Abstract
Improving personal health (care) for pervasive and ubiquitous health services requires the involvement of principals with different skills, education, social, cultural, ethical and legal background. They have to cooperate and communicate the necessary information in an interoperable way, so that the information can be used on all sides. The resulting necessary interoperability among human beings and of course systems requires the management and communication of knowledge. This knowledge management should be based on appropriate and hopefully shared ontologies. Natural languages are an efficient and powerful means in representing meaning, knowledge and skills. They balance between special sentence structures and generative flexibility, allowing for unambiguous representation of real world concepts used in communication. This paper provides an overview of the current state of the art functionality in NLP with regard to its application in health information systems interoperability. Therefore this paper deals less with an in-depth analysis of the methodologies currently developed in NLP and rather motivates for using NLP in real-life use cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In Germany, improvements in the healthcare domain are rarely enforced by jurisdictional requirements, but by the strong commitments given by the involved stakeholders. However, these have conflicting interests preventing any real progress.
- 2.
In the healthcare domain, the ambulatory (outpatients with general practitioners) and stationary sector (inpatients with hospitals) have different requirements impacting the communication between those stakeholders.
- 3.
HL7 started its work on enabling and establishing intra-hospital communication, i.e. supporting the data exchange among systems within the same hospital. For this purpose the world-wide most accepted communication standard is “HL7 version 2.x”. A few years after HL7’s inception work, “HL7 Version 3” has started to support inter-hospital and cross-sectoral communication.
- 4.
ICD is the International Classification of Diseases as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) and is used to code information about diagnoses.
- 5.
WYSIWYG: “What You See Is What You Get”.
References
Blaschke C, Hirschman L, Yeh A, Valencia A (2003) Critical assessment of information extraction systems in biology. Comp Funct Genomics 4:674–677. Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). doi:10.1002/cfg.337
Garets G (2001) Gartner’s vision for healthcare: the next 10 years. Presentation at the HL7 Plenary and Working Group Meeting in Orlando, FL
Hall JA, Blobel B (2013) Paradigm changes in health lead to paradigm changes in pathology. Stud Health Technol Inform 179:38–50
Blobel B (2013) Knowledge representation and management enabling intelligent interoperability – principles and standards. In: Blobel B, Hasman A, Zvárová J (eds) Data and knowledge for medical decision support. Series studies in health technology and informatics, vol 186. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 3–21
Blobel B, Gonzalez C, Oemig F, Lopez DM, Nykänen P, Ruotsalainen P (2010) The role of architecture and ontology for interoperability. In: Blobel B, Hvannberg EP, Gunnarsdóttir V (eds) Seamless care – safe care: the challenges of interoperability and patient safety in health care. Series studies in health technology and informatics, vol 155. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 33–39
Blobel B (2011) Ontologies, knowledge representation, artificial intelligence – hype or prerequisite for international pHealth Interoperability? In: Stoicu-Tivadar L, Blobel B, Marčun T, Orel A (eds) e-Health across borders without boundaries. E-salus trans confinia sine finibus. Series studies in health technology and informatics, vol 165. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 11–20
Merriam Webster Dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/interoperability. Last accessed 1 Apr 2014
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) (1990) IEEE standard computer dictionary: a compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. New York
Health Level Seven (HL7). www.hl7.org
Blobel B (2010) Architectural approach to eHealth for enabling paradigm changes in health. Methods Inf Med 49(2):123–134
Van Bemmel J, Musen MA (1997) Handbook of medical informatics. Springer, Heidelberg
Shannon C, Weaver W (1959) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Champaign
Brillouin L (1962) Science and information theory. Academic, Waltham
Wiener N (1948) Cybernetics. MIT Technology Press, Boston
DIN ISO 7498: Informationsverarbeitung Kommunikation Offener Systeme, Basis-Referenzmodell, DIN EN ISO 7498-1 ISO/OSI-Modell, Beuth Verlag, 1982
Chomsky N (1959) On certain formal properties of grammars. Inf Control 2:137–167
Rebstock M, Fengel J, Paulheim H (2008) Ontologies-based business integration. Springer, Berlin
NIST: Named Entity Recognition. www.nist.gov
Wikipedia. www.wikipedia.de
Medica 2013 (Bröckerhoff, Main, Geßner, Heidenreich, Mohr, Oemig): Einfacher Datenaustausch für Ärzte II – Wozu benötigt man überhaupt Interoperabilität und wie kann sie hergestellt werden?, discussion round 20.11.2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMxXu-TH77U&feature=view_all. Last accessed 3 Apr 2014
Oemig F, Blobel B (2007) Semantic interoperability adheres to proper models and code systems: an examination of different approaches or score systems. In: Blobel B, Pharow P, Zvarova J, Lopez DM (eds) CeHR conference proceedings 2007: eHealth: combining health telematics telemedicine, biomedical engineering and bioinformatics to the edge, S. 97ff. ISBN: 978-3-89838-089-8 (Aka), ISBN: 978-1-58603-834-2 (IOS), pp 97–104
Detailed Clinical Models. http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Detailed_Clinical_Models, http://www.detailedclinicalmodels.nl/. Last accessed 3 Apr 2014
openEHR Archetypes. http://www.openehr.org/. Last accessed 3 Apr 2014
BFO: The Basic Formal Ontology. www.ifomis.org/bfo. Last accessed 30 June 2014
Kak S (1987) The Paninian approach to natural language processing. Int J Approx Reason 1:117–130
Rindflesch TC, Fiszman M (2003) The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text. J Biomed Inform. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2003.11.003
Oemig F, Blobel B (2010) Harmonizing the semantics of technical terms by the generic component model. In: 10th international special topic conference of the European federation for medical informatics in Reykjavík Iceland, 2–4 June 2010, pp 115–121. IOS. http://www.sky.is/efmi-stc-2010-.html. ISBN: 978-1-60750-562-5
DIMDI: Alpha-ID – Identifkationsnummer für Diagnosen. http://www.dimdi.de/static/de/klassi/alpha-id/. Last accessed 3 Apr 2014
DIMDI: ICD-10-GM. http://www.dimdi.de/static/de/klassi/icd-10-gm/index.htm. Last accessed 3 Apr 2014
Snomed CT: Systemized NOmenclature for MEDicine – Clinical Terms. www.ihtsdo.org. Last accessed 3 Apr 2014
HL7 Version 3 Standard: Privacy, Access and Security Services; Security Labeling Service, Release 1 (SLS). http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=360. Last accessed 3 Apr 2014
MDHT: Model-Driven Health Tools. https://www.projects.openhealthtools.org/sf/projects/mdht/, http://sourceforge.net/projects/oht-modeling/files/Releases/Runtime/. Last accessed 30 June 2014
HL7 Clinical Document Architecture. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=7, http://www.hl7.org/search/viewSearchResult.cfm?search_id=505296&search_result_url=%2Fdocumentcenter%2Fprivate%2Fstandards%2Fcda%2Fr2%2FCDA%5FR2%5FNormativeWebEdition2010%2Ezip. Last access 30 June 2014
HL7 Version 3. www.hl7.org. Last accessed 9 Apr 2014
Heitmann K. CDA und HL7 Version 3 – Nachrichten und Dokumente. http://sciphox.hl7.de/atwork/protokolle/sciphoxHL7v3o.pdf. Last accessed 15 July 2014
CorepointHealth. HL7 CDA Rel.2 D-MIM. http://www.corepointhealth.com/sites/default/files/CDA-R-MIM-Model.gif. Last accessed 15 July 2014
HL7 Development Framework, HL7 Inc. HL7. 2006. http://www.hl7.org/library/committees/mnm%5Chdf_workproduct/HDF%20Methodology%20Specification%2Ezip
VHitG-Arztbrief. http://www.bvitg.de/arztbrief.html. Last accessed 30 June 2014
Meystre SM, Lee S, Jung CY, Chevrier RD (2011) Common data model for natural language processing based on two existing standard information models: CDA+GrAF. J Biomed Inform. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.11.018
Ide NM, Suderman K (2007) GrAF: a graph-based format for linguistic annotations. In: Proceedings of the first linguistic annotation workshop, Prague, pp 1–8
ZUGFeRD einheitliches Format für elektronische Rechnungen: http://www.ferd-net.de/front_content.php?idcat=231&lang=3. Last accessed 9 Apr 2014
CDA und PDF/A: http://wiki.hl7.de/index.php/IG:CDA_und_PDF/A3. Last accessed 9 Apr 2014
Acknowledgements
The authors are indebted to their colleagues from SDOs such as IHTSDO and HL7 for open-minded discussions and their kind cooperation and valuable support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oemig, F., Blobel, B. (2014). Natural Language Processing Supporting Interoperability in Healthcare. In: Biemann, C., Mehler, A. (eds) Text Mining. Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12655-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12655-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12654-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12655-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)