Abstract
Do global patterns of corporate sustainability management exist or are national differences reflected in substantially different corporate practices? This chapter reviews the literature supporting these two lines of argumentation. By taking a ‘bird’s view’ of the overall patterns of sustainability management, we examine whether similarities or differences are predominant on the basis of the International Corporate Sustainability Barometer data. The key findings are that similarities predominate for the overall pattern but some national differences are found when examining the results in detail.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Babiak K, Trendafilova S (2011) CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 18(1):11–24
Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies go green. A model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manag J 43(4):717–736
Crane A, Matten D, Spence L (2014) Corporate social responsibility: in a global context. In: Crane A, Matten D, Spence L (eds) Corporate social responsibility: readings and cases in global context, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 3–20
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160
Epstein MJ (2008) Making sustainability work. Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Greenleaf, Sheffield
European Commission (2004) ABC of the main instruments of corporate social responsibility. http://www.coc-runder-tisch.de/news/news_juni_2005/csr_abc.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
Hansen EG, Klewitz J (2012) Publicly mediated inter-organizational networks: a solution for sustainability-oriented innovation in SMEs? In: Wagner M (ed) Entrepreneurship, innovation and sustainability. Greenleaf, Sheffield, pp 254–278
Hansen EG, Grosse-Dunker F, Reichwald R (2009) Sustainability innovation cube – a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. Int J Innov Manag 13(4):683–713
Hofstede G (1994) Management scientists are human. Manag Sci 40(1):4–13
Husted BW (2005) Culture and ecology: a cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. Manag Int Rev 45(3):349–371
Krick T, Forstater M, Monaghan P, Sillanpää M (2005) Stakeholder engagement manual. In: The practitioner’s handbook on stakeholder engagement, vol 2. AccountAbility, London
Matten D, Moon J (2008) ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 33(2):404–424
Paech N (2007) Directional certainty in sustainability-oriented innovation management. In: Lehmann-Waffenschmidt M (ed) Innovations towards sustainability. Conditions and consequences. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg/New York, pp 121–140
Porter ME, Kramer MR (2006) Strategy and society. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev 84(12):78–92
Schaltegger S, Burritt R (2005) Corporate sustainability. In: Folmer H, Tietenberg T (eds) International yearbook of environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 245–289
Schaltegger S, Herzig C, Kleiber C, Müller J (2002) Sustainability management in business enterprises, concepts and instruments for sustainable organisation development. The Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU)/Federation of German Industries (BDI), Bonn/Berlin
Schaltegger S, Lüdeke-Freund F, Hansen E (2012) Business cases for sustainability. The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. Int J Innov Sustain Dev 6(2):95–119
Schaltegger S, Harms D, Hörisch J, Windolph SE, Burritt R, Carter A, Truran S, Crutzen N, Ben Rhouma A, Csutora M, Tabi A, Kokubu K, Kitada H, Haider MB, Kim J-D, Lee K-H, Moneva JM, Ortas E, Álvarez-Etxeberria I, Daub C-H, Schmidt J, Herzig C, Morelli J (2013) International corporate sustainability barometer: a comparative study of 11 countries. Centre for Sustainability Management, Lüneburg
Schaltegger S, Harms D, Windolph SE, Hörisch J (2014) Involving corporate functions: who contributes to sustainable development? Sustainability 6(5):3064–3085
Tietze F, Hansen EG (2013) To own or to use: how product service systems impact firms’ innovation behaviour. Eur Financ Rev Aug–Sept:53–56
Vachon S (2010) International operations and sustainable development: should national culture matter? Sustain Dev 18(6):350–361
Vitell SJ, Nwachukwu SL, Barnes JH (1993) The effects of culture on ethical decision-making: an application of Hofstede’s typology. J Bus Ethics 12(10):753–760
Whitley R (1997) Business systems. In: Sorge A, Warner M (eds) The IEBM handbook of organizational behavior. International Thomson Business Press, London, pp 173–186
Wright C, Nyberg D, de Cock C, Whiteman G (2013) Future imaginings: organizing in response to climate change. Organization 20(5):647–658
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schaltegger, S., Harms, D. (2014). General Patterns and Conclusions. In: Schaltegger, S., Windolph, S., Harms, D., Hörisch, J. (eds) Corporate Sustainability in International Comparison. Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06227-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06226-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06227-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)