Skip to main content

Processing Biological Tissues for Ultrastructural Study

  • Protocol
Electron Microscopy

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology™ ((MIMB,volume 369))

Abstract

Biological tissues are passed through numerous procedures before they can be studied at the ultrastructural level with the electron microscope. Chemical fixation is widely used as a method for preserving structural detail and can be performed by simple immersion or total body vascular perfusion. A 2 to 4% solution of glutaraldehyde buffered with 0.1 M sodium phosphate, or a combination of similarly buffered glutaraldehyde and paraformaldehyde, can be used successfully to preserve the fine structure of biological tissues. The material next is washed briefly in the buffer vehicle and then secondarily fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (osmic acid), which also is buffered with sodium phosphate. The tissue then is thoroughly dehydrated in solutions of ethanol at increasing concentrations of 50%, 70%, 95%, and 100%. After dehydration, tissues are infiltrated for a prescribed time interval with an epoxy embedding medium. After infiltration, specimens are transferred into fresh epoxy resin and polymerized at 60 to 70°C for several hours. This orderly process ultimately yields fixed tissues that are encased in hardened blocks that can be thin-sectioned with an ultramicrotome. The thin sections are counterstained with solutions of heavy metals to add contrast. The material then can be subjected to the electron beam in an electron microscope to produce useful images for ultrastructural study. This overall procedure has been used successfully since the advent of biological electron microscopy to define the minute details of cells and tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Glauert, A. M. (ed.) (1974) Fixation, Dehydration and Embedding of Biological Specimens: Practical Methods in Electron Microscopy. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sabatini, D. D., Bensch, K., and Barnett, R. J. (1963) Cytochemistry and electron microscopy. The preservation of cellular ultrastructure and enzymatic activity by aldehyde fixation. J. Cell Biol. 17, 19–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fahimi, H. D. (1967) Perfusion and immersion fixation of rat liver with glutaraldehyde. Lab. Invest. 16, 736–751.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Trump, B. F. and Bulger, R. E. (1966) New ultrastructural characteristics of cells fixed in glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide mixture. Lab. Invest. 15, 368–379.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayat, M. A. (1989) Principles and Techniques of Electron Microscopy: Biological Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glauert, A. M. and Lewis, P. R. (1988) Biological Specimen Preparation for Transmission Electron Microscopy, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Luft, J. H. (1961) Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 9, 409–414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Finck, H. (1960) Epoxy resins in electron microscopy. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 7, 27–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reynolds, E. S. (1963) The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–212.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Watson, M. L. (1958) Staining of tissue sections for electron microscopy with heavy metals. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 4, 475–478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maunsbach, A. B. (1966) The influence of different fixative and fixation methods on the ultrastructure of rat kidney proximal tubule cells. I. Comparison of different perfusion fixation methods and of glutaraldehye, formalin and osmium tetroxide. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 15, 242–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maunsbach, A. B. (1966) The influence of different fixative and fixation methods on the ultrastructure of rat kidney proximal tubule cells. II. Effects of varying osmolality, ionic strength, buffer system and fixative concentration of glutaraldehyde solutions. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 15, 283–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mollenhauer, H. H. (1993) Artifacts caused by dehydration and epoxy embedding in transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Res. Tech. 26, 496–512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bain, J. M. and Gove, D. W. (1971) Rapid preparation of plant tissues for electron microscopy. J. Microsc. (Oxford) 93, 159–162.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gahan, P. B., Greenoak, G. C., and James, D. (1970) Preparation of ultrathin frozen sections of plant tissues for electron microscopy. Histochemie 24, 230–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bowes, D., Bullock, G. R., and Winsey, N. P. J. (1970) A method for fixing rabbit and hind limb skeletal muscle by perfusion. Proc. 7th Annual Int. Cong. Electron Microsc. 1, 397a.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hayat, M. A. (1972) Basic Electron Microscopy Techniques. Van Nostrand Reihnold, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wood, R. L. and Luft, J. H. (1965) The influence of buffer systems on fixation with osmium tetroxide. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 12, 22–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bennett, H. S. and Luft, J. H. (1959) s-Collidine as a basis for buffering fixatives. J. Biophysic. Biochem Cytol. 6, 113–114.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karnovsky, M. J. (1965) A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 27, 137a.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schultz, R. L. and Case, N. M. (1970) A modified aldehyde perfusion technique for preventing certain artifacts in electron microscopy. J. Microsc. (Oxford) 92, 69–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ericsson, J. L. E., Saladino, A. J., and Trump, B. F. (1965) Electron microscopic observations of the influence of different fixatives on the appearance of cellular ultrastructure. Z. fur Zellforsch. 66, 161–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Luft, J. H. and Wood, R. L. (1963) The extraction of tissue protein during and after fixation with osmium tetroxide in various buffer systems. J. Cell Biol. 19, 46a.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lee, R. M. K. W. (1984) A critical appraisal of the effects of fixation, dehydration and embedding on cell volume, in Science of Biological Specimen Preparation: SEM Proceedings (Revel, J.-P., Barnard, T., and Haggis, G. H., eds.), Scanning Electron Microscopy, Inc. AMF O’Hare, IL, 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mascorro, J. A. (2004) Propylene oxide: to use or not to use in biological tissue processing. Microscopy Today 12, 45–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Humana Press Inc.

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Mascorro, J.A., Bozzola, J.J. (2007). Processing Biological Tissues for Ultrastructural Study. In: Kuo, J. (eds) Electron Microscopy. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol 369. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-294-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-294-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Humana Press

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-58829-573-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-59745-294-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics