Skip to main content

A randomized controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke

  • Conference paper
Reconstructive Neurosurgery

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 101))

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the benefits of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) relative to traditional intervention equal in treatment intensity and use of restraint mitt outside rehabilitation on motor performance and daily functions in stroke patients. Design. Two-group randomized controlled trial (RCT). Setting. Rehabilitation clinics. Subjects. Twenty-two chronic stroke patients (mean time postonset of stroke = 18.9 months).

Intervention

The subjects were randomized to receive CIMT (restraint of the less affected limb combined with intensive training of the affected limb) or traditional intervention (control treatment) during the study. The treatment intensity was matched between the two groups (2h/d, 5d/wk for 3 wk). Both groups of patients received restraint of the less affected limb outside rehabilitation (ca. 3h/d).

Main measures

Motor performance was evaluated using the Fugl-Myer Assessment and the Motor Activity Log. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Functional Independence Measure and the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale.

Results

The CIMT group showed significantly greater improvements in motor performance, level of functional independence, and the mobility domain of extended activities of daily living. Conclusions. This is the first RCT to show the benefits of CIMT, relative to control treatment equal in amount of therapy, in improving motor performance and some aspects of basic and extended activities of daily living.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 75–108

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M (2000) Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischémic stroke? Stroke 31: 2984–2988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG (1983) Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovas-cular accident. Phys Ther 63: 1606–1610

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harwood RH, Ebrahim S (2000) A comparison of the responsiveness of the Nottingham extended activities of daily living scale, London handicap scale and SF-36. Disabil Rehabil 22: 786–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J, Johnsson J, Rossiter D, Petruckevitch A, Thomson AJ (1995) The functional independence measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil 17: 10–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sabes P (2000) The planning and control of reaching movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10: 740–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connell JS, Crago JE (1993) Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74: 347–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Taub E, Uswatte G, King DK, Morris D, Crago JE, Chatterjee A (2006) A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke 37: 1045–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Trombly-Latham CA (2008) Optimizing motor behavior using the Brunnstrom movement therapy approach. In: Radomski MV, Trombly-Latham CA (eds) Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York, pp 667–689

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu CY, Chen CL, Tsai WC, Lin KC, Chou SH (2007) A randomized, controlled trial of mCIT for elderly stroke survivors: changes in motor impairment, daily functioning, and quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88: 273–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lin, K.C., Wu, Cy., Liu, J.S. (2008). A randomized controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. In: Chiu, WT., et al. Reconstructive Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, vol 101. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-78205-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-78205-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-78204-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-78205-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics