Skip to main content

A “Brief” History of the Psychology of Autobiographical Memory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Psychology of Autobiographical Memory

Abstract

This chapter describes the genesis and historical development of the psychology of autobiographical memory. First of all, the author presents the pioneering contributions made by Francis Galton, Victor and Catherine Henri, and Sigmund Freud before examining the contributions made by the main psychology schools which succeeded one another in the period from 1879—generally considered to be scientific psychology’s date of birth—to the first half of the 1970s. The rest of the chapter focuses on the contribution to the psychology of autobiographical memory made by one of Cognitivism’s primary exponents—i.e. Ulric Neisser—and the main theoretical models and research areas characterising the debate on autobiographical memory in the contemporary era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term eugenics (from the Greek eugenes, literally “well-born” and thus being born with good qualities) was coined by Galton himself. For Galton, eugenics was to have been a branch of science free from any sort of political or cultural conditioning and entirely focused on the objective of improving the human condition as far as possible. In an article published in the journal Nature (1904), Galton threw light on his perspective on eugenics in this way: “Eugenics is the science which deals with all influences that improve and develop the inborn qualities of a race. But what is meant by improvement? We must leave morals as far as possible out of the discussion on account of the most almost hopeless difficulties they raise as to whether a character as a whole is good or bad. The essentials of eugenics may, however, be easily defined. All would agree that it was better to be healthy than sick, vigorous than weak, well fitted than ill fitted for their part in life. In short, that it was better to be good rather than bad specimens of their kind, whatever that kind might be” (p. 82). Unfortunately, with the advent of Nazism and other twentieth-century totalitarian ideologies, Galton’s progressive messages were tragically distorted and eugenics was used to justify some of humanity’s worst crimes.

  2. 2.

    In Galton’s writings, the expressions “mental association” and “idea” are used interchangeably.

  3. 3.

    With this expression, Galton meant mental images of a visual type only.

  4. 4.

    It is important to underline that, in contrast to the cue word technique experiment, this investigation focused exclusively on memories we might call “recent”. The study participants were, in fact, invited to think of their breakfast that same day and thus they were asked to recall a mundane personal episode that occurred just a few hours before they filled in the questionnaire.

  5. 5.

    In this respect, it should be remembered that Galton always argued forcefully for the need for psychology to equip itself with methodologies designed to generate quantitative descriptions of mental phenomena. Psychometry is the word which Galton (1879b) coined to describe this theoretical and methodological orientation, which he defined as “the art of imposing measurement and number upon operations of the mind” (p. 149).

  6. 6.

    For Freud (1905/1953b), this amnesia period continues “up to their sixth or eighth year” (p. 174).

  7. 7.

    Freud is explicit regarding his doubts on the use of surveys as a childhood memory enquiry method in chapter four of The Psychopathology of Everyday Life (see Freud, 1901/1960, p. 46). It is worth remembering that the Henris themselves were well aware of the limitations inherent to the survey method. In the conclusion to their article, they note: “One must not expect to obtain a complete solution to a question in a survey—rather, it makes it possible to indicate the areas that must be studied. A survey always remains superficial, it does not say why [emphasis added] things are the way they are” (Nicolas et al., 2013, p. 374).

  8. 8.

    In contemporary literature, these two very different forms of memory experiences are referred to as first-person memories and third-person memories, respectively (see Cohen & Gunz, 2002; Rice & Rubin, 2009). Other expressions used with a certain frequency to describe these same experiences are field memories and observer memories (Nigro & Neisser, 1983; Robinson & Swanson, 1993).

  9. 9.

    It was Titchener who first coined the expression structural psychology in an article published in 1898 in the Philosophical Review journal. For more on the relationship between Titchener’s approach and that of Wundt, see Schultz and Schultz (2011).

  10. 10.

    Careful readers will not have missed the similarity between this example and the observations made by the Henris in the context of their childhood memory survey (see Nicolas et al., 2013, p. 369; see Sect. 2.1.2 of the current volume). While Wundt makes no reference to these observations (apparently unsurprising, as the Henris’ article came out in 1897, a year later, that is, than Grundriss der Psychologie), it is extremely likely that he had had access to at least part of the data supplied by the French couple. My reason for formulating this hypothesis relates to a detail in Victor Henri’s scientific biography which I have not mentioned but will comment on here. From October 1894 to March 1896, Victor Henri spent a period of study at the Leipzig Experimental Psychology Laboratory, working under Wundt’s direct supervision. As Serge Nicolas has noted (1994; see also Nicolas et al., 2013), it was during this period that Victor Henri decided to undertake his survey on early childhood memories with his wife. Further proof of this lies in the fact that the questionnaire used for this research was published in the early months of 1895 in a grand total of three journals (L’Annéé Psychologique, Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, Psychological Review) and that in each of these the list of questions was followed by an invitation to readers—formulated by Henri himself—to send in answers by post, directly to Leipzig, where he then lived (see Henri, 1895a, 1895b, 1895c). Returning to the relationship between the Henris and Wundt, we thus have a valid reason to believe that Wundt could not have been unaware of the results, however preliminary, of research which was conceived and carried out precisely by one of the young scholars who regularly attended his laboratory.

  11. 11.

    The most important research carried out in this period includes the following: Sperling’s (1960) experiments on iconic memory; Brown and McNeill’s (1966) study on the “tip of the tongue” phenomenon; Atkinson and Shiffrin’s (1968) theoretical model dividing up the memory into three subsystems (sensory register, short-term store, long-term store); research into semantic networks by Collins and Quillian (1969); and, lastly, Baddeley and Warrington’s (1970) study into the distinction between short- and long-term memory in amnesia patients.

  12. 12.

    The essay was part of an essay collection edited by Tulving himself together with his colleague Wayne Donaldson, entitled Organization of Memory (Tulving & Donaldson, 1972).

  13. 13.

    Tulving (1985, 2002) used the term autonoetic consciousness to indicate this component of episodic remembering.

  14. 14.

    In an autobiographical essay published five years before his death, Neisser (2007) felt the need to clarify that in historical terms according to him the status of founder of the cognitive movement was incorrect: “I was not really the father of cognitive psychology, only the godfather who gave it a name. The name itself was not even very original, given that the Harvard Center for Cognitive Studies was already functioning” (p. 297).

  15. 15.

    Neisser’s presentation—Memory: What Are the Important Questions?—was first published in the volume Practical Aspects of Memory (Gruneberg et al., 1978) which comprised the Cardiff conference proceedings. A few years later, this same text was reprinted in a volume edited by Neisser (1982)—Memory Observed: Remembering in Natural Contexts—a collection of research articles and theoretical essays written by the scholars who had contributed significantly to the emergence and affirmation of the ecological approach to the study of memory.

  16. 16.

    This specific memory contents category is frequently called personal semantic memories (see Kopelman et al., 1989).

  17. 17.

    This system’s task is to transfer autobiographical information from the short-term to the long-term memory (Rubin, 2012, p. 14).

  18. 18.

    The functions of this system, entirely similar to those performed by the working memory system, comprise identifying and temporarily retaining information making up episodic autobiographical memories (Rubin, 2006, p. 284).

  19. 19.

    Very recently, Rubin (2019) has proposed combining the basic systems model with a broad theoretical approach applying to memory in general which he called the dimensional model. This new integrated theory’s main contribution consists in finding a clear location for autobiographical memory within the wide realm of memory phenomena. Indeed, Rubin holds that three fundamental properties distinguish autobiographical memory from other kinds of memory: (1) it is a self-referential mental activity, (2) it involves an ability to mentally construct scenes (which, in turn, enables a sense of reliving), and (3) it is an explicit form of remembering.

  20. 20.

    For more on Conway’s hypotheses on the specific cognitive structures which form the autobiographical memory knowledge base, see Sect. 3.1 of Chapter 3.

  21. 21.

    Most recent research indicates that this ability emerges at 2–3 years of age (see Fivush et al., 2011).

  22. 22.

    Those taking part can express judgements of a quantitative type on the phenomenological features of their recollections: for example, pressing a button to answer questions such as “On a scale from 0 to 10 how vivid is your recollection?

References

  • Angell, J. R. (1904). Psychology. An introductory study of the structure and function of human consciousness. Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A. (2011). Cultural memory and Western civilization: Functions, media, archives. Cambridge University Press (Original work published 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2012). Reflections on autobiographical memory. In D. Berntsen & D. C. Rubin (Eds.), Understanding autobiographical memory: Theories and approaches (pp. 70–87). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Warrington, E. K. (1970). Amnesia and the distinction between long- and short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9(2), 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Wilson, B. (1986). Amnesia, autobiographical memory, and confabulation. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.), Autobiographical memory (pp. 225–252). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, A., & Samson, S. (2014). Music evoked autobiographical memory after severe acquired brain injury: Preliminary findings from a case series. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(1), 125–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. J. (2007). Remembering the times of our lives: Memory in infancy and beyond. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P. J., Tasdemir-Ozdes, A., & Larkina, M. (2014). Adults’ reports of their earliest memories: Consistency in events, ages, and narrative characteristics over time. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 76–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bedard-Gilligan, M., & Zoellner, L. A. (2012). Dissociation and memory fragmentation in post-traumatic stress disorder: An evaluation of the dissociative encoding hypothesis. Memory, 20(3), 277–299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D. (1996). Involuntary autobiographical memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(5), 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D. (1999). Moments of recollection: A study of involuntary autobiographical memories (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Aarhus University (Denmark).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D. (2001). Involuntary memories of emotional events: Do memories of trauma and extremely happy events differ? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(7), S135–S138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D. (2009). Involuntary autobiographical memories: An introduction to the unbidden past. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D., & Hall, N. M. (2004). The episodic nature of involuntary autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 789–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D., & Jacobsen, A. S. (2008). Involuntary (spontaneous) mental time travel into the past and future. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(4), 1093–1104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2012). Introduction. In D. Berntsen & D. C. Rubin (Eds.), Understanding autobiographical memory: Theories and approaches (pp. 1–8). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binet, A., & Henri, V. (1896). Individual psychology. L’Année Psychologique, 114, 14–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W. F. (1992). Phenomenal experience in laboratory and autobiographical memory tasks. In M. Conway, D. C. Rubin, H. Spinnler, & W. A. Wagenaar (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on autobiographical memory (pp. 31–51). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, W. F., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2006). Scientists are not deficient in mental imagery: Galton revised. Review of General Psychology, 10(2), 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, C. R. (2007). Autobiographical memory for trauma: Update on four controversies. Memory, 15(3), 227–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, C. R. (2011). The nature and significance of memory disturbance in posttraumatic stress disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 203–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewin, C. R. (2016). Coherence, disorganization, and fragmentation in traumatic memory reconsidered: A response to Rubin et al. (2016). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(7), 1011–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brindley, R., Bateman, A., & Gracey, F. (2011). Exploration of use of SenseCam to support autobiographical memory retrieval within a cognitive-behavioural therapeutic intervention following acquired brain injury. Memory, 19(7), 745–757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories. Cognition, 5(1), 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5(4), 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabeza, R., & St. Jacques, P. L. (2007). Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 219–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, H. A. (1925). Psychology. A study of mental activity. Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. (Ed.). (2018). Introduction to contemporary psychoanalysis: Defining terms and building bridges. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, S-Å. (1992a). Do flashbulb memories differ from other types of emotional memories? In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of «flashbulb» memories (pp. 191–211). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, S-Å. (1992b). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 284–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christianson, S-Å. (Ed.). (2007). Offenders’ memories of violent crimes. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., & Gunz, A. (2002). As seen by the other …: Perspectives on the self in the memories and emotional perceptions of Easterners and Westerners. Psychological Science, 13(1), 55–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8(2), 240–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A. (Ed.). (1997). Recovered memories and false memories. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A. (2006). Memory and desire: Reading Freud. The Psychologist, 19(9), S48–S50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107(2), 261–288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. A., Singer, J. A., & Tagini, A. (2004). The self and autobiographical memory: Correspondence and coherence. Social Cognition, 22(5), 491–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crovitz, H. F., & Quina-Holland, K. (1976). Proportion of episodic memories from early childhood by years of age. Bulletin of the Psychomomic Society, 7(1), 61–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crovitz, H. F., & Schiffman, H. (1974). Frequency of episodic memories as a function of their age. Bulletin of the Psychomomic Society, 4(5), 517–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 687–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Della Sala, S., Laiacona, M., Spinnler, H., & Trivelli, C. (1992). Is autobiographical impairment due to a deficit of recollection? An overview of studies on Alzheimer dements, frontal and global amnesic patients. In M. A. Conway, D. C. Rubin, H. Spinnler, & W. A. Wagenaar (Eds.), Theoretical perspectives on autobiographical memory (pp. 451–472). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1886). Psychology. Harper & brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodier, O. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of the recovered memory controversy in the 21st century. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(4), 571–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers, A., Hackmann, A., & Michael, T. (2004). Intrusive re-experiencing in post-traumatic stress disorder: Phenomenology, theory, and therapy. Memory, 12(4), 403–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisen, M. L., Quas, J. A., & Goodman, G. S. (Eds.). (2002). Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Haj, M., Antoine, P., Nandrino, J. L., & Kapogiannis, D. (2015). Autobiographical memory decline in Alzheimer’s disease, a theoretical and clinical overview. Ageing Research Reviews, 23(Part B), 183–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ender, E. (2005). Architexts of memory: Literature, science, and autobiography. The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. M., & Broadbridge, C. L. (2012). Theory and research in autobiographical memory: A life-span developmental perspective. In D. Berntsen & D. C. Rubin (Eds.), Understanding autobiographical memory: Theories and approaches (pp. 246–266). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fivush, R. (2018). Sociocultural developmental approaches to autobiographical memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(4), 489–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fivush, R., Habermas, T., Waters, T. E. A., & Zaman, W. (2011). The making of autobiographical memory: Intersections of culture, narratives and identity. International Journal of Psychology, 46(5), 321–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1953a). The interpretation of dreams. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 4–5, pp. 1–751). Hogarth Press (Original work published 1900).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1953b). Three essays on the theory of sexuality. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 7, pp. 123–245). Hogarth Press (Original work published 1905).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1955). A childhood recollection from Dichtung und Wahrheit. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 17, pp. 145–156). Hogarth Press (Original work published 1917).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1959a). An autobiographical study. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 20, pp. 1–74). Hogarth Press (Original work published 1925).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1959b). Psycho-analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 20, pp. 259–270). Hogarth Press (Original work published 1926).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1959c). The question of lay analysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 20, pp. 177–258). Hogarth Press (Original work published 1926).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1960). The psychopathology of everyday life. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 6, pp. 1–310). Hogarth Press (Original work published 1901).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1961). Introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 15–16, pp. 1–496). Hogarth Press (Original work published 1916–1917).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1962). Screen memories. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 3, pp. 303–322). Hogarth Press (Original work published 1899).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1964). New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 22, pp. 1–182). Hogarth Press (Original work published 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbard, G. O., Litowitz, B. E., & Williams, P. (Eds.). (2012). Textbook of psychoanalysis (2nd ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1879a). Psychometric Facts. The Nineteenth Century, 5(25), 425–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1879b). Psychometric experiments. Brain, 2(2), 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1880). Statistics of mental imagery. Mind, 5(19), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. Macmillan and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1901). The possible improvement of human breed under the existing conditions of law and sentiment. Nature, 1670(64), 659–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. (1904). Eugenics: Its definition, scope, and aims. American Journal of Sociology, 10(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gay, P. (2006). Freud: A life for our time. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleaves, D. H., Smith, S. M., Butler, L. D., & Spiegel, D. (2004). False and recovered memories in the laboratory and clinic: A review of experimental and clinical evidence. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(1), 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. (Ed.). (2017). The Routledge international handbook on narrative and life history. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, A. (1984). The foundations of psychoanalysis: A philosophical critique. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., & Sykes, R. N. (Eds.). (1978). Practical aspects of memory. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, T. (2012). Identity, emotion, and the social matrix of autobiographical memory: A psychoanalytic narrative view. In D. Berntsen & D. C. Rubin (Eds.), Understanding autobiographical memory. Theories and approaches (pp. 33–53). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri, V. (1895a). Enquête sur les premiers souvenirs de l’enfance [A survey on the earliest memories of childhood]. L’Année Psychologique, 1, 534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri, V. (1895b). Enquête sur les premiers souvenirs de l’enfance [A survey on the earliest memories of childhood]. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger, 39, 231–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri, V. (1895c). On our earliest recollection of childhood. Psychological Review, 2(2), 215–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henri, V., & Henri, C. (1897). Enquête sur les premiers souvenirs de l’enfance [A survey on the earliest memories of childhood]. L’Année Psychologique, 3, 184–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, W., & Phelps, E. A. (2015). Flashbulb memories. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 25(1), 36–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedlowski, P. (2001). Memory and sociology. Time & Space, 10(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. (1953). The life and works of Sigmund Freud. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, J., & Harackiewicz, J. (1982). The earliest recollection: A new survey. Journal of Personality, 50(2), 134–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingo, O. S., Berntsen, D., & Krøjgaard, P. (2013). Adults’ earliest memories as a function of age, gender, and education in a large stratified sample. Psychology and Aging, 28(3), 646–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopelman, M. D., Wilson, B. A., & Baddeley, A. D. (1989). The autobiographical memory interview: A new assessment of autobiographical and personal semantic memory in amnesic patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11(5), 724–744.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, S. F. (1992). Potential flashbulbs: Memory of ordinary news as the baseline. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of «flashbulb» memories (pp. 32–64). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, L. J., & Pizarro, D. A. (2004). Emotion and memory research: A grumpy overview. Social Cognition, 22(5), 530–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. C. L., Ross, D. F., Read, J. D., & Toglia, M. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of eyewitness psychology. Vol. 2: Memory for people. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, M. (1978). Real world memory after six years: An in vivo study of very long term memory. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 69–76). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, M. (1986). Ways of searching and the contents of memory. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.), Autobiographical memory (pp. 50–67). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E. F., & Davis, D. (2006). Recovered memories. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2, 469–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luminet, O., & Curci, A. (Eds.). (2018). Flashbulb memories: New issues and new perspectives (2nd ed.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, S., Uesiliana, K., & Hayne, H. (2000). Cross-cultural and gender differences in childhood amnesia. Memory, 8(6), 365–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mace, J. H. (2010). Involuntary remembering and voluntary remembering: How different are they? In J. H. Mace, (Ed.), The act of remembering: Toward an understanding of how we recall the past (pp. 43–55). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, J. H. (Ed.). (2019). The organization and structure of autobiographical memory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M. (1992). Special versus ordinary memory mechanisms in the genesis of flashbulb memories. In E. Winograd & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of «flashbulb» memories (pp. 227–235). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, M., Wible, C. G., & Cohen, N. J. (1988). Is there a special flashbulb-memory mechanism? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(2), 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (2003). Remembering trauma. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovitch, M. (2012). The contribution of research on autobiographical memory to past and present theories of memory consolidation. In D. Berntsen & D. C. Rubin (Eds.), Understanding autobiographical memory: Theories and approaches (pp. 91–113). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, M. K. (1994). Earliest recollections of childhood: A demographic analysis. Cognition, 52(1), 55–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbantian, S. (2003). Memory in literature. From Rousseau to Neuroscience. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1978). Memory: What are the important questions? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 3–24). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1981). John Dean’s memory: A case study. Cognition, 9(1), 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (Ed.). (1982). Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts. W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (2007). Ulric Neisser. In G. Lindzey & W. M. Runyan (Eds.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 9, pp. 269–300). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., & Fivush, R. (Eds.). (1994). The remembering self: Construction and accuracy in the self-narrative. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., & Harsch, N. (1992). Phantom flashbulbs: False recollections of hearing the news about Challenger. In E. Winograd, & U. Neisser (Eds.), Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of «flashbulb» memories (pp. 9–31). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., & Winograd, E. (Eds.). (1988). Remembering reconsidered: Ecological and traditional approaches to the study of memory. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U., Winograd, E., Bergman, E. T., Schreiber, C. A., Palmer, S. E., & Weldon, M. S. (1996). Remembering the earthquake: Direct experience vs. hearing the news. Memory, 4(4), 337–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K., & Fivush, R. (2004). The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychological Review, 111(2), 486–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neshat-Doost, H. T., Dalgleish, T., Yule, W., Kalantari, M., Ahmadi, S. J., Dyregrov, A., & Jobson, L. (2013). Enhancing autobiographical memory specificity through cognitive training: An intervention for depression translated from basic science. Clinical Psychological Science, 1(1), 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas, S. (1994). Qui était Victor Henri (1872–1940)? [Who was Victor Henri (1872–1940)?]. L’Année Psychologique/Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 94(3), 385–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas, S., Coubart, A., & Lubart, T. (2014). The program of individual psychology (1895–1896) by Alfred Binet and Victor Henri. L’Année Psychologique/Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 114(1), 5–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas, S., Gounden, Y., & Piolino, P. (2013). Victor and Catherine Henri on earliest recollections. L’Année Psychologique/Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 113(3), 349–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigro, G., & Neisser, U. (1983). Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology, 15(4), 467–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1914–1930). The life, letters and labours of Francis Galton (Vols. 1–2–3). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1969). Conjectures and refutations. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raes, F., Williams, J. M. G., & Hermans, D. (2009). Reducing cognitive vulnerability to depression: A preliminary investigation of MEmory Specificity Training (MEST) in inpatients with depressive symptomatology. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40(1), 24–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reisberg, D., & Heuer, F. (2004). Memory for emotional events. In D. Reisberg & P. Hertel (Eds.), Memory and emotion (pp. 3–41). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, H. J., & Rubin, D. C. (2009). I can see it both ways: First- and third-person visual perspectives at retrieval. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(4), 877–890.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rimé, B. (2004). Emotion et mémoire: la rémanence des expériences émotionnelles [Emotion and memory: The persistence of emotional experiences]. In G. Kirouac (Ed.), Cognition et émotion (pp. 79–96). Coimbra University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. A. (1976). Sampling autobiographical memory. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 578–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. A., & Swanson, K. L. (1993). Field and observer modes of remembering. Memory, 1(3), 169–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P. (1993). Freud and his critics. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, B. M. (1991). Remembering the personal past. Descriptions of autobiographical memory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., & Wang, Q. (2011). Why we remember and what we remember: Culture and autobiographical memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, M. (2016). Memory and the self: Phenomenology, science and autobiography. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (Ed.). (1986). Autobiographical memory. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (2005). A basic-systems approach to autobiographical memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 79–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (2006). The basic-systems model of episodic memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 277–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (2012). The basic systems model of autobiographical memory. In D. Berntsen & D. C. Rubin (Eds.), Understanding autobiographical memory: Theories and approaches (pp. 11–32). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (2019). Placing autobiographical memory in a general memory organization. In J. H. Mace (Ed.), The organization and structure of autobiographical memory (pp. 6–27). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C., Berntsen, D., Ogle, C. M., Deffler, S. A., & Beckham, J. C. (2016). Scientific evidence versus outdated beliefs: A response to Brewin (2016). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(7), 1018–1021.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C., Wetzler, S. E., & Nebes, R. D. (1986). Autobiographical memory across the life span. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.), Autobiographical memory (pp. 202–221). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, M. (2010). Self impression: Life-writing, autobiografiction, and the forms of modern literature. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L. (1995). Memory wars. Scientific American, 272(April), 135–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. R., & Bohannon, J. N. (1988). In defense of the flashbulb-memory hypothesis: A comment on McCloskey, Wible, and Cohen (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(3), 332–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2011). A history of modern psychology (10th ed.). Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Eds.). (2000a). Positive psychology [Special issue]. American Psychologist, 55(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000b). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotgiu, I., & Mormont, C. (2008). Similarities and differences between traumatic and emotional memories: Review and directions for future research. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 142(5), 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotgiu, I., & Rusconi, M. L. (2014). Why autobiographical memories for traumatic and emotional events might differ: Theoretical arguments and empirical evidence. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 148(5), 523–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74(11, whole no. 498), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Jacques, P. L. (2012). Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory. In D. Berntsen & D. C. Rubin (Eds.), Understanding autobiographical memory: Theories and approaches (pp. 114–138). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suardi, A., Sotgiu, I., Costa, T., Cauda, F., & Rusconi, M. L. (2016). The neural correlates of happiness: A review of PET and fMRI studies using autobiographical recall methods. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 383–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda, E., McKinnon, M. C., & Levine, B. (2006). The functional neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 44(12), 2189–2208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Talarico, J. M., & Mace, J. H. (2010). Involuntary and voluntary memory sequencing phenomena: An interesting puzzle for the study of autobiographical memory organization and retrieval. In J. H. Mace, (Ed.), The act of remembering: Toward an understanding of how we recall the past (pp. 71–82). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2007). Flashbulb memories are special after all; in phenomenology, not accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(5), 557–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terdiman, R. (2010). Memory in Freud. In S. Radstone & B. Schwarz (Eds.), Memory. Histories, theories, debates (pp. 93–108). Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1898). The postulates of a structural psychology. Philosophical Review, 7(5), 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1901–1905). Experimental psychology (Vols. 1–2). The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. B. (1910). A text-book of psychology. The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toglia, M., Read, J. D., Ross, D. F., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of eyewitness psychology. Vol. 1: Memory for events. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381–403). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Donaldson, W. (Eds.). (1972). Organization of memory. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5), 352–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagenaar, W. A. (1986). My memory: A study of autobiographical memory over six years. Cognitive Psychology, 18(2), 225–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q. (2013). The autobiographical self in time and culture. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., Conway, M. A., & Hou, Y. (2004). Infantile amnesia: A cross-cultural investigation. Cognitive Sciences, 1(1), 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. J., & Tulving, E. (1975). Episodic memory: When recognition fails. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20(2), 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1919). Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Lippincott Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B. (1924). Behaviorism. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, L. A., & Berntsen, D. (Eds.). (2015). Clinical perspectives in autobiographical memory. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., Memom, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(2), 45–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. T. (2020). Autobiographical memory after 40 years. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(3), 776–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, E., & Neisser, U. (Eds.). (1992). Affect and accuracy in recall: Studies of “flashbulb” memories. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wundt, W. (1897). Outlines of psychology (C. Hubbard Judd, Trans.). Engelmann (Original work published 1896).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Sotgiu .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sotgiu, I. (2021). A “Brief” History of the Psychology of Autobiographical Memory. In: The Psychology of Autobiographical Memory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69571-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics