Abstract
The military Command, Control, Computer, Communication, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) concepts and those of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) have lots in common. The analysis of defense systems is described by showing the corresponds of the three basic concepts of I4.0 in defense systems. These are connections between cyber-physical systems and automated weapon systems, between Internet of the things and shared tactical picture and sensory data, and between smart factories and computer in the C4ISR concept. The main motivation of this study is to make a conceptual association between C4ISR and I4.0 technologies and an intelligent analysis and run-time decision making mechanism as an intersection of both technologies is exemplified with a smart war effectiveness analysis system which is designed as an intelligent agent for a land-based air defense system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Williams A, Scharre PD (2015) Autonomous systems : issues for defence policymakers autonomous systems issues for defence
Tolk A et al (2017) Hybrid simulation for cyber physical systems—a panel on where are we going regarding complexity, intelligence and adaptability of CPS using simulation. In: M&S and complexity in intelligent, adaptive and autonomous systems symposium (MSCIAAS 2018). https://doi.org/10.22360/springsim.2018.msciaas.004
Tolk A, Page EH, Mittal S (2018) Hybrid simulation and cyber physical systems—state of the art and a literature review. In: Annual simulation symposium (ANSS 2018). https://doi.org/10.22360/springsim.2018.anss.019
Industry 4.0. What are we talking about? (2017) Available at: https://www.sew-eurodrive.de/company/your_success/future_trends/industry-40/basics/industry_40/basic_information.html#panel-ef1bb7c7-0d3b-4833-a6bf-d73d352b322f-2
Baheti R, Gill H (2011) ‘Cyber-physical systems’. The impact of control technology, 12, pp 161–166
Andreas T (2015) Modeling and simulation interoperability concepts for multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity—implications for computational intelligence enabling autonomous systems. In: Hodicky J (ed) Modelling and simulation for autonomous systems, second international workshop, MESAS 2015, Prague, Czech Republic, 29–30 Apr 2015, Revised selected papers. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22383-4_5
Yoon J-S, Shin S-J, Suh S-H (2012) A conceptual framework for the ubiquitous factory. Int J Prod Res 50(8):2174–2189
Constantinescu C et al (2008) ‘Smart factory—a step towards the next generation of manufacturing. In: 41st CIRP conference on manufacturing systems, in manufacturing systems and technologies for the new frontier. Springer, Berlin, pp 115–118
Zuehlke D (2010) SmartFactory—towards a factory-of-things. Ann Rev Control Elsevier 34(1):129–138
Hameed B, Durr F, Rothermel K (2011) RFID based complex event processing in a smart real-time factory. In: Expert discussion: distributed systems in smart spaces
Madu CN et al (1994) Integrating total quality management in the adoption of new technologies. Benchmarking Qual Manage Technol 1(3):52–66
Perme D et al (2005) Integrating air and ground operations within a common battle management language. In: IEEE fall simulation interoperability workshop, Orlando, USA
Sudnikovich W et al (2006) NATO exploratory team—016 integration lessons learned for C2IEDM and C-BML. In: IEEE spring simulation interoperability workshop, San Diego CA, USA
RTO-TR-MSG-048 and Members, M.-048 T. A. P. (no date) Coalition battle management language (C-BML)
Boyd JR (1976) Destruction and creation. A discourse on winning and losing, (September), pp 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107415324.004
Galster SM et al (2007) Collaboration technologies for tactical command and control: performance, workload, and situation awareness. In: 2007 international symposium on collaborative technologies and systems, (June), pp xxxiii–xxxiv. https://doi.org/10.1109/cts.2007.4621722
Wang S et al (2015) Towards smart factory for Industry 4.0: A self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput Netw 101:158–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.12.017
Alberts DS, Huber RK, Moffat J (2010) NATO NEC C2 maturity model
Lee J, Bagheri B, Kao HA (2015) A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufact Lett 3:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001 (Society of Manufacturing Engineers (SME))
Suggs C (2013) Technical framework for cloud computing at the tactical edge
Clausewitz CV (2007) On war. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Clausewitz CV (1942) Principles of war. The Military Service Publishing Company
C4ISR Architectures Working Group (1997) C4ISR architecture framework. Version 2.0, (December), p 239
Lu Y (2017) Industry 4.0: a survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. J Ind Inf Integr 6:1–10
Laeger MW, Sauter T (2017) The future of industrial communication, automation networks in the era of the internet of things and industry 4.0. IEEE industrial electronics magazine, pp 17–27
Bienvenu MP, Shin I, Levis AH (2000) C4ISR architectures: III. An object-oriented approach for architecture design. Syst Eng 3(4):288–312
Balanis CA (2005) Antenna theory: analysis and design. Wiley-Interscience
Bullington K (1977) Radio propagation for vehicular communications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 26(4):295–308
ITU (2005) Recommendation, Specific attenuation model for rain for use in prediction methods. ITU
Ishimaru A (1978) Wave propagation and scattering in random media, vol 1. Academic Press
Barton DK (2012) Radar equations for modern radar. Artech House
Thames L, Schafer D (2016) Software-defined cloud manufacturing for Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 52:12–17
Monostori L et al (2016) Cyber-physical systems in manufacturing. In: CIRP annual manufacturing technology, pp 621–641
Hermann M, Pentek T, Otto B (2016) Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios. In IEEE 49th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS), pp 3928–3937
Sauter T (2010) The three generations of field-level networks—evolution and compatibility issues. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 3585–3595
Schlesinger R, Springer A, Sauter T (2016) Automatic packing mechanism for simplification of the scheduling in Profinet IRT. IEEE Trans Ind Informat, 1822–1831
Tramarin F, Vitturi S (2015) Strategies and services for energy efficiency in real-time Ethernet networks. IEEE Trans Ind Informat, pp 841–852
Toscano E, Lo Bello L (2012) Comparative assessments of IEEE 802.15. 4/ZigBee and 6LoWPAN for low-power industrial WSNs in realistic scenarios. In: Proceedings of ninth IEEE international workshop factory communication systems (WFCS), pp 115–124
Tramarin F et al (2016) On the use of IEEE 802.11n for industrial communications. IEEE Trans Ind Informat, 1877–1886
Girs S, Willig A, Uhlemann E, Björkman M (2016) Scheduling for source relaying with packet aggregation in industrial wireless networks. IEEE Trans Ind Informat 12(5)
Vitturi S, Tramarin F, Seno L (2013) Industrial wireless networks: the significance of timeliness in communication systems. IEEE Ind Electron Mag, 40–51
Bratukhin A, Sauter T (2011) Functional analysis of manufacturing execution system distribution. IEEE Trans Ind Informat 7(4):740–749
Zhang Y et al (2017) Agent and cyber-physical system based self-organizing and self-adaptive intelligent shopfloor. IEEE Trans Ind Informat 13(2)
Hayes-Roth B (1995) An architecture for adaptive intelligent systems. Artif Intell: Spec Issue Agents Interactivity 72(1–2):329–365
Suarez FJ, Nuno P, Granda JC, Garcia DF (2015) Computer networks performance modeling and simulation. In: Obaidat P, Nicopolitidis FZ (eds) Modeling and simulation of computer networks and systems. Elsevier, pp 187–223
‘The Network Simulator—NS-2. (2018, 09 15)’ (2018) Available at: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
(2018, 0915). OPNET: https://www.riverbed.com/gb/products/steelcentral/opnet.html
Varga A (1999) The OMNET++ discrete event simulation system. ACM Trans Model Comput Simul 42(4):11. https://doi.org/10.1109/13.804564
Obaidat M, Boudriga NA (2010) Fundamentals of performance evaluation of computer and telecommunication systems. Wiley
Papadimitrioul GI, Sadoun B, Papazoglou C (2003) Fundamentals of system simulation. In: Obaidat MS, Papadimitriou GI (ed) Applied system simulation—methodologies and applications, pp 9–39
Kelly FP (1985) Stochastic models of computer communication systems. J R Stat Soc B 47(3):379–395
Boel R (1981) Stochastic models of computer networks. Stochastic systems: the mathematics of filtering and identification and applications, pp 141–167
Wainer GA (2009) Discrete-event modeling and simulation: a practitioner’s approach. CRC Press
ISO/IEC (1994) Information technology open systems interconnection basic reference model: the basic model
Burbank J, Kasch W, Ward J (2011) An introduction to network modeling and simulation for the practicing engineer. Wiley, New York
Aktas I, King T, Mengi C (2010) Modeling application traffic. In: Wehrle K, Güneş M, Gross içinde J (eds) Modeling and tools for network simulation. Springer, Berlin, pp 397–426
Li X, Li D, Wan J, Vasilakos AV, Lai CF, Wang S (2017) A review of industrial wireless networks in the context of Industry 4.0. Wireless Netw 23(1):23–41
Hocaoglu MF (2005) AdSiF : agent driven simulation framework. In: Gauthier JS (ed) Hunstville simulation conference -HSC2005. Huntsvill Alabama
Hocaoğlu MF (2018) AdSiF: agent driven simulation framework paradigm and ontological view. Sci Comput Program 167:70–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2018.07.004
Tolk A (2012) Engineering principles of combat modeling and distributed simulation. Wiley
Anthony S (2012) The solar storm of 2012 that almost sent us back to a post-apocalyptic Stone Age, ExtremeTech. Available at: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/186805-the-solar-storm-of-2012-that-almost-sent-us-back-to-a-post-apocalyptic-stone-age
Wilson C (2008) High altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) and high power microwave (HPM) devices: threat assessments, library of congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service, ADA529982
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hocaoğlu, M.F., Genç, İ. (2019). Smart Combat Simulations in Terms of Industry 4.0. In: Gunal, M. (eds) Simulation for Industry 4.0. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04137-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04137-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04136-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04137-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)