Skip to main content

Superficial Chemical Peels and Microdermabrasion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Procedural Dermatology
  • 1489 Accesses

Abstract

Superficial skin resurfacing is a process causing controlled injury to the epidermis. Processes can be chemical or mechanical and classified as laser or nonlaser. Although our armamentarium for skin resurfacing ranges from topical medicaments to ablative lasers, superficial skin resurfacing with chemical peels and microdermabrasion (MDA) has maintained its popularity. These well-established therapies have proven safe and effective, offer minimal risk, low cost, and are well-tolerated by patients often with little to no post-procedure downtime. Potential benefits extend to all Fitzpatrick skin types and if done appropriately are highly unlikely to cause significant dyspigmentation or scarring. Indications for treatment are acne vulgaris, rosacea, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, melasma, and photodamage including lentigines, fine rhytides, and actinic keratoses. Superficial resurfacing with chemical peels or MDA can be used in combination with other therapies (e.g., laser) and may enhance the efficacy of other topical treatments. A superficial depth of penetration may be of significant benefit to the patient but does have limitations. It is important for patients to understand the likely need for a series of treatments, the importance of pre- and post-care regimens, and expected outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dréno B, Fischer TC, Perosino E, Poli F, Viera MS, Rendon MI, et al. Expert opinion: efficacy of superficial chemical peels in active acne management–what can we learn from the literature today? Evidence-based recommendations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011 Jun;25(6):695–704.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JJ, Schaffer JV, Callen JP, Cerroni L, Heymann WR, et al. Dermatology. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Roenigk RK, Broadland DG. A primer of facial chemical peel. Dermatol Clin. 1993;11(2):349–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rendon MI, Berson DS, Cohen JL, Roberts WE, Starker I, Wang B. Evidence and considerations in the application of chemical peels in skin disorders and aesthetic resurfacing. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3(7):32–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman WP, Brody HJ. Advances in chemical peeling. Dermatol Clin. 1997 Jan;15(1):19–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer TC, Perosino E, Poli F, Viera MS, Dréno B. Chemical peels in aesthetic dermatology: an update 2009. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010;24(3):281–92. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berson DS, Cohen JL, Rendon MI, Roberts WE, Starker I, Wang B. Clinical role and application of superficial chemical peels in today’s practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009 Sep;8(9):803–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharad J. Glycolic acid peel therapy – a current review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013;6:281–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Garg VK, Sarkar R, Agarwal R. Comparative evaluation of beneficiary effects of priming agents (2% hydroquinone and 0.025% retinoic acid) in the treatment of melasma with glycolic acid peels. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(8):1032–9; discussion 1340.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Monheit GD, Chastain MA. Chemical peels. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2001;9(2):239–55; viii.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Landau M. Chemical peels. Clin Dermatol. 2008;26:200–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Resnik SS, Resnik BI. Complications of chemical peeling. Dermatol Clin. 1995;13(2):309–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Murad H, Shamban AT, Premo PS. The use of glycolic acid as a peeling agent. Dermatol Clin. 1995;13(2):285–307.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Scott EJ, Ditre CM, Yu RJ. Alpha-hydroxyacids in the treatment of signs of photoaging. Clin Dermatol. 1996;14(2):217–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ditre CM. Glycolic acid peels. Dermatol Ther. 2000;13(2):165–72. Blackwell Science Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Scott EJ, Yu RJ. Hyperkeratinization, corneocyte cohesion, and alpha hydroxy acids. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;11(5):867–79. Mosby.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim SJ, Park JH, Kim DH, Won YH, Maibach HI. Increased in vivo collagen synthesis and in vitro cell proliferative effect of glycolic acid. Dermatol Surg. 1998 Oct;24(10):1054–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Erbil H, Sezer E, Tastan B, Arca E, Kurumlu Z. Efficacy and safety of serial glycolic acid peels and a topical regimen in the treatment of recalcitrant melasma. J Dermatol. 2007;34(1):25–30. Blackwell Publishing Asia.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamamoto Y, Uede K, Yonei N, Kishioka A, Ohtani T, Furukawa F. Effects of alpha-hydroxy acids on the human skin of Japanese subjects: the rationale for chemical peeling. J Dermatol. 2006;33(1):16–22. Blackwell Publishing Asia.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moy LS, Peace S, Moy RL. Comparison of the effect of various chemical peeling agents in a mini-pig model. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22(5):429–32. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Usuki A, Ohashi A, Sato H, Ochiai Y, Ichihashi M, Funasaka Y. The inhibitory effect of glycolic acid and lactic acid on melanin synthesis in melanoma cells. Exp Dermatol. 2003;12(Suppl 2):43–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takenaka Y, Hayashi N, Takeda M, Ashikaga S, Kawashima M. Glycolic acid chemical peeling improves inflammatory acne eruptions through its inhibitory and bactericidal effects on Propionibacterium acnes. J Dermatol. 2012 Apr;39(4):350–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Deprez P. Textbook of chemical peels. Superficial, medium, and deep peels in cosmetic practice. London: Informa UK; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van Scott EJ. Control of keratinization with a-hydroxy acids and related compounds. Arch Dermatol. 1974;110(4):586–90. American Medical Association.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ditre CM, Griffin TD, Murphy GF, Sueki H, Telegan B, Johnson WC, et al. Effects of α-hydroxy acids on photoaged skin: a pilot clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural study. J Am Dermatol. 1996;34(2):187–95. Mosby.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Butler PE, González S, Randolph MA, Kim J, Kollias N, Yaremchuk MJ. Quantitative and qualitative effects of chemical peeling on photo-aged skin: an experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jan;107(1):222–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Newman N, Newman A, Moy LS, Babapour R, Harris AG, Moy RL. Clinical improvement of photoaged skin with 50% glycolic acid. A double-blind vehicle-controlled study. Dermatol Surg. 1996 May;22(5):455–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Alam M, Omura NE, Dover JS, Arndt KA. Glycolic acid peels compared to microdermabrasion: a right-left controlled trial of efficacy and patient satisfaction. Dermatol Surg. 2002 Jun;28(6):475–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lim JT, Tham SN. Glycolic acid peels in the treatment of melasma among Asian women. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(3):177–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lawrence N, Cox SE, Brody HJ. Treatment of melasma with Jessner’s solution versus glycolic acid: a comparison of clinical efficacy and evaluation of the predictive ability of Wood’s light examination. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 Apr;36(4):589–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sarkar R, Kaur C, Bhalla M, Kanwar AJ. The combination of glycolic acid peels with a topical regimen in the treatment of melasma in dark-skinned patients: a comparative study. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(9):828–32. Blackwell Science Inc.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hurley ME, Guevara IL, Gonzales RM, Pandya AG. Efficacy of glycolic acid peels in the treatment of melasma. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138(12):1578–82. American Medical Association.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Coleman WP 3rd, Brody HJ. Efficacy of low-strength glycolic acid application in the treatment of melasma. Arch Dermatol. 2003;139(6):811; author reply 811–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharquie KE, Al-Tikreety MM, Al-Mashhadani SA. Lactic acid as a new therapeutic peeling agent in melasma. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(2):149–54; discussion 154.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharquie KE, Tikreety MM, Al-Mashhadani SA. Lactic acid chemical peels as a new therapeutic modality in melasma in comparison to Jessner’s solution chemical peels. Dermatologic Surgery. 2006;32(12):1429–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sarkar R, Garg V, Bansal S, Sethi S, Gupta C. Comparative evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of glycolic acid, salicylic mandelic acid, and phytic acid combination peels in melasma. Dermatol Surg. 2016;42(3):384–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang CM, Li HC, Sindy Hu CT, Chan HL. The effect of glycolic acid on the treatment of acne in Asian skin. Dermatol Surg Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 1997;23(1):23–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Atzori L, Brundu MA, Orru A, Biggio P. Glycolic acid peeling in the treatment of acne. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 1999;12(2):119–22. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim SW, Moon SE, Kim JA, Eun HC. Glycolic acid versus Jessner’s solution: which is better for facial acne patients? Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(4):270–3. Blackwell Science Inc.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kessler E, Flanagan K, Chia C, Rogers C, Glaser DA. Comparison of alpha- and beta-hydroxy acid chemical peels in the treatment of mild to moderately severe facial acne vulgaris. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(1):45–50; discussion 51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee SH, Huh CH, Park KC, Youn SW. Effects of repetitive superficial chemical peels on facial sebum secretion in acne patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006 Sep;20(8):964–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kaminaka C, Uede M, Matsunaka H, Furukawa F, Yamomoto Y. Clinical evaluation of glycolic acid chemical peeling in patients with acne vulgaris: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, split-face comparative study. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(3):314–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Burns RL, Prevost-Blank PL, Lawry MA, Lawry TB, Faria DT, Fivenson DP. Glycolic acid peels for postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in black patients. A comparative study. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(3):171–4; discussion 175.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Garg VK, Sinha S, Sarkar R. Glycolic acid peels versus salicylic-mandelic acid peels in active acne vulgaris and post-acne scarring and hyperpigmentation: a comparative study. Dermatol Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):59–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Grimes PE. The safety and efficacy of salicylic acid chemical peels in darker racial‐ethnic groups. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(1):18–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kodali S, Guevara IL, Carrigan CR, Daulat S, Blanco G, Boker A, et al. A prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled trial of salicylic acid peels in the treatment of melasma in Latin American women. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Dec;63(6):1030–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ejaz A, Raza N, Iftikhar N, Muzzafar F. Comparison of 30% salicylic acid with Jessner’s solution for superficial chemical peeling in epidermal melasma. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008;18(4):205–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Joshi SS, Boone SL, Alam M, Yoo S, White L, Rademaker A, et al. Effectiveness, safety, and effect on quality of life of topical salicylic acid peels for treatment of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation in dark skin. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(4):638–44; discussion 644.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kligman D, Kligman A. Salicylic acid peels for the treatment of photoaging. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(3):325–8. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Dainichi T, Ueda S, Isoda M, Koga T, Kinukawa N, Nose Y, et al. Chemical peeling with salicylic acid in polyethylene glycol vehicle suppresses skin tumour development in hairless mice. Br J Dermatol. 2003 May;148(5):906–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yu RJ, Van Scott EJ. Salicylic acid: not a b-hydroxy acid. Cosmet Dermatol. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Arif T. Salicylic acid as a peeling agent: a comprehensive review. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015;8:455. Dove Press.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Imayama S, Ueda S, Isoda M. Histologic changes in the skin of hairless mice following peeling with salicylic acid. Arch Dermatol. 2000 Nov;136(11):1390–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rawlings A, Harding C, Watkinson A, Banks J, Ackerman C, Sabin R. The effect of glycerol and humidity on desmosome degradation in stratum corneum. Arch Dermatol Res. 1995;287(5):457–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lazo ND, Meine JG, Downing DT. Lipids are covalently attached to rigid corneocyte protein envelopes existing predominantly as β-sheets: a solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance study. J Investig Dermatol. 1995;105(2):296–300. Elsevier.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Akhavan A, Bershad S. Topical acne drugs: review of clinical properties, systemic exposure, and safety. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(7):473–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Starling J III, Karimipour DJ. Nonlaser superficial resurfacing techniques: superficial chemical peels and microdermabrasion. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 301–16.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ueda S, Mitsugi K, Ichige K, Yoshida K, Sakuma T, Ninomiya S-I, et al. New formulation of chemical peeling agent: 30% salicylic acid in polyethylene glycol. Absorption and distribution of 14C-salicylic acid in polyethylene glycol applied topically to skin of hairless mice. J Dermatol Sci. 2002 Apr;28(3):211–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lévêque JL, Corcuff P, Rougier A, Piérard GE. Mechanism of action of a lipophilic salicylic acid derivative on normal skin. Eur J Dermatol. 2002 Jul;12(4):XXXV–XXXVIII.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Uhoda E, Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard GE. Comedolysis by a lipohydroxyacid formulation in acne-prone subjects. Eur J Dermatol. 2003 Jan;13(1):65–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lee HS, Kim IH. Salicylic acid peels for the treatment of acne vulgaris in Asian patients. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(12):1196–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ahn HH, Kim IH. Whitening effect of salicylic acid peels in Asian patients. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(3):372–5. Blackwell Publishing Inc.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Dainichi T, Ueda S, Imayama S, Furue M. Excellent clinical results with a new preparation for chemical peeling in acne: 30% salicylic acid in polyethylene glycol vehicle. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(7):891–9; discussion 899.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hashimoto Y, Suga Y, Mizuno Y, Hasegawa T, Matsuba S, Ikeda S, et al. Salicylic acid peels in polyethylene glycol vehicle for the treatment of comedogenic acne in Japanese patients. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34(2):276–9; discussion 279.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Bae BG, Park CO, Shin H, Lee SH, Lee YS, Lee SJ, et al. Salicylic acid peels versus Jessner’s solution for acne vulgaris: a comparative study. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Feb;39(2):248–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Dayal S, Amrani A, Sahu P, Jain VK. Jessner’s solution vs. 30% salicylic acid peels: a comparative study of the efficacy and safety in mild‐to‐moderate acne vulgaris. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16(1):43–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Monheit GD. The Jessner’s+ TCA peel: a medium-depth chemical peel. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989;15(9):945–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Monheit GD. Chemical peels. Skin Therapy Lett. 2004;9(2):6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Monteleone, G. Microdermabrasion with aluminum hydroxide powder in scars camouflaging. In Proceedings of the 3rd meeting of Southern Italy Plastic Surgery Association, Benevento; 1988. pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Guidance for Industry – Guidance for Dermabrasion Devices [Internet]. [cited 2016 Dec 15]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm073788.htm

  71. Kirkland EB, Hantash BM. Microdermabrasion: molecular mechanisms unraveled, part 2. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012 Sep;11(9):e10–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Reddy BY, Hantash BM. Emerging technologies in aesthetic medicine. Dermatol Clin. 2009;27(4):521–7; vii–viii.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Shim EK, Barnette D, Hughes K, Greenway HT. Microdermabrasion: a clinical and histopathologic study. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(6):524–30. Blackwell Science, Inc.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Tsai RY, Wang CN, Chan HL. Aluminum oxide crystal microdermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(6):539–42. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Tan MH, Spencer JM, Pires LM, Ajmeri J, Skover G. The evaluation of aluminum oxide crystal microdermabrasion for photodamage. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(11):943–9. Blackwell Science, Inc.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lloyd JR. The use of microdermabrasion for acne: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(4):329–31. Blackwell Science, Inc.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Hernandez Perez E, Ibiett EV. Gross and microscopic findings in patients undergoing microdermabrasion for facial rejuvenation. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(7):637–40. Blackwell Science, Inc.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Coimbra M, Rohrich RJ, Chao J, Brown SA. A prospective controlled assessment of microdermabrasion for damaged skin and fine Rhytides. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;113(5):1438.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Bhalla M, Thami GP. Microdermabrasion: reappraisal and brief review of literature. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(6):809–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. El-Domyati M, Hosam W, Abdel Azim E, Abdel Wahab H, Mohamed E. Microdermabrasion: a clinical, histometric, and histopathologic study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15(4):503–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Abdel-Latif AM, Elbendary AS. Treatment of striae distensae with microdermabrasion: a clinical and molecular study. JEWDS. 2008;5:24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Freedman BM, Rueda Pedraza E, Waddell SP. The epidermal and dermal changes associated with microdermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(12):1031–4. Blackwell science, Inc.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Hussein MRA, Ab-Deif EE, Abdel-Motaleb AA, Zedan H, Abdel-Meguid AM. Chemical peeling and microdermabrasion of the skin: comparative immunohistological and ultrastructural studies. J Dermatol Sci. 2008 Dec;52(3):205–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Karimipour DJ, Kang S, Johnson TM, Orringer JS, Hamilton T, Hammerberg C, et al. Microdermabrasion: a molecular analysis following a single treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Feb;52(2):215–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Karimipour DJ, Kang S, Johnson TM, Orringer JS, Hamilton T, Hammerberg C, et al. Microdermabrasion with and without aluminum oxide crystal abrasion: a comparative molecular analysis of dermal remodeling. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(3):405–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Rajan P, Grimes PE. Skin barrier changes induced by aluminum oxide and sodium chloride microdermabrasion. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(5):390–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Andrews SN, Zarnitsyn V, Bondy B, Prausnitz MR. Optimization of microdermabrasion for controlled removal of stratum corneum. Int J Pharm. 2011;407(1–2):95–104.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Lee WR, Tsai RY, Fang CL, Liu CJ, Hu CH, Fang JY. Microdermabrasion as a novel tool to enhance drug delivery via the skin: an animal study. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(8):1013–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Karimipour DJ, Karimipour G, Orringer JS. Microdermabrasion: an evidence-based review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125(1):372–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miest, R. (2019). Superficial Chemical Peels and Microdermabrasion. In: Alam, M. (eds) Evidence-Based Procedural Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02023-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02023-1_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02022-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02023-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics