Skip to main content

Sustainable Manufacturing as Mutual Competence Building

  • Chapter
Book cover Higher Education in a Sustainable Society

Abstract

In this chapter, Sustainable Manufacturing as MCB, Halvor Holtskog, Richard Ennals, and Hans Chr Garmann Johnsen argue how sustainable manufacturing can be seen as combining the traditional manufacturing management perspective with organisational development and participatory perspectives. The definition of Sustainable Business Systems is different from other uses of sustainability. The chapter tries to link arguments for business and for education. Arguably Working Life Research has an integrative role. One might ask: how can universities be seen as sustainable work systems, and how can they develop an account of empowerment?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation: The pathological pursuit of profit and power. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. M. (2004). What’s driving the new economy? The benefits of workplace innovation. The Economic Journal, 114(493), F97–F116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. E., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for entrepreneurial leadership historical research reference in entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis (Vol. 248). London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrkjeflot, H. (2001). The Nordic model of democracy and management. In H. Byrkjeflot, S. Myklebust, C. Myrvang, & F. Sejersted (Eds.), The democratic challenge to capitalism: Management and democracy in the Nordic countries. Fagbokforlaget: Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Greenwich, CT: Fawcett Crest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, L. T. (2011). At gripe muligheten for forandring: En analyse af ikke-deltagelse i naturbeskyttelsen med Møn som eksempel (To seize the opportunity of change: Analysis of non-participation in nature protection with Moen as example). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Roskilde University, Institut for miljø, samfund og rumlig forandring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1830). Introduction to positive philosophy. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett. 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M. (1987). Human centred systems: An urgent problem for systems designers. AI & Society, 1(1), 37–46. doi:10.1007/BF01905888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. E. (1982). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Docherty, P., Kira, M., & Shani, A. R. (Eds.). (2008). Creating sustainable work systems: Developing social sustainability. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drejhammar, I. B. (1998). Organisationsutveckling och jämställdhet: en studie i tre företag. Lund: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eikeland, O. (2008). The ways of Aristotle: Aristotelian phronesis, Aristotelian philosophy of dialogue, and action research (Vol. 5). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, M., Gustavsen, B., Asheim, B. T., & Pålshaugen, O. (Eds.). (2010). Learning regional innovation: Scandinavian models. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century. London: Capstone Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F., & Thorsrud, E. (1976). Democracy at work: The report of the Norwegian industrial democracy program. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, F. E., & Trist, E. L. (1965). The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations, 18, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennals, R., & Gustavsen, B. (1999). Work organisation and Europe as a development coalition. Amsterdam: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennals, R., & Hutchins, D. (Eds.). (2012). Communities of circles [Special issue]. AI & Society 27.3 2013. Electronic Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyssenet, M., Mair, A., Shimizu, K., & Volpato, G. (1998). One best way? Trajectories and industrial models of the world’s automobile producers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricke, W., & Totterdill, P. (Eds.). (2004). Action research in workplace innovation and regional development. Amsterdam: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimoto, T. (1999). Capability building and over-adaptation: A case of ‘fat design’ in the Japanese auto industry. In Y. Lung, J.-J. Chanaron, & D. Raff (Eds.), Coping with variety; flexible productive systems for product variety in the auto industry (pp. 261–286). Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi, S., & Nicolini, D. (2001). The sociological foundations of organizational learning. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 35–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (1988). On two AI traditions. AI & Society, 2(4), 321–340. doi:10.1007/BF01891366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, R. (1993). Manufacturing knowledge: A history of the Hawthorne experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B. (1992). Dialogue and development. Maastricht: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B., Finne, H., & Oscarsson, B. (2001). Creating connectedness: The role of social research in innovation policy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsen, B., Nyhan, B., & Ennals, R. (Eds.). (2007). Learning together for local innovation: Promoting learning regions. Luxembourg: Cedefop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huczynski, A. A. (1993). Explaining the succession of management fads. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4(2), 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: How business can save the planet. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtskog, H. (2013). Continuous improvement beyond the Lean Understanding. Procedia CIRP, 7(0), 575–579. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.035

  • Holtskog, H., & Ringen, G. (2013). Opportunities in the wake of crisis. Procedia CIRP, 7(0), 73–78. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.013

  • Høyrup, S. (2012). Employee-driven innovation: A new phenomenon, concept and mode of innovation. In S. Høyrup, M. Bonnafous-Boucher, C. Hasse, M. Lotz, & K. Møller (Eds.), Employee-driven innovation—A new approach. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, D. (2008). Hoshin Kanri: The strategic approach to continuous improvement. Farnham: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingvaldsen, J. A., & Rolfsen, M. (2012). Autonomous work groups and the challenge of inter-group coordination. Human Relations. doi:10.1177/0018726712448203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, K. (1980). QC circle Koryo: General principles of the QC circle. Tokyo: JUSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, H. (2001). Involvement at work. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, H. C. G., & Ennals, R. (Eds.). (2012a). Creating collaborative advantage: Innovation and knowledge creation in regional economies. Farnham: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, H. C. G., & Ennals, R. (2012b). Creating collaborative advantage. Farnham: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesting, P., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2010). Employee-driven innovation: Extending the license to foster innovation. Management Decisions, 48(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klev, R., & Levin, M. (2009). Forandring som praksis: Endringsledelse gjennom læring og utvikling. Bergen: Fagbokforl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. C. (2001). When corporations rule the world. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1966). A sand county almanac: With other essays on conservation from round river. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, M. (Ed.). (2001). Researching enterprise development. Amsterdam: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg, B. (2003). The skeptical environmentalist: Measuring the real state of the world (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York, NY: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York, NY: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, R. (1965). Unsafe at any speed: The designed-in dangers of the American automobile. New York, NY: Grossman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netland, T. (2012). Exploring the phenomenon of company-specific production systems: One-best-way or own-best-way? International Journal of Production Research, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pålshaugen, Ø. (2013). Meta-theory and practice: A plea for pluralism in innovation studies. In H. C. G. Johnsen & Ø. Pålshaugen (Eds.), Hva er innovasjon? Oslo: Cappelen Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S. H. (2012). Employee-driven innovation: A new approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pot, F. (2011). Workplace innovation for better jobs and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(4), 404–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, G. (2010). Organizational learning and knowledge in the Norwegian automotive supplier industry (Doctor philosophiae, NTNU, Trondheim).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, G., & Holtskog, H. (2011). How enablers for lean product development motivate engineers. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2011, 1–11. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2011.593046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringen, G., Holtskog, H., & Martinsen, K. (2012). User friendly framework for measuring product and process novelty in the early stages of product development. Procedia CIRP, 3(0), 513–518. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.088

  • Roddick, A. (2000). Business as unusual. London: Thorsons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røvik, K. A. (1998). Moderne organisasjoner: Trender i organisasjonstenkningen ved tusenårsskiftet. Bergen-Sandviken: Fagbokforl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration: A sociological interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semler, R. (1993). Maverick: The success story behind the world’s most unusual workplace. London: Century.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, R., & Ward, P. T. (2007). Defining and developing measures of lean production. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 785–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. W. (1914). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S., Toulmin, S. E., & Gustavsen, B. (Eds.). (1996). Beyond theory: Changing organizations through participation (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems (Occasional Paper, 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, E. U., Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (1997). Factor four: Doubling wealth, halving resource use: The new report to the club of Rome. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Report of the world commission on environment and development: Our common future. Chaired by Gro Harlem Brundtland. Transmitted to the General Assembly as an Annex to document A/42/427—Development and International Co-operation: Environment. New York, NY: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadek, S. (2001). The civil corporation: The new economy of corporate citizenship. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Christian Garmann Johnsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holtskog, H., Ennals, R., Johnsen, H.C.G. (2015). Sustainable Manufacturing as Mutual Competence Building. In: Johnsen, H., Torjesen, S., Ennals, R. (eds) Higher Education in a Sustainable Society. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15919-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics