Skip to main content

Biofuels and Food Security in Brazil

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biofuels and Food Security

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES))

Abstract

To reduce its oil import bill, the government of Brazil inaugurated a national bioethanol program (PROALCOOL) in 1975. An important direct effect of the program was the creation of huge domestic demand for its sugarcane market because sugarcane is the feedstock of bioethanol production, which has increased in Brazil since 1975. In the late 2000s the Brazilian government achieved the original policy target of PROALCOOL to reduce dependency of petroleum imports. The Brazilian bioethanol industry, including bioelectricity, is growing as one of the main energy industries in the Brazilian economy. While it is possible Brazil will expand sugarcane production to the Cerrado area, this may cause land-use change and environmental problems. Bioethanol and sugar are produced from sugarcane and the allocation rate for bioethanol and sugar is decided by the relationship between domestic bioethanol and sugar prices. Since 1990, more than half of Brazil’s harvested sugarcane has been for bioethanol use. Therefore, bioethanol and sugar production are competing by allocating sugarcane production. Soybean oil accounts for 71.7–90.9 % of the feedstock of Brazil’s biodiesel program, which the government has been promoting. Since 2005, production has increased rapidly; in 2012 the soybean oil use ratio in domestic soybean oil consumption increased to 32.2 %. This means the Brazilian biodiesel program has had an impact on global soybean and soybean products markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It can run nearly 100 % of bioethanol.

  2. 2.

    Bioethanol is applied for preferential tax measures. CIDE (Contribuicao de Intervencao no Domini Economico) is charged at 0.28 R$/L for gasoline and fixed at zero for bioethanol. PIS/COFINS, a social tax, is charged at 0.2616 R$/L for gasoline and 0.048 R$/L for bioethanol producers or 0.12 R$/L for bioethanol distributors.

  3. 3.

    Anhydrous bioethanol has an alcohol content of more than 99.3 %.

  4. 4.

    Hydrated bioethanol an alcohol content of between 92.6 and 99.2 %.

  5. 5.

    Interviewed from UNICA (May 2011).

  6. 6.

    The net energy return on investments  for bioethanol is defined as the ratio of energy contained in a given volume of bioethanol divided by the fossil energy required for its production.

  7. 7.

    This default GHG emission did not cover indirect land use change.

  8. 8.

    Sugarcane data are derived from [15].

References

  1. Licht FO (2013a) FO Licht world ethanol & biofuels report, vol 11, no 17, Agra Imforma Ratzeburg, Germany. p 345

    Google Scholar 

  2. Licht FO (2013b) FO Licht world ethanol & biofuels report, vol 11, no 19, Agra Imforma Ratzeburg, Germany. p 387

    Google Scholar 

  3. Licht FO (2013c) FO Licht world ethanol & biofuels report, vol 12, no 3, Agra. Imforma Ratzeburg, Germany. p 42

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2012) World energy outlook 2012, International Energy Agency. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/publications/weo-2013/. Accessed 12 Dec 2013

  5. Goldemberg J (2008) The Brazilian biofuels industry. Biotechnol Biofuels 2008:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hira A, de Oliveira LG (2009) No substitute for oil? How developed its ethanol industry. Energy Policy 37:2450–2456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rovere EL, Pereira AS (2011) Biofuels and sustainable energy development in Brazil. World Dev 39(6):1026–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall J, Matos S, Severino L, Beltrao N (2009) Brazilian biofuels and social exclusion: established and concentrated ethanol versus emerging and dispersed biodiesel. J Clean Prod 17:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Silva JAG, Perez R, Oliveira RO (2008) Analysis, design and implementation of biodiesel projects in Brazil. Paper prepared for presentation at the 110 th EAAE seminar, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yamamoto S, Tezuka A (1992) Brazil, Hakusuisya. Tokyo, pp 51–52

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ministério da Agricultura, Pcuária e Abastecimento (MAPA) (2012) ANUÁRIO ESTATÍSTICODA AGROENERGIA 2012. Ministério da Agricultura, Pcuária e Abastecimento, Brazil. http://www.agricultura.gov.br/arq_editor/file/Desenvolvimento_Sustentavel/Agroenergia/anuario_agroenergia_web_2012.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2013

  12. Associacção Nacional dos Fabricantes de Veículos Automotores (ANFAVEA) (2013) Frota brasileira de automóveis e veículos leves. http://www.anfavea.com.br/. Accessed 11 Dec 2013

  13. Ministério de Minas e Energia (MME) (2013) Brazilian energy balance 2013. Ministério de Minas e Energia, Brazil. https://ben.epe.gov.br/downloads/Relatorio_Final_BEN_2013.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2013

  14. Center for Advanced Studies on Applied Economics (CEPEA) (2013) CEPEA daily indexes. http://www.cepea.esalq.usp.br/english/. Accessed 21 Dec 2013

  15. Food and Agriculural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2013) FAOSTAT, FAO. http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed 15 Dec 2013

  16. Agra FNP (2010) Agriannual 2010, Anuario da Agricultura Brasieira, AgraFNP, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  17. Von Lampe M (2006) Agricultural market impacts of future growth in the production of biofuels. OECD, AGR/CA/APM (2006)15, Paris, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  18. Licht FO (2008) Ethanol production costs, a worldwide survey. Agra Imforma Ltd., Ratzeburg, Germany, p 345

    Google Scholar 

  19. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA-FAS) Production, supply and distribution online. http://www.fas.usda.gov/psd/intro.asp. Accessed 1 Dec 2013

  20. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (MAPA) (2011) Projeções do agronegócio 2010/11 a 2020/21. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. http://www.agricultura.gov.br/arq_editor/file/Ministerio/gestao/projecao/PROJECOES%20DO%20AGRONEGOCIO%202010-11%20a%202020-21%20-%202_0.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2013

  21. UNICA (Sao Paulo Sugarcane Agroindustry Union) (2013) The Brazilian sugarcane industry. http://english.unica.com.br/. Accessed 1 Dec 2013

  22. Macedo IC, Seabra JEA, Silva JEAR (2008) Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. Biomass Bioenergy 32:582–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. European Parliament and of the Council (2009), The promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, DIRECTIVE 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/energy/renewable_energy/en0009_en.htm. Accessed 15 Jan 2014

  24. Goldemberg J, Coelho ST, Nastari PM, Lucon O (2004) Ethanol learning curve-the Brazilian experience. Biomass Bioenergy 26(3):301–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rover ELL, Pereira AS, Simoes AF (2011) Biofuels and sustainable energy development in Brazil. World Development 39:1026–1036

    Google Scholar 

  26. High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) (2013) Biofuels and food security, a report by the high level panel of experts on food security and nutrition. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/hlpe/hlpe_documents/HLPE_Reports/HLPEReport5_Biofuels_and_food_security.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2013

  27. Nassar AM (2008) Sustainability considerations for ethanol, food, fuel and forests, Bogor, Indonesia. http://www.agritrade.org/events/documents/Nassar2008.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2013

  28. Kim S, Dale BE (2011) Indirect land use change for biofuels: testing predictions and improving analytical methodologies. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3235–3240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. European Commission. Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC). http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-12-787_en.htm. Accessed 15 Jan 2014

  30. Gao Y, Skutsh M, Drigo M, Pacheco O, Masera O (2011) Assessing deforestation from biofuels: methodological challenges. Appl Geogr 31(2):508–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística) (2005) Diretoria de Pesquisas,Coordenação de Contas Nacionais: Contas Regionais do Brasil 2003, IBGE, Barzilia

    Google Scholar 

  32. Koizumi T, Ohga K (2008) Impacts of the Brazilian biodiesel program on the world soybean and soybean products market: an econometric simulation approach. Jpn J Rural Econ 10:12–32

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ministério da Agricultura, Pcuária e Abastecimento (MAPA) (2005) Biodiesel in Brazil, Ministério da Agricultura, Pcuária e Abastecimento

    Google Scholar 

  34. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA-FAS) (2009) Brazil biofuel annual report. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/BIOFUELS%20ANNUAL_Sao%20Paulo%20ATO_Brazil_8-5-2009.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2013

  35. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service (USDA-FAS) (2013) Brazil biofuel Annual Report. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Biofuels%20Annual_Sao%20Paulo%20ATO_Brazil_9-12-2013.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2013

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatsuji Koizumi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koizumi, T. (2014). Biofuels and Food Security in Brazil. In: Biofuels and Food Security. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05645-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05645-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05644-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05645-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics