Skip to main content

Intraoperative Complications: How to Avoid Them?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and ECIRS

Abstract

At present, PNL is the minimally invasive technique of choice to treat complex renal stones. Despite being a safe surgical intervention, PNL is not exempt from potential complications, which can arise at any stage of the procedure: patient positioning, renal puncture, tract dilation, intraoperative manipulation, stone fragmentation and postoperative management. Besides being the majority of them minor, they can be kept to a minimum in experienced hands with the development of new techniques and improved technologies. However, patient positioning-related complications are not considered in any classification, as well as those related to anaesthesiological problems, which are the ones minimised adopting ECIRS in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position. In particular, with regard to the potential complications due to decubitus, haemodynamic conditions, management of the respiratory tract and the relative location of the colon with respect to the puncture site, PNL performed in supine decubitus or in any of its variations proves to be safer than in prone decubitus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Langmayr J, Ortler M, Obwegeser A, Felber S (1996) Quadriplegia after lumbar disc surgery. A case report. Spine 21:1932–1935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderton J, Schady W, Markham D (1994) An unusual cause of postoperative brachial plexus palsy. J Anaesth 72:605–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartz D, Drummond D, Hahn M et al (2000) Prevention of positional brachial plexopathy during surgical correction of scoliosis. Spinal Disord 13:178–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Winfree C, Kline D (2005) Intraoperative positioning nerve injuries. Surg Neurol 63:5–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Valdivia Uria J, Valle J, Villarroya S et al (1990) Why is percutaneous nephrostomy still performed with patient prone? J Endourol 4:269–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G et al (2008) Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access. a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol 54:196–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ibarluzea G, Scoffone C, Cracco C et al (2007) Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int 100: 233–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Daels F, Gonzalez M, Garcia Freire F et al (2009) Percutaneous lithotripsy in Valdivia-Galdakao decubitus position: our experience. J Endourol 23:1615–1620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Valdivia Uría JG, Valle Gerhol J, López López JA (1999) Percutaneous nephroscopy technique in supine position. Braz J Urol 25:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderton J (1991) The prone position for the surgical patient: a historical review of the principles and hazards. Br J Anaesth 67:452–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jain Y, Bithal P, Rath J (2007) Pressure score on malar prominences by horseshoe headrest in prone position. Anaesth Int Care 35:304–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore D, Edmunds L (1950) Prone position frame. Surgery 27:276–279

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ray C (1987) New kneeling attachment and cushioned face rest for spinal surgery. Neurosurgery 20:266–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jericho B, Scaria G (2003) Contact dermatitis after use of the prone positioned. Br Anesth Analg 19:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kai Y, Yamaoka A, Irita K, Zaitsu A, Takahashi S (1995) Transient tracheal obstruction during surgical correction of scoliosis in a patient with Marfan’s syndrome. Masui 44:868–873

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Szabo M, Denman W, Marota J, Roberts J (1997) Evaluation of airway edema in patients operated on in the prone position. J Neurosurg Anaesthesiol 9:380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheng M, Todorov A, Templehoff R et al (2001) The effect of prone positioning on intraocular pressure in anesthetized patients. Anaesthesiology 95:1351–1355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee L (2003) Postoperative visual loss registry: preliminary analysis of factors associated with spine operations. ASA Newsl 67:7–8

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roth S, Tung A, Ksiazek S (2007) Visual loss in a prone-positioned spine surgery patient with the head on a foam headrest and goggles covering the eyes: an old complication with a new mechanism. Anesth Analg 104:1185–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee L, Posner K (2006) The American Society of Anaesthesiologists Postoperative visual loss registry: analysis of 93 spine surgery cases with postoperative visual loss. Anaesthesiology 105:652–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stevens W, Glazer P, Kelley S et al (1997) Ophthalmic complications after spinal surgery. Spine 22:1319–1322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Palmon S, Kirsch J, Deppe J, Toung T (1998) The effect of the prone position on pulmonary mechanics is frame dependent. Anesth Analg 87:1175–1180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee T, Yamg L, Chen H (1998) Effect of patient position and hypotensive anesthesia on inferior vena cava pressure. Spine 23:941–948

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tobias D, Mencio G, Atwood R, Gurwitz G (1994) Intraoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone position. J Pediatr Surg 29:1537–1538

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gonzalez MS, Billordo Peres N, Garcia Marchibena P et al (2009) Colon position in ventral and intermediate dorsal decubitus (Valdivia). J Endourol 23(Suppl 1):A49, World Congress of Endourology 2009, abstract MP4-19

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hopper K, Sherman J, Luethke J, Ghaed N (1987) The retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient. Radiology 162:443–446

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. LeRoy A, Williams H Jr, Bender C (1985) Colonic perforation following percutaneous nephrostomy and renal calculus removal. Radiology 155:83–85

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta R, Kumar A, Kapoor R et al (2002) Prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of the supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 90:809–813

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, Preminger GM (2001) Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 166:1242–1246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Robert M, Maubon A, Roux JO et al (1999) Direct percutaneous approach to the upper pole of the kidney: MRI anatomy with assessment of the visceral risk. J Endourol 13:17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Desai A, Jain S, Benway B et al (2010) Spleen injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a case report with a novel management technique. J Endourol 24:541–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Valer Algarabel J, Valdivia Uria J, Orozco J et al (1992) Anatomia renal aplicada a la cirugia percutánea, Cuadernos de Endourologia. Hospital Clinico Universitario, Zaragoza

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sampaio F (1992) Anatomic background for intrarenal endourologic surgery. J Endourol 6:301–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sampaio F, Zanier J, Aragao A (1992) Intrarenal access: three dimensional anatomical study. J Urol 148:1769–1773

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sampaio F, Aragao A (1990) Anatomical relationship between the intrarenal arteries and the kidney collecting system. J Urol 143:679–681

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Koroglu A, Toga T, Cicek M et al (2003) The effects of irrigation fluid volume and irrigation time on fluid electrolyte balance and hemodynamics in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol 35:1–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rozentsveig V, Neulander E, Roussabrov E et al (2007) Anesthetic considerations during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Clin Anesth 19:351–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gehring H, Nahm W, Zimmermann K et al (1999) Irrigation fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43:316–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Roberts S, Bolton D, Stoller M (1994) Hypothermia associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 44:832–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Tefekli A, Altunrende F, Tepeler K et al (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison. Int Urol Nephrol 39:57–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shah H, Khandar A, Sodha H et al (2009) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 3 years of experience with 454 patients. BJU Int 104:840–846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. De La Rosette JJ, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P et al (2008) Prognostic factors and per cutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol 180:2489–2493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53:184–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zuazu JR, Hruza M, Rassweiler JJ, De Rosette JJ (2010) The Clavien classification system to optimize documentation of PCNL morbidity. Arch Ital Urol Androl 82:20–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. De La Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, CROES PCNL Study Group (2011) The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications and outcomes in 5,803 patients. J Endourol 25:11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Yakupoglu YK et al (2011) Modified Clavien classification in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: assessment of complications in children. J Urol 185:264–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A et al (2011) The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol 25:1275–1280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Seitz C, Desai M, Haecker A et al (2012) Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol 61:146–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Pedro Juan Daels MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Daels, F.P.J., Gonzalez, M.S. (2014). Intraoperative Complications: How to Avoid Them?. In: Scoffone, C., Hoznek, A., Cracco, C. (eds) Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and ECIRS. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0459-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0459-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0359-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0459-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics