Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the Anophthalmic Socket

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Oculofacial, Orbital, and Lacrimal Surgery

  • 1351 Accesses

Abstract

Loss of an eye to tumor, trauma, or end-stage ocular disease can be devastating. The loss of binocular visual function with reduced peripheral visual field and loss of depth perception may result in difficulties with activities of daily living and have various vocational restrictions [1–6]. Individuals may experience a sense of facial disfigurement and poor self-esteem as a result of the “lost body part” [3–6]. Because eye contact is such an essential part of human interaction, it is extremely important for the patient with an artificial eye to maintain a natural, normal-appearing prosthetic eye (Fig. 62.1a, b).

The authors of this study do not have a commercial or proprietary interest in any of the products reviewed in this manuscript.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Coday MP, Warner MA, Jarling KU, Rubin PAD. Acquired monocular vision, functional consequences form the patients perspective. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18:55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohman E, Roed Rassmussen ML, Dafgard KE. Pain and discomfort in the anophthalmic socket. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25:455–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rasmussen ML, Ekholm O, Prause JU, Toft PB. Quality of life of eye amputated patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:435–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahn JM, Lee SY, Yoon JS. Health related quality of life and emotional status of anophthalmic patients in Korea. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:1005–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Masdottir S, Sahlin S. Patient satisfaction and results after evisceration with a split-sclera technique. Orbit. 2007;26:241–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McBain HB, Ezra DG, Rose GE, Newman SP. The psychological impact of living with an ocular prosthesis. Orbit. 2014;33:33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gougelmann HP. The evolution of the ocular motility implant. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1970;10(4):689–711.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smit TJ, Koornneef L, Zonnereld FW, Groet E, Otto AJ. Computed tomography in the assessment of the postenucleation socket syndrome. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:137–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smit TJ, Koornneef L, Zonnereld FW, Groet E, Otto AJ. Primary and secondary implants in the anophthalmic orbit: preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic appearance. Opthalmology. 1991;98(1):106–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Soll DB. The anophthalmic socket. Ophthalmology. 1982;89:407–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaltreider SA. The ideal ocular prostheses. Analysis of prosthetic volume. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;16(5):388–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaltreider SA, Lucarelli MJ. A simple algorithm for selection of implant size for enucleation and evisceration. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;18:336–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM. Volumetric determination of enucleation Implant size. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:489–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thaller VT. Enucleation volume measurement. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;13:18–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Allen L. Modified impression fitting. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1970;10:747–62.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parr GR, Goldman BM, Rahn AO. Post insertion care of the ocular prosthesis. J Pros Dentistry. 1983;49(2):220–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pine KR, Sloan BH, Jacobs RJ. A proposed model of the response of the anophthalmic socket to prosthetic eye wear and its application to the management of mucoid discharge. Med Hypothesis. 2013;81:300–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pine KR, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ. The response of the anophthalmic socket to prosthetic eye wear. Clin Exp Optom. 2013;96:338–93.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pine KR, Sloan B, Jacobs RJ. Deposit build up on prosthetic eyes and implications for conjunctival inflammation and mucoid discharge. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;12(6):1755–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pine KR, Sloan B, Stewart J, Jacobs RJ. A surgery of prosthetic eye wearers to investigate mucoid discharge. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;1(6):707–13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pine KR, Sloan B, Jacobs RJ. The development of measurement tools for prosthetic eye research. Clin Exp Optom. 2013;96:32–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Osborn KL, Hottler D. A survey of recommendations on the care of ocular prostheses. Optometry. 2010;81:142–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trawnik WR. Care of the ocular prostheses. Adv Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;8:146–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fett DR, Scott R, Putterman AM. Evaluation of lubricants for prosthetic eye wearers. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;2(1):29–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. LeGrand JA. Chronic exudate: an unnecessary evil. J of Ophthal prosthetics. 1999;4(1):757–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jones CA, Collin JRO. A classification and review of the causes of discharging sockets. Trans Ophthalmol UK. 1983;103:351–3.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Larned DC. Lacrimal mechanics in the enucleated state. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;8:202–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Allen L, Kolder HE, Bulgarelli EM, Bulgarelli DM. Artificial eyes and tear measurements. Ophthalmology. 1980;87:155–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim SE, Yoon JS, Lee SY. Tear measurements in prosthetic eye users with Fourier-Domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:602–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vasquez RJ, Linberg JV. The anophthalmic socket and prosthetic eye: a clinical and bacteriologic study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;5:277–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rose GE. The giant fornix syndrome: an unrecognized cause of chronic, relapsing, grossly purulent conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1539–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones DF, Lyle CE, Fleming JC. Superior conjunctivoplasty-Mullerectomy for correction of chronic discharge and concurrent ptosis in anophthalmic socket with enlarged superior fornix. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26:172–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Lee-Wing M, Ashenhurst M. Pyogenic granulomas following oculoplastic procedures: an imbalance in angiogenesis regulation. Can J Ophthalmol. 2001;36(5):260–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Dorey MW. Clinicopathologic analysis of 15 explanted hydroxyapatite implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20(4):285–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chang WJ, Tse DT, Rosa RH, Huang A, et al. Conjunctival cytologic features of giant papillary conjunctivitis associated with ocular prostheses. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(1):39–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Scrinivasan OD, Jakobiec FA, Iwamoto T, DeVoe G. Giant papillary conjunctivitis with ocular prostheses. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97:892–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kymionis GD, Goldman D, Ide T, Yoo SH. Tacrolimus ointment 0.03% in the eye for treatment of giant papillary conjunctivitis. Cornea. 2008;27:228–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Attas-Fox L, Barkena Y, Iskhakov V, Rayvich S. Topical tacrolimus 0.03% ointment for intractable allergic conjunctivitis: an open-label pilot study. Curr Eye Res. 2008;33:545–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Remulla HD, Rubin PAD, Shore JW, Sutula FC, Townsend DJ, Woog JJ, Jahrling KV. Complications of porous spherical orbital implants. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:586–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jordan DR, Bawazeer A. Experience with 120 synthetic hydroxyapatite implants (FCI3). Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17:184–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Glaft HJ, Googe PB, Powers T, Apple DJ. Anophthalmic socket pain. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116:357–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rasmussen ML, Prause JU, Toft PB. Phantom pain after eye amputation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:10–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gerding H, Vo O, Husstedt IW, Evers S, Soros P. Phantom pain after enucleation. Ophthalmology. 2003;100:943–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jordan DR. Anophthalmic orbital implants. Ophthal Clin NA. 2000;13(4):587–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Massary GC, Holds JB. Coralline hydroxyapatite spheres as secondary orbital implants in anophthalmos. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:161–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jordan DR, Nerad J, Tse DT. An unusual case of orbital cellulitis. Can J Ophthalmol. 1990;25(4):210–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McCarthy RW, Beyer CK, Dallow RL, Burke JF, Lessell S. Conjunctival cysts of the orbit following enucleation. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(1):30–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Owji N, Aslani A. Conjunctival cysts of the orbit after enucleation: the use of trichloroacetic acid. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(4):264–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sanchez EM, Formento NA, Peres-Lopez M, Jimenez AA. Role of trichloroacetic acid in treating posterior conjunctival cyst in anophthalmic socket. Orbit. 2009;28:101–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hornblass A, Bosniak S. Orbital cyst following enucleation: the use of absolute alcohol. Ophthalmic Surg. 1981;12:123–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Smit TJ, Koorneef L, Zonneveld FW. Conjunctival cysts in anophthalmic orbits. Br J Ophthalmol. 1991;75:342–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Goldstein MH, Soparkar CNS, Kersten RC, Orcutt JC, Patrinely JR, Holds J. Conjunctival cysts of the orbit. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(11):2056–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hanig CJ, Hornblass A. Treatment of postenucleation orbital cysts. Ann Ophthalmol. 1986;18:191–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Juneman A, Holbach LM. Epithelial giant inclusion cyst 50 years after enucleation without orbital implant. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1998;212:127–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Anderson RL. The tarsal strip procedure for correction of eyelid laxity and canthal malposition in the anophthalmic socket. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:895–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Anderson RL, Gordy DD. The Tarsal strip procedure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97(11):2192–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Jordan DR, Anderson RL. The lateral tarsal strip revisited: the enhanced tarsal strip. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(4):604–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Smith RJ, Malet T. Auricular cartilage grafting to correct lower conjunctival fornix retraction and eyelid malposition in anophthalmic patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24(1):13–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ma’luf RN. Correction of the inadequate lower fornix in the anophthalmic socket. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:881–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Neuhaus RW, Hawes MJ. Inadequate inferior cul-de-sac in the anophthalmic socket. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:153–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rougraff PM, Tse DT, Johnson TE, Feuer W. Involutional entropion repair with fornix sutures and lateral tarsal strip. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;17(4):281–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ho SF, Pherwani A, Elsssherbiny SM, Reuser T. Lateral tarsal strip and quickert sutures for lower eyelid entropion. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(5):345–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kersten RC, Kleiner FP, Kulwin DR. Tarsotomy for the treatment of cicatricial entropion with trichiasis. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:714–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Weis FA. Surgical treatment of entropion. J Int Coll Surg. 1954;21:758–60.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Allen LH. Four-snip procedure for involutional lower lid entropion: modification of Quickert and Jones Procedures. Can J Ophthalmol. 1991;26(3):139–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kaltreider S, Shields MD, Heipperd SC, Patrie J. Anophthalmic ptosis: investigation of the mechanisms and statistical analysis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19(6):421–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Vistnes LM. Mechanism of upper eyelid ptosis in the anophthalmic orbit. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58:539–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Karesh JW, Putterman AM, Fett DR. Conjunctival-Muellers muscle excision to correct anophthalmic ptosis. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:1068–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lee EW, Berbos Z, Zaldivar RA, Lee MS, Harrison AR. Use of a Dermatrix graft in Oculoplastic Surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26(3):153–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Rubin PA, Fay AM, Remulla HD, Maus M. Ophthalmic plastic applications of acellular dermal allografts. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:2091–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Shorr N, Perry JD, Glodberg RA, et al. The safety and applications of acellular human dermal allograft in ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;16:223–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Vagefi MR, McMullan TFW, Burroughs JR, White GW, McCann JD, Anderson RL. Injectable calcium hydroxylapatite for orbital volume augmentation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;9(6):439–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Cahill KV, Burns JA. Volume augmentation of the anophthalmic orbit with cross-linked collagen (Zyplast). Arch Ophthalmol. 1989;107(11):1684–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Hunter PD, Baker SS. The treatment of enophthalmos by orbital injection of fat autograft. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(8):835–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Huang ZL, Ma L. Restoration of enophthalmos in anophthalmic socket by HTR polymer. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(4):318–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Tenag MA, Madura T, Yano K, Hosokawa K. Use of calcium phosphate cement paste in orbital volume augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(4):1186–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Morley AMS, Mehryar T, Malhorta R, Goldberg R. Use of Hyaluronic acid gel for upper eyelid filling and contouring. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;25:440–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Smit TJ, Koornneef L, Mourits MP, et al. Primary versus secondary intraorbital implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;6:115–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Georgiadis NS, Tezidou CD, Dimitriadis AS. Restoration of the anophthalmic socket with secondary implantation of a coralline hydroxyapatite sphere. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998;29:808–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Frueh BR, Kelker GV. Baseball implant, a method of secondary insertion of an intraorbital implant. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976;94:429–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Massry GG, Holds JB. Coralline hydroxyapatite spheres as secondary orbital implants in anophthalmos. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:161–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Jordan DR. Localization of Extraocular muscles during secondary orbital implantation surgery. The tunnel technique: experience with 100 patients. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1048–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Allen L. The argument against imbrication the rectus muscles over spherical orbital implants after enucleation. Ophthalmology. 1983;90:1116–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Perry AC. Advances in enucleation. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;4:173–82.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Dutton JJ. Coralline hydroxyapatite as an ocular implant. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:370–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Sheilds CL, Sheilds JA, Potter D, et al. Lack of complications of the hydroxyapatite orbital implant in 250 consecutive cases. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1993;91:177–89.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Sheilds CL, Sheilds JA, De Potter P, et al. Problems with the hydroxyapatite orbital implant: experience with 250 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1994;78:702–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Nunery WR, Heinz GW, Bonnin JM, Martin RT, Cepela MA. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite spheres in the anophthalmic socket: histopathologic correlation and comparison with silicone sphere implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;9:96–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Goldberg RA, Holds JB, Ebrahimpour J. Exposed hydroxyapatite orbital implants: report of six cases. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:831–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Kim YD, Goldberg RA, Shorr N, Steinsapir KD. Management of exposed hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1709–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Oestreicher JH, Liu E, Berkowitz M. Complications of hydroxyapatite orbital implants: a review of 100 consecutive cases and a comparison of Dexon mesh (polyglycolic acid) with scleral wrapping. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:324–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Jolly SS. Abscessed hydroxyapatite orbital implants: a report of two cases. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1784–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Yoon JS, Lew H, Kim SJ, et al. Exposure rate of hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:566–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Shoamanesh A, Pang N, Oestreicher JH. Complications of orbital implants: a review of 542 patients who have undergone orbital implantation and 275 subsequent peg placements. Orbit. 2007;25:173–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Custer PL, Trinkaus KM. Porous implant exposure: incidence, management, and morbidity. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Jordan DR, Klapper SR, Gilberg SM. The use of vicryl mesh in 200 porous orbital implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:53–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Wang JK, Liao SL, Lai PC, et al. Prevention of exposure of porous orbital implants following enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Blaydon SM, Shepler TR, Neuhaus RW, White WL, Shore JW. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:364–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Karesh JW, Dresner SC. High density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic implant. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1688–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ma Y, Schou KR, Maloney-Schou M, Harwin FM, Ng J. The porous polyethylene/Bioglass spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 170 cases. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27:21–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Mahoney NR, Grant MP, Illiff NT, Merbs SL. Exposure rate of smooth surface tunnel porous polyethylene implants after enucleation. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;30:492–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Jordan DR, Munro SM, Brownstein S, Gilberg SM, Grahovac SZ. A synthetic hydroxyapatite implant: the so-called counterfeit implant. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14(4):244–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Jordan DR, Mawn L, Brownstein S, McEachren TM, Gilberg SM, Hill V, Grahovac SZ, Adenis JP. The bioceramic orbital implant: a new generation of porous implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;16:347–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn LA. The bioceramic orbital implant: experience with 107 implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:128–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Alwitry A, West S, King J, Foss AJ, Abercrombie LC. Long term follow-up of porous polyethylene spherical implants after enucleation and evisceration. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23:11–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Ahmed Sadiq S, Mengher LS, Downes R. Integrated orbital implants – a comparison of hydroxyapatite and porous polyethylene implants. Orbit. 2008;27:37–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Jordan DR, Klapper SK, Gilberg SM, Dutton JJ, Wong A, Mawn L. The bioceramic implant: evaluation of implant exposures in 419 implants Ophthalmic. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;26:80–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Wang JK, Lai PC, Liao SL. Late exposure of the bioceramic orbital implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:162–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Karslioglu SK, Buttanri IB, Fazil K, Serin D, Akbaba M. Long-term outcomes of pegged and unpegged bioceramic orbital implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;28:264–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Jordan DR, Gilberg SM, Bawazeer A. The coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant (Bio-Eye™): experience with 170 Patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20(1):69–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Jordan DR, Klapper SR. Anophthalmic orbital implants: current concepts and controversies. Compr Ophthalmol. 2005;6(6):287–96.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Jordan DR. Problems after evisceration surgery with porous orbital implants: experience with 86 patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;20(5):374–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Pelletier C, Gilberg D, Jordan DR. Use of temporalis fascia for management of exposed hydroxyapatite implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;14(3):198–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Buettner H, Bartley GB. Tissue breakdown and exposure associated with orbital hydroxyapatite implants. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:669–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. El-Sharhed FS, Sherief MM, Ali AT. Management of tissue breakdown and exposure associated with orbital hydroxyapatite implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;11:91–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  116. Neuhaus RW, Shorr N. Use of temporalis fascia and muscle as an auto graft. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983;101:262–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Oestreicher JH. Treatment of exposed coral implants after failed scleral patch graft. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;10(2):110–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Wiggs EO, Becker BB. Extrusion of enucleation implants: treatment with secondary implants and autogenous temporalis fascia or fascia lata patch grafts. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23:472–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Soporkar CNS, Patrinely JR. Tarsal patch flap for orbital implant exposure. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;6:391–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Joly SS. Abscessed hydroxyapatite orbital implants: a report of 2 cases. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1784–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Jordan DR, Klapper SR, Mawn L, et al. Abscess formation within a synthetic hydroxyapatite implant. Can J Opthalmol. 1998;33:329–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Ainbinder DJ, Haik BG, Tallado M. Hydroxyapatite orbital implants abscess: histopathologic consideration of an infected implant following evisceration. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;10:267–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Rawlings N, Robinson J. An infected porous polyethylene orbital implant. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23(5):413–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Robinson J. An infected Aluminum oxide orbital implant. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22(1):66–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Guillinta P, Vasani SN, Granet DB, Kikkawa DO. Prosthetic motility in pegged versus unpegged integrated porous orbital implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19:119–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Jordan DR, Chan S, Mawn L, Gilberg S, Dean T, Brownstein S, Hill VE. Complications associated with pegging hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:505–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Fahim DK, Frueh BR, Musch DC, Nelson CC. Complications of pegged and non-pegged hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;23:206–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Jordan DR, Chan S, Mawn L, Gilberg SM, Brownstein S, Hill V. Complications associated with pegging hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:505–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Edelstein C, Shields CL, DePotter P, Shields JA. Complications of motility peg placement for the hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:1616–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Lin CJ, Lio SL, Jou JR, Kao SC, Hou PK, Chen MS. Complications of motility peg placement for porous hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:394–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Jordan DR. Spontaneous loosening of hydroxyapatite peg sleeves. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:2041–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Cheng MS, Lio SL, Lin L. Late porous polyethylene implant exposure after motility coupling post placement. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138:420–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Lee SY, Jang JW, Lew H, Kim SJ, Kim HY. Complications in motility peg placement for hydroxyapatite orbital implants in anophthalmic socket. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2002;46:103–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Jordan DR, Klapper SR. A new titanium peg system for hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;16:380–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Johnson RLC, Ramstead CL, Nathoo N. Periocular mass lesions secondary to dermatologic fillers: report of 3 cases. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;27:74–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Yazici B, Akova B, Sanli O. Complications of primary placement of motility post in porous polyethylene implants during enucleation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143:828–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Krishna G. Contracted sockets (etiology and types). Indian J Ophthalmol. 1980;28:117–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Tawfik HA, Raslan AO, Talib N. Surgical management of acquired socket contracture. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20:406–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Klein M, Manneking H, Bier J. Reconstruction of the contracted ocular socket with free full-thickness mucosa graft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;29:96–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Molgat YM, Hurwitz JJ, Webb MC. Buccal mucous membrane-fat graft in the management of the contracted socket. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;9:267–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Massry GG, Hornblass A, Rubin P, Holds JB. Tarsal switch procedure for the surgical rehabilitation of the eyelid and socket deficiencies of the anophthalmic socket. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;15:333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Holck DE, Foster JA, Dutton JJ, Dillon HD. Hard palate mucosal grafts in the treatment of the contracted socket. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;15:202–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Lee AC, Fedorovich I, Heinz GW, Kikkawa DO. Socket reconstruction with combined mucous membrane and hard palate mucous grafts. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2002;33:463–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Karesh JW, Putterman AM. Reconstruction of the partially contracted ocular socket or fornix. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:552–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Klein M, Menneking H, Bier J. Reconstruction of the contracted ocular socket with free full thickness mucous membrane graft. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;29:96–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Betharia SM, Patil ND. Dermis fat grafting in contracted sockets. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1988;36:110–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Lee YH, Kim HC, Lee JS, Park WJ. Surgical reconstruction of the contracted orbit. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;4:1129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Suh IS, Yang YM, Oh SJ. Conjunctival cul-de-sac reconstruction with radial forearm free flap in anophthalmic orbit syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:914–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Aihara M, Sakai S, Matsuzaki K, Ishida H. Eye socket reconstruction with free flaps in patients who have had postoperative radiotherapy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;26:301–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Anita NH, Arora S. Malignant contracture of the eye socket. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;74:292–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Tahara S, Susuki T. Eye socket reconstruction with free radial forearm flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;23:112–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Sterker I, Frerich B. Secondary reconstruction of the eye socket with a free radial forearm flap. Ophthalmology. 2007;104:978–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. Li D, Jie Y, Liu H, Liu J, Zhu Z, Mao C. Reconstruction of anophthalmic orbits and contracted eye sockets with microvascular radial forearm free flaps. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;24:94–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Soutar DS, Scheker LR, Tanner NS. The radial forearm flap: a versatile method for intra-oral reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1983;36:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Bajaj MS, Pushker N, Kumar KS, Chandra M, Ghose S. Evaluation of amniotic membrane grafting in the reconstruction of contracted socket. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;22(2):116–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Poonyathalang A, Preechawat P, Pomsathit J, Mahaisaviriya P. Reconstruction of contracted eye socket with amniotic membrane graft. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21:359–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Putterman AM, Karesh JW. A surgical technique for the successful and stable reconstruction of the totally contracted ocular socket. Ophthalmic Surg. 1988;19(3):193–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Timothy NH, Feilich DE, Linberg JV. Perspective: evisceration versus enucleation, the ocularists standpoint. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;19(6):417–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa Eye Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    David R. Jordan

  2. Department of Ophthalmology, Klapper Eyelid and Facial Plastic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Carmel, IN, USA

    Stephen R. Klapper

Authors
  1. David R. Jordan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen R. Klapper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Eyelid and Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and MediSpa, Diseases and Surgery of the Orbit & Lacrimal System Neuro-ophthalmology, Glenview/Chicago, IL, USA

    Adam J. Cohen

  2. Oculoplastics, Orbital, and Cosmetic Facial Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Madison, WI, USA

    Cat Nguyen Burkat

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jordan, D.R., Klapper, S.R. (2019). Evaluation of the Anophthalmic Socket. In: Cohen, A., Burkat, C. (eds) Oculofacial, Orbital, and Lacrimal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14092-2_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14092-2_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14090-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14092-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation