Skip to main content

Motivational Factors in Students’ Approaches to Learning

  • Chapter
Learning Strategies and Learning Styles

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

This chapter describes the theoretical background to, and the development and use of, an Approaches-to-Studying Inventory. This inventory covers the two main components consistently found to be predictive of academic success—organized study methods and active learning processes (Weinstein & Underwood, 1985)—but it also includes a series of motivational components. It is, of course, commonplace to attribute levels of attainment to the degree of effort exerted which, in turn, is explained in terms of the motivational characteristics of the learner. But the research based on the use of this inventory goes further. It indicates clearly that there are distinctive forms of motivation which affect the outcome of learning both quantitatively and qualitatively. The differing forms of motivation are associated with contrasting learning processes and, so, with qualitatively different outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, J. W., & Feather, N. T. (1966). A theory of achievement motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1976). Dimensions of study behavior: Another look at a.t.i. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1979). Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning outcomes. Higher Education, 8, 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of metalearning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 185-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birney, R. C., Burdick, H., & Teevan, R. C. (1969). Fear of failure. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. F. & Holtzman, W. H. (1966). Manual of the survey of study habits. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, D. (1984). The identification of approaches to learning adopted by Venezuelan university students. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology, Cardiff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. (1987). A model of the teaching-learning process derived from research on student learning. In J.T.E. Richardson, M. Eysenck, and D. Pipes (Eds.), Student learning research in education and cognitive psychology. London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., Hanley, M., & Hounsell, D. J. (1979). Identifying distinctive approaches to studying. Higher Education, 8, 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., Hanley, M., & Ratcliffe, G. (1979). Approaches to learning and levels of understanding. British Educational Research Journal, 5, 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Kozeki, B. (1985). Relationships between school motivation, approaches to studying, and attainment among British and Hungarian adolescents. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 124–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Marton, F. (1984). Changing conceptions of learning and research. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Waterston, S. (1985). Approaches to studying and levels of processing: A comparison of inventories derived from contrasting theoretical bases. Paper presented to the International Conference on Cognitive Processes in Student Learning, Lancaster University, England. Also, British J. of Educational Psychology (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Wilson, J. D. (1970). Personality, study methods and academic performance. Universities Quarterly, 24, 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., & Wilson, J. D. (1977). Degrees of excellence: The academic achievement game. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N.J., Odor, P., & Anderson, C. (1987). Anticipating the experience of higher education through computer simulation. Higher Education, 16, 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J., Thompson, J. B., & Wilson, J. D. (1974). Motivation and study habits. Higher Education, 3, 379–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, H. (1982). Learning to read. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, H. (1984). Minds of their own. Inaugural lecture, University of London, Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransson, A. (1977). On qualitative differences in learning. IV—Effects of motivation and test anxiety on process and outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 244–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (1981). Teaching students to learn. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., Morgan, A., & Taylor, E. (1984). The world of the learner. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 165–188). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, V. (1984). Learning from lectures. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 90–102). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1984). Learning from problem-solving. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 124–144). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1975). What does it take to learn? In N. J. Entwistle (Ed.), Strategies for research and development in higher education, (pp. 32–43). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., Hounsell, D. J., & Entwistle, N. J. (1984). (Eds.). The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36–55). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. M., & Parlett, M. R. (1974). Up to the mark: A study of the examination game. London: SRHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A., Biggs, G., & Taylor, E. (1980). Students’ approaches to studying the Social Science Foundation Courses: Preliminary studies (Student Methods Group Report No. 4). Milton Keynes: The Open University, Institute of Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odor, J. P. Anderson, C., & Entwistle, N. J., (1985). The interactive simulation of student learning. Working Paper 1. The development of a systems representation of the simulation. University of Edinburgh, Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G. (1976). Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pond, L. (1964). A study of high achieving and low achieving freshmen. Australian Journal of Higher Education, 2, 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1984). The context of learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 144–164). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (1982). Learning and understanding: A study of differences in constructing meaning from a text. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R. (1983). Learning styles of college students. In R. F. Dillon & R. R. Schmeck (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition, Volume 1. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selmes, I. P. (1985). Approaches to learning at secondary school: Their identification and facilitation. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. (1976). Study skill and learning. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L. (1984). Skill in learning. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D. J., and Entwistle, N. J. (Eds.) The experience of learning, (pp. 56–70). Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. (1983). Orientations to study: a longitudinal interview investigation of students on two human studies degree courses at Surrey University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey, Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rossum, E. J. (1984). Students’ conceptions of learning and good teaching. Mimeographed article, University of Tilburg, Department of Educational Psychology, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wankowski, J. A. (1973). Temperament, motivation and academic achievement (2 volumes). University of Birmingham Educational Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (1982). Identifying the study process dimensions of Australian university students. Australian Journal of Education, 1982, 26, 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (1983). Assessing tertiary study processes. Human Learning, 2, 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Underwood, V.L. (1985). Learning strategies: the ‘how’ of learning. In J. W. Segal, (Eds.). Thinking and learning skills (Volume 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Entwistle, N. (1988). Motivational Factors in Students’ Approaches to Learning. In: Schmeck, R.R. (eds) Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2120-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2118-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics