Skip to main content

Creating Inclusion to Leverage Workforce Diversity from a Work Characteristics Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aligning Perspectives in Gender Mainstreaming

Abstract

Over the past couple of decades, organisational scholars have been investigating barriers that prevent minorities (e.g. women) from entering and remaining at all levels of organisations. Consequently, the management of workforce diversity and inclusion became a central topic for organisations and research. Despite this attention, our understanding of how diversity shapes the work context in organisations and how these can be translated into an inclusive climate that fosters employees’ performance and well-being is limited. Based on insights of the diversity and inclusion literature and occupational health research, this chapter presents a conceptual framework that suggests that work environments are influenced by the extent of workforce diversity that is present in the organisation (e.g. homogeneous organisations mostly have processes and infrastructures that are developed by and based on the needs of the majority group, minority employees might thus face an unfavourable work context). Moreover, the framework points out that the work context affects employees’ experience of inclusion. The more resourceful one’s work (e.g. the freedom to fulfil task in an authentic way) and the less demanding the work environment (e.g. fewer discrimination), the more one feels an accepted member of their work environment. Higher levels of feeling included is likely to result in better performance and well-being of employees. Finally, the framework proposes that inclusive organisations, in which employees feel good and perform well, will in the long term have more diversity among employees and more gender equality because they attract and retain a diverse workforce.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acquavita, S. P., Pittman, J., Gibbons, M., & Castellanos-Brown, K. (2009). Personal and organizational diversity factors’ impact on social workers’ job satisfaction: Results from a national internet-based survey. Administration in Social Work, 33(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., & Schreurs, P. J. (2003). A multigroup analysis of the job demands-resources model in four home care organizations. Journal of Stress Management, 10(1), 16–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M. J., Sacco, D. F., Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., & Cook, E. (2010). Being “in” with the in-crowd: The effects of social exclusion and inclusion are enhanced by the perceived essentialism of ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8), 999–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive–motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brimhall, K. C., Lizano, E. L., & Barak, M. E. M. (2014). The mediating role of inclusion: A longitudinal study of the effects of leader–member exchange and diversity climate on job satisfaction and intention to leave among child welfare workers. Children and Youth Services Review, 40, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1991). An identity theory approach to commitment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst. (2019). Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics STEM: Quick take. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from https://www.catalyst.org/knowledge/women-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem#footnote27_777ra2y.

  • Chen, C., & Tang, N. (2018). Does perceived inclusion matter in the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, S., & Mor Barak, M. E. (2008). Understanding of diversity and inclusion in a perceived homogeneous culture: A study of organizational commitment and job performance among korean employees. Administration in Social Work, 32(4), 100–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, I. H.-S. (2018). Cognitive diversity and creativity in teams: The mediating roles of team learning and inclusion. Chinese Management Studies, 12(2), 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrobot-Mason, D., Ruderman, M. N., & Nishii, L. H. (2013). Leadership in a diverse workplace. In Q. M. Roberson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of diversity and work (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, G. B., & Melton, E. N. (2014). Signals and cues: LGBT inclusive advertising and consumer attraction. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 23, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 544–560. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daya, P. (2014). Diversity and inclusion in an emerging market context. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, 33(3), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devillard, S., Sancier-Sultan, S., de Zelicourt, A., & Kossoff, C. (2016). Reinventing the workplace to unlock the potential of gender diversity. Women matter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrhart, K. H., Chung-Herrera, B. G., Randel, A. E., Dean, M. A., & Shore, L. M. (2014). Inclusion and health moderated by demographic status as numerical majority/minority. Honolulu, HI: Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work the effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 229–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdman, B. M., Avigdor, A., Braun, D., Konkin, J., & Kuzmycz, D. (2010). Collective experience of inclusion, diversity, and performance in work groups. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie (Online), 11(3), 6–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, F. J. (2005). Identity and forms of orientations in organizations social exchange. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 737–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, J. A., & DeNisi, A. S. (2009). Cross-level effects of demography and diversity climate on organizational attachment in firm effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume, Y. R. F., Dawson, J., Otaye-Ebede, L., Woods, S. A., & West, M. A. (2017). Harnessing demographic differences in organizations: What moderates the effects of workplace diversity? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 276–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofhuis, J., Van der Zee, K. I., & Otten, S. (2014). Comparing antecedents of voluntary job turnover among majority and minority employees. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 33(8), 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-09-2013-0071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, J., & Hopkins, K. (2012). Organizational inclusion, commitment, and turnover among child welfare workers: A multilevel mediation analysis. Administration in Social Work, 36(1), 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., & Good, C. (2005). How environments can threaten academic performance, self-knowledge, and sense of belonging. In Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 129–150). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, W. S. (2015). Social inclusion in diverse work settings. Groningen: University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, W. S., Otten, S., Van der Zee, K. I., & Jans, L. (2014). Inclusion: Conceptualization and measurement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 370–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsen, K., Point, S., Kelan, E., & Grieble, A. (2019). Diversity and inclusion branding: A five-country comparison of corporate websites. International Journal of Human Resource Management.https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1496125

  • Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraiger, K., & Ford, J. K. (1985). A meta-analysis of rate race effects in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(1), 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-brown, A. M. Y. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: Meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). The nature and function of self-esteem: Sociometer theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 1–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 518–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeussen, L., Delvaux, E., & Phalet, K. (2014). Becoming a group: Value convergence and emergent work group identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(2), 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeussen, L., & van Dijk, H. (2016). The perceived value of team players: A longitudinal study of how group identification affects status in work groups. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 200–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak, M. E. (2015). Inclusion is the key to diversity management, but what is inclusion? Human Service Organizations Management Leadership and Governance, 39(2), 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak, M. E., & Cherin, D. A. (1998). A tool to expand organizational understanding of workforce diversity. Administration in Social Work, 22(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak, M. E., Levin, A., Nissly, J. A., & Lane, C. J. (2006). Why do they leave? Modeling child welfare workers’ turnover intentions. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 548–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak, M. E., Lizano, E. L., Kim, A., Duan, L., Rhee, M.-K., Hsiao, H.-Y., et al. (2016). The promise of diversity management for climate of inclusion: A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 40(4), 305–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak, M. E., & Travis, D. (2009). Diversity and organizational performance. In Y. Hasnfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 341–378). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(2), 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1754–1774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. L., & Randel, A. E. (2004). Expectations of organizational mobility, workplace social inclusion, and employee job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabharwal, M. (2014). Is diversity management sufficient? Organizational inclusion to further performance. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 197–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneid, M., Isidor, R., Li, C., & Kabst, R. (2015). The influence of cultural context on the relationship between gender diversity and team performance: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6), 733–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Sanchez, D. (2018). Inclusive workplaces: A review and model. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 176–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Ehrhart, K. H., & Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: A review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J., & Spychala, A. (2008). Job performance. In J. Barling & C. Cooper (Eds.), Sage Handbook of Organizational Behavior (pp. 427–447). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200448.n24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, J. M., & Buckley, M. R. (2005). The existence and nature of racial bias in supervisory ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 586–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity of intergroup behavior. In W. A. S. Worchel (Ed.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2019). Human development report 2019. Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequaltities in human development in the 21st century, New York, NY. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2019.pdf.

  • Van Dijk, H., Van Engen, M., & Paauwe, J. (2012). Reframing the business case for diversity: A values and virtues perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, H., Van Engen, M. L., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2012). Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 38–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, D., & Schie, E. C. M. (2000). Foci and correlates of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(2), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, S., Rothgerber, H., Day, E. A., Hart, D., & Butemeyer, J. (1998). Social identity and productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 389–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janna Behnke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Behnke, J., Rispens, S., Demerouti, E. (2021). Creating Inclusion to Leverage Workforce Diversity from a Work Characteristics Perspective. In: Hassard, J., Torres, L.D. (eds) Aligning Perspectives in Gender Mainstreaming. Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53269-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics