Summary
Upper extremity motor impairment is a major contributing factor to functional disability of stroke patients. Functional electric stimulation (FES) is one of the therapeutic regimens for the management of upper extremity dysfunction after stroke. This review shows that therapeutic FES intervention on supraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles for 6 weeks is effective to speed up upper limb motor recovery in hemiplegia of short-duration after stroke or less severely affected symptoms. The positive effect of FES could be attributable to neural mechanisms including: an enhanced information flow from the joint and muscle afferents, a better visual perception of the movement produced, and a stronger muscle contraction due to direct stimulation of the motor neuron. However, FES was demonstrated as not being effective in reducing the shoulder range of motion of external rotation in patients with either short- or long-duration hemiplegia. In order to offer better management in maintaining or improving limited shoulder range of motion, other types of electrical stimulation should be considered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ada L, Foongchomcheay A (2002) Efficacy of electrical stimulation in preventing or reducing subluxation of the shoulder after stroke: a meta-analysis. Aust J Physiother 48: 257–267 (review)
Albert A, Andre JM (1984) State of the art of functional electrical stimulation in France. Int Rehabil Med 6: 13–18
Anderson LT (1985) Shoulder pain in hemiplegia. Am J Occup Ther 39: 1–19
Anderson M (1993) The role of cerebellum in motor control and motor learning. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 4: 623–636
Asanuma H, Keller A (1991) Neuronal mechanisms of motor learning in mammals. Neuroreport 2: 217–224
Asanuma H, Keller A (1991) Neurobiological basis of motor learning and memory. Conc Neurosci 2: 1130
Baker LL, Parker K (1986) Neuromuscular electrical stimulation of the muscles surrounding the shoulder. Phys Ther 66: 1930–1937
Bender L, MaKenna K (2001) Hemiplegic shoulder pain: defining the problem and its management. Disabil Rehabil 23: 698–705
Caldwell CB, Wilson DJ, Braun RM (1969) Evaluation and treatment of the upper extremity in the hemiplegic stroke patient. Clin Orthop Rel Res 63: 69–92
Chantraine A, Baribeault A, Uebelhart D, Gremion G (1999) Shoulder pain and dysfunction in hemiplegia: effects of functional electrical stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80: 328–331
De Kroon JR, IJzerman MJ, Lankhorst GJ, Zilvold G (2004) Electrical stimulation of the upper limb in stroke: stimulation of the extensors of the hand vs. alternate stimulation of flexors and extensors. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 83: 592–600
Dimitriijevic MM, Soroker N (1994) Mesh-glove: 2. Modulation of residual upper limb motor control after stroke with whole-hand electric stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med 26: 187–190
Faghri PD (1997) The effects of neuromuscular stimulation-induced muscle contraction versus elevation on hand oedema in CVA patients. J Hand Ther 10: 29–34
Faghri PD, Rodgers MM, Glaser RM, Bors JG, Ho C, Akuthota P (1994) The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 73–79
Francisco G, Chae J, Chawla H, Kirshblum S, Zorowitz R, Lewis G, Pang S (1998) Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation for improving the arm function of acute stroke survivors: a randomized pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79: 570–575
Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, Berkey C, Chalmers T (1996) Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a metaanalysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77: 549–553
Griffin JW (1986) Hemiplegic shoulder pain. Phys Ther 66: 1884–1893
Griffin JW, Reddin G (1981) Shoulder pain in patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther 61: 1041–1045
Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Langton-Hewer R, Ward E (1987) Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50: 714–719
Hendricks HT, Ijzerman MJ, de Kroon JR, in’ t Groen FA, Zilvold G (2001) Functional electrical stimulation by means of the ‘Ness Handmaster Orthosis’ in chronic stroke patients: an exploratory study. Clin Rehabil 15: 217–220
Hunt S, Pini A, Evan G (1987) Induction of c-fos-like protein in spinal cord neurons following sensory stimulation. Nature 328: 632–634
Kirkham AP, Shah NC, Knight SL, Shah PJ, Craggs MD (2001) The acute effects of continuous and conditional neuromodulation on the bladder in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 39: 420–428
Kobayashi H, Onishi H, Ihashi K, Yagi R, Handa Y (1999) Reduction in subluxation and improved muscle function of the hemiplegic shoulder joint after therapeutic electrical stimulation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 9: 327–336
Kumar VP, Lau HK, Lui J, Pereira BP, Phjo RW (1995) Clinical applications of functional electrical stimulation. Ann Acad Med Singapore 24: 428–435
Leandri M, Parodi CI, Corrieri N, Rigardo S (1990) Comparison of TENS treatments in hemiplegic shoulder pain. Scand J Rehabil Med 22: 69–71
Liberson WT, Holmquest HJ, Scot D, Dow M (1961) Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronised with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 42: 101–105
Linn SL, Granat MH, Lees KR (1999) Prevention of shoulder subluxation after stroke with electrical stimulation. Stroke 30: 963–968
Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1994) The recovery of the upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 1–5
Pandyan AD, Granat MH, Stott DJ (1997) Effects of electrical stimulation on flexion contractures in the hemiplegic wrist. Clin Rehabil 11: 123–130
Prada G, Tallis R (1995) Treatment of the neglect syndrome in stroke patients using a contingency electrical stimulator. Clin Rehabil 9: 304–313
Price CI, Pandyan AD (2001) Electrical stimulation for preventing and treating post-stroke shoulder pain: a systematic Cochrane review. Clin Rehabil 15: 5–19 (review)
Sonde L, Gip C, Fernaeus SE, Nilsson CG, Viitanen M (1998) Stimulation with low frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low-tens) increases motor function of the poststroke paretic arm. Scand J Rehabil Med 30: 95–99
Thatch T (1993) Neural basis of motor control: an overview. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 4: 615–422
Turner-Stokes L, Jackson D (2002) Shoulder pain after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development of an integrated care pathway. Clin Rehabil 16: 276–298 (review)
Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM (1983) The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 46: 521–524
Wang R-Y, Yang YR, Tsai MW, Wang TJ, Chan RC (2002) Effects of functional electric stimulation on upper limb motor function and shoulder range of motion in hemiplegia patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81: 283–290
Yu DT, Chae J, Walker ME, Kirsteins A, Elovic EP, Flanagan SR, Harvey RL, Zorowitz RD, Frost FS, Gill JH, Feldstein M, Fang ZP (2004) Intramuscular neuromuscular electric stimulation for poststroke shoulder pain: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85: 695–704
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wang, RY. (2007). Neuromodulation of effects of upper limb motor function and shoulder range of motion by functional electric stimulation (FES). In: Sakas, D.E., Simpson, B.A., Krames, E.S. (eds) Operative Neuromodulation. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 97/1. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33079-1_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33079-1_50
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-33078-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-211-33079-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)