Abstract
This chapter explores some of the contextual factors and the key drivers shaping the movement towards routine measurements. It touches upon some underlying philosophies behind some key drivers and how they differentially shape the way in which outcome measurement may be implemented. It also considers the body of research which demonstrates that while different therapeutic approaches are broadly similar in their outcomes, at a service and practitioner level there is considerable variance. We provide examples of outcome measurement from research and practice settings, inviting you to consider options of engaging with measurement of outcome in therapy settings to both learn and evidence effective prac tice
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BACP. (2018a). Ethical Framework for the Counselling Professions. Available at: https://www.bacp.co.uk/events-and-resources/ethics-and-standards/ethical-framework-for-the-counselling-professions/.
BACP. (2018b). Ethical Guidelines for Research in the Counselling Professions. Available at: https://www.bacp.co.uk/events-and-resources/research/publications/ethical-guidelines-for-research-in-the-counselling-professions/.
Börjesson, S., & Boström, P. K. (2019). “I want to know what it is used for”: Clients’ perspectives on completing a routine outcome measure (ROM) while undergoing psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2019.1630780.
Boynton, P. M., & Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ, 328(7451), 1312–1315. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312.
Brown, J., Dreis, S., & Nace, D. K. (1999). What really makes a difference in psychotherapy outcome? Why does managed care want to know? In M. A. Hubble, B. L. Duncan, & S. D. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 389–406). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Chow, D., Miller, S. D., Seidel, J. A., Kane, R. T., Thornton, J., & Andrews, W. P. (2015). The role of deliberate practice in the development of highly effective psychotherapists. Psychotherapy, 52(3), 337–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pst0000015
Firth, N., Saxon, D., Stiles, W. B., & Barkham, M. (2019) Therapist and clinic effects in psychotherapy: a three-level model of outcome variability. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(4), 345–356.
Goldberg, S. B., Rousmaniere, T., Miller, S. D., Whipple, J., Nielsen, S. L., et al. (2016). Do psychotherapists improve with time and experience? A longitudinal analysis of outcomes in a clinical setting. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 1–11.
Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., et al. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 155–163.
Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18, 66–67.
Howard, K. I., Kopta, S. M., Krause, M. S., & Orlinsky, D. E. (1986). The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41(2), 159–164.
Jefford, M., Stockler, M.R., Tattersa, M. (2003) Outcomes research: what is it and why does it matter? Internal Medicine Journal. 33(3):110–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00302.x.
Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Slade, K., Whipple, J. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2005). Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients’ progress: Clinical results and practice suggestions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 165–174.
Lambert, M. J. (2013). Outcome in psychotherapy: The past and important advances. Psychotherapy, 50(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030682
Law, D. (2018). Goals and goal-based outcomes (GBOs): Goal progress chart. Available at: https://goalsintherapycom.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/gbo-version-2-march-2018-final.pdf
Marsella, A. J. (2003). Cultural Aspects of Depressive Experience and Disorders. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1081.
Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Sorrell, R., Brown, G. S., & Chalk, M. B. (2006). Using outcome to inform therapy practice. Journal of Brief Therapy, 5(1), 5–22.
Okiishi, J., Lambert, M., Nielsen, S. L., & Ogles, B. M. (2003). Waiting for supershrink: An empirical analysis of therapist effects. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 10(6), 361–373.
Stafford, M. R., Cooper, M., Barkham, M., Beecham, J., Bower, P., Cromarty, K., et al. (2018). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of humanistic counselling in schools for young people with emotional distress (ETHOS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 19, 175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2538-2.
Van Rijn, B. (2020). Evaluating Our Practice. In S. Bager-Charleson (Ed.), Reflective Practice and Personal Development in the field of Therapy. London: Sage.
Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work (Second Edition). New York, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203582015.
Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2003). Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 59–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duncan, C., McInnes, B. (2020). Doing Quantitative Research with Outcome Measures. In: Bager-Charleson, S., McBeath, A. (eds) Enjoying Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55127-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55127-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55126-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55127-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)