Skip to main content

‘What Family Actually Means’: Re-Articulations of ‘Family’ in and Around Netflix’s Sense8

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creative Families

Abstract

The Netflix show Sense8 (2015–18) invokes varying concepts of ‘family’ as a leitmotif for reflections on the social and affective conditions of contemporary media economies defined by a shift in the producer–user interaction. It thereby makes an interesting case study of transmedia storytelling which equally serves as entertainment for a niche audience and helps to activate a cheap digital workforce. Through a close reading of the show’s fictional themes and their transfer into Social Media extensions, informed by Digital Fandom and Queer Affect Studies, I discuss the term ‘family’ as an ambivalent concept in processes of story-based queer (fan) community-building and ask for its economic value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2010) ‘Happy Objects’, in Gregg, M. and Seigworth, G. J. (eds) The Affect Theory Reader (Durham: Duke University Press), 29–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, S. (2017) ‘What Makes ‘Sense8’ the Best LGBT TV Show’, TheDailyBeast 5 May 2017, https://www.thedailybeast.com/what-makes-sense8-the-best-lgbt-tv-show, date accessed 26 January 2019.

  • Bacon-Smith, C. (1992) Enterprising Women: Television Fandom and the Creation of Popular Myth (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M., cárdenas, m., Horak, L., Kaimana, L., Keegan, C. M., Newman, G., Samer, G. and Sarkissian, R. (2017) ‘Sense8 Roundtable’, Transgender Media: Spectator, 37 (2), 74–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, P. and Kelly, P. (2013) ‘The Changing Faces of Doctor Who Fandom: New Fans, New Technologies, Old Practices?’, Participations: Journal of Audience & Reception Studies, 10 (1), 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fina, A. (2008) ‘Who Tells Which Story and Why? Micro and Macro Contexts in Narrative’, Special Issue Text and Talk: Narrative Analysis in the Shift from Text to Practices, 28 (3), 421–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessart, G. (2013 [1997]) ‘Standards and Practices’, in Newcomb, H. (ed) Encyclopedia of Television, 2nd Edn (New York, London: Routledge), 2186–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, L. (2018) ‘Transnational Queerings and Sense8,’ in Aldama, F.L. (ed) The Routledge Companion to Gender, Sex and Latin American Culture (New York: Routledge), 222–30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, J. (1992) ‘The Cultural Economy of Fandom’, in Lewis, L.A. (ed) The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media (London: Routledge), 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, J. and Hartley, J. (2003 [1978]) Reading Television, 2nd Edn (London/New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1976) Der Wille zum Wissen: Sexualität und Wahrheit I (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuch, C. and Sevignani, S. (2013) ‘What Is Digital Labour? What Is Digital Work? What’s Their Difference? And Why Do These Questions Matter for Understanding Social Media?’, tripleC 11 (2), 237–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garde-Hansen, J. and Gorton, K. (2013) Emotion Online: Theorizing Affect on the Internet (London: Palgrave-Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gill. R. (2002) ‘Cool, Creative and Egalitarian? Exploring Gender in Project-Based New Media Work in Europe’, Information, Communication & Society 5 (1), 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, T. (2017) ‘Sense8’ Season 2: TV Review, The Hollywood Reporter 5/4/2017, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/sense8-review-1000283, date accessed 22 October 2020.

  • Hausen, K. (1976) ‘Die Polarisierung der Geschlechtscharaktere. Eine Spiegelung der Dissoziation von Erwerbs- und Familienleben‘, in Conze, W. (ed) Sozialgeschichte der Familie in der Neuzeit Europas (Stuttart: Klett), 363–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, K. (1997) ‘Introduction: Situating Narrative in an Ecology of New Media’, Modern Fiction Studies 43 (3), 573–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellekson, K. (2009) ‘A Fannish Field of Value: Online Fan Gift Culture’, Cinema Journal 48 (4), 113–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellekson, K. (2018) ‘The Fan Experience’, in Booth, P. (ed) A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies (Oxford: Wiley), 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrett, K. (2016) Feminism, Labour, and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, C. (2015) Home Movies: The American Family in Contemporary Hollywood Cinema (New York: Tauris).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (1992) Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2007) Transmedia Storytelling 101, http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2007/03/transmedia_storytelling_101.html, date accessed 26 January 2019.

  • Jenkins, H., Ford, S. and J. Green (2013) Spreadable Media. Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, C. M. (2016) ‘Tongues Without Bodies: The Wachowskis’ Sense8’, Transgender Studies Quarterly 3 (3–4), 605–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohnen, M. E. S. (2018) ‘Fannish Affect, “Quality” Fandom, and Transmedia Storytelling Campaigns’, in Click, M. A. and Scotte, S. (eds) The Routledge Companion to Media Fandom (New York: Routledge), 337–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, J. (2008) ‘Picturing Whiteness: The Events of 9/11 in Children’s Storybooks’, in Moreton-Robinson, A., Casey, M. and Nicoll, F. (eds) Transnational Whiteness Matters (Lanham: Lexington), 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. (1996) ‘Immaterial Labor’ [Transl. P. Colilli, E. Emery], in Hardt, M. and Virno, P. (eds) Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 133–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessard, J. (2016) ‘A Sense of the World: Sense8, Transmedia Storytelling, and the Erotics of Distraction’, Draft/Paper, Presented at the UC Berkeley, Interdisciplinary German Studies Conference, Focus in Distraction (Feb 2016), http://www.academia.edu/22692612/A_Sense_of_the_World_Sense8_Transmedia_Storytelling_and_the_Erotics_of_Distraction, date accessed 26 January 2019.

  • Levesley, D. (2015) ‘Here’s the Best Queer Scene in Sense8’, Slate June 22, 2015, https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/06/in-sense8-netflix-has-created-a-queer-masterpiece.html, date accessed 22 October 2020.

  • McFarlane, A. (2017) ‘Sense8 (Review)’, Science Fiction Film and Television 10 (1), 149–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlotten, S. (2013) Virtual Intimacies: Media, Affect, and Queer Sociality (Albany: Suny Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T. (2012 [2004]) ‘What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software’, in Mandiberg, M. (ed) The Social Media Reader (New York/London: New York University Press), 32–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelters, J. C. (2015) ‘Kein Quotenschwuler, keine “Transe vom Dienst”’, https://www.queer.de/detail.php?article_id=24379, date accessed 26 January 2019.

  • Philipps, T. (2011) ‘When Film Fans Become Fan Family: Kevin Smith Fandom and Communal Experience’, Participations. Journal of Audience & Reception Studies 8 (2), 478–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piontek, T. (2012) ‘Tears for Queers: Ang Lee’s Brokeback Mountain, Hollywood, and American Attitudes Toward Homosexuality’, Journal of American Culture 35 (2), 123–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerance, M. (2008) ‘Introduction: Family Affairs’, in Pomerance, M. (ed) A Family Affair: Cinema Calls Home (London: Wallflower), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, M. (2003)Brandon Goes to Hollywood: Boys Don’t Cry and the Transgender Body in Film’, Film Criticism 28 (2), 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabotini, R. (1999) ‘The Fannish Potlatch: Creation of Status Within the Fan Community’, The Fanfic Symposium, http://www.trickster.org/symposium/symp41.htm, date accessed 27 January 2019.

  • Scholz, T. (ed) (2013) Digital Labor. The Internet as Playground and Factory (New York, London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seier, A. (2007) Remediatisierung. Die Performative Konstitution von Gender und Medien (Münster: Lit).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. (2016) ‘The Netflix Effect: Impacts of the Streaming Model on Television Storytelling [B.A.-thesis], Wesleyan University, College of Film and the Moving Image, https://wesscholar.wesleyan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2591&context=etd_hon_theses, date accessed 27 January 2019.

  • Smith, A. (2017) ‘Sense8 and a Radical Queer Future’, Medium May 6, 2017, https://medium.com/@AdamCommentism/sense8-and-a-radical-queer-future-ca7f7f4fa1f9, date accessed 26 January 2019.

  • Spence, J. (2014) Labours of Love: Affect, Fan Labour, and the Monetization of Fandom [M.A.-Thesis], University of Western Ontario: Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository, https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3906&context=etd, date accessed 01 March 2019.

  • Terranova, T. (2013 [2000]) ‘Free Labor’, in Scholz, T. (ed) Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory (New York: Routledge), 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1980) The Third Wave: The Classic Study of Tomorrow (New York: Bantam).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Doorn, N. (2017) ‘Platform Labor: on the Gendered and Racialized Exploitation of Low-Income Service Work in the ‘On-Demand’ Economy’, Information, Communication & Society 20 (6), 898–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. (2010) ‘Desiring Recognition, Accumulating Affect’, in Gregg, M. and Seigworth, G. J. (eds) The Affect Theory Reader (Durham/London: Duke), 285–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubernis, L. S. (2017) Family Don’t End with Blood. Cast and Fans on How Supernatural Has Changed Lives (Dallas: Benbella).

    Google Scholar 

Filmography

  • Sense8 (2015–2018), 2 Seasons, 24 Episodes, including 2 Film-Specials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Written and directed by Lilly Wachowski (S01), Lana Wachowski, J. Michael Straczynski. Distributed via Netflix.

    Google Scholar 

  • S01E04 ‘What’s Going On?’

    Google Scholar 

  • Writ. by The Wachowskis/J. Michael Straczynski, dir. by Tom Tykwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • S02E09 ‘What Family Actually Means’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Writ. by Lana Wachowski/J. Michael Straczynski, dir. by Lana Wachowski.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Dannenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dannenberg, N. (2021). ‘What Family Actually Means’: Re-Articulations of ‘Family’ in and Around Netflix’s Sense8. In: Mikats, J., Kink-Hampersberger, S., Oates-Indruchová, L. (eds) Creative Families. Palgrave Studies in Mediating Kinship, Representation, and Difference. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70803-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70803-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70802-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70803-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics