Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Rehabilitation Education ((RE))

Abstract

The number and variety of early intervention models and programmes for at-risk and handicapped infants and their families has increased dramatically in the last two decades. This increase can undoubtedly be attributed to the intrinsic appeal of early intervention which draws on concepts of stimulation and prevention from developmental psychology and medicine. The intrinsic nature of this appeal is grounded in the belief that early development is more plastic than later development and that intervention in this sensitive period is thus likely to have greater preventive or ameliorative effects than in other periods. This belief underlies most early intervention programmes and currently finds its expression in an array of programmes for handicapped and at-risk infants in hospitals, homes and child care facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bailey, D.B. and Simeonsson, R.J. (1986) ‘Design issues in family impact evaluation,’ in L. Bickman and D.L. Weatherford (eds), Evaluating Early Intervention Programmes for Severely Handicapped Children and Their Families, Pro-Ed, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casto, G. and Mastropieri, M.A. (1986) ‘The efficacy of early intervention programs: A meto-analysis,’ Exceptional Children, 52, 417–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, D. and Cook, T.J. (1980) ‘Avoiding type III error in program evaluation,’ Evaluation and Program Planning, 3, 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W.T. and Baird, M.A. (1987) Family Centered Medical Care: A Clinical Casebook, Guilford Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunst, C. (1985) ‘Editors introduction’, Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunst, C. and Snyder, S. (1987) ‘A critique of the Utah State University early intervention meta-analysis research,’ Exceptional Children, 53 (3), 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, M.J. (1985) ‘An analysis of the effects of early intervention services for infants and toddlers with moderate and severe handicaps,’ Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5, 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisels, S.J. (1985) ‘The efficacy of early intervention: Why are we still asking this question?’ Topics in Early Childhood Education, 5 (2), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Offord, G.R. (1982) ‘Primary prevention: Aspects of program design and evaluation,’ Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 21 (1), 225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottenbacher, K.J. (1989) ‘Statistical conclusion validity of early intervention research with handicapped children,’ Exceptional Children, 55 (6), 534–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonkoff, J.P. and Hauser-Cram, P. (1987) ‘Early intervention for disabled infants and their families: A quantitative analysis,’ Pediatrics, 80 (5), 650–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simeonsson, R.J. and Bailey, D.B. (1989), ‘Family dimensions in early intervention,’ in S.J. Meisels and J.P. Shonkoff (eds), Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention, Cambridge University Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N.L. (1981) ‘The certainty of judgments in health evaluations,’ Evaluation and Program Planning, 4, 273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strain, P. and Smith, B.J. (1987) A counter-interpretation of early intervention effects a response to Casto and Mastropieri,’ Exceptional Children, 53 (3), 260–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadasy, P.F., Fewell, R.R., Greenberg, M.T., Dermond, N.L., and Meyer, D.J. (1986) ‘Follow-up evaluation of the effect of involvement in the father’s program,’ Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6, 16–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 David Mitchell and Roy I. Brown

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simeonsson, R.J., Bailey, D.B. (1991). Evaluating Programme Impact: Levels of Certainty. In: Mitchell, D.M., Brown, R.I. (eds) Early Intervention Studies for Young Children with Special Needs. Rehabilitation Education. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3292-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3292-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-31530-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3292-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics