Skip to main content

Doing Quantitative Research with Outcome Measures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enjoying Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy

Abstract

This chapter explores some of the contextual factors and the key drivers shaping the movement towards routine measurements. It touches upon some underlying philosophies behind some key drivers and how they differentially shape the way in which outcome measurement may be implemented. It also considers the body of research which demonstrates that while different therapeutic approaches are broadly similar in their outcomes, at a service and practitioner level there is considerable variance. We provide examples of outcome measurement from research and practice settings, inviting you to consider options of engaging with measurement of outcome in therapy settings to both learn and evidence effective prac tice

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BACP. (2018a). Ethical Framework for the Counselling Professions. Available at: https://www.bacp.co.uk/events-and-resources/ethics-and-standards/ethical-framework-for-the-counselling-professions/.

  • BACP. (2018b). Ethical Guidelines for Research in the Counselling Professions. Available at: https://www.bacp.co.uk/events-and-resources/research/publications/ethical-guidelines-for-research-in-the-counselling-professions/.

  • Börjesson, S., & Boström, P. K. (2019). “I want to know what it is used for”: Clients’ perspectives on completing a routine outcome measure (ROM) while undergoing psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2019.1630780.

  • Boynton, P. M., & Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. BMJ, 328(7451), 1312–1315. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Dreis, S., & Nace, D. K. (1999). What really makes a difference in psychotherapy outcome? Why does managed care want to know? In M. A. Hubble, B. L. Duncan, & S. D. Miller (Eds.), The heart and soul of change: What works in therapy (pp. 389–406). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, D., Miller, S. D., Seidel, J. A., Kane, R. T., Thornton, J., & Andrews, W. P. (2015). The role of deliberate practice in the development of highly effective psychotherapists. Psychotherapy, 52(3), 337–345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pst0000015

  • Firth, N., Saxon, D., Stiles, W. B., & Barkham, M. (2019) Therapist and clinic effects in psychotherapy: a three-level model of outcome variability. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(4), 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, S. B., Rousmaniere, T., Miller, S. D., Whipple, J., Nielsen, S. L., et al. (2016). Do psychotherapists improve with time and experience? A longitudinal analysis of outcomes in a clinical setting. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, C., Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S. L., Smart, D. W., et al. (2005). A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18, 66–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, K. I., Kopta, S. M., Krause, M. S., & Orlinsky, D. E. (1986). The dose-effect relationship in psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 41(2), 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefford, M., Stockler, M.R., Tattersa, M. (2003) Outcomes research: what is it and why does it matter? Internal Medicine Journal. 33(3):110–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00302.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., Harmon, C., Slade, K., Whipple, J. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2005). Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients’ progress: Clinical results and practice suggestions. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J. (2013). Outcome in psychotherapy: The past and important advances. Psychotherapy, 50(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030682

  • Law, D. (2018). Goals and goal-based outcomes (GBOs): Goal progress chart. Available at: https://goalsintherapycom.files.wordpress.com/2018/03/gbo-version-2-march-2018-final.pdf

  • Marsella, A. J. (2003). Cultural Aspects of Depressive Experience and Disorders. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1081.

  • Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Sorrell, R., Brown, G. S., & Chalk, M. B. (2006). Using outcome to inform therapy practice. Journal of Brief Therapy, 5(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okiishi, J., Lambert, M., Nielsen, S. L., & Ogles, B. M. (2003). Waiting for supershrink: An empirical analysis of therapist effects. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 10(6), 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, M. R., Cooper, M., Barkham, M., Beecham, J., Bower, P., Cromarty, K., et al. (2018). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of humanistic counselling in schools for young people with emotional distress (ETHOS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials, 19, 175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2538-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijn, B. (2020). Evaluating Our Practice. In S. Bager-Charleson (Ed.), Reflective Practice and Personal Development in the field of Therapy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work (Second Edition). New York, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203582015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whipple, J. L., Lambert, M. J., Vermeersch, D. A., Smart, D. W., Nielsen, S. L., & Hawkins, E. J. (2003). Improving the effects of psychotherapy: The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlie Duncan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Duncan, C., McInnes, B. (2020). Doing Quantitative Research with Outcome Measures. In: Bager-Charleson, S., McBeath, A. (eds) Enjoying Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55127-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics