Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multichannel Urodynamic Testing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pelvic Floor Dysfunction and Pelvic Surgery in the Elderly

Abstract

Multichannel urodynamic testing is a set of tests used to measure lower urinary tract function. When used together they can diagnose dysfunction effecting the bladder, urethra, and pelvic floor. Data is gathered during both the filling and voiding phases of micturition. The components of urodynamics include: uroflowmetry, filling cystometrogram, urethral pressure study, voiding pressure flow study, post void residual measurement, and sphincter electromyography. This article will provide an introduction to the basic principles of urodynamic testing and the foundation needed for practitioner interpretation of urodynamic findings. Familiarity with the terms, equipment used, methodology, and goals of each study is an essential step to using urodynamics to guide treatment for lower urinary tract dysfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davis DM. The hydrodynamics of the upper urinary tract (urodynamics). Ann Surg. 1954;140(6):839–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JT. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardisation of Terminology. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1988;114:5–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gray M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing–part 2: uroflowmetry. Urol Nurs. 2010;30(6):321–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gray M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing–part 3: electromyography of the pelvic floor muscles. Urol Nurs. 2011;31(1):31–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gray M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing–part 5: evaluation of bladder filling/storage functions. Urol Nurs. 2011;31(3):149–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gray M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing–part 6: evaluation of bladder filling/storage: bladder wall compliance and the detrusor leak point pressure. Urol Nurs. 2011;31(4):215–21. 235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Issa MM, Chun T, Thwaites D, Bouet R, Hall J, Miller LE, et al. The effect of urethral instrumentation on uroflowmetry. BJU Int. 2003;92(4):426–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meffan PJ, Nacey JN, Delahunt B. Effect of abdominal straining on urinary flow rate in normal males. Br J Urol. 1991;67(2):134–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly CE, Krane RJ. Current concepts and controversies in urodynamics. Curr Urol Rep. 2000;1(3):217–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Van de Beek C, Stoevelaar HJ, McDonnell J, Nijs HG, Casparie AF, Janknegt RA. Interpretation of uroflowmetry curves by urologists. J Urol. 1997;157(1):164–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jarvis TR, Chan L, Tse V. Practical uroflowmetry. BJU Int. 2012;110(Suppl):28–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jensen KM, Jørgensen JB, Mogensen P. Urodynamics in prostatism. I. Prognostic value of uroflowmetry. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1988;22(2):109–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wheeler TL, Richter HE, Greer WJ, Bowling CB, Redden DT, Varner RE. Predictors of success with postoperative voiding trials after a mid urethral sling procedure. J Urol. 2008;179(2):600–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chancellor MB, Hanno PM, Malkowicz SB WA. Clinical manual of urology. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2007, p. 448–50.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coombes GM, Millard RJ. The accuracy of portable ultrasound scanning in the measurement of residual urine volume. J Urol. 1994;152(6 Pt 1):2083–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Byun SS, Kim HH, Lee E, Paick J-S, Kamg W, Oh S-J. Accuracy of bladder volume determinations by ultrasonography: are they accurate over entire bladder volume range? Urology. 2003;62(4):656–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Griffiths DJ, Harrison G, Moore K, McCracken P. Variability of post-void residual urine volume in the elderly. Urol Res. 1996;24(1):23–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Homma Y, Batista J, Bauer S, Griffiths D, Hilton P, KRAMER G, et al. Urodynamics. p. 317–72. Available from: http://www.ics.org/publications/ici_2/chapters/chap07.pdf.

  20. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(2):167–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gammie A, Clarkson B, Constantinou C, Damaser M, Drinnan M, Geleijnse G, et al. International Continence Society guidelines on urodynamic equipment performance. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33(4):370–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. McKinney TB, Babin E, Shah N, McKinney C, Glowack J. (2015) Comparison of water and air-charged transducer catheters during voiding pressure studies. Lecture presented at Tokyo, Japan; International Continence Society.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klevmark B. Volume threshold for micturition. Influence of filling rate on sensory and motor bladder function. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 2002;(210):6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fitzgerald MP, Stablein U, Brubaker L. Urinary habits among asymptomatic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(5):1384–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Latini JM, Mueller E, Lux MM, Fitzgerald MP, Kreder KJ. Voiding frequency in a sample of asymptomatic American men. J Urol. 2004;172(3):980–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Harris RL, Cundiff GW, Theofrastous JP, Bump RC. Bladder compliance in neurologically intact women. Neurourol Urodyn. 1996;15(5):483–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Brostrom S, Jennum P, Lose G. Short-term reproducibility of cystometry and pressure-flow micturition studies in healthy women. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(5):457–60.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heesakkers JPFA, Vandoninck V, van Balken MR, Bemelmans BLH. Bladder filling by autologous urine production during cystometry: a urodynamic pitfall! Neurourol Urodyn. 2003;22(3):243–5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yuan Z, Tang Z, He C, Tang W. Diabetic cystopathy: a review. J Diabetes. 2015;7(4):442–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Srikandarajah N, Boissaud-Cooke MA, Clark S, Wilby MJ. Does early surgical decompression in cauda equina syndrome improve bladder outcome? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(8):580–3.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Palmer MH, Athanasopoulos A, Lee K-S, Takeda M, Wyndaele J-J. Sociocultural and environmental influences on bladder health. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66(12):1132–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuo Y-C, Kuo H-C. The urodynamic characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67(9):863–9.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nigro DA, Wein AJ, Foy M, Parsons CL, Williams M, Nyberg LM, et al. Associations among cystoscopic and urodynamic findings for women enrolled in the Interstitial Cystitis Data Base (ICDB) Study. Urology. 1997;49(5A Suppl):86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Chen Y-C, Kuo H-C. Clinical and video urodynamic characteristics of adult women with dysfunctional voiding. J Formos Med Assoc. 2014;113(3):161–5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Madersbacher S, Pycha A, Klingler CH, Mian C, Djavan B, Stulnig T, et al. Interrelationships of bladder compliance with age, detrusor instability, and obstruction in elderly men with lower urinary tract symptoms. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18(1):3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Griffiths D. Urodynamics: the mechanics and hydrodynamics of the lower urinary tract. 2nd ed. Rotterdam: International Continence Society; 2014. p. 139–48.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Blaivas J, Chancellor M, Weiss J, Verhaaren M. Atlas of Urodynamics. 2nd ed. Victoria: Blackwell; p. 56–68.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Houle AM, Gilmour RF, Churchill BM, Gaumond M, Bissonnette B. What volume can a child normally store in the bladder at a safe pressure? J Urol. 1993;149(3):561–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, Weiss RM. Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol. 1981;126(2):205–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gilmour RF, Churchill BM, Steckler RE, Houle AM, Khoury AE, McLorie GA. A new technique for dynamic analysis of bladder compliance. J Urol. 1993;150(4):1200–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Peterson A, Webster G. Urodynamic and videourodynamic evaluation of voiding dysfunction. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; p. 1986–2010.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kershen RT, Azadzoi KM, Siroky MB. Blood flow, pressure and compliance in the male human bladder. J Urol. 2002;168(1):121–5.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cho S-Y, Yi J-S, Oh S-J. The clinical significance of poor bladder compliance. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(8):1010–4.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shin JC, Park C, Kim HJ, Lee IY. Significance of low compliance bladder in cauda equina injury. Spinal Cord. 2002;40(12):650–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim SH, Kim TB, Kim SW, Oh S-J. Urodynamic findings of the painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: a comparison with idiopathic overactive bladder. J Urol. 2009;181(6):2550–4.

    Google Scholar 

  46. de Figueiredo AA, Lucon AM, Srougi M. Bladder augmentation for the treatment of chronic tuberculous cystitis. Clinical and urodynamic evaluation of 25 patients after long term follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006;25(5):433–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Viart L, Elalouf V, Petit J, Al Khedr A, Kristkowiak P, Saint F. [Prognostics factors of renal failure in multiple sclerosis]. Progrès en Urol J l’Association Fr d’urologie la Société Fr d’urologie. 2012;22(16):1026–32.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Gray M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing–part 7: evaluation of bladder filling/storage: evaluation of urethral sphincter incompetence and stress urinary incontinence. Urol Nurs. 2011;31(5):267–77, 289.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Smith AL, Ferlise VJ, Wein AJ, Ramchandani P, Rovner ES. Effect of A 7-F transurethral catheter on abdominal leak point pressure measurement in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence. Urology. 2011;77(5):1188–93.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Griffiths D. The pressure within a collapsed tube, with special reference to urethral pressure. Phys Med Biol. 1985;30(9):951–63.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Heesakkers JPFA, Vriesema JLJ. The role of urodynamics in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in women. Curr Opin Urol. 2005;15(4):215–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Brown M, Wickham JE. The urethral pressure profile. Br J Urol. 1969;41(2):211–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Shah SM, Gaunay GS. Treatment options for intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9(11):638–51.

    Google Scholar 

  54. McGuire EJ, Cespedes RD, O’Connell HE. Leak-point pressures. Urol Clin North Am. 1996;23(2):253–62.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Betson LH, Siddiqui G, Bhatia NN. Intrinsic urethral sphincteric deficiency: critical analysis of various diagnostic modalities. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15(5):411–7.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gray M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing–part 8: evaluating sensations of bladder filling. Urol Nurs. 2011;31(6):369–74.

    Google Scholar 

  57. De Wachter SG, Heeringa R, van Koeveringe GA, Gillespie JI. On the nature of bladder sensation: the concept of sensory modulation. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(7):1220–6.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wyndaele JJ. The normal pattern of perception of bladder filling during cystometry studied in 38 young healthy volunteers. J Urol. 1998;160(2):479–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wyndaele JJ, De Wachter S. Cystometrical sensory data from a normal population: comparison of two groups of young healthy volunteers examined with 5 years interval. Eur Urol. 2002;42(1):34–8.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Homma Y. OAB symptoms: assessment and discriminator for etiopathology. Curr Opin Urol. 2014;24(4):345–51.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Abrams P, Chapple CR, Jünemann K-P, Sharpe S. Urinary urgency: a review of its assessment as the key symptom of the overactive bladder syndrome. World J Urol. 2012;30(3):385–92.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Parsons CL. Diagnosing the bladder as the source of pelvic pain: successful treatment for adults and children. Pain Manag. 2014;4(4):293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Haab F. Chapter 1: The conditions of neurogenic detrusor overactivity and overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33 Suppl 3:S2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ruffion A, Castro-Diaz D, Patel H, Khalaf K, Onyenwenyi A, Globe D, et al. Systematic review of the epidemiology of urinary incontinence and detrusor overactivity among patients with neurogenic overactive bladder. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;41(3–4):146–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Gray M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing – part 10: evaluation of micturition via the voiding pressure-flow study. Urol Nurs. 2012;32(2):71–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rosier PFWM, Kirschner-Hermanns R, Svihra J, Homma Y, Wein AJ. ICS teaching module: analysis of voiding, pressure flow analysis (basic module). Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(1):36–8.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Gray M. Traces : making sense of urodynamics testing – part 3 : electromyography of the pelvic floor muscles. Urol Nurs. 2011;31(1):31–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Valentini FA, Marti BG, Robain G, Nelson PP. Detrusor after-contraction: a new insight. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41(3):527–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Rodrigues P, Hering F, Campagnari JC. Urodynamic after-contraction waves: a large observational study in an adult female population and correlation with bladder and ureter emptying functions in women. Urol Int. 2014;93(4):431–6.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Pfisterer MH-D, Griffiths DJ, Rosenberg L, Schaefer W, Resnick NM. Parameters of bladder function in pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal continent women without detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(3):356–61.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Rosario DJ, Woo HH, Chapple CR. Definition of normality of pressure-flow parameters based on observations in asymptomatic men. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(5):388–94.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sekido N. Bladder contractility and urethral resistance relation: what does a pressure flow study tell us? Int J Urol. 2012;19(3):216–28.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pfisterer MH-D, Griffiths DJ, Schaefer W, Resnick NM. The effect of age on lower urinary tract function: a study in women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(3):405–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Gray M. Traces: making sense of urodynamics testing–part 11: quantitative analysis of micturition via the voiding pressure flow study: pressure-flow nomograms. Urol Nurs. 2012;32(3):159–65. 147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Schafer W. Current opinion in urology. 1992. p. 252–6. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/co-urology/Abstract/1992/08000/Urodynamics_of_micturition_.4.aspx.

  76. Chassagne S, Bernier PA, Haab F, Roehrborn CG, Reisch JS, Zimmern PE. Proposed cutoff values to define bladder outlet obstruction in women. Urology. 1998;51(3):408–11.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Nitti VW. Pressure flow urodynamic studies: the gold standard for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction. Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 6:S14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Abrams P. Bladder outlet obstruction index, bladder contractility index and bladder voiding efficiency: three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. BJU Int. 1999;84(1):14–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Winters J, Dmochowski R, Goldman H, Herndon C, Kobashi K, Kraus S. Adult urodnamics: AUA/SuFU guideline. 2012. Available from: https://www.auanet.org/common/pdf/education/clinical-guidance/Adult-Urodynamics.pdf.

  80. Chancellor MB. The overactive bladder progression to underactive bladder hypothesis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46 Suppl 1:S23–7.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Resnick NM, Yalla SV. Detrusor hyperactivity with impaired contractile function. An unrecognized but common cause of incontinence in elderly patients. JAMA. 1987;257(22):3076–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Stav K, Shilo Y, Zisman A, Lindner A, Leibovici D. Comparison of lower urinary tract symptoms between women with detrusor overactivity and impaired contractility, and detrusor overactivity and preserved contractility. J Urol. 2013;189(6):2175–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800422, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA

    Mikel Gray & Jessica Jackson

Authors
  1. Mikel Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikel Gray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pelvic NeuroScience, Department of Surgery, The Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

    David A. Gordon

  2. Sinai Center for Geriatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Sinai Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

    Mark R. Katlic

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gray, M., Jackson, J. (2017). Multichannel Urodynamic Testing. In: Gordon, D., Katlic, M. (eds) Pelvic Floor Dysfunction and Pelvic Surgery in the Elderly. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6554-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6554-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-6552-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-6554-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation