Skip to main content

L’incontinence urinaire : handicap physique, social et conjugal

  • Chapter
Les incontinences urinaires de l’homme

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Fine A (1994) La maladie organique et ses remaniements psychiques. Revue française de psychosomatique 5: 65–81

    Google Scholar 

  2. Temml C, Haidinger G, Schmidbauer J et al. (2000) Urinary incontinence in both sexes: prevalence rates and impact on quality of life and sexual life. Neurourol Urodynam 19(3): 259–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mercier M (2004) L’identité handicapée, Presses Universitaires de Namur, p 332

    Google Scholar 

  4. Giami A (1996) Sexualité et handicaps: quelques représentations. In Delcey M (dir), Déficiences motrices et situations de handicap: aspects sociaux, psychologiques, médicaux, techniques et législatifs, troubles associés, Paris, Association des paralysés de France pp 101–103

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mannoni P (2006) Les représentations sociales, Paris, Presse Universitaire de France, pp 5, 127

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pateman B, Johnson M (2000) Men’s lived experiences following transurethral prostatectomy for benign prostatic hypertrophy. J Adv Nurs 31(1): 51–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mc Callum TJ, Moore K, Griffiths D (2001) Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: implications and urodynamics. Urologic Nursing 21(2): 113–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. O’Connell B, Day K, Wellman D, Baker L (2005) Development, implementation and evaluation of a continence education package in acute and sub-acute care settings. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 32(2): 101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore KN, Griffiths D, Hughton A (1999) Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial comparing pelvic muscle exercises with or without electrical stimulation. BJU International 83(1): 57–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Paterson J, Dunn S, Kowanko I et al. (2003) Selection of continence products: perspectives of people who have incontinence and their careers. Disability and Rehabilitation 25(17): 955–963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Valerius AJ (1997) The psychosocial impact of urinary incontinence on women aged 25 to 45 years. Urologic Nursing 17(3): 96–103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deutsch V, Reyal F, Vincens E et al. (2008) Incontinence urinaire d’effort et bandelette sous-urétrale: implications sur la sexualité. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité 36(4): 417–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon D, Groutz A, Sinai T et al. (1999) Sexual function in women attending a urogynecology clinic. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10: 325–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Amarenco G, Le Cocquen A, Bosc S (1996) Stress urinary incontinence and genito-sexual conditions. Study of 35 cases. Prog Urol 6: 913–919

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Glavind K, Tetsche MS (2004) Sexual function in women before and after suburethral sling operation for stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective questionnaire study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83: 965–968

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aslan G, Koseoglu H, Sadik Ö et al. (2005) Sexual function in women with urinary incontinence. Int J Impot Res 17: 248–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Salonia A, Munarriz RM, Naspro R et al. (2004) Women’s sexual dysfunction: a pathophysiological review. BJU Int 93: 1156–1164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Urwitz-Lane R, Ozel B (2006) Sexual function in women with urodynamic stress incontinence, detrusor overactivity, and mixed urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195: 1758–1761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Briganti A, Capitanio U, Chun FK et al. (2009) Prediction of sexual function after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 115(13): 3150–3159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mattson D, Petrie M, Srivastava DK, McDermott M (1995) Multiple sclerosis. Sexual dysfunction and its response to medications. Arch Neurol-Chicago 52(9): 862–868

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tepavcevic DK, Kostic J, Basuroski ID et al. (2008) The impact of dysfunction on the quality of life measured by MSQoL-54 in patients with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis 4(8): 1131–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Denys P, Ben Smail D, Even-Schneider A, Chartier-Kastler E (2004) Les troubles génitosexuels du blessé médullaire. Journal de la société de biologie 198(3): 243–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sestini AJ, Pakenham KI (2000) Cancer of the prostate: A biopsychosocial review. J Psychosoc Oncol 18(1): 17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG (2004) Post-traumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol Inq 15: 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alperovitz DJ (2001) Discrepancy between desired and actual level of active participation in treatment and use of social support as a predictor of adjustment to prostate cancer. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 62(4-B): 2045

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hubin, A., Mercier, M., Opsomer, R.J. (2011). L’incontinence urinaire : handicap physique, social et conjugal. In: Les incontinences urinaires de l’homme. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99160-8_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99160-8_45

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-99159-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-99160-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics