Skip to main content

Topology Optimization Additive Manufacturing-Oriented for a Biomedical Application

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Topological optimization is a fairly innovative numerical technique that makes it possible to reduce the mass of mechanical components. It is an alternative to the optimizations of shape or geometry that allow to highly improve the efficiency of products. The recent development of metal additive manufacturing technologies allows the production of pieces that were not feasible before, permitting the use of topological optimization in many fields. In the biomedical field, for example, the reduction of prosthetic and orthotic materials allows to save weight, to the advantage of comfort, and to minimize the invasiveness of these systems. In this paper, an optimization of a system consisting of a femoral nail and two screws is carried out. The pieces were obtained by 3D scanning of prostheses, so as to obtain the true geometry. The femur is the standard one in literature. Following topological optimization, a new nail, with a mass of 60% of the previous one, was obtained, without limiting the functionality or the reliability of the product. Results and methodological problems are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berman B (2012) 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution. Bus Horiz 55:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prestipino M, Chiodo V, Maisano S, Zafarana G, Urbani F, Galvagno A (2017) Hydrogen rich syngas production by air-steam gasification of citrus peel residues from citrus juice manufacturing: experimental and simulation activities. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:26816–26827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiodo V, Urbani F, Zafarana G, Prestipino M, Galvagno A, Maisano S (2017) Syngas production by catalytic steam gasification of citrus residues. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:28048–28055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Paulic M, Irgolic T, Balic J, Cus F, Cupar A, Brajlih T, Drstvensek I (2014) Reverse engineering of parts with optical scanning and additive manufacturing. Procedia Eng 69:795–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gardan J (2016) Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. Int J Prod Res 54:3118–3132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tamburrino F, Perrotta V, Aversa R, Apicella A (2015) Additive technology and design process : an innovative tool to drive and assist product development. In: XIII international forum Le Vie dei Mercanti, pp. 1742–1747

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shapiro AA, Borgonia JP, Chen QN, Dillon RP, McEnerney B, Polit-Casillas R, Soloway L (2016) Additive manufacturing for aerospace flight applications. J Spacecr Rockets 53:952–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leal R, Barreiros FM, Alves L, Romeiro F, Vasco JC, Santos M, Marto C (2017) Additive manufacturing tooling for the automotive industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:1671–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Graziosi S, Rosa F, Casati R, Solarino P, Vedani M, Bordegoni M (2017) Designing for metal additive manufacturing: a case study in the professional sports equipment field. Procedia Manuf 11:1544–1551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Graziosi S, Tamburrino F, Bordegoni M (2018) The design process of additively manufactured Meso-Scale Lattice Structures: a review. J Comput Inf Sci, Eng

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cucinotta F, Paoli A, Risitano G, Sfravara F (2018) Optical measurements and experimental investigations in repeated low-energy impacts in powerboat sandwich composites. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ 232:234–244

    Google Scholar 

  12. Comotti C, Regazzoni D, Rizzi C, Vitali A (2017) Additive manufacturing to advance functional design: an application in the medical field. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 17:31006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Filardi V (2017) Characterization of an innovative intramedullary nail for diaphyseal fractures of long bones. Med Eng Phys 49:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Palomba V, Prestipino M, Galvagno A (2017) Tri-generation for industrial applications: development of a simulation model for a gasification-SOFC based system. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:27866–27883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshioka Y, Siu D, Cooke T (1987) The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Jt Surg 69:873–880

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wirtz DC, Schiffers N, Pandorf T, Radermacher K, Weichert D, Forst R (2000) Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur. J Biomech 33:1325–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor WR, Roland E, Ploeg H, Hertig D, Klabunde R, Warner MD, Hobatho MC, Rakotomanana L, Clift SE (2002) Determination of orthotropic bone elastic constants using FEA and modal analysis. J Biomech 35:767–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng L, Bai J, Zeng X, Zhou Y (2006) Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions. Med Eng Phys 28:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Beaupre GS, Orr TE (1990) An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application a preliminary remodeling simulation—Beaupré—2005. J Orthop Res 662–670

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ashman RB, Cowin SC, Van Buskirk WC, Rice JC (1984) A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 17:349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Watanabe Y, Shiba N, Matsuo S, Higuchi F, Tagawa Y, Inoue A (2000) Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:505–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Coutinho KD, Carlos J, Costa A (2011) Compliance minimization using topology optmization. In: Proceedings of COBEM, 21st Brazilian congress of mechanical engineering, Natal, Brazil, p 7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Cucinotta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cucinotta, F., Guglielmino, E., Longo, G., Risitano, G., Santonocito, D., Sfravara, F. (2019). Topology Optimization Additive Manufacturing-Oriented for a Biomedical Application. In: Cavas-Martínez, F., Eynard, B., Fernández Cañavate, F., Fernández-Pacheco, D., Morer , P., Nigrelli, V. (eds) Advances on Mechanics, Design Engineering and Manufacturing II. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12346-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12346-8_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-12345-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-12346-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics