Skip to main content

The Contribution of Science and Technology to Meeting the Challenge of Risk and Disaster Reduction in Developing Countries: From Concrete Examples to the Proposal of a Conceptual Model of “Resiliencery Vulnerability”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technologies and Innovations for Development

Abstract

Human societies and territories have always been confronted with hazards and risks, which are occasionally the source of disasters (Quarantelli et al. 2006). Over recent years, natural disasters have taken a heavy toll throughout the world, and more severely so in the developing countries: from the tsunami in the Indian Ocean to the earthquakes in Iran and Southern Asia, including the hurricanes in Burma, the Caribbean, and the Pacific; torrential rains, mudslides, and landslides in various parts of Asia and Latin America; and volcanic eruptions. Even if the situation in poor countries varies, the distribution of disaster victims illustrates the contrast between developed countries and developing countries (Fig. 10.1). In developing countries, the loss of human life and means of subsistence as a result of disasters due to natural, technological (EM-DAT Database n.d.), or social causes are major. The population explosion in Southern countries, development of megalopolises, anarchic urban growth, environmental degradation and the impact of climate change combined with the social and economic context of these societies, and their lack of means and organization in terms of risk and disaster prevention and management, all contribute to making these events catastrophic. Apart from the fact that these factors increase the vulnerability of Southern countries, the consequences of these disasters can also constitute a brake upon development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The original French term is “vulnérabilité résiliençaire.”

References

  • Adger, W. N. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Development, 27(2), 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4(3–4), 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. (2007). Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty (CPRC Working Paper 88). Oxford: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, K. (2003). Vulnerability reduction and the community-based approach. In M. Pelling (Ed.), Natural disasters and development in a globalising world (pp. 170–184). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amigues, J. P., Debaeke, P., Itier B., Lemaire, G., Seguin, B., Tardieu, F., & Thomas, A. (2006). Sécheresse et agriculture. Réduire la vulnérabilité de l'agriculture à un risque accru de manque d'eau. Rapport d’Expertise scientifique collective. Paris: INRA Collections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aschan Leygonie, C. (2000). Vers une analyse de la résilience des systèmes spatiaux. Espace Géographique, 1, 64–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, P. (1996). How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi, P., Brouillet, A.-S., Duray-Soundron, C., & Dubois, J.-L. (Eds.). (2008). Repenser l’action collective: une approche par les capabilités. Paris: L’Harmattan (Réseau Impact).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becerra, S., & Peltier, A. (2009). Risques et environnement: recherches interdisciplinaires sur la vulnérabilité des sociétés. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (Eds.). (1998). Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., et al. (Eds.). (2003). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beucher, S., Reghezza M., sous la direction de Veyret Y. (2004). Les risques. Paris: Breal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolay, J.-C. (1994). Urbanization and environment: Which sustainable housing for the poors of Latin America. Lausanne: IREC/EPFL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, N. (2003). Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework (Working Paper 38). Norwich: Tyndall Center for Climate Change Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaline, C., & Dubois-Maury, J. (2004). Les risques urbains. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collin, D. (n.d.). Brouillard ou arc-en-ciel de sens? http://lionel.mesnard.free.fr/le%20site/psy-resilience.html. Accessed November 15, 2010.

  • Cross, J. A. (2001). Megacities and small towns: Different perspectives on hazard vulnerability. Environmental Hazards, 3(2), 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter, L. (1996). Les réactions des sociétés aux risques écologiques. Revue internationale des sciences sociales, 150, 603–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyrulnik, B. (2002). Un merveilleux malheur. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ercole, R., et al. (1994). Les vulnérabilités des sociétés et des espaces urbanisés: concepts, typologie, modes d’analyse. Revue de Géographie Alpine, Tome LXXXII, 4, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daudé, E., Provitolo, D., Dubos-Paillard, E., Gaillard, D., Eliot, E., Langlois, P., Propeck-Zimmermann, E., & Saint-Gerand, T. (2009). Spatial risks and complex systems: Methodological perspectives. In M. A. Aziz-Alaoui & C. Bertelle (Eds.), From system complexity to emergent properties (pp. 165–178). Heidelberg: Springer. Understanding Complex Systems.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dauphiné, A. (2003). Risques et catastrophes: observer, spatialiser, comprendre, gÕrer. Paris: A. Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauphiné, A., & Provitolo, D. (2007). La résilience: un concept pour la gestion des risques. Annales de Géographie, 654, 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Décamps, H. (2007). La vulnérabilité des systèmes socioécologiques aux événements extremes: exposition, sensibilité, résilience. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 15(1), 48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnadieu, G., & Karsky, M. (2002). La systémique, penser et agir dans la complexité. Paris: Editions Liaisons (Rueil-Malmaison).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovers, S., & Handmer, J. (1992). Uncertainty, sustainability and change. Global Environmental Change, 2(4), 262–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EM-DAT Database. (n.d.). The international disaster data base. http://www.emdat.be/database

  • Folke, C., et al. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations (Report for the Swedish Environmental Advisory Council 2002:1). Stockholm: Ministry of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, P. (2009). Fires: Spotted from satellites, warned by phone. http://web.scidev.net/en/new-technologies/opinions/fires-spotted-from-satellites-warned-by-phone-1.html. Accessed November 15, 2010.

  • Gallopin, G. C. (2003). A systemic synthesis of the relations between vulnerability, hazard, exposure and impact, aimed at policy identification. Economic Commission for Latin American and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Handbook for estimating the socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters (pp. 2–5). Mexico: ECLAC, LC/MEX/G.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopin, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C. (2006). La vulnérabilité, une notion à explorer. Dossier Pour la Science, 51, 116–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C. (2009). La vulnérabilité: une notion vulnérable? In S. Becerra & A. Peltier (Eds.), Risques et environnement: recherches interdisciplinaires sur la vulnérabilité des sociétés (pp. 23–40). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gondard-Delcroix, C., & Rousseau, S. (2004). Vulnérabilité et stratégie durable de gestion des risques: une étude appliquée aux ménages ruraux de Madagascar. Développement Durable et Territoires, No. 3, http://developpementdurable.revues.org/index1143.html. Accessed November 10, 2010.

  • Gordon, J. E. (1978). Structures or why things don’t fall down. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., & Holling, C. S. (Eds.). (2002). Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilhorst, D. (2004). Complexity and diversity: Unlocking social domains of disaster response. In G. Bankoff, G. Frerks, & D. Hilhorst (Eds.), Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development and people (pp. 52–66). London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 4(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems, 4(5), 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2001). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability (Contribution of Working Group II to the IPCC Third Assessment Report). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2007). Climate change 2007: Climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Fund for Agricultural Development [IFAD]. (n.d). Climate change: Building the resilience of poor rural communities. http://www.ifad.org/climate/factsheet/e.pdf. Accessed December 5, 2010.

  • International Human Dimension Programme [IHDP]. (2003). Resilience, IHDP Update, Newsletter 02, http://www.ihdp.unu.edu/file/get/7189. Accessed January 15, 2011.

  • International Strategy for Disaster Reduction [ISDR]. (2005). Hyogo Framework for action 2005–2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. Extract from the final report of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/eng/hfa/hfa.htm. Accessed January 15, 2011.

  • International Strategy for Disaster Reduction [ISDR]. (2009). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction: Risk and poverty in a changing climate. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/report. Accessed January 15, 2011.

  • Kasperson, J. X., et al. (Eds.). (1995). Regions at risk: Comparisons of threatened environments. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kervern, G.-Y. (1995). Éléments fondamentaux des Cindyniques. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. J., Smit, M., Goosen, H., & Hulsbergen, C. H. (1998). Resilience and vulnerability: Coastal dynamics or dutch dikes. The Geographical Journal, 164(3), 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. J., Nicholls, R. J., & Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Global Environmental Change, 5(1–2), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lallau, B., & Dumbi, C. (2007). L’éthique du mayélé: les fins et les moyens de la débrouille dans la filière maraîchère de Kinshasa. Mondes en développement, 2007/1(137), 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lallau, B., & Rousseau, S. (2009). De la vulnérabilité à la résilience: une approche par les capabilités de la gestion des risques. In S. Becerra & A. Peltier (Eds.), Risques et environnement: recherches interdisciplinaires sur la vulnérabilité des sociétés (pp. 171–183). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. (2009). Spotlight on satellites for disaster management. http://www.scidev.net/en/editorials/spotlight-on-satellites-for-disaster-management-1.html. Accessed November 15, 2010.

  • Luers, A. L. (2005). The surface of vulnerability: An analytical framework for examining environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnan, A. (2009). La vulnérabilité des territoires littoraux au changement climatique: mise au point conceptuelle et facteurs d’influence. Paris: Iddri Analyses, 2009/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maret, I., & Cadoul, T. (2008). Résilience et reconstruction durable: que nous apprend La Nouvelle-Orléans? Annales de géographie, 117(663), 104–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskrey, A. (1993). Vulnerability accumulation in peripheral regions of Latin America: The challenge for disaster prevention and management. In P. A. Merriman & C. W. A. Browitt (Eds.), Natural disasters: Protecting vulnerable communities (pp. 461–472). London: Thomas Telford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. P. (1991). Dictionnaire de physique. Paris: Masson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouscadet, J. F. (2009). Dossier Sida: Nouveaux traitements et futures cibles. Pour la Science 377, Mars.

    Google Scholar 

  • November, V. (2006). Le risque comme objet géographique. Cahiers de géographie du Québec, 50(141), 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development. The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottichilo, W. K. (2009). Satellites can help monitor and manage African droughts. http://www.scidev.net/en/opinions/satellites-can-help-monitor-and-manage-african-droughts.html. Accessed November 15, 2010.

  • Ouallet, A. (2009). Vulnérabilités et patrimonialisations dans les villes africaines: de la préservation à la marginalisation. Cybergeo, Vulnérabilités urbaines au sud, Article 455, http://www.cybergeo.revue.org/22229. Accessed November 15, 2010.

  • Pigeon, P. (2005). Géographie critique des risques. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, S. L. (1984). The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature, 307(5949), 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provitolo, D. (2002). Risque urbain, catastrophes et villes méditerranéennes, Thèse de doctorat en géographie, Université Nice-Sophia Antipolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provitolo, D. (2003). Modélisation et simulation de catastrophe urbaine: le couplage de l'aléa et de la vulnérabilité. Actes du colloque SIRNAT, janvier 29–30, 2003, La Prévention des Risques Naturels, Orléans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provitolo, D. (2005). Un exemple d’effets de dominos: la panique dans les catastrophes urbaines. Cybergéo, Article 328, http://cybergeo.revues.org/2998

  • Provitolo, D. (2007). La vulnérabilité aux inondations méditerranéennes: une nouvelle démarche géographique. Annales de Géographie, 653, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provitolo, D. (2009). A new classification of catastrophes based on “complexity criteria”. In M.-A. Aziz-Alaoui & C. Bertelle (Eds.), From system complexity to emergent properties (pp. 165–177). Heidelberg: Springer. Understanding Complex Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provitolo, D., Müller, J. P., & Dubos-Paillard, E. (2009a). Vers une ontologie des risques et des catastrophes: le modèle conceptual. Actes du colloque international Ontologie et dynamique des systèmes complexes, perspectives interdisciplinaires, Rencontres interdisciplinaires sur les systèmes complexes naturels et artificiels, janvier 2009, Rochebrune, Megève.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provitolo, D., Müller, J. P., Dubos-Paillard, E. (2009b). Validation of an ontology of risk and disaster through a case study of the 1923 Great Kanto Earthquake. 3rd International Conference on Complex Systems and Applications (pp. 140–150). Le Havre, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli, E. L., Lagadec, P., & Boin, A. (2006). A heuristic approach to future disasters and crises: New, old, and in-between types. In H. Rodriguez, E. L. Quarantelli, & R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 16–41). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reghezza, M. (2006). Réflexions sur la vulnérabilité métropolitaine: le cas de la métropole francilienne face au risque de crue centennale. Thèse de doctorat de géographie, Université Paris X Nanterre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resilience Alliance. (n.d.). http://www.resalliance.org

  • Revet, S. (2009). De la vulnérabilité aux vulnérables. Approche critique d’une notion performative. In S. Becerra & A. Peltier (Eds.), Risques et environnement: recherches interdisciplinaires sur la vulnérabilité des societies (pp. 89–99). Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, S. (2007). Vulnérabilité et résilience, analyse des entrées et sorties de la pauvreté: le cas de Manjakandriana à Madagascar. Mondes en développement, 140, 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Serie: Oxford India Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction, Committee on Environment and Natural Resources, National Science and Technology Council, 2005, Grand Challenges for Disaster Reduction. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiétart, R.-A. (2000). Management et complexité: concepts et theories. Cahier no 282, Centre de Recherche DMSP (Dauphine Marketing Strategie Prospective).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thouret, J. C., & D’Ercole, R. (1996). Vulnérabilité aux risques naturels en milieu urbain: effets, facteurs et réponses socials. Cahiers des Sciences Humaines, 32(2), 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Der Leeuw, S. E., & Aschan-Leygonie, C. (2005). A long-term perspective on resilience in social-natural systems. In: Liljenstr­m, H., & Svedin, U. (Eds.), Micro, Meso, Macro. Addressing Complex Systems Couplings, pp. 227–264. New Jersey: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vis, M., Klijn, F., & Van Buuren, M. (Eds.). (2001). Living with floods. Resilience strategies for flood risk management and multiple land use in the lower Rhine River Basin (NCR-publication 10–2001). Delft: NCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. H., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. H., Gunderson, L. H., Kinzing, A. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Schultz, L. (2006). A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in socio-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B. (1998). Marginality and vulnerability: Why the homeless of Tokyo don’t count in disaster preparations. Applied Geography, 18(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B. (1999). There are worse things than earthquakes: Hazard, vulnerability and mitigation capacity in Greater Los Angeles. In J.-K. Mitchell (Ed.), Crucibles of hazard: Disasters and megacities in transition. Tokyo/New York/Paris: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially sponsored by the Conseil Général des Alpes-Maritimes (CG06), France, in the framework of the project “Vulnerability and Resilience of Mediterranean Cities.” We wish to thank the CG 06 for research subsidies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damienne Provitolo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Provitolo, D. (2012). The Contribution of Science and Technology to Meeting the Challenge of Risk and Disaster Reduction in Developing Countries: From Concrete Examples to the Proposal of a Conceptual Model of “Resiliencery Vulnerability”. In: Bolay, JC., Schmid, M., Tejada, G., Hazboun, E. (eds) Technologies and Innovations for Development. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0268-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics