Skip to main content

Culture as Sensemaking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Culture and Policy-Making

Abstract

This chapter outlines the Semiotic Cultural Psychology Theory (SCPT). SCPT defines culture as the dynamics of sensemaking enacted by a social group defined by common participation in a given environment (e.g. a territory, a system of action, a communication setting). Such a dynamics of sensemaking is channelled by embodied, generalised, affect-laden meaning (Symbolic Universes, according to the SCPT terminology) that are active within the cultural milieu. The SCPT view of culture leads us to focus on the processes of interpretations through which social actors shape, react and act upon the socio-political, institutional and economic reality as well as on the way the symbolic fields generated by these processes shape their form, in a recursive semiotic dynamic. Emphasis is placed on how the focus on the recursive linkage between sensemaking and symbolic fields enables us to go beyond the essentialist and descriptive view of the role of culture in society and economy as well as to bridge micro and macro levels of analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett Freeman, L. (2006). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 20–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Luckman, T. (1966/1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Open Road.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickhard, M. H. (2009). Interactivism: A manifesto. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and oOpinions: Studies in Rhetorical sociology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. R. (1961). Experience in groups and other papers. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (Vol. 16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Original work in French, Genève [CH]: Droz, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrettero, M., & Kriger, M. (2011). Historical representations and conflicts about indigenous people as national identities. Culture & Psychology, 17(2), 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciavolino, E., Redd, R., Avdi, E., Falcone, F., Fini, V., Kadianaki, I., Kullasepp, K. Mannarini, T., Matsopoulos, A., Mossi, P., Rochira, A., Santarpia, A., Sammut, G., Valsiner, J., Veltri, G. A., & Salvatore, S. (2017a). Views of Context. An instrument for the analysis of the cultural milieu. A first validation study. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 10(2), 599–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciavolino, E., Salvatore, S., Mossi, P., & Vernai, M. (2017b). Quality and Prosumership. PROSERV: a new tool for measuring the Customer satisfaction International Journal of Business and Society, 18(3), 409–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2005). Beyond the flesh: some lessons from a mole cricket. Artificial Life, 11(1–2), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions think. Syracuse (NY): Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. (Eds.). (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (2017). Society and economy. Framework and principles. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap of the Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Arndt, J. (2012). Terror management theory. In P. A. M. K. Van Lange & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 398–415). Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications Ltd.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, D., J. (2020). Arguments and institutions. In P. Haack, J. Sieweke, & L. Wessel (Eds.), Microfoundations of institutions (Vol. 65B; 3–22). Bingley (UK): Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Sammut, G. (2013). What lies between? In G. Sammut, P. Daanen, & F. M. Moghaddam (Eds.), Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in intersubjectivity and interobjectivity (pp. 15–30). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauro-Grotto, R. P., Salvatore, S., Gennaro, A., & Gelo, O. (2009). The unbearable dynamicity of psychological processes: Highlights of the psychodynamic theories. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamics process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 1–30). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, J. (2015). Embodied social cognition. Heidelberg (DE): Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking language, mind and world dialogically. Interactional and contextual theories of sensemaking. Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., Kaiser, C. R., O’Brien, L. T., & McCoy, S. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1068–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannarini, T., & Salvatore, S. (2020). The politicization of otherness and the privatization of the enemy: Cultural hindrances and assets for active citizenship. Human Affairs. Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly, 30, 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markova, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations. The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. An integration. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 952–953). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossi, P. G., Ingusci, E., Tonti, M., & Salvatore, S. (2019). QUASUS: A Tool for Measuring the Parents’ School Satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., May, W. H., & Miron, M. S. (1975). Cross-cultural Universals of affective meaning. Chicago (IL): Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proulx, T., & Inzlicht, M. (2012). The Five “A”s of meaning maintenance: Finding meaning in the theories of sense-making. Psychological Inquiry, 23(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2012.702372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochira, A., Mannarini, T., Fini, V., & Salvatore, S. (2019). Symbolic Universes, Semiotic Capital and Health. A Semiotic Cultural Psychological Analysis of the Vaccination Hesitancy Phenomenon in Italy. In S. Salvatore, V. Fini, T. Mannarini, J. Valsiner, & G. A. Veltri (Eds.), Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)CrisisThe Future of European Societies (pp. 215–233). Cham (CH): Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2018). The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S. (2012). Social Life of the Sign: Sensemaking in Society. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 241–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S. (2013). The reciprocal inherency of self and context. Outline for a semiotic model of constitution of experience. Interacçioes, 24(9), 20–50, retrieved June 3, 2013 from https://www.eses.pt/interaccoes.

  • Salvatore, S. (2016). Psychology in black and white. The project of a theory-driven science. Charlotte (NC): InfoAge Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S. (2018). Cultural Psychology as the Science of Sensemaking: A Semiotic-cultural Framework for Psychology. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (2nd Edition) (pp 35–48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316662229.003.

  • Salvatore, S. (2019a). Beyond the meaning given. The meaning as explanandum. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science, 53, 632–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-9472-z

  • Salvatore, S., Fini, V., Mannarini, T., Veltri, G. A., Avdi, E., Battaglia, F., Castro-Tejerina, J., Ciavolino, E., Cremaschi, M., Kadianaki, I., Kharlamov, A. N., Krasteva, A., Kullasepp, K., Matsopoulos, A., Meschiari, C., Mossi, P., Psinas, P., Redd, R., Rochira, A., Santarpia, A., Sammut, G., Valsiner, J., & Valmorbida, A. (2018) Symbolic universes between present and future of Europe. First results of the map of European societies’ cultural milieu. PLoS ONE 13(1), e0189885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189885.

  • Salvatore, S., & Freda, M. F. (2011). Affect unconscious and sensemaking. A psychodynamic semiotic and dialogic model. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S., & Tschacher, W. (2012). Time dependency of psychotherapeutic exchanges: The contribution of the theory of dynamic systems in analyzing process. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S. (2019b). Lotteries, bets, Coca-cola and Octopus Paul. The extraordinary of ordinary. In G. Marsico, & L. Tateo (Eds.), Ordinary things and their extraordinary meanings (pp. 123–144). Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S., & Zittoun, T. (Eds.). (2011). Cultural psychology and psychoanalysis in dialogue. Issues for constructive theoretical and methodological synergies. Charlotte (NC): InfoAge Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S., Lauro-Grotto, R., Gennaro, A., & Gelo, O. (2009). Attempts to grasp the dynamicity of intersubjectivity. In J. Valsiner, P. Molenaar, M. Lyra, & N. Chaudhary (Eds.), Dynamics process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 171–190). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S., Gelo, O., Gennaro, A., Manzo, S., & Al-Radaideh, A. (2010). Looking at the psychotherapy process as an intersubjective dynamic of meaning-making. A case study with Discourse Flow Analysis. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 23, 195–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S. Tebaldi, C., & Poti, S. (2009). The discursive dynamic of sensemaking. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout & J. Clegg (Eds.), Yearbook of Idiographic Science—Volume 1 (pp. 39–72). Roma: Firera Publishing Group. First published 2006, International Journal of Idiographic Science [On Line Journal], Article 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S., Tonti, M., & Gennaro, A. (2017). How to model sensemaking. A contribution for the development of a methodological framework for the analysis of meaning. In M. Han & C. Cunha (Eds.), The subjectified and subjectifying Mind (pp. 245–268). Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., & Veltri, G. A. (2019). The Theoretical and methodological framework. Semiotic cultural psychology, symbolic universes and lines of semiotic forces. In S. Salvatore, V. Fini, T. Mannarini, J. Valsiner, & G. A. Veltri (Eds.). Symbolic Universes in Time of (Post)Crisis. The Future of European Societies (pp. 25–49). Cham (CH): Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvatore, S., Mannarini, T., Avdi, E., Battaglia, F., Cremaschi, M., Forges Davanzati, G., Fini, V., Kadianaki, I., Krasteva, A., Matsopoulos, A., Mølholm, M., Redd, R., Rochira, A., Russo, F., Santarpia, A., Sammut, G., Valmorbida, A., & Veltri G. A. (2019). Globalization, demand of sense and enemization of the other. A psycho-cultural analysis of European societies’ socio-political crisis. Culture & Psychology, 25(3), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X18779056.

  • Salvatore, S., De Luca Picione, R., Cozzolino M., Bochicchio, V., & Palmieri, A. (2021, on line). The role of affective sensemaking in the constitution of experience. The Affective Pertinentization Model (APER). Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09590-9.

  • Tonti, M., & Salvatore, S. (2015). The Homogenization of Classification Functions Measurement (HOCFUN): A method for measuring the salience of emotional arousal in thinking. American Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 469–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaisey, S., & Lizardo, O. (2010). Can cultural worldview influence network composition? Social Forces, 88(4), 1595–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. London: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valsiner, J. (2019). Generalization in Science: Abstracting from unique events. In C. Højholt, & E. Schraube (Eds.), Subjectivity and Knowledge: Generalization in the Psychological Study of Everyday Life (pp. 79–97). Cham (CH): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29977-4_5.

  • Venuleo, C., Salvatore, G., Andrisano Ruggieri, R., Marinaci, T., Cozzolino, M., & Salvatore, S. (2020). Steps towards a unified theory of psychopathology: The Phase Space of Meaning model. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 17(4), 236–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organization. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cremaschi, M., Fioretti, C., Mannarini, T., Salvatore, S. (2021). Culture as Sensemaking. In: Culture and Policy-Making. Culture in Policy Making: The Symbolic Universes of Social Action. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71967-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71967-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71966-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71967-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics