Skip to main content
  • 1858 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Handa VL, Jensen JK, Ostergard DR. Federal guidelines for the management of urinary incontinence in the United States. Which patients should undergo urodynamic testing. Int Urogynecol J 1995;6:198–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jarvis GJ, Hall S, Stamp S et al. Assessment of urodynamic examination in continent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87:893–896.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mundt-Pettersen B, Mattiason A, Sundin T. Reproducibility of the 1 hour incontinence test proposed by the ICS standardisation committee. Proceedings of the International Continence Society, 14th annual meeting. Innsbruck: International Continence Society, 1984, pp 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lose G, Gammelgaard J, Jorgensen TJ. The one-hour pad test: Reproducibility and the correlation between the test result, the start volume in the bladder and the diuresis. Neurourol Urody 1986;5:17–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Versi E, Orrego G, Hardy E et al. Evaluation of the home pad test in the investigation of female urinary incontinence Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:162–167.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jorgensen L, Lose G, Thunedborg B. One hour pad weighing test for objective assessment of female urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 69:39–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rowan D, James ED, Kramer AE et al. Urodynamic equipment: technical aspects. International Continence Working Party on Urodynamic Equipment. J Med Eng Technol 1987;11:57–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lagro-Jansen FM, Debruyne FM, van Weel C. Value of the patients case history in diagnosing urinary incontinence in general practice. Br J Urol 1991;67(6):569–572.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abrams P, Cardozo l, Fall M et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21(2):167–178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnold EP, Brown A, Webster J. Videocystography with synchronous detrusor pressure and flow recording. Ann Roy Coll Surg 1974;55:99–98.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ramsden PD, Smith JC, Pierce JM, Ardran GM. The unstable bladder—fact or artefact? Br J Urol 1977;49:633–639.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bates CP, Whiteside CG, Turner-Warwick RT. Synchronous cine/pressure/flow/videocystourethrography with special reference to stress and urge incontinence. Br J Urol 1970;44:44–50.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Digesu GA, Hutchings A, Salvatore S et al. Reproducibility and reliability of pressure flow parameters in women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;110:774–776.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miller EA, Amundsen CL, Toh KL et al. Pre-operative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing the pubovaginal sling. J Urol 2003;169:2234–2237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gateau T, Faramarzi –Roques R, Le Normand L et al. Clinical and urodynamic repercussions after TVT procedure and how to diminish patient complaints. Eur J Urol 2003:44:372–376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang AC, Chen MC. The correlation between pre-operative voiding mechanism and surgical outcome of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure with reference to quality of life. BJU Int 2003;91:502–506.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Benness CJ, Barnick CG, Cardozo L. Is there a place for routine videocystourethrography in the assessment of lower urinary tract dysfunction? Neurourol Urodyn 1989;8:299–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Versi E, Cardozo LD, Studd JW et al. Internal urinary sphincter in the maintanence of female continence. BMJ 1986;292(6514):166–167.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bates CP, Corney LE. Synchronous cine/pressure/ flow/cystourethrography: A method of routine urodynamic investigation. Br Journal Urol 1971;44: 44–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McGuire EJ, Brady S. Detrusor sphincter dyssynergia. J Urol 1979;121:774–777.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shepherd A. the range of urodynamic investigation. In: Jarvis GJ ed. Female urinary incontinence. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists,1990, pp 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Waalwijk van Dorn ESC, Remmers A, Janknegt RA. Extramural ambulatory urodynamic monitory during natural filling and normal daily activities: Evaluation of 100 patients. 1991;146:124–131.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hill S, Khullar V, Cardozo L et al. Ambulatory urodynamics versus videocystometrogram: A test-retest analysis. Neurourol Urodyn 1995; 14; 528–529.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van Waalwijk van Dorn ESC, Remmers A, Janknegt RA. Conventional and extramural ambulatory uro-dynamic testing of the lower urinary tract in female volunteers. J Urol 1992;47:1319–1326.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robertson AS, Griffiths CJ, Ramsden PD et al. Bladder function in healthy volunteers: Ambulatory monitoring and conventional urodynamic studies. Br J urol 1994;73:242–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Heslington K, Hilton P. Ambulatory monitoring and conventional cystometry in asymptomatic volunteers. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;103:434–441.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Salvatore S, Khullar V, Anders K et al. Reducing artefacts in ambulatory urodynamics. Br J Urol 1998;81:211–214.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sand PK, Bowen LW. Panganiban R et al. The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 1987;68:399–402.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hilton P, Stanton SL. Urethral pressure measurement by microtransducer: The results in symptom-free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983;90:919–933.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Versi E. Discriminant analysis of urethral pressure profilometry data for diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:251–257.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bhatia MN, McCarthy TA, Ostergard D. Urethral diverticula, urethral closure profile: A preliminary report. Prog Clin Biol Res 1981;78:239–242.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fox M, Power RF, Bruce AW. Diverticulum of the bladder-presentation and evaluation in 115 cases. Br J Urol 1962;34:286–289.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wise BG, Burton G, Cutner A et al. Effect of vaginal ultrasound probe on lower urinary tract function. Br J Urol 1992;70:12–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shapeero LG, Friedland GW, Perkash I. Transrectal sonographic voiding cystourethrography: Studies in neuromuscular bladder dysfunction. AJR 1983;141:83–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Khullar V, Cardozo LD, Salvatore S et al. Ultrasound—A non-invasive screening test for detrusor instability. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996;103:904–908.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schaer GN, Schmid T, Peschers U et al. Intraurethral ultrasound correlated with urethral histology. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:60–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Athansiou S, Boos K, Khullar V et al. Pathogenesis of genuine stress incontinence and urogenital prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn 1996;15:339–340.

    Google Scholar 

  38. DeLancey JO, Hurd WW. Size of the urogenital prolapse in the levator ani muscles in normal women and women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:364–368.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Toozs-Hobson P, Athanasiou S, Khullar V et al. Does vaginal delivery damage the pelvic floor? Neurourol Urodyn 1997;16:385–386.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fielding JR, Dumanli H, Schreyer AG et al. MR-based three dimensional modelling of the normal pelvic floor in women: quantification of muscle mass. Am J Roentgenology 2000;174:657–660.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Goh V, Halligan S, Kaplan G et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor in asymptomatic subjects. Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:6661–6666.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Myers RP, Cahill DR, Kay PA et al. Puboperineales: Muscular boundaries of the male urogenital hiatus in 3D form magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 2000;164(4):1412–1415.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Takahashi S, Homma Y, Fujishiro T et al. Electromyographic study of the striated urethral sphincter in type 3 stress incontinence: Evidence of myogenic-dominant changes. Urology 2000; 56:946–950.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chaliha, C., Khullar, V. (2008). Investigations for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction. In: Haslam, J., Laycock, J. (eds) Therapeutic Management of Incontinence and Pelvic Pain. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-756-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-756-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-661-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-756-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics