Skip to main content

Image Guided Thoracic Interventions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Clinically Oriented Pulmonary Imaging

Part of the book series: Respiratory Medicine ((RM))

  • 2099 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the major types of thoracic interventional procedures, including radiofrequency ablation, transthoracic needle biopsy of lung, mediastinal and pleural disease, thoracentesis, and pleural chest tube drainage. The clinical indications for these procedures, risks and complications of each procedure, and where appropriate, a description of how they are performed are covered. This chapter should be relevant to the chest clinician to better understand risks and benefits of interventional chest procedures, hopefully leading to a better understanding of the appropriate use of each procedure and to help explain them to their patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McVay PA, Toy PT. Lack of increased bleeding after paracentesis and thoracentesis in patients with mild coagulation abnormalities. Transfusion. 1991;31(2):164–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS, Solbiati L, et al. Ablation of liver tumors using percutaneous RF therapy. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(4):1023–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee JM, Jin GY, Goldberg SN, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer and metastases: preliminary report. Radiology. 2004;230(1):125–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gadaleta C, Mattioli V, Colucci G, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of 40 lung neoplasms: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(2):361–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dupuy DE, Zagoria RJ, Akerley W, Mayo-Smith WW, Kavanagh PV, Safran H. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of malignancies in the lung. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(1):57–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinke K, King J, Glenn DW, Morris DL. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors with expandable needle electrodes: tips from preliminary experience. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183(3):605–11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. VanSonnenberg E, Shankar S, Morrison PR, et al. Radiofrequency ablation of thoracic lesions: part 2, initial clinical experience–technical and multidisciplinary considerations in 30 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(2):381–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chan VO, McDermott S, Malone DE, Dodd JD. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors: evaluation of the literature using evidence-based techniques. J Thorac Imaging. 2011;26(1):18–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lencioni R, Crocetti L, Cioni R, et al. Response to radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary tumours: a prospective, intention-to-treat, multicentre clinical trial (the RAPTURE study). Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(7):621–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hiraki T, Gobara H, Mimura H, et al. Brachial nerve injury caused by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of apical lung cancer: a report of four cases. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(7):1129–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rose SC, Thistlethwaite PA, Sewell PE, Vance RB. Lung cancer and radiofrequency ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17(6):927–51. quiz 951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nomura M, Yamakado K, Nomoto Y, et al. Complications after lung radiofrequency ablation: risk factors for lung inflammation. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(963):244–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nguyen S, Hojjati M. Review of current therapies for secondary hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;30(1):7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kishi K, Nakamura H, Sudo A, et al. Tumor debulking by radiofrequency ablation in hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy associated with pulmonary carcinoma. Lung Cancer. 2002;38(3):317–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Baere T, Palussiere J, Auperin A, et al. Midterm local efficacy and survival after radiofrequency ablation of lung tumors with minimum follow-up of 1 year: prospective evaluation. Radiology. 2006;240(2):587–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Talton BM, Constable WC, Kersh CR. Curative radiotherapy in non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990;19(1):15–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gohari A, Haramati LB. Complications of CT scan-guided lung biopsy: lesion size and depth matter. Chest. 2004;126(3):666–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Savage C, Zwischenberger JB. Image-guided fine needle aspirate strategies for staging of lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2000;2(2):101–10. discussion 111–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein JS, Salomon G, Stewart EA. Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxially placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients. Radiology. 1996;198(3):715–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Austin JH, Cohen MB. Value of having a cytopathologist present during percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of lung: report of 55 cancer patients and metaanalysis of the literature. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160(1):175–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kothary N, Lock L, Sze DY, Hofmann LV. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules: impact of nodule size on diagnostic accuracy. Clin Lung Cancer. 2009;10(5):360–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bocking A, Klose KC, Kyll HJ, Hauptmann S. Cytologic versus histologic evaluation of needle biopsy of the lung, hilum and mediastinum. Sensitivity, specificity and typing accuracy. Acta Cytol. 1995;39(3):463–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gong Y, Sneige N, Guo M, Hicks ME, Moran CA. Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration vs concurrent core needle biopsy in diagnosis of intrathoracic lesions: a retrospective comparison of diagnostic accuracy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125(3):438–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wallace MJ, Krishnamurthy S, Broemeling LD, et al. CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of small (< or =1-cm) pulmonary lesions. Radiology. 2002;225(3):823–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thiessen R, Seely JM, Matzinger FR, et al. Necrotizing granuloma of the lung: imaging characteristics and imaging-guided diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189(6):1397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ayyappan AP, Souza CA, Seely J, Peterson R, Dennie C, Matzinger F. Ultrathin fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the lung with transfissural approach: does it increase the risk of pneumothorax? Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(6):1725–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dennie CJ, Matzinger FR, Marriner JR, Maziak DE. Transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung: results of early discharge in 506 outpatients. Radiology. 2001;219(1):247–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Oikonomou A, Matzinger FR, Seely JM, Dennie CJ, Macleod PJ. Ultrathin needle (25 G) aspiration lung biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication rates. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(3):375–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. VanSonnenberg E, Goodacre BW, Wittich GR, Logrono R, Kennedy PT, Zwischenberger JB. Image-guided 25-gauge needle biopsy for thoracic lesions: diagnostic feasibility and safety. Radiology. 2003;227(2):414–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hare S, Gupta A, Souza CA, Matzinger F, Seely J. Systemic arterial air embolism after percutaneous lung biopsy. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(7):589--96.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Blanc FX, Atassi K, Bignon J, Housset B. Diagnostic value of medical thoracoscopy in pleural disease: a 6-year retrospective study. Chest. 2002;121(5):1677–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Adams RF, Gleeson FV. Percutaneous image-guided cutting-needle biopsy of the pleura in the presence of a suspected malignant effusion. Radiology. 2001;219(2):510–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Maskell NA, Gleeson FV, Davies RJ. Standard pleural biopsy versus CT-guided cutting-needle biopsy for diagnosis of malignant disease in pleural effusions: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;361(9366):1326–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gopal M, Romero AB, Baillargeon J, Sharma G. Trends in pleural biopsies between 1996 and 2006 at a tertiary medical center. Am J Med Sci. 2010;339(4):345–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Heilo A, Stenwig AE, Solheim OP. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: US-guided histologic core-needle biopsy. Radiology. 1999;211(3):657–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Adams RF, Gray W, Davies RJ, Gleeson FV. Percutaneous image-guided cutting needle biopsy of the pleura in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma. Chest. 2001;120(6):1798–802.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Qureshi NR, Gleeson FV. Imaging of pleural disease. Clin Chest Med. 2006;27(2):193–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Agarwal PP, Seely JM, Matzinger FR, et al. Pleural mesothelioma: sensitivity and incidence of needle track seeding after image-guided biopsy versus surgical biopsy. Radiology. 2006;241(2):589–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Screaton NJ, Flower CD. Percutaneous needle biopsy of the pleura. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38(2):293–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Boutin C, Rey F, Viallat JR. Prevention of malignant seeding after invasive diagnostic procedures in patients with pleural mesothelioma. A randomized trial of local radiotherapy. Chest. 1995;108(3):754–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Diacon AH, Brutsche MH, Soler M. Accuracy of pleural puncture sites: a prospective comparison of clinical examination with ultrasound. Chest. 2003;123(2):436–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hirsch JH, Rogers JV, Mack LA. Real-time sonography of pleural opacities. Am J Roentgenol. 1981;136(2):297–301.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kohan JM, Poe RH, Israel RH, et al. Value of chest ultrasonography versus decubitus roentgenography for thoracentesis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1986;133(6):1124–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. O’Moore PV, Mueller PR, Simeone JF, et al. Sonographic guidance in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the pleural space. Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149(1):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Grogan DR, Irwin RS, Channick R, et al. Complications associated with thoracentesis. A prospective, randomized study comparing three different methods. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(4):873–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Raptopoulos V, Davis LM, Lee G, Umali C, Lew R, Irwin RS. Factors affecting the development of pneumothorax associated with thoracentesis. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(5):917–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mahfood S, Hix WR, Aaron BL, Blaes P, Watson DC. Reexpansion pulmonary edema. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45(3):340–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Havelock T, Teoh R, Laws D, Gleeson F. Pleural procedures and thoracic ultrasound: British thoracic society pleural disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii61–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pavlin J, Cheney FW Jr. Unilateral pulmonary edema in rabbits after reexpansion of collapsed lung. J Appl Physiol. 1979;46(1):31–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Miller WC, Toon R, Palat H, Lacroix J. Experimental pulmonary edema following re-expansion of pneumothorax. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1973;108(3):654–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Feller-Kopman D, Walkey A, Berkowitz D, Ernst A. The relationship of pleural pressure to symptom development during therapeutic thoracentesis. Chest. 2006;129(6):1556–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Josephson T, Nordenskjold CA, Larsson J, Rosenberg LU, Kaijser M. Amount drained at ultrasound-guided thoracentesis and risk of pneumothorax. Acta Radiol. 2009;50(1):42–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Mayo PH, Goltz HR, Tafreshi M, Doelken P. Safety of ultrasound-guided thoracentesis in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2004;125(3):1059–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rahman NM, Singanayagam A, Davies HE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy, safety and utilisation of respiratory physician-delivered thoracic ultrasound. Thorax. 2010;65(5):449–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Moulton JS. Image-guided management of complicated pleural fluid collections. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38(2):345–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Keeling AN, Leong S, Logan PM, Lee MJ. Empyema and effusion: outcome of image-guided small-bore catheter drainage. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31(1):135–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. VanSonnenberg E, Nakamoto SK, Mueller PR, et al. CT- and ultrasound-guided catheter drainage of empyemas after chest-tube failure. Radiology. 1984;151(2):349–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Moulton JS, Moore PT, Mencini RA. Treatment of loculated pleural effusions with transcatheter intracavitary urokinase. Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153(5):941–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Moulton JS, Benkert RE, Weisiger KH, Chambers JA. Treatment of complicated pleural fluid collections with image-guided drainage and intracavitary urokinase. Chest. 1995;108(5):1252–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Westcott JL. Percutaneous catheter drainage of pleural effusion and empyema. Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144(6):1189–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Maskell NA, Medford A, Gleeson FV. Seldinger chest drain insertion: simpler but not necessarily safer. Thorax. 2010;65(1):5–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Rahman NM, Maskell NA, Davies CW, et al. The relationship between chest tube size and clinical outcome in pleural infection. Chest. 2010;137(3):536–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Maskell NA, Davies CW, Nunn AJ, et al. U.K. Controlled trial of intrapleural streptokinase for pleural infection. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(9):865–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Rahman NM, Maskell NA, West A, et al. Intrapleural use of tissue plasminogen activator and DNase in pleural infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:518–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Casola G, vanSonnenberg E, Keightley A, Ho M, Withers C, Lee AS. Pneumothorax: radiologic treatment with small catheters. Radiology. 1988;166(1 Pt 1):89–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean M. Seely .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Humana Press, a part of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barnes, D., Amjadi, K., Seely, J.M. (2012). Image Guided Thoracic Interventions. In: Kanne, J. (eds) Clinically Oriented Pulmonary Imaging. Respiratory Medicine. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-542-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-542-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-541-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-542-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics