Skip to main content

The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis

  • Chapter
Readings in Accounting for Management Control

Abstract

Contingency theories of management accounting have become a current vogue but have produced few significant new results. By surveying the development and content of these theories it is argued that they have been based on an inadequate and insufficiently articulated model. An improved model, based on ideas of organizational control and effectiveness, is put forward which suggests appropriate directions for future work that will be both perceptive and cumulative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Amigoni, F., Planning Management Control Systems, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (1978), pp. 279-291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, S.L., An Integrated Approach to Control System Design, Accounting, Organisations and Society (1977), pp. 101-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony, R.N., Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis (Harvard U.P., 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., Organisational Learning and Effective Management Information Systems: A Prospectus for Research, Harvard University, Program on Information Technologies and Public Policy, Working Paper 76-4 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. & Schon, D., Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Addison-Wesley, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J.C., Derivation of Theory by Means of Factor Analysis or Tom Swift and his Electric Factor Analysis Machine, The American Statistician (December, 1967), pp. 17-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banbury, J. & Nahapiet, J.E., Towards a Framework for the Study of the Antecedents and Consequences of Information Systems in Organizations, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1979), pp. 163-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumler, J.V., Defined Criteria of Performance and Organisational Control, Administrative Science Quarterly (September, 1971), pp. 340-349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, W.J. & Waterhouse, J.H., Budgetary Control and Organisational Structure, Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn, 1975), pp. 177-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A.G., Hughes, T. & Nahapiet, J., The Roles of Accounting in Organizations and Society, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T. & Stalker, G.M., The Management of Innovation (Tavistock, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.P., Contributions Research can make in Understanding Organisations Effectiveness in Spray, S.L. (ed.), Organisational Effectiveness: Theory-Research-Utilisation (Comparative Administration Research Institute, Graduate School of Business Administration, Kent State University, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, E.H., Behavioural Assumptions of Management Accounting, Accounting Review (July, 1966), pp. 496-509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A., Strategy and Structure (MIT Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. & Daems, H., Administrative Co-ordination, Allocation and Monitoring: A Comparative Analysis of the Emergence of Accounting and Organization in the U.S.A. and Europe, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1979), pp. 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., Organization: A Guide to Problems and Practice (Harper and Row, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., Organization Structure, Environment and Performance — The Role of Strategic Choice, Sociology (January, 1972), pp. 1-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D., A Social and Organisational View of Management Accounting in M. Bromwich and A.G. Hopwood (eds), Essays on British Accounting Research (Pitman, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. & March, J.G., A Behavioural Theory of the Firm (Prentice-Hall, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.L. & Macintosh, N.B., A New Approach to Design and Use of Management Information, California Management Review (Fall, 1978), pp. 82-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dermer, J., Management Planning and Control Systems (Irwin, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W.M., Organisation Theory and Organizational Effectiveness: An Exploratory Analysis in Spray, S.L. (ed.), Organisational Effectiveness: Theory-Research-Utilisation (Comparative Administration Research Institute, Graduate School of Business Administration, Kent State University, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambling, T.R., Theory Construction, Empiricism and Validation in Accounting Practice, Working Paper, Department of Accounting, University of Birmingham, May 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L.A. & Miller, D., A Contingency Framework for the Design of Accounting Information Systems, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1976), pp. 59-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hägg, I. & Hedlund, G., Case Studies in Accounting Research, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1979), pp. 135-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting, Accounting Review (January, 1977), pp. 22-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting: A Reply, Accounting Review (April, 1978), pp. 530-533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., The Game of Budget Control (Tavistock, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A.G., An Empirical Study of the Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation, Empirical Research in Accounting, Supplement to Journal of Accounting Research (1972), pp. 156-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A.G., Towards an Organisational Perspective for the Study of Accounting and Information Systems, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1978), pp. 3-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horngren, C.T., Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpik, L. (ed.), Organisation and Environment: Theory, Issues and Reality (Sage, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandwalla, P.N., The Effect of Different Types of Competition on the Use of Management Controls, Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn, 1972), pp. 275-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E.E. (III), Control Systems in Organizations, in Dunnette, M.D. (ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Rand McNally, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I.I. & Kilman, R.H., Methodological Approaches to the Social Sciences (Jossey-Bass, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, W., Management Controls in Action (Irish National Productivity Committee, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D.T., Budget Use and Managerial Performance, Journal of Accounting Research (1978), pp. 122-149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D.T., The Role of Management Accounting in Organisational Control, in M. Bromwich and A.G. Hopwood, Essays in British Accounting Research (Pitman, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Otley, D.T. & Berry, A.J., Control, Organization and Accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.G., The Relationship Between Organisational Structure and Organisational Control, Administrative Science Quarterly (1977), pp. 95-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W.G. & Maguire, M.A., Organisational Control: Two Functions, Administrative Science Quarterly (1975), pp. 559-569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennings, J.M., The Relevance of the Structural Contingency Model for Organisational Effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly (1975), pp. 393-410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C., A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Organisations, American Sociological Review (1967), pp. 194-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G.R., The External Control of Organisations (Harper and Row, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, J., Determinants of Financial Control Systems for Multiple Retailers — Some Case Study Evidence, unpublished paper, University of Loughborough, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, J.L., Organisational Effectiveness: An Inventory of Propositions (Irwin, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D.S. & Hickson, D.J. (eds), Organisational Structure in its Context (The Aston Programme 1) (Saxon House, 1976a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D.S. & Hinings, CR. (eds), Organisational Studies: Extensions and Replications (The Aston Programme 2) (Saxon House, 1976b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, D.S.& Payne, R.L. (eds), Organisational Behaviour in its Context (The Aston Programme 3) (Saxon House, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, G., Work Organisations: Resistance and Control (Longman, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathe, V., Contingency Theories of Organisational Structure, in Livingstone, J.L. (ed.), Managerial Accounting: The Behavioural Foundations (Grid, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathe, V., The Relevance of Modern Organization Theory for Managerial Accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1978), pp. 89-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steers, R.M., Organizational Effectiveness: A Behavioural View (Goodyear, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L., The Problem of Standards in Illuminative Research, Scottish Educational Review (May 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D., Organizations in Action (McGraw-Hill, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiessen, P. & Waterhouse, J.H., The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting: A Comment, Accounting Review (April, 1978), pp. 523-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, C., Rosenberg, D. & Colville, I., The Social Process of Research: Some Reflections on Developing a Multi-Disciplinary Accounting Project, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterhouse, J.H. & Tiessen, P., A Contingency Framework for Management Accounting Systems Research, Accounting, Organizations and Society (1978), pp. 65-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D.J.H., Contingency Formulations of Organisational Structure: Implications for Managerial Accounting, in Livingstone, J.L. (ed.), Managerial Accounting: The Behavioural Foundations (Grid, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerlund, G. & Sjöstrand, S., Organisational Myths (Harper and Row, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S., A Reappraisal of the Contingency Approach to Organisation, Journal of Management Studies (1979), pp. 334-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J., Industrial Organisation: Theory and Practice (Oxford, U.P., 1965).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Otley, D.T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis. In: Emmanuel, C., Otley, D., Merchant, K. (eds) Readings in Accounting for Management Control. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-41490-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7138-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics