Skip to main content

Central Nerve System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Practical Immunohistochemistry

Abstract

Since most of the diagnoses specifically tumor diagnoses are H&E based, immunohistochemistry has a limited use in central nervous system (CNS). However, it is very useful in difficult cases in differentiating neural (e.g. synaptophysin) from glial (e.g. GFAP) tumors; differentiating low cellularity infiltrating glioma (diffuse astrocytoma and oligodendroglioma; most of them are positive for mutated IDH1or 2 from non-neoplastic lesions; identifying viral inclusions (JC virus etc.) and in neurodegenerative diseases (tau etc.). In addition, a few antibodies are now being used as predictive and prognostic markers (IDH1 etc.).

This chapter addresses frequently asked practical questions about the application of immunohistochemistry to the central nervous system (CNS). The first table, Table 15.1, is a summary table of frequently used antibodies in the CNS. The markers for individual tumor types in the CNS are given in Tables 15.2–15.20. Tables 15.21–15.34 list markers useful in differential diagnosis of CNS tumors. The last four tables, Tables 15.35–15.38, are markers for non-neoplastic lesions in the CNS, listing the markers for neurodegenerative disorders (Table 15.35), virus and parasite infections (Table 15.36), epilepsy (Table 15.37), and histiocytic disorders (Table 15.38).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer); 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miller DC. Modern surgical neuropathology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ellison D, Love S, Chimelli L, et al. Neuropathology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dabbs DJ. Diagnostic immunohistochemistry. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Perry A, Brat DJ. Practical surgical neuropathology: a diagnostic approach. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vogel H. Nervous system. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Burger PC, Scheithauer BW. Tumors of the central nervous system. Vol Fascicle 7. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Registry of Pathology; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edgar MA, Rosenblum MK. The differential diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: a critical examination of some recent immunohistochemical applications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132(3):500–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Preusser M, Laggner U, Haberler C, Heinzl H, Budka H, Hainfellner JA. Comparative analysis of NeuN immunoreactivity in primary brain tumours: conclusions for rational use in diagnostic histopathology. Histopathology. 2006;48(4):438–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Akiyama H, Kondo H, Ikeda K, Arai T, Kato M, McGleer PL. Immunohistochemical detection of coagulation factor XIIIa in postmortem human brain tissue. Neurosci Lett. 1995;202(1–2):29–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takata M, Imai T, Hirone T. Factor-XIIIa-positive cells in normal peripheral nerves and cutaneous neurofibromas of type-1 neurofibromatosis. Am J Dermatopathol. 1994;16(1):37–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi YL, Chi JG, Suh YL. CD99 immunoreactivity in ependymoma. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2001;9(2):125–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Perry A, Scheithauer BW, Macaulay RJ, Raffel C, Roth KA, Kros JM. Oligodendrogliomas with neurocytic differentiation. A report of 4 cases with diagnostic and histogenetic implications. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002;61(11):947–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wharton SB, Chan KK, Hamilton FA, Anderson JR. Expression of neuronal markers in oligodendrogliomas: an immunohistochemical study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1998;24(4):302–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321(5897):1807–12.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yan H, Parsons DW, Jin G, et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(8):765–73.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ligon KL, Alberta JA, Kho AT, et al. The oligodendroglial lineage marker OLIG2 is universally expressed in diffuse gliomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004;63(5):499–509.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ducray F, Mokhtari K, Crinière E, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of alpha internexin expression in a series of 409 gliomas. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(5):802–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barresi V, Vitarelli E, Branca G, Antonelli M, Giangaspero F, Barresi G. Expression of brachyury in hemangioblastoma: potential use in differential diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(7):1052–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parkkila AK, Herva R, Parkkila S, Rajaniemi H. Immunohistochemical demonstration of human carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme II in brain tumours. Histochem J. 1995;27(12):974–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujisawa H, Marukawa K, Hasegawa M, et al. Genetic differences between neurocytoma and dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor and oligodendroglial tumors. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(6):1350–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yuen ST, Fung CF, Ng TH, Leung SY. Central neurocytoma: its differentiation from intraventricular oligodendroglioma. Childs Nervous System. 1992;8(7):383–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin F, Shi J, Liu H, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of the von Hippel-Lindau gene product (pVHL) in human tissues and tumors: a useful marker for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma of the ovary and uterus. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;129(4):592–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kubota T, Hayashi M, Kawano H, et al. Central neurocytoma: immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;81(4):418–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Giangaspero F, Cenacchi G, Losi L, Cerasoli S, Bisceglia M, Burger PC. Extraventricular neoplasms with neurocytoma features. A clinicopathological study of 11 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21(2):206–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vege KD, Giannini C, Scheithauer BW. The immunophenotype of ependymomas. Appl Immunohistochem Molecul Morphol. 2000;8(1):25–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Suri VS, Tatke M, Singh D, Sharma A. Histological spectrum of ependymomas and correlation of p53 and Ki-67 expression with ependymoma grade and subtype. Indian J Cancer. 2004;41(2):66–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wolfsberger S, Fischer I, Hoftberger R, et al. Ki-67 immunolabeling index is an accurate predictor of outcome in patients with intracranial ependymoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(7):914–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahfouz S, Aziz AA, Gabal SM, el-Sheikh S. Immunohistochemical study of CD99 and EMA expression in ependymomas. Medscape J Med. 2008;10(2):41.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sangoi AR, Dulai MS, Beck AH, Brat DJ, Vogel H. Distinguishing chordoid meningiomas from their histologic mimics: an immunohistochemical evaluation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(5):669–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Reifenberger G, Weber T, Weber RG, et al. Chordoid glioma of the third ventricle: immunohistochemical and molecular genetic characterization of a novel tumor entity. Brain Pathol. 1999;9(4):617–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Horbinski C, Dacic S, McLendon RE, et al. Chordoid glioma: a case report and molecular characterization of five cases. Brain Pathol. 2008;19(3):439–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sugita Y, Ohshima K, Shigemori M, Arakawa M, Kuramoto T, Nakayama K. The tumor of the third ventricle. Neuropathology. 2010;30(1):97–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McLendon RE, Bentley RC, Parisi JE, et al. Malignant supratentorial glial-neuronal neoplasms: report of two cases and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;121(5):485–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moran CA, Rush W, Mena H. Primary spinal paragangliomas: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 30 cases. Histopathology. 1997;31(2):167–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Fevre-Montange M, Jouvet A, Privat K, et al. Immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, biochemical and in vitro studies of a pineocytoma. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1998;95(5):532–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Okuda Y, Taomoto K, Saya H, et al. Pineoblastoma with neuronal differentiation–immunohistochemical and immunocytochemical studies. J Neurooncol. 1988;6(2):193–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mena H, Rushing EJ, Ribas JL, Delahunt B, McCarthy WF. Tumors of pineal parenchymal cells: a correlation of histological features, including nucleolar organizer regions, with survival in 35 cases. Hum Pathol. 1995;26(1):20–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Badiali M, Iolascon A, Loda M, et al. p53 gene mutations in medulloblastoma. Immunohistochemistry, gel shift analysis, and sequencing. Diagn Mol Pathol. 1993;2(1):23–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McLendon RE, Friedman HS, Fuchs HE, Kun KE, Bigner SH. Diagnostic markers in paediatric medulloblastoma: a Paediatric Oncology Group Study. Histopathology. 2001;34(2):154–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Giordana MT, Mauro A, Migheli A, Schiffer D. Contributions of immunohistochemistry to the problem of differentiation in medulloblastoma. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1983;4(4):411–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Eberhart CG, Tihan T, Burger PC. Nuclear localization and mutation of beta-catenin in medulloblastomas. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2000;59(4):333–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ellison DW, Onilude OE, Lindsey JC, et al. Beta-Catenin status predicts a favorable outcome in childhood medulloblastoma: the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group Brain Tumour Committee. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(31):7951–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Jaffee ES, Harris NL, Stein H, et al. WHO classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumors of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon: IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer); 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Cruz-Sanchez FF, Haustein J, Rossi ML, Cervos-Navarro J, Hughes JT. Ependymoblastoma: a histological, immunohistological and ultrastructural study of five cases. Histopathology. 1988;12(1):17–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gyure KA, Prayson RA, Estes ML. Extracerebellar primitive neuroectodermal tumors: A clinicopathologic study with bcl-2 and CD99 immunohistochemistry. Ann Diagn Pathol. 1999;3(5):276–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Alassiri AH, Birks DK, Newell KL, Moore W, Lillehei KO. Epithelioid versus rhabdoid glioblastomas are distinguished by monosomy 22 and immunohistochemical expression of INI-1 but not claudin 6. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(3):341–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Birks DK, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Donson AM, et al. Claudin 6 is a positive marker for atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors. Brain Pathol. 2010;20(1):140–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ertan Y, Sezak M, Turhan T, et al. Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor of the central nervous system: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features of four cases. Childs Nerv Syst. 2009;25(6):707–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fine SW, McClain SA, Li M. Immunohistochemistry staining for calretinin is useful for differentiating schwannoma from neurofibroma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004;122:552–9.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Yaskiv O, Rubin BP, He H, Falzarano S, Magi-Galluzzi C, Zhou M. ERG protein expression in human tumors detected with a rabbit monoclonal antibody. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;138(6):803–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jung SM, Kuo TT. Immunoreactivity of CD10 and inhibin alpha in differentiating hemangioblastoma of central nervous system from metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2005;18(6):788–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Glasker S, Li J, Xia JB, et al. Hemangioblastomas share protein expression with embryonal hemangioblast progenitor cell. Cancer Res. 2006;66(8):4167–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lach B, Gregor A, Rippstein P, Omulecka A. Angiogenic histogenesis of stromal cells in hemangioblastoma: ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1999;23(5): 299–310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bohling T, Plate KH, Haltia MJ, Alitalo K, Neumann HPH. Von Hippel-Lindau disease and capillary hemangioblastoma. In: Kleihues P, Cavenee WK, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics-tumours of the nervous system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Becker I, Paulus W, Roggendorf W. Histogenesis of stromal cells in cerebellar hemangioblastomas. An immunohistochemical study. Am J Pathol. 1989;134(2):271–5.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hufnagel TJ, Kim JH, True LD, Manuelidis EE. Immunohistochemistry of capillary hemangioblastoma. Immunoperoxidase-labeled antibody staining resolves the differential diagnosis with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, but does not explain the histogenesis of the capillary hemangioblastoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989;13(3):207–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hoang MP, Amirkhan RH. Inhibin alpha distinguishes hemangioblastoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(8):1152–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Vuorinen V, Sallinen P, Haapasalo H, Visakorpi T, Kallio M, Jaaskelainen J. Outcome of 31 intracranial haemangiopericytomas: poor predictive value of cell proliferation indices. Acta Neurochir. 1996;138(12):1399–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kurosaki M, Saeger W, Ludecke DK. Immunohistochemical localisation of cytokeratins in craniopharyngioma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143(2):147–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Hofmann BM, Kreutzer J, Saeger W, et al. Nuclear beta-catenin accumulation as reliable marker for the differentiation between cystic craniopharyngiomas and rathke cleft cysts: a clinico-pathologic approach. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(12):1595–603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Veltrini VC, Etges A, Magalhaes MH, de Araujo NS, de Araujo VC. Solitary fibrous tumor of the oral mucosa–morphological and immunohistochemical profile in the differential diagnosis with hemangiopericytoma. Oral Oncol. 2003;39(4):420–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Thompson LD, Miettinen M, Wenig BM. Sinonasal-type hemangiopericytoma: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic analysis of 104 cases showing perivascular myoid differentiation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(6):737–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hori E, Kurimoto M, Fukuda O, et al. Recurrent intracranial solitary fibrous tumor initially diagnosed as hemangiopericytoma. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2007;24(1):31–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Shidham VB, Chivukula M, Gupta D, Rao RN, Komorowski R. Immunohistochemical comparison of gastrointestinal stromal tumor and solitary fibrous tumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126(10):1189–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rodriguez F, Scheithauer BW, Ockner DM, Giannini C. Solitary fibrous tumor of the cerebellopontine angle with salivary gland heterotopia: a unique presentation. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(1):139–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang J, Arber DA, Frankel K, Weiss LM. Large solitary fibrous tumor of the kidney: report of two cases and review of the literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(9):1194–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Suzuki SO, Fukui M, Nishio S, Iwaki T. Clinicopathological features of solitary fibrous tumor of the meninges: An immunohistochemical reappraisal of cases previously diagnosed to be fibrous meningioma or hemangiopericytoma. Pathol Int. 2000;50(10): 808–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Nakagawa Y, Perentes E, Rubinstein LJ. Immunohistochemical characterization of oligodendrogliomas: an analysis of multiple markers. Acta Neuropathol. 1986;72(1):15–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Dulai MS, Caccamo DV, Briley AL, Edwards MS, Fisher PG, Lehman NL. Intramedullary papillary ependymoma with choroid plexus differentiation and cerebrospinal fluid dissemination to the brain. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;5(5):511–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Rajaram V, Brat DJ, Perry A. Anaplastic meningioma versus meningeal hemangiopericytoma: immunohistochemical and genetic markers. Hum Pathol. 2004;35(11):1413–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Goedert M, Klug A. Tau protein and paired helical filament of Alzheimer’s Disease. Brain Res Bull. 1999;50(5–6):469–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Dickson DW. Review article: neuropathology of non-Alzheimer degenerative disorders. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2010;3(1):1–23.

    PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Cetin N, Dienel G, Gokden M. CD117 expression in glial tumors. J Neurooncol. 2005;75(2):195–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Matsuda R, Takahashi T, Nakamura S, et al. Expression of the c-kit protein in human solid tumors and in corresponding fetal and adult normal tissues. Am J Pathol. 1993;142(1):339–46.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed A. Jaffar Kazmi MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kazmi, S.A.J., Wu, H.H., Schuerch, C. (2015). Central Nerve System. In: Lin, F., Prichard, J. (eds) Handbook of Practical Immunohistochemistry. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1578-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1578-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-1577-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-1578-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics