Skip to main content

Collaboration and Co-creation in a General Engagement Platform to Foster Organizational Benefits During a Post-project-phase

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering (CDVE 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11792))

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a conceptual layout and design as starting point for an intra-organizational general engagement platform (GEP). Accordingly, we identify concepts and functions that are required or/and that are value generating for the development of a GEP for company-internal co-creation in post-project phases. Furthermore, we discuss pros and cons in terms of a SWOT-analysis. Results may provide a basis for further empirical studies, practical development, or/and future research in this direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mladenow, A., Bauer, C., Strauss, C.: Social crowd integration in new product development. CrowdSourcing communities nourish the open innovation paradigm. Glob. J. Flexible Syst. Manag. 15(1), 77–86 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoyer, W.D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., Singh, S.S.: Consumer cocreation in new product development. J. Serv. Res. 13(3), 283–296 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Petersen, K.J., Handfield, R.B., Ragatz, G.L.: Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design. J. Oper. Manag. 23(3–4), 371–388 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Semmann, M., Grotherr, C.: How to empower users for co-creation – conceptualizing an engagement platform for benefits realization. In: 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, St. Gallen, Switzerland, pp. 91–105 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Archibald, R.D., Di Filippo, I., Di Filippo, D.: The six-phase comprehensive project life cycle model including the project incubation/feasibility phase and the post-project evaluation phase. PM World J. 1(5), 1–40 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kezar, A.: Bottom-up/top-down leadership: contradiction or hidden phenomenon. J. High. Educ. 83(5), 725–760 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heyden, M.L.M., Fourné, S.P.L., Koene, B.A.S., Werkman, R., Ansari, S.S.: Rethinking ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ roles of top and middle managers in organizational change: implications for employee support: TM-MM change roles and employee support. J. Manag. Stud. 54(7), 961–985 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Estellés-Arolas, E., González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, F.: Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. J. Inf. Sci. 38(2), 189–200 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zuchowski, O., Posegga, O., Schlagwein, D., Fischbach, K.: Internal crowdsourcing: conceptual framework, structured review, and research agenda. J. Inf. Technol. 31(2), 166–184 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schlagwein, D., Bjørn-Andersen, N.: Organizational learning with crowdsourcing: the revelatory case of LEGO. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. (JAIS) 15(11), 754–778 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Simula, H., Vuori, M.: Benefits and barriers of crowdsourcing in B2B firms: generating ideas with internal and external crowds. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 16(06), 1240011 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ward, J., Elvin, R.: A new framework for managing IT-enabled business change. Inf. Syst. J. 9(3), 197–221 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Böhmann, T., Leimeister, J.M., Möslein, K.: Service systems engineering: a field for future information systems research. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6(2), 73–79 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geels, F.W.: From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Res. Policy 3, 6–7 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alter, S.: Metamodel for service analysis and design based on an operational view of service and service systems. Serv. Sci. 4(3), 218–235 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sum, J.: Service systems engineering: framework & systems modeling, vol. 1, pp. 1–68. Institute of Technology Management, National Chung Hsing University (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oertzen, A.-S., Odekerken-Schröder, G., Brax, S.A., Mager, B.: Co-creating services—conceptual clarification, forms and outcomes. J. Serv. Manag. 29(4), 641–679 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-03-2017-0067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Russo-Spena, T., Mele, C.: “Five Co-s” in innovating: a practice-based view. J. Serv. Manag. 23(4), 527–553 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gyrd-Jones, R.I., Kornum, N.: Managing the co-created brand: value and cultural complementarity in online and offline multi-stakeholder ecosystems. J. Bus. Res. 66(9), 1484–1493 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tidd, J., Bessant, J.R.: Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th edn. Wiley, Chichester (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chesbrough, H.: Bringing open innovation to services. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 52(2), 85–90 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Verrinder, J.: E.ON and 100% Open Launch Crowdsourcing Project (2012). https://www.research-live.com/article/news/eon-and-100open-launch-crowdsourcing-project/id/4006939

  23. Harwood, R.: E.ON Innovation – and the winners are…, June 2012. (Company Website)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bell, R.M., Koren, Y.: Lessons from the Netflix prize challenge. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 9(2), 75–97 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Prpic, J., Shukla, P.P., Kietzmann, J.H., McCarthy, I.P.: How to work a crowd: developing crowd capital through crowdsourcing. Bus. Horiz. 58(1), 77–85 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou, Y., Wilkinson, D., Schreiber, R., Pan, R.: Large-scale parallel collaborative filtering for the Netflix prize. In: Fleischer, R., Xu, J. (eds.) AAIM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5034, pp. 337–348. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68880-8_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Mörl, S., Heiss, M., Richter, A.: Siemens: Wissensvernetzung mit TechnoWeb 2.0. In: Enterprise 2.0 Fallstudien-Netzwerk. München/St. Gallen/Koblenz/Frankfurt: Andrea Back, Michael Koch, Petra Schubert, Stefan Smolnik (2011). https://www.e20cases.org/files/fallstudien/e20cases-09-siemens.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Mladenow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Koehler, A., Mladenow, A., Strauss, C. (2019). Collaboration and Co-creation in a General Engagement Platform to Foster Organizational Benefits During a Post-project-phase. In: Luo, Y. (eds) Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering. CDVE 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11792. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30949-7_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30949-7_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30948-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30949-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics