Skip to main content

Body Cavity Effusions and Washings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Cytopathology

Part of the book series: Practical Anatomic Pathology ((PAP))

  • 1198 Accesses

Abstract

Body cavity effusions refer to excess fluid that accumulates in the peritoneal, pleural, or pericardial cavity. Body cavity washings often include intraoperative peritoneal or pelvic washings. Cytologic evaluation of body cavity fluids plays an important role in the detection of metastatic diseases, as well as primary body cavity-based lesions. It is crucial to distinguish malignant from benign effusions/washings as the presence of malignant cells may affect diagnosis and staging of malignancies, and ultimately influence treatment of patients. This chapter aims to answer commonly encountered questions regarding cytologic diagnoses of effusions/washings associated with common and uncommon malignancies, as well as a few benign conditions. Cytomorphological features will be demonstrated along with discussions of the practical use of ancillary tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rooper LM, Ali SZ, Olson MT. A minimum fluid volume of 75 mL is needed to ensure adequacy in a pleural effusion: a retrospective analysis of 2540 cases. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122(9):657–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leung CS, Chiu B, Bell V. Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations: nongynecologic cytology evaluation. Diagn Cytopathol. 1997;16(4):368–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elsheikh TM, Kirkpatrick JL, Wu HH. Comparison of ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in the evaluation of exfoliative cytology specimens. Cancer. 2006;108(3):144–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dadhich H, Toi PC, Siddaraju N, Sevvanthi K. A comparative analysis of conventional cytopreparatory and liquid based cytological techniques (Sure Path) in evaluation of serous effusion fluids. Diagn Cytopathol. 2016;44(11):874–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shivakumarswamy U, Arakeri SU, Karigowdar MH, Yelikar B. Diagnostic utility of the cell block method versus the conventional smear study in pleural fluid cytology. J Cytol. 2012;29(1):11–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wojcik EM, Naylor B. "collagen balls" in peritoneal washings. Prevalence, morphology, origin and significance. Acta Cytol. 1992;36(4):466–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Parwani AV, Chan TY, Ali SZ. Significance of psammoma bodies in serous cavity fluid: a cytopathologic analysis. Cancer. 2004;102(2):87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar PV, Esfahani FN. Cytopathology of peritoneal endometriosis caused by ruptured ovarian cysts. Acta Cytol. 1988;32(4):523–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sneige N, Dawlett MA, Kologinczak TL, Guo M. Endosalpingiosis in peritoneal washings in women with benign gynecologic conditions: thirty-eight cases confirmed with paired box-8 immunohistochemical staining and correlation with surgical biopsy findings. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(10):582–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dragoescu EA, Liu L. Pericardial fluid cytology: an analysis of 128 specimens over a 6-year period. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(5):242–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta S, Sodhani P, Jain S. Cytomorphological profile of neoplastic effusions: an audit of 10 years with emphasis on uncommonly encountered malignancies. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012;8(4):602–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Porcel JM, Quiros M, Gatius S, Bielsa S. Examination of cytological smears and cell blocks of pleural fluid: complementary diagnostic value for malignant effusions. Rev Clin Esp. 2017;217(3):144–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasteh F, Lin GY, Weidner N, Michael CW. The use of immunohistochemistry to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from malignant mesothelioma in cytologic effusions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2010;118(2):90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ikeda K, Tate G, Suzuki T, Kitamura T, Mitsuya T. Diagnostic usefulness of EMA, IMP3, and GLUT-1 for the immunocytochemical distinction of malignant cells from reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cytology using cytospin preparations. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011;39(6):395–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ordonez NG. Application of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma: a review and update. Hum Pathol. 2013;44(1):1–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Conway AB, Hart MK, Jessurun J, Pambuccian SE. “Cannonballs” and psammoma bodies: unusual cytologic features of metastatic pulmonary small-cell carcinoma in a pleural effusion. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41(3):247–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cameron SE, Alsharif M, McKeon D, Pambuccian SE. Cytology of metastatic thymic well-differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (thymic carcinoid) in pleural fluid: report of a case. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36(5):333–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin F, Chen ZE, Wang HL. Utility of immunohistochemistry in the pancreatobiliary tract. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015;139(1):24–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nofech-Mozes S, Khalifa MA, Ismiil N, Saad RS, Hanna WM, Covens A, et al. Immunophenotyping of serous carcinoma of the female genital tract. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(9):1147–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lew M, Pang JC, Jing X, Fields KL, Roh MH. Young investigator challenge: the utility of GATA3 immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of metastatic breast carcinomas in malignant effusions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015;123(10):576–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. El Hag MI, Ha J, Farag R, El Hag AM, Michael CW. Utility of GATA-3 in the work-Up of breast adenocarcinoma and its differential diagnosis in serous effusions: a Cell-Block Microarray Study. Diagn Cytopathol. 2016;44(9):731–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miettinen M, McCue PA, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Rys J, Czapiewski P, Wazny K, et al. GATA3: a multispecific but potentially useful marker in surgical pathology: a systematic analysis of 2500 epithelial and nonepithelial tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(1):13–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Olson MT, Nuransoy A, Ali SZ. Malignant pleural effusion resulting from metastasis of thyroid primaries: a cytomorphological analysis. Acta Cytol. 2013;57(2):177–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lew M, Pang JC, Roh MH, Jing X. Cytologic features and immunocytochemical profiles of malignant effusions with metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma: a case series from a single institution. Acta Cytol. 2015;59(5):412–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jing X, Michael CW, Theoharis CG. The use of immunocytochemical study in the cytologic diagnosis of melanoma: evaluation of three antibodies. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41(2):126–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Das DK. Serous effusions in malignant lymphomas: a review. Diagn Cytopathol. 2006;34(5):335–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Czader M, Ali SZ. Flow cytometry as an adjunct to cytomorphologic analysis of serous effusions. Diagn Cytopathol. 2003;29(2):74–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author thanks Brian Smola, senior cytotechnologist at University of Michigan for proofreading and editing the chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Jing .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jing, X. (2020). Body Cavity Effusions and Washings. In: Xu, H., Qian, X., Wang, H. (eds) Practical Cytopathology . Practical Anatomic Pathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24059-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24059-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24058-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24059-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics