Abstract
This section of the document describes the proposed HIT diffusion framework based on capabilities. In this section diffusion and adoption theories, software engineering techniques, dynamic capabilities, and multi-perspectives are discussed. In the later sections the model is future reasoned for in the context of modeling, documenting, and simulating it. Various perspectives are discussed and why certain particular design decisions were made.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
“Basic Flow Chart Sample.”
“NDE Project Management.”
“OMG SysML.”
“SysML Forum—SysML FAQ.”
“UML 2.0.”
“What Could OOA&D Benefit From Gounded Theory?.”
“Data flow diagram—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.”
“Unified Modeling Language—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.”
“Unified Modeling Language—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.”
Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and refection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16, 586–612.
Abrahamson, E. (1996). Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21, 254–285.
Abrahamson, E., & Fombrun, C. J. (1994). Macrocultures: Determinants and consequences. Academy of Management Review, 19, 728–755.
Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. (1993). Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 18, 487–517.
Abrial, J. R. (1996). The B-book: assigning programs to meanings. Cambridge Univ Press.
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Quarterly, 16, 227–247.
Ajzen, I. (1985). “From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology (pp. 11–39). New York, NY: Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1973). Attitudinal and normative variables as predictors of specific behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 41–57.
Ambler, S. W. (2004). The object primer: Agile model-driven development with UML 2.0. Cambridge University Press
Amey, P. Dear sir, Yours faithfully: An everyday story of formality. Proc. 12th Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, pp. 3–18.
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.
Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge: Harvard Univ Press.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management Science, 32, 1231–1241.
Barney, J. (1991). Special theory forum: The resource-based model of the firm: Origins, implications, and prospects. Journal of Management, 17, 97–98.
Barney, J. B., & Clark, D. N. (2007). Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baskerville, R., & Pries-Heje, J. (1999). Grounded action research: A method for understanding IT in practice. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 9, 1–23.
Batra, D. (2009). Unified modeling language (UML) topics: Cognitive issues in UML research. Journal of Database Management.
Behkami, N. A. (2009). Diffusion of Innovation (Healthcare IT)--System Dynamics. Portland State University: Department of Engineering & Technology Management Working Paper Series.
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS quarterly, 369–386.
Chakraborty, S., & Dehlinger J. (2009). Applying the Grounded Theory Method to Derive Enterprise System Requirements. Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking, and Parallel/Distributed Computing, ACIS International Conference on, Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2009, pp. 333–338.
Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking, systems practice: Includes a 30-year retrospective. Wiley.
Checkland, P., Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. John Wiley & Sons Ltd (Import).
Chi, C. Method-Case Study vs Grounded Theory.
Chuttur M (2009) Overview of the technology acceptance model: Origins, developments and future directions
Collan M, Tétard F (2007) Lazy user theory of solution selection. Proceedings or the CELDA 2007 conference, pp. 7–9
Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (1995). Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Knowledge and Strategy, 25–40.
Cooper, R. B., & Zmud, R. W. (1990). Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Science, 36, 123–139.
Cousins, J. B., & Simon, M. (1996). The nature and impact of policy-induced partnerships between research and practice communities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(Autumn), 199–218.
Creswell, J. W. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.
Damanpour, F. (1988). Innovation type, radicalness, and the adoption process. Communication Research, 15, 545–567.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555–590.
Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of “organizational lag”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 392–409.
Data Flow Diagram—SSADM Diagrams—SmartDraw Tutorials.
Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.
Demsetz, H. (1973). Industry structure, market rivalry, and public policy. Journal of Law and economics, 16, 1–9.
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 1504–1511.
Dobing, B., & Parsons, J. (2005). Current practices in the use of UML. Perspectives in Conceptual Modeling, 2–11.
Dori, D. (2001). Object-process methodology applied to modeling credit card transactions. Journal of Database Management, 12, 4–14.
Dori, D. (2002). Why significant UML change is unlikely.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers Fort Worth.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 532–550.
Erdil, N., & Emerson, C. R. (2008). Modeling the dynamics of electronic health records adoption in the us healthcare system. Proceedings of the 26th international conference of the system dynamics society, 2008
Evermann, J., & Wand, Y. (2006). Ontological modeling rules for UML: An empirical assessment. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46, 14.
Finegan, A. D. (2003). Wicked problems, organizational complexity and knowledge management–a systems approach. The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 3.
Fishbein, M. (1967). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. Readings in attitude theory and measurement 477–492
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Sociology Press.
Goede, R., & Villiers, C. D. (2003). The applicability of grounded theory as research methodology in studies on the use of methodologies in IS practices. Proceedings of the 2003 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on Enablement through technology, South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, 2003, pp. 208–217.
Goldkuhl, G., & Cronholm, S. (2003). Multi-grounded theory–Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory. European conference on research methodology for business and management studies, p. 177.
Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33, 114–35.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.
Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 135–144.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68, 79–91.
Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, R. (2006). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. Teachers College Press.
Hart, D. N. (2005). Information systems foundations. ANU E Press.
Henderson-Sellers, B., & Gonzalez-Perez, C. (2006). Uses and Abuses of the Stereotype Mechanism in UML 1.x and 2.0. Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems 16–26.
Hendrickson, A. R., Massey, P. D., & Cronan, T. P. (1993). On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly, 17, 227–230.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal 767–798.
Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (1985a). Strategy, contextual factors, and performance. Human Relations, 38, 793.
Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (1985b). Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 273–293.
Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (1986). Relationships among corporate level distinctive competencies, diversification strategy, corporate structure and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 23, 0022–2380.
Hrebiniak, L. G., & Snow, C. C. (1982). Top-management agreement and organizational performance. Human Relations, 35, 1139.
Itami, H., & Roehl, T. (1987). Mobilizing intangible assets. Cambridge, MA.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. B. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Research Edition, Second Edition, Allyn & Bacon.
Klein H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 67–93.
Kossiakoff, A., & Sweet, W. N. (2003). Systems engineering. Wiley-IEEE.
Learned, E., Christensen, C., Andrews, K., & Guth, W. (1969). Business policy: Text and cases’. Homewood IL: Richard D., Irwin, Inc.
Lehmann, H. (2001). Using grounded theory with technology cases: Distilling critical theory from a multinational information systems development project. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 4, 45–60.
Liebeskind, J. P. (1996). Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 93–107.
Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 473–492.
Meyer, B. (1997). UML: The positive spin. Cutter IT Journal, x.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press.
Nutley, S., & Davies, H. T. O. (2000). Making a reality of evidence-based practice: some lessons from the diffusion of innovations. Public Money & Management, 20, 35.
O'Neill, H. M., Pouder, R. W., & Buchholtz, A. K. (1998). Patterns in the diffusion of strategies across organizations: Insights from the innovation diffusion literature. Academy of Management Review, 23, 98–114.
Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 309–340.
Osborne, S. P. (1998). Naming the beast: Defining and classifying service innovations in social policy. Human Relations, 51, 1133–1154.
Otto, P., & Simon, M. (2009). Coordinating quality care: A policy model to simulate adoption of EHR. Proceedings of the 26th international system dynamics conference, Albuquerque, 2009.
Peleg, M., & Dori, D. (2000). The model multiplicity problem: Experimenting with real-time specification methods. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26, 742–759.
Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York, NY: Wiley.
Porter, M. E. (1981). The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management. The Academy of Management Review, 6, 609–620.
Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY.
Porter Michael, E. (1979). How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 57, 137–145.
Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 485–501.
Rennie, D. L., Phillips, J. R., & Quartaro, G. K. (1988). Grounded theory: A promising approach to conceptualization in psychology. Canadian Psychology, 29, 139–150.
Ricardo, D. (1817). The principles of political economy and taxation (1817). The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, hrsg. v. Sraffa, Piero, Bd. I, Cambridge.
Robinson, K., Berrisford, G. (1994). Object oriented SSADM. Prentice Hall PTR.
Rumelt, R. P., & Lamb, R. (1984). Competitive strategic management. Toward a Strategic Theory of the Firm, 556–570.
Scherer, M. J. (2002). Assistive technology: Matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington, DC: APA Books.
Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17, 517–525.
Siau, K., & Cao, Q. (2001). Unified modeling language: A complexity analysis. Journal of Database Management, 12, 26–34.
Siau, K., & Loo, P. P. (2006). Identifying difficulties in learning UML. Information Systems Management, 23, 43–51.
Smart, P. A., Maddern, H., & Maull, R. S. (2008). Understanding business process management: Implications for theory and practice.
Snook, C., & Butler, M. (2006). UML-B: Formal modeling and design aided by UML. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 15, 122.
Sommerville, I. (2000). Software engineering. Addison Wesley.
Spender, J. C., & Grant, R. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 5–9.
SSADM Diagram Software—Structured Systems Analysis and Design Methodology.
Stake, D. R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications, Inc.
Stalk, G., Evans, P., & Shulman, L. E. (1992). Competing on capabilities: The new rules of corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review.
Stevens, W., Myers, G., & Constantine, L. (1979). Structured design, Classics in software engineering. Yourdon Press, 205–232.
Strauss, A. L., Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Pubns.
Subramanian, G. H. (1994). A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement. Decision Sciences, 25, 863–863.
Szajna, B. (1994). Software evaluation and choice: Predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18, 319–324.
Teece, D. J. (1980). Economy of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1, 223–247.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.
Tetard, F., & Collan, M. (1899). Lazy user theory: A dynamic model to understand user selection of products and services. HICSS (pp. 1–9). Big Island, HI: IEEE.
Theories Used in IS Research Wiki, York University
Thompson, A. A., & Strickland, A. J. (1983). Strategy formulation and implementation: Tasks of the general manager. Business Publications.
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). Processes of technological innovation. New York: The Free Press.
Trauth, E. M., & Jessup, L. M. (2000). Understanding computer-mediated discussions: Positivist and interpretive analyses of group support system use. MIS Quarterly, 24, 43–79.
Urquhart, C. (2001). An encounter with grounded theory: Tackling the practical and philosophical issues. Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends, 104–140.
van de Water, H., Schinkel, M., & Rozier, R. (2006). Fields of application of SSM: A categorization of publications. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 271–287.
Vandeven, A. H., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Innovations and organizations: Critical perspectives. Communication Research, 15, 632–651.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., DeLone, W. H., McLean, E. R., et al. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Inform Management, 27, 425–478.
Viswanath, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.
W.W. Wakeland, E.J. Gallaher, L.M. Macovsky, and C.A. Aktipis, “A Comparison of System Dynamics and Agent-Based Simulation Applied to the Study of Cellular Receptor Dynamics,” Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’04)—Track 3—Volume 3, IEEE Computer Society, 2004, p. 30086.2.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 171–180.
Williams, B. (2005). Soft systems methodology.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications.
Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16, 85–102.
Wolfe, R. A. (1994). Organizational innovation: Review, critique and suggested research. Journal of Management Studies, 31, 405–431.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
Zenobia, B. (2008). A grounded agent model of the consumer technology adoption process. Portland State University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Behkami, N.A., Daim, T.U. (2016). Methods and Models. In: Healthcare Technology Innovation Adoption. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17975-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17975-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17974-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17975-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)