Abstract
Anodic incidents occur when an aluminum electrolysis cell short circuits at a specific anode position as a result of a spike or other deformation forming on the bottom surface of the anode. These undesirable process events reduce the current efficiency of the affected cell, which makes early detection critical for minimizing losses. This paper describes the development of an anodic incident detection system based on monitoring individual anode current signals with a multivariate Principal Component Analysis (PCA) model. The model and monitoring system were developed and tested using 2422 individual anode current signals collected from an aluminum smelter. The results indicate that anode current signals may be useful for detecting anodic incidents in advance relative to regular detection methods based on typical process signals. Anodic incidents appear to alter the correlation structure of individual anode current signals, which could make detection possible by monitoring the Squared Prediction Error (SPE) statistic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arthur Martel. Spike Detection Using Advanced Analytics and Data Analysis. In Olivier Martin, editor, Light Metals 2018, pages 485–490, Cham, 2018. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-72283-2 978-3-319-72284-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72284-9_64.
Nazatul Aini Abd Majid, Mark P. Taylor, John J. J. Chen, Wei Yu, and Brent R. Young. Diagnosing faults in aluminium processing by using multivariate statistical approaches. Journal of Materials Science, 47(3):1268–1279, February 2012. ISSN 0022-2461, 1573-4803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5884-y.
Lukas Dion, Laszlo I Kiss, Dany Lavoie, and Jean-Paul Arvisais. Developing a New Proces Indicator Based on the Relationship between an Electrolysis Cell Impurity Balance and its Incidents. In Light Metals 2014, pages 829–834, 2014.
C Cheung and C Menictas. Frequency response analysis of anode current signals as a diagnostic aid for detecting approaching anode effects in aluminum smelting cells. In Light Metals 2013, pages 887–892, 2013.
Lukas Dion, Charles-Luc Lagacé, François Laflamme, Antoine Godefroy, James W. Evans, László I. Kiss, and Sándor Poncsák. Preventive Treatment of Anode Effects Using on-Line Individual Anode Current Monitoring. In Arne P. Ratvik, editor, Light Metals 2017, pages 509–517, Cham, 2017. Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-51540-3 978-3-319-51541-0. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51541-0_64.
Bernd Rolofs and Neal Wai-Poi. The Effect of Anode Spike Formation on Operational Performance. In R.D. Peterson, editor, Light Metals 2000, pages 189–193, 2000.
Paul Geladi and Bruce R. Kowalski. Partial least-squares regression: a tutorial. Analytica Chimica Acta, 185:1–17, 1986. ISSN 00032670. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(86)80028-9. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0003267086800289.
Paul Nomikos and John F. MacGregor. Multivariate SPC Charts for Monitoring Batch Processes. Technometrics, 37(1):41, February 1995. ISSN 00401706. https://doi.org/10.2307/1269152. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1269152?origin=crossref.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society
About this paper
Cite this paper
LaJambe, D., Poulin, É., Duchesne, C., Tessier, J. (2020). Anodic Incident Detection through Multivariate Analysis of Individual Anode Current Signals. In: Tomsett, A. (eds) Light Metals 2020. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36408-3_74
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36408-3_74
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-36407-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-36408-3
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)