ced-9 inhibit cell death in tobacco plants. Curr Biol 9:775–778

    Google Scholar 

  108. Schultz DJ, Craig R, Cox-Foster DL, Mumma RO, Medford JI (1994) RNA isolation from recalcitrant plant tissue. Plant Mol Biol Rep 12:310–316

    Google Scholar 

  109. Tomlinson PB (1982) Helobiae (Alismatidae). In: Metcalfe CR (ed) Anatomy of the monocotyledons. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Nancy Dengler for the guidance and support throughout the entirety of the development of the lace plant as a model and for a critical review of this book chapter. Likewise, we thank Dr. Paul McCabe (University College Dublin) and Dr. Julie Kang (University of Northern Iowa) for critical reviews, as well as Gaolathe Rantong (Dalhousie University) for providing the description of current molecular investigations in the lace plant. Additionally, we extend our thanks to Dr. Michael Kane (University of Florida) for original lace plant sterile cultures from seeds; collaborators Dr. Christian Lacroix (University of Prince Edward Island), Dr. Keiko Yoshioka (University of Toronto), and Dr. Frank Van Breusegem (Ghent University, Belgium); and Angelica Camillo for her work on callus induction and protoplast isolation. A.N.D. received Ph.D. funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). A.N.G. was funded by an NSERC Discovery grant and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arunika N. Gunawardena .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Compilation of videos from a lace plant window stage leaf. (a) There is a visible gradient of PCD, which shows various features of PCD across N-, E-, and LPCD stage cells. (b) NPCD stage cells have anthocyanin (in the mesophyll), as well as chlorophyll pigmentation, and illustrate typical cellular dynamics as they persist throughout leaf morphogenesis. (c) EPCD stage cells have lost anthocyanin pigmentation and are fated to die. As PCD advances, aggregate of organelles are collected in the central vacuole and can be seen undergoing Brownian motion. There is an increase in transvacuolar strands in this early phase of PCD. (d) LPCD stage cells that are on the brink of collapse are nearly void of pigmentation and have large aggregates within the vacuole. In the very late stages of PCD, there is nuclear displacement; cessation of the aggregate, which precedes the collapse of the tonoplast; and plasma membrane shrinkage. Scale bars: 30 μm. ~25× playback speed. Video editing was performed using Adobe Premiere Pro CC (MP4 18655 kb)

Developmental vs. induced death in lace plant. (a) Cells in the later stages of developmental PCD (LPCD) exhibit little to no pigmentation. Aggregates undergoing Brownian motion in the central vacuole are visible. As the cell is terminated, nuclear displacement occurs, followed by the collapse of the tonoplast and the plasma membrane, leaving a condensed corpse. (b) NPCD stage cells (which do not undergo PCD during leaf development) treated with a 2 M NaCl solution, which causes a reduction in cellular volume due to plasmolysis. As the cells die, the color shifts to green, and there is swelling which occurs prior to tonoplast collapse. Finally, there is further shrinkage of the corpse. Scale bars: (a) = 10 μm; (b) = 15 μm. ~25× and 250× playback speeds, respectively. Video editing was performed using Adobe Premiere Pro CC (MP4 2177 kb)

Lace plant shoot apical meristems (SAMs) and young leaf primordia. (Left) Maximum projection. (Right) 3D projection video. Images were captured via confocal laser scanning microscopy. Scale bar: 50 μm. Video editing was performed using Adobe Premiere Pro CC (MP4 1569 kb)

Live cell imaging video of apical region of mature lace plant leaf sheaths. Chloroplasts and mitochondria are readily observable and can be seen streaming throughout the cell guided by the cytoskeleton. Scale bar = 15 μm. ~120× playback speed. Video editing was performed using Adobe Premiere Pro CC (MP4 11770 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dauphinee, A.N., Gunawardena, A.N. (2015). An Overview of Programmed Cell Death Research: From Canonical to Emerging Model Species. In: Gunawardena, A.N., McCabe, P.F. (eds) Plant Programmed Cell Death. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21033-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics